• A very good video explaining the origin of global temperatures

    From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 5 15:05:43 2021
    Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
    of your time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ

    Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
    than it was.

    --

    Brian Morrison

    "I am not young enough to know everything"
    Oscar Wilde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Sat Nov 6 09:38:46 2021
    On 05/11/2021 15:05, Brian Morrison wrote:

    Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
    of your time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ

    Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
    than it was.

    Tempting, but 80 minutes is a fair amount to invest on spec, Any chance
    of a three-line summary?

    I started to watch The Trick (BBC1, iPlayer) but after 10 minutes it was obvious the way the BBC has slanted things - i lost count of the
    character assassinations and mentions of 'denier' and 'sceptic' - so
    turned it off. Apparently the BBC are running a four part series on the
    same topic, on R4 and BBC Sounds. Why the charm offensive, one wonders...


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sysadmin@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Sat Nov 6 13:27:04 2021
    On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:05:43 +0000, Brian Morrison wrote:

    Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
    of your time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ

    Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
    than it was.


    I watched all the way through and understood the concept completely.....excellent!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to Spike on Sat Nov 6 14:15:20 2021
    On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 09:38:46 +0000
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:

    Tempting, but 80 minutes is a fair amount to invest on spec, Any chance
    of a three-line summary?

    Essentially it all hinges on demonstrating that the idea of the planet radiating heat that is then reflected by "greenhouse gases" is false,
    because it violates the 1st law of thermodynamics. Warmists claim
    that extra heat will raise the tropopause height, this leading
    to a hotter surface if the adiabatic lapse rate remains constant. In
    doing so they violate Charles and Boyle's gas laws. Later in the
    video the authors also demonstrate that the surface temperature of
    widely varying planets and moons follows a regression line that depends
    only on solar illuminance and surface atmospheric pressure. The
    measured values follow this curve exactly for Earth, Moon, Venus, Mars
    and Triton, there are some others in papers.

    --

    Brian Morrison

    "I am not young enough to know everything"
    Oscar Wilde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim GM4DHJ ...@21:1/5 to Sysadmin on Sun Nov 7 07:29:50 2021
    On 06/11/2021 13:27, Sysadmin wrote:
    On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:05:43 +0000, Brian Morrison wrote:

    Somewhat mathematical in places, but well worth an hour and 20 minutes
    of your time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnt9YZyCTAQ

    Once you have watched it, I think your view of COP26 will be even lower
    than it was.


    I watched all the way through and understood the concept completely.....excellent!

    smart arse

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Sun Nov 7 09:39:38 2021
    On 06/11/2021 14:15, Brian Morrison wrote:
    Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:

    Tempting, but 80 minutes is a fair amount to invest on spec, Any chance
    of a three-line summary?

    Essentially it all hinges on demonstrating that the idea of the planet radiating heat that is then reflected by "greenhouse gases" is false,
    because it violates the 1st law of thermodynamics. Warmists claim
    that extra heat will raise the tropopause height, this leading
    to a hotter surface if the adiabatic lapse rate remains constant. In
    doing so they violate Charles and Boyle's gas laws. Later in the
    video the authors also demonstrate that the surface temperature of
    widely varying planets and moons follows a regression line that depends
    only on solar illuminance and surface atmospheric pressure. The
    measured values follow this curve exactly for Earth, Moon, Venus, Mars
    and Triton, there are some others in papers.

    Now that does sound an interesting application of basic science, I'll
    find time to watch it,

    Many thanks for the summary.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)