What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global Ethics used by scientists?
What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global Ethics used by scientists?
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53?AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote:
What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote:
What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
On 26/07/2023 14:15, Jonathan Gresham wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote: >>> What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say
about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has
been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global
Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized
life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
You need to define your terms. Human life could refer to anything from behaviourally modern humans (a term I am skeptical is meaningful*) to
the whole of the genus Homo, or even more. The ice age could refer to
the Wurm/Wisconsin( glaciation, or to the whole Pleistocene. (For some combinations of definitions there were no humans before the ice age.) Organised life strikes me as tautological - all life is organised. I
presume you intend a different definition, but I hesitate to guess your meaning.
* I suspect that behaviourally modern human is a sigmoid fraud - that
there is no discontinuity between behaviourally modern humans and
earlier anatomically modern humans.
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 26/07/2023 14:15, Jonathan Gresham wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote:
What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say >>> about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has >>> been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global >>> Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized >> life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
You need to define your terms. Human life could refer to anything from behaviourally modern humans (a term I am skeptical is meaningful*) to
the whole of the genus Homo, or even more. The ice age could refer to
the Wurm/Wisconsin( glaciation, or to the whole Pleistocene. (For some combinations of definitions there were no humans before the ice age.) Organised life strikes me as tautological - all life is organised. I presume you intend a different definition, but I hesitate to guess your meaning.
* I suspect that behaviourally modern human is a sigmoid fraud - that there is no discontinuity between behaviourally modern humans and
earlier anatomically modern humans.
Such discontinuity could be provided for by formulated social constructions humans lacked long ago, such as a bill of “rights”, universal suffrage, corporate personhood, sovereignty conflicts etc and the social reflexivity such concepts unleash upon the world.
People feel vaguely resentful their rights and sense of personal and national sovereignty are being encroached upon by impersonal multinational corporations that capture and supersede elected governments. Thus people tend to invent stories about globalists that often enough dovetail with medieval bogeys about the Jews.
The same long held tendencies in human nature are there such as outgrouping and xenophobia, but the historical particulars were a bit more small scale when we were unsettled roving bands long before the agricultural revolution transformed us into more stable cumulative political and economic entities.
Stuff that didn’t exist until recently such as Mount Pelerin and/or ChicagoThe reason why I ask is because I am taking a class on Global Ethics
school style neoliberalism and debt based structural adjustment regimes do now. Given it’s a Washington Consensus, the US doesn’t quite have to abide
by the same rules set for other struggling developing nations. But problems like offshoring and the opiate crisis do inject a populist sense of foreboding that is easily coopted and manipulated into bizarre mass delusions about shape shifting vampiric “lizard” cabals, 5G, and adrenochrome. The evils of globalism tend to be projected and scapegoated onto people like Bill Gates and George Soros.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:15:54?PM UTC-4, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:The reason why I ask is because I am taking a class on Global Ethics
On 26/07/2023 14:15, Jonathan Gresham wrote:Such discontinuity could be provided for by formulated social constructions >> humans lacked long ago, such as a bill of rights, universal suffrage,
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53?AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote: >> >>> What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say >> >>> about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has >> >>> been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global >> >>> Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized >> >> life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
You need to define your terms. Human life could refer to anything from
behaviourally modern humans (a term I am skeptical is meaningful*) to
the whole of the genus Homo, or even more. The ice age could refer to
the Wurm/Wisconsin( glaciation, or to the whole Pleistocene. (For some
combinations of definitions there were no humans before the ice age.)
Organised life strikes me as tautological - all life is organised. I
presume you intend a different definition, but I hesitate to guess your
meaning.
* I suspect that behaviourally modern human is a sigmoid fraud - that
there is no discontinuity between behaviourally modern humans and
earlier anatomically modern humans.
corporate personhood, sovereignty conflicts etc and the social reflexivity >> such concepts unleash upon the world.
People feel vaguely resentful their rights and sense of personal and
national sovereignty are being encroached upon by impersonal multinational >> corporations that capture and supersede elected governments. Thus people
tend to invent stories about globalists that often enough dovetail with
medieval bogeys about the Jews.
The same long held tendencies in human nature are there such as outgrouping >> and xenophobia, but the historical particulars were a bit more small scale >> when we were unsettled roving bands long before the agricultural revolