1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. TALK.ORIGINS

  • Re: Evidence! (was - Ping: SNIT)

    From Gremlin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 3 07:52:31 2024
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> news:eTGdnXH2fpEw3374nZ2dnZfqlJ_8fwAA@giganews.com Sat, 02 Mar 2024
    15:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

    On 3/2/24 12:50 AM, dgb (David) wrote:

    [snipped]

    Perhaps you could post this in some other, more appropriate newsgroup
    instead of one dedicated to arguing about creationism.

    I do apologize for my posts having entered your newsgroup. I didn't catch
    the fact the OP opted to cross-post it in an effort to draw in more people under the false guise of having legitimate questions and concerns.

    David Brooks as well as Snit are not individuals you really want to spend
    much time associating with.

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php> <https://tinyurl.com/whatissnit>
    <https://tinyurl.com/snitliemethods>

    There's a ton more online if you just google about either one of them.
    Both are very bad news. Don't let your newsgroup become infested by entertaining their BS. Otherwise, you'll have the same problem that alt.computer.workshop has now, and what various other newsgroups as
    described in the above urls all had to deal with. Snit and David Brooks
    are bad news. You've been warned.





    --
    I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Sun Mar 3 18:20:12 2024
    erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/2/24 5:45 PM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 3/2/24 4:07 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On 3/2/24 7:15 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 3/2/24 12:50 AM, dgb (David) wrote:

    [snipped]

    Perhaps you could post this in some other, more appropriate newsgroup
    instead of one dedicated to arguing about creationism.

    I've tried to contact DIG.  No answer as yet.  It isn't clear to me
    that he has banning powers since the demise of GG.

    Of course he does. His powers have nothing to do with GG.

    Well, I hope he exersizes them.

    He’s in control of Beagle which houses the robomoderator. He can ban on our end regardless of what goes on for the rest of usenet. GG was only a
    web-based usenet interface/provider. Usenet pre-dated GG and has outlived
    GG.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Casanova@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 3 12:17:53 2024
    On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 18:20:12 +0000, the following appeared
    in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
    <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:

    erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/2/24 5:45 PM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 3/2/24 4:07 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On 3/2/24 7:15 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 3/2/24 12:50 AM, dgb (David) wrote:

    [snipped]

    Perhaps you could post this in some other, more appropriate newsgroup >>>>> instead of one dedicated to arguing about creationism.

    I've tried to contact DIG.  No answer as yet.  It isn't clear to me
    that he has banning powers since the demise of GG.

    Of course he does. His powers have nothing to do with GG.

    Well, I hope he exersizes them.

    He’s in control of Beagle which houses the robomoderator. He can ban on our >end regardless of what goes on for the rest of usenet. GG was only a >web-based usenet interface/provider. Usenet pre-dated GG and has outlived
    GG.

    I just sent an email to DIG informing him of the issue. And
    yes, as moderator he still has all the authority he ever
    had; as others have noted GG's existence is irrelevant to
    that.

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)