https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campaign-1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campaign-1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
Nikki is a globalist, war monger neocon in my opinion.
However, she is FAR BETTER than any of the democrats.
I'm not sure why she is remaining in the elections. It could be that there is a lot of money being
made by her staff, campaign workers and handlers.
If she drops, the money stops flowing.
Just a thought.
pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campaign-
1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
Nikki is a globalist, war monger neocon in my opinion.
Standing up to Putin and honoring our
NATO commitments makes her a "war monger"?
On 2/26/24 10:24 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campaign-1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
Nikki is a globalist, war monger neocon in my opinion.
She is more of a hawk than Trump, though Trump sometimes
sounds like an Armageddonist - nothing, or BOOM - when
speaking about Russia/China/NK. However either attitude
probably beats the Dems "Let me bend over, and never
mind the lube" attitude when it comes to standing our
ground on any world stage.
"Globalist" ... I think you've gotta be able to think both
global and domestic these days. The USA is not some colony
under a dome in some distant galaxy. Our stuff, "their" stuff,
it all counts and all has to be dealt with. I don't think
Haley is gonna give away the store to the EU/etc like the
Dems always seem eager to do. Might not be quite as selfish
on trade/defense pacts as Trump ... but I'm not sure what
that will mean in 2025.
The "NeoCons" are gone as a force and philosophy. The only
residual one we ever hear from is Newtie - and I change the
channel if he starts to rant on. The NeoCons were perhaps a
necessary reaction to the post-Carter leftist debacle and
national weakness. Alas, post-Joe, we may need something
like Neo-NeoCons to straighten the national front fender.
MAGA is a little bit NeoCon in many respects, however it
tends to be more utilitarian, less ideological.
However, she is FAR BETTER than any of the democrats.
I'm not sure why she is remaining in the elections. It could be that there is a lot of money being
made by her staff, campaign workers and handlers.
If she drops, the money stops flowing.
Just a thought.
Besides her role as "back-up candidate" (important !)
and hopeful role luring in more cross-over votes even
if she doesn't love Trump, staying "in the spotlight"
is important for politicians. Helps earn them a living,
let's them get a word in edgewise, lets them seem to
be an 'authority'. It's why Newtie never went away, why
the Clintons and Obama can't shut up.
Anyway, I'd be pleased to see (almost) any Republican
back in the WH. Haley & DeSantis were the top alt
choices.
Dunno how RFK is going to figure into all this. Hard
to say who he'll steal the most votes from.
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
On 2/26/24 10:24 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campaign-1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
Nikki is a globalist, war monger neocon in my opinion.
She is more of a hawk than Trump, though Trump sometimes
sounds like an Armageddonist - nothing, or BOOM - when
speaking about Russia/China/NK. However either attitude
probably beats the Dems "Let me bend over, and never
mind the lube" attitude when it comes to standing our
ground on any world stage.
Trump is more of a bull in a China shop type person.
Haley has a bit more finesse.
"Globalist" ... I think you've gotta be able to think both
global and domestic these days. The USA is not some colony
under a dome in some distant galaxy. Our stuff, "their" stuff,
it all counts and all has to be dealt with. I don't think
Haley is gonna give away the store to the EU/etc like the
Dems always seem eager to do. Might not be quite as selfish
on trade/defense pacts as Trump ... but I'm not sure what
that will mean in 2025.
We need someone who is not going to make the US the world's piggy bank and give away the store.
Biden has sold the country out with idiotic deals.
The "NeoCons" are gone as a force and philosophy. The only
residual one we ever hear from is Newtie - and I change the
channel if he starts to rant on. The NeoCons were perhaps a
necessary reaction to the post-Carter leftist debacle and
national weakness. Alas, post-Joe, we may need something
like Neo-NeoCons to straighten the national front fender.
MAGA is a little bit NeoCon in many respects, however it
tends to be more utilitarian, less ideological.
I would add Lindsey Graham to the list as well.
However, she is FAR BETTER than any of the democrats.
I'm not sure why she is remaining in the elections. It could be that there is a lot of money being
made by her staff, campaign workers and handlers.
If she drops, the money stops flowing.
Just a thought.
Besides her role as "back-up candidate" (important !)
and hopeful role luring in more cross-over votes even
if she doesn't love Trump, staying "in the spotlight"
is important for politicians. Helps earn them a living,
let's them get a word in edgewise, lets them seem to
be an 'authority'. It's why Newtie never went away, why
the Clintons and Obama can't shut up.
Yep.
