https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/fossil-friday-did-the-cambrian-explosion-really-happen/
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch scam denial.
He does post the junk by mistake
from time to time, but hasn't done it in the last few months.
What is so stupid about this IDiotic Cambrian article is that the
majority of IDiots are still YEC,
and Bechly makes a big deal about the
event occurring between 540 and 515 million years ago.
This is the
revised dating that is about the only difference between what the
scientific creationists used to be in denial of and what the ID perps
have put up as one of their Top Six best evidences for IDiocy.
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/fossil-friday-did-the-cambrian-explosion-really-happen/
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch scam denial. He does post the junk by mistake
from time to time, but hasn't done it in the last few months.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 6:36:12 AM UTC-7, RonO wrote:
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/fossil-friday-did-the-cambrian-explosion-really-happen/https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/from-bad-to-worse-for-darwinism-as-new-cambrian-explosion-finds-arrive/
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn
usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch scam denial. He does post the junk by mistake
from time to time, but hasn't done it in the last few months.
Oops.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 6:36:12 AM UTC-7, RonO wrote:
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/fossil-friday-did-the-cambrian-explosion-really-happen/
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch scam denial. He does post the junk by mistake
from time to time, but hasn't done it in the last few months.
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/from-bad-to-worse-for-darwinism-as-new-cambrian-explosion-finds-arrive/
Oops.
https://evolutionnews.org/2023/08/fossil-friday-did-the-cambrian-explosion-really-happen/
It is actually the YEC IDiots that do not want the Cambrian explosion to have ever happened and the Reason to Believe IDiots also can't deal with
the event. The Reason to Believe IDiots are old earth creationists, and
use the Cambrian explosion gap denial
the same way that the ID perps use it, but then they have to deny the denial because their Bible tells them
that their designer made land plants before sea creatures, and land
plants do not show up in the fossil record until the Ordovician.
So the Cambrian explosion data doesn't really mean what it looks like it means
for the IDiots at Reason to Believe. They even have to claim that
whales were among the sea creatures created on the 5th day before the ancestors of whales were created on day 6. The gaps in the whale fossil records have to be denied by the Reason to Believe IDiots. Most IDiots
just cannot deal with the Top Six in an honest and straight forward
manner because the designer of the Top Six is not the Biblical designer.
This is really how lame the IDiots are.
To demonstrate that this is the current reality, all anyone has to do is read this IDiotic stupidity, and then try to get any YEC IDiots to
accept the reality outlined by this article.
Most of the IDiotic
creationists supporting the ID scam are still YEC.
Nelson has been a
YEC ID perp since the beginning of the current creationist ID scam.
Nelson has pretty much always claimed that the ID science does not
exist, and that they are just working on it. The reason is that Nelson
can't stand the Top Six and what it means.
If Meyer and Bechly were
ever able to demonstrate that their designer was responsible for the Cambrian explosion
Nelson would have to deny that science.
Even though
the Top Six are the same god-of-the-gaps denial stupidity that the scientific creationists used to put up
it is only meant to allow
creationists to lie to themselves for the moment. It isn't supposed to
be used to build anything positive.
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/cY2JbNjBLwE/m/mJelpHjzAwAJ
Creationists that still go back to the ID perps for the ID scam junk
have to deal with their current reality. All they get from the ID perps
is junk that they can lie to themselves about. What is that ever going
to do for them?
The Big Bang (#1 of the Top Six) is already a science topic that the
IDiots want to remove from public school science standards along with biological evolution.
As sad as it may be the IDiots never wanted to
teach the best evidence for the creationist ID scam science.
It is a major reason why the bait and switch has been going down for over 20 years.
Every time a group of IDiot creationists want to teach IDiocy in
the public schools the ID perps run the bait and switch and only give
the rubes an obfuscation and denial switch scam,
and the reason seems to
be that there isn't anything positive about IDiocy that the ID perps
want the IDiots to teach in the public schools. The majority of IDiots
are YEC and how many of them want to teach their kids about the Big Bang that occurred over 13 billion years ago, and the fine tuning of our
planet 4.5 billion years ago, the origin of life, possibly, around 3.8 billion years ago, the origin of the flagellum over a billion years ago,
the Cambrian explosion over half a billion years ago, and gaps in the
fossil record during the time that life has existed on this planet even
if you limit the scope to the gaps in the human fossil record for the
last 10 million years? The designer responsible for the Top Six is not Biblical enough for most of the IDiots in existence,
including old earth
creationists like they have at Reason to Believe.
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn
usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch
RonO wrote:
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn
usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch
You are deeply emotionally invested in this nonsense.
