This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
""Thank you for your email sent to our office on 1 February 2024 in which
you requested a review of your complaint made about the Metropolitan
Police Service (MPS) on 3 November 2023.
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) is the relevant review body for your complaint. [. . .]
[. . .]
I would like to take this opportunity to remind you of MOPAC’s role in the police complaints process. My role is to ensure that the MPS complaint
handler fully understood and addressed your complaint and that their
findings were logical based on the information and evidence available.
My role does not extend to reconsidering your complaint, or any subsequent matters you have raised following the conclusion of the complaint
handling. However, I can recommend that a complaint is investigated should
I identify any issues with the handling of this matter.
[. . .]
• I recommend that this matter is remedied according to paragraph 28ZA, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002;"
said Mr. A Broad.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thanks for the above. Acuity Law had recommended a law firm (5PL) for me
to instruct but genocide in Gaza used to deprive that firm de capacity to represent me. So I telephoned Acuity Law instead yesterday. If neither de these firms has spare capacity to represent me or if they do not work in a relevant area de law, then please recommend to me the law firms that can represent me for paragraph 28ZA, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002 and
that can represent me against wilful misconduct in public office by police officers and against wilful neglect of duty.
What are the relevant "Area[s] of practice"s in the search engine on
HTTPS://solicitors.LawSociety.org.UK/?Pro=True
?
Today's
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
lacks this fact: I sent a warning to Mister PC Caldwell on 06/08/2024.
I republish points de
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
via
[. . .]
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages15-16.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages21-23.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages28-29.pdf
I will republish via LinkedIn after a few seconds. (LinkedIn imposes tiny
size limits so LinkedIn republications shall probably be smaller than this email.)
Yours faithfully,
Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter"
say I myself to MOPAC today.
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Scholastica_or_LinkedIn_connivance/
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/2023-10-28b_I_see_no_convincing_evidence_that_they_counter_these_murderesses04.png
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