And when you have the money the next item on the list is control and power.
If a normal person just barely escaped prosecution like the Clinton's have, they would move to some
quiet island and live out their lives in luxury and thank their lucky stars that they escaped
prosecution.
But people like the Clinton's are incapable of doing that.
They need to be in the spotlight as much as possible in order to feed their egos.
Anyway, I'd be pleased to see (almost) any Republican
back in the WH. Haley & DeSantis were the top alt
choices.
Same.
Dunno how RFK is going to figure into all this. Hard
to say who he'll steal the most votes from.
RFK is a little like Bernie in that he seems to be attracting younger people.
So far I believe he steals votes from both sides equally.
That can of course change and it most likely will.
If a normal person just barely escaped prosecution like the
Clinton's have, they would move to some quiet island and live out
their lives in luxury and thank their lucky stars that they escaped prosecution.
Trump meant JOBS,
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:urjfb0$2roi0$1@dont-email.me:
If a normal person just barely escaped prosecution like the
Clinton's have, they would move to some quiet island and live out
their lives in luxury and thank their lucky stars that they escaped
prosecution.
Escaped prosecution?
The Clintons are the most examined
political couple in history.
Fostergate, CattleFuturesgate,
Travelgate, Filegate, Troopergate,
Whitewater, BenghaziGate, EmailGate -
the list of GOP manufactured "scandals"
goes back decades, none of which
amounted to anything. Even Trump's
own "Lock her up!" investigation fizzled
into nothing.
Trump meant JOBS,
Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> wrote in news:XnsB124D7265316Enoemailcomcastnet@69.80.102.16:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:urjfb0$2roi0$1@dont-email.me:
If a normal person just barely escaped prosecution like the
Clinton's have, they would move to some quiet island and live out
their lives in luxury and thank their lucky stars that they escaped
prosecution.
Escaped prosecution?
The Clintons are the most examined
political couple in history.
Fostergate, CattleFuturesgate,
Travelgate, Filegate, Troopergate,
Whitewater, BenghaziGate, EmailGate -
the list of GOP manufactured "scandals"
goes back decades, none of which
amounted to anything. Even Trump's
own "Lock her up!" investigation fizzled
into nothing.
You forgot uranium one where Hillary and Barack sold uranium rights to
Putin via Canada.
61h.1601 wrote:
On 2/26/24 12:50 PM, Lee wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2024-02-26, 61h.1601 <61h.1602@e3t2w.net> wrote:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/haley-campa
ign- 1-million/
Haley campaign touts $1 million haul but major donor stops
spending
Haley's campaign says it has raised $1M since Saturday's primary
. . .
Haley won't have many points for the Convention, but
I think she's still RELEVANT on a few levels and will
use residual donations to "stay in the spotlight" to
some degree.
Oh, and Trump could be legally disqualified at ANY
time now. Then who ya gonna call ???
Haley isn't Trump, but she's CLOSE ENOUGH in most
categories. Would you rather see HER as POTUS, or
Joe/Newsom/M.Obama ??? We already know where THEY
lead ....
Nikki is a globalist, war monger neocon in my opinion.
Standing up to Putin and honoring our
NATO commitments makes her a "war monger"?
She WAS pretty harsh about the Hamas and the more recent
US base attacks ... something about broadscale direct
attacks on Iran ......
Tempting, knee-jerk, but NOT the best tact for a number
of reasons .... not at THIS juncture anyhow.
Note that even in today's 'west', female leaders still
feel pressure to talk/act aggressively so they can't
be called 'girly-girl wussies'. Whomever our first
female POTUS may be, she'll have to ACT like she's
taking testosterone sometimes just to get respect.
Note that HRC sounded very hawkish during her runs,
and kinda so a few times afterwards.
Now would Trump do it different ? Likely not TOO much
different ... but he would have had pre-made huge
threats up front so the terrorists would know damned
well what would come. He didn't have to bomb Russia
to keep them from going after Ukraine, Putin was
firmly warned early on and had to wait for Joe.
Trump can be a bit scary - and I don't think it's an
act either - but scary WORKS with certain foes.
Trump retreated from every
foreign conflict. Syria, Somalia,
Afghanistan, Iraq. He made it clear
early on that his "America First"
meant abandoning the world stage.
Abandon our allies, abanding our
treaties, abandon NATO, suck up
to every tyrant from N Korea to
Russia to the Saudis.
This does not make America great.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 29:52:34 |
Calls: | 6,907 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,376 |
Messages: | 5,427,787 |
Posted today: | 1 |