This is why you can't admit that Darwin was a fraud who didn't
even believe in evolution. His beliefs, his one and only theory
were aligned with those who later OPPOSED evolution in the
communist world, Darwin was such a hoax.
It's not about facts or science, with your time. It's about winning.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/120673964523
What a nut job.
There is no winning in the case of IDiocy and Scientific creationism.
The best that you can hope for is to see a
little honesty and integrity in the anti-evolution creationists.
RonO wrote:
What a nut job.
Speaking of which..
There is no winning in the case of IDiocy and Scientific creationism.
Yet you persist.
The best that you can hope for is to see a
little honesty and integrity in the anti-evolution creationists.
So are you ready to be honest and admit that abiogenesis is
pseudo scientific rubbish, and that Darwin is a hoax?
Are you suddenly going to show some honesty? Are you now
going to start putting facts ahead of your dogma?
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/726632328614526976
RonO wrote:
[---nut job---]
Abiogenesis isn't science. It's a belief no different from
any other religious belief. It's true no matter what. It
can't be falsified. It's literally the antithesis of science.
Darwin was a hoax. He didn't even believe in evolution.
Stalin, Mao mirrored Darwins beliefs and they arrested
anyone teaching evolution!
If you can't accept these facts then you live in a fantasy
world. You're a nut case, incapable of dealing with
reality.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/728166607418949632
RonO wrote:
This is up at Glenn's favorite creationist propaganda site, but Glenn usually runs from the Top Six stupidity and just presents the second
rate denial and switch.
You are deeply emotionally invested in this nonsense.
This is why you can't admit that Darwin was a fraud who didn't
even believe in evolution.
His beliefs, his one and only theory
were aligned with those who later OPPOSED evolution in the
communist world, Darwin was such a hoax.
It's not about facts or science, with your time. It's about winning.
On 9/11/2023 7:38 AM, JTEM is my hero wrote:
RonO wrote:
[---nut job---]
Abiogenesis isn't science. It's a belief no different from
any other religious belief. It's true no matter what. It
can't be falsified. It's literally the antithesis of science.
Darwin was a hoax. He didn't even believe in evolution.
Stalin, Mao mirrored Darwins beliefs and they arrested
anyone teaching evolution!
If you can't accept these facts then you live in a fantasy
world. You're a nut case, incapable of dealing with
reality.
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/728166607418949632
We both know who the nut job is.
It is the one that has assiduously
removed everything that he couldn't deal with in this thread to the
point where he didn't even know what he was in denial of.
Just go back
up and check. You don't seem to have a clue about what you started to
argue about.
Snipping and running is all that you have accomplished in
this thread.
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
In the category of weaponizing Chez Watt by taking things our of context
and indulging in capricious vilification ["delinquents"]:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:35:41?AM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote:
In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
The "someone" is Ron O, who has been neatly pegged in the following
post on another thread:
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/0MdDym8ZAwAJ
Re: Tour's 60 day challenge
Sep 16, 2023, 7:35:39?PM
Excerpt:
For those who may not know, "Ron Okimoto" is the name given to an early beta release of ChatGPT. It's nostalgic to see it still running here with these bot posts.
[end of excerpt; the rest of the post continues the pegging at a reduced rate of intensity]
With the name redacted, this might make a real Chez Watt, except that there aren't enough
repetitious dingbats posting to talk.origins, and none so obvious as you-know-who.
Peter Nyikos
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com" <peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the category of weaponizing Chez Watt by taking things our of context >and indulging in capricious vilification ["delinquents"]:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:35:41?AM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote:
In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
The "someone" is Ron O, who has been neatly pegged in the following
post on another thread:
Nah, I was thinking more of "someone" who accused me of being an
apostate
and said 6 months ago that he would give a detailed account
*next week* supporting his claim but still hasn't done so.
The same
"someone" who falsely fabricated me saying stuff about abortion
and
didn't bother to correct it when the source of his error was
identified.
Sound familiar, Peter?
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/0MdDym8ZAwAJ
Re: Tour's 60 day challenge
Sep 16, 2023, 7:35:39?PM
Excerpt:
For those who may not know, "Ron Okimoto" is the name given to an early beta release of ChatGPT. It's nostalgic to see it still running here with these bot posts.
[end of excerpt; the rest of the post continues the pegging at a reduced rate of intensity]
With the name redacted, this might make a real Chez Watt, except that there aren't enough
repetitious dingbats posting to talk.origins, and none so obvious as you-know-who.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:20:41?PM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
<peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the category of weaponizing Chez Watt by taking things our of context
and indulging in capricious vilification ["delinquents"]:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:35:41?AM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote:
In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions
about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
The "someone" is Ron O, who has been neatly pegged in the following
post on another thread:
Nah, I was thinking more of "someone" who accused me of being an
apostate
Gross misrepresentation noted.
and said 6 months ago that he would give a detailed account
*next week* supporting his claim but still hasn't done so.
