LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly
weapon as guns so now Democrats are treating both the same.
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message news:updgfm$1h3qf$1@dont-email.me...
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Ok.. if I shoot on public roads then I will carry liability insurance..
as long as I shoot off-road or on private property then I don't need
any.
I mean if we are going to treat them the same..
Oh, and I don't need liability insurance to carry a car from one place
to another on public roads since I'm not operating it.
Then, of course, you have the agricultural and emergency exemptions. So
as long as I'm shooting for a agricultural use, or in an emergency then
I still won't need liability insurance.
After all, we gotta treat them the same..
So that does that get you?
I need insurance if I decide to set up a shooting range on the interstate?
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
On 1/31/2024 8:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly
weapon as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Liability insurance to enjoy a constitutional right...
Liberals are nuts.
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadlyWell, no. You only need auto liability insurance when operating
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
weapon
On 1/31/2024 6:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly asWell, no. You only need auto liability insurance when operating
guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
weapon
your car on public roads. Unlike a car, it's already illegal to
operate a gun on a public road.
That's not the only difference. If guns were treated like cars:
There would be no background checks to buy guns.
Felons could buy guns.
There would be no restrictions on gun type, features, or accessories.
For example, no restrictions on short-barrelled or automatic rifles.
No restrictions on gun silencers, in fact they would come standard
with every gun purchase.
You could carry concealed with no restrictions.
No restrictions on interstate sales.
No age-based restrictions on buying and owning guns.
No limits on ghosts guns as long as you didn't operate
your gun on a public road.
No red-flag laws.
No demonizing guns as "military style" etc.
Others out there can surely add to this list.
No, Washington is not treating guns and cars the same.
No gun hater wants that. If they say they do, they lie.
On 1/31/2024 1:01 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 1/31/2024 6:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly asWell, no. You only need auto liability insurance when operating
guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
weapon
your car on public roads. Unlike a car, it's already illegal to
operate a gun on a public road.
That's not the only difference. If guns were treated like cars:
There would be no background checks to buy guns.
Felons could buy guns.
There would be no restrictions on gun type, features, or accessories.
For example, no restrictions on short-barrelled or automatic rifles.
No restrictions on gun silencers, in fact they would come standard
with every gun purchase.
You could carry concealed with no restrictions.
No restrictions on interstate sales.
No age-based restrictions on buying and owning guns.
No limits on ghosts guns as long as you didn't operate
your gun on a public road.
No red-flag laws.
No demonizing guns as "military style" etc.
Others out there can surely add to this list.
No, Washington is not treating guns and cars the same.
No gun hater wants that. If they say they do, they lie.
More fundamentally, there's no constitutional right to own a car.
On 1/31/2024 8:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon as >> guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Liability insurance to enjoy a constitutional right...
On 1/31/2024 9:05 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of
times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 1/31/2024 8:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly
weapon as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Liability insurance to enjoy a constitutional right...
No — liability insurance to cover the damage you cause while abusing a constitutional right.
Fuck off, you goddamned Nazi
little person.
On 2024-01-31 15:59:35 +0000, Scout said:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:updgfm$1h3qf$1@dont-email.me...
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Ok.. if I shoot on public roads then I will carry liability insurance..
as long as I shoot off-road or on private property then I don't need any.
I mean if we are going to treat them the same..
Oh, and I don't need liability insurance to carry a car from one place to
another on public roads since I'm not operating it.
Then, of course, you have the agricultural and emergency exemptions. So
as long as I'm shooting for a agricultural use, or in an emergency then I
still won't need liability insurance.
After all, we gotta treat them the same..
So that does that get you?
I need insurance if I decide to set up a shooting range on the
interstate?
If you set up a shooting range on the interstate you really are mentally
ill and shouldn't be around guns.
On 1/31/2024 1:01 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 1/31/2024 6:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly as guns >>> so now Washington is treating both the same.Well, no. You only need auto liability insurance when operating
weapon
your car on public roads. Unlike a car, it's already illegal to
operate a gun on a public road.
That's not the only difference. If guns were treated like cars:
There would be no background checks to buy guns.
Felons could buy guns.
There would be no restrictions on gun type, features, or accessories.
For example, no restrictions on short-barrelled or automatic rifles.
No restrictions on gun silencers, in fact they would come standard
with every gun purchase.
You could carry concealed with no restrictions.
No restrictions on interstate sales.
