Ultimately, the goal would be that people would
start noticing things, think they make sense and
then run off, do a study, write a paper...
Yeah, steal them.
In science you can't have originality. It's impossible.
You can be FIRST in science but you can never be
original. The facts are the facts, and they were the
facts even before you became the FIRST to uncover
them. And, once uncovered, in science, you need to
stick to them.
In science, you can't say "Well someone already
determined the boiling point of water under these
conditions, so I have to determine a new one."
Consistency. Repeatability.
Ideally, someone who always realized that Out of
Africa purity was nonsense, that the savanna or the
forest couldn't have spawned bipedalism, reads
some of our discussions, grabs what makes sense
to them and starts testing.
Well, "Testing" could mean logically. It could mean
finding physical evidence, or it could mean
repositioning/interpreting the existing physical evidence.
It could mean anything.
And all of this is going to happen.
Right now science is gone. We went from pranksters
punking "Peer Review" with A.I. generated nonsense
to the A.I. now becoming the "Peer Review!" And
everyone appears to want it this way.
Unfortunately, Human Origins has no military application.
And apart from some tourism, there's no economic value
in it either. So, if the self imposed elite want it to be shit,
so what? It's shit.
And you have to go along with it.
And lots of people who what they're doing. They don't
believe the things they're writing. They see all the a-priori
assumptions, the selection bias... they know it's wrong.
And now they know what's right.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/732380430601437184
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)