Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
of your time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ
Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
than it was.
Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
of your time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ
Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
than it was.
Tempting, but 80 minutes is a fair amount to invest on spec, Any chance
of a three-line summary?
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:05:43 +0000, Brian Morrison wrote:
Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
of your time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ
Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
than it was.
I watched all the way through and understood the concept completely.....excellent!
Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
Tempting, but 80 minutes is a fair amount to invest on spec, Any chance
of a three-line summary?
Essentially it all hinges on demonstrating that the idea of the planet radiating heat that is then reflected by "greenhouse gases" is false,
because it violates the 1st law of thermodynamics. Warmists claim
that extra heat will raise the tropopause height, this leading
to a hotter surface if the adiabatic lapse rate remains constant. In
doing so they violate Charles and Boyle's gas laws. Later in the
video the authors also demonstrate that the surface temperature of
widely varying planets and moons follows a regression line that depends
only on solar illuminance and surface atmospheric pressure. The
measured values follow this curve exactly for Earth, Moon, Venus, Mars
and Triton, there are some others in papers.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 80:52:33 |
Calls: | 6,916 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,433,090 |