The real claim was that you often disregard Jesus's commandment against >bearing false witness, and you proved that many times over, since about >midway between then and now:
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/xqiemRxP0mI/m/zJ8rzQ7uAAAJ
Re: A thread about banning, paradoxically about stopping discussion of banning >Jun 9, 2023, 7:05:49?PM
In your only reply to that post, you snipped the damning evidence that you had committed libel against
me in reply to both Tiib and Bill Rogers. In the linked post, I showed how you falsely accused me of
behavior more hateful than anything I'd ever seen anyone in t.o. being accused of before, including myself.
With that snip, you continued to leave Bill Rogers in the dark about what a damnable lie you
had told him about me, since he has not shown any sign of having read a post by me
in something like five years.
If you try to whitewash what you did there, I can repost the linked post right here. Since it did not take
place on this thread, Google Groups will not hide any of it behind ellipses.
The same
"someone" who falsely fabricated me saying stuff about abortion
Going by an undocumented claim by you, I had confused something you had written back in 2015,
about a referendum on same-sex marriage in Ireland, [1] with having written it about a later (2018)
referendum on abortion [2].
And you didn't vote against it, according to that undocumented claim
, you were merely *contemplating*
a vote against it.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland >[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland
Such lapses of memory by me are supposed to be worse than deliberate libel by you, eh?
and
didn't bother to correct it when the source of his error was
identified.
Sound familiar, Peter?
Yes, you reinforced my main point in any case: your commitment to the Catholic Church's unchanging
opposition to at least one of {same-sex marriage, abortion} is lukewarm at best.
But that doesn't make you an apostate: it merely makes you a "liberal Catholic"
along the lines of the "National Catholic Reporter." [3] Your refusal to criticize Mark Isaak's
attack on the Church's ban on women priests reinforces that status.
[3] Not to be confused with the conservative "National Catholic Register," now published
under the aegis of EWTN, and therefore low in your esteem.
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/0MdDym8ZAwAJ
Re: Tour's 60 day challenge
Sep 16, 2023, 7:35:39?PM
Excerpt:
For those who may not know, "Ron Okimoto" is the name given to an early beta release of ChatGPT. It's nostalgic to see it still running here with these bot posts.
[end of excerpt; the rest of the post continues the pegging at a reduced rate of intensity]
With the name redacted, this might make a real Chez Watt, except that there aren't enough
repetitious dingbats posting to talk.origins, and none so obvious as you-know-who.
I see you have nothing bad to say about this repetitious dingbat. Birds of a feather, and all that.
Peter Nyikos
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:49:42 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com" ><peter2nyikos@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:20:41?PM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
<peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the category of weaponizing Chez Watt by taking things our of context >>> >and indulging in capricious vilification ["delinquents"]:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:35:41?AM UTC-4, Martin Harran wrote: >>> >> In Category "Out of the mouths of babes and delinquents):
It is a sign of psychosis when someone confuses his private opinions >>> >> >about people with reality, without having produced an iota
of evidence for his opinions.
The "someone" is Ron O, who has been neatly pegged in the following
post on another thread:
Nah, I was thinking more of "someone" who accused me of being an
apostate
Gross misrepresentation noted.
Glenn claimed: "Everything you [Martin Harran] say just adds supports
to the fact that you are an atheist. It is why your lame crap is
tolerated here."
You replied: "Nah, being an apostate Catholic is adequate for that.".
Feel free to identify my gross misrepresentation.
We both know who the nut job is.
It is the one that has assiduously
removed everything
Nut job, RonO wrote:
We both know who the nut job is.
Yes you are!
Cowering behind sock puppets... pretending to have an
education... not even reading much less grasping any of
your cites...
It is the one that has assiduously
removed everything
Speaking of which: Abiogenesis still isn't science, even if
you won't deal with this fact. And Darwin didn't believe in
evolution. He was a waste product. He was an overly
privileged "Fortune Son" who believed all the nonsense
that Stalin & Mao believed -- while they were arresting
anyone who taught evolution!
How did you incorporate these facts into your world
view? What did they change for you?
Only kidding. You're a freak who isn't mentally healthy
enough to deal with challenges to their dogma...
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/727701377221083136
The saddest
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 81:23:26 |
Calls: | 6,916 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,433,159 |