No age-based restrictions on buying and owning guns.
No limits on ghosts guns as long as you didn't operate
your gun on a public road.
No red-flag laws.
No demonizing guns as "military style" etc.
Others out there can surely add to this list.
No, Washington is not treating guns and cars the same.
No gun hater wants that. If they say they do, they lie.
More fundamentally, there's no constitutional right to own a car.
[Default] super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Really? So 16 year olds can own whatever gun they want and can carry
across state lines?
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message >news:updssd$1jmhb$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-01-31 15:59:35 +0000, Scout said:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:updgfm$1h3qf$1@dont-email.me...
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon >>>> as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Ok.. if I shoot on public roads then I will carry liability insurance..
as long as I shoot off-road or on private property then I don't need any. >>>
I mean if we are going to treat them the same..
Oh, and I don't need liability insurance to carry a car from one place to >>> another on public roads since I'm not operating it.
Then, of course, you have the agricultural and emergency exemptions. So
as long as I'm shooting for a agricultural use, or in an emergency then I >>> still won't need liability insurance.
After all, we gotta treat them the same..
So that does that get you?
I need insurance if I decide to set up a shooting range on the
interstate?
If you set up a shooting range on the interstate you really are mentally
ill and shouldn't be around guns.
I acknowledge your admission that I wouldn't need the "liability insurance" >you seem to think is so important if we treated guns the same as cars.
Oh, and you might want to talk to some Europeans about that.. I seem to >recall at least one of their long distance gun ranges actually has shooters >firing over a major highway...
Hint: It's in Switzerland.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:47:56 -0500, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:updssd$1jmhb$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-01-31 15:59:35 +0000, Scout said:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:updgfm$1h3qf$1@dont-email.me...
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon >>>>> as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Ok.. if I shoot on public roads then I will carry liability insurance.. >>>> as long as I shoot off-road or on private property then I don't need any. >>>>
I mean if we are going to treat them the same..
Oh, and I don't need liability insurance to carry a car from one place to >>>> another on public roads since I'm not operating it.
Then, of course, you have the agricultural and emergency exemptions. So >>>> as long as I'm shooting for a agricultural use, or in an emergency then I >>>> still won't need liability insurance.
After all, we gotta treat them the same..
So that does that get you?
I need insurance if I decide to set up a shooting range on the
interstate?
If you set up a shooting range on the interstate you really are mentally >>> ill and shouldn't be around guns.
I acknowledge your admission that I wouldn't need the "liability insurance" >> you seem to think is so important if we treated guns the same as cars.
Oh, and you might want to talk to some Europeans about that.. I seem to
recall at least one of their long distance gun ranges actually has shooters >> firing over a major highway...
Hint: It's in Switzerland.
Libs think that voter ID is unconstitutional but that requiring
liability insurance for gun is....
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:47:56 -0500, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message >>news:updssd$1jmhb$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-01-31 15:59:35 +0000, Scout said:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:updgfm$1h3qf$1@dont-email.me...
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly
weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Ok.. if I shoot on public roads then I will carry liability insurance.. >>>> as long as I shoot off-road or on private property then I don't need
any.
I mean if we are going to treat them the same..
Oh, and I don't need liability insurance to carry a car from one place >>>> to
another on public roads since I'm not operating it.
Then, of course, you have the agricultural and emergency exemptions. So >>>> as long as I'm shooting for a agricultural use, or in an emergency then >>>> I
still won't need liability insurance.
After all, we gotta treat them the same..
So that does that get you?
I need insurance if I decide to set up a shooting range on the
interstate?
If you set up a shooting range on the interstate you really are mentally >>> ill and shouldn't be around guns.
I acknowledge your admission that I wouldn't need the "liability
insurance"
you seem to think is so important if we treated guns the same as cars.
Oh, and you might want to talk to some Europeans about that.. I seem to >>recall at least one of their long distance gun ranges actually has
shooters
firing over a major highway...
Hint: It's in Switzerland.
Libs think that voter ID is unconstitutional but that requiring
liability insurance for gun is....
On 1/31/2024 8:03 AM, super70s wrote:
LOL, the gun nuts are always saying cars are as much of a deadly weapon
as guns so now Washington is treating both the same.
Liability insurance to enjoy a constitutional right...
Liberals are nuts.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 67:13:27 |
| Calls: | 6,915 |
| Files: | 12,379 |
| Messages: | 5,431,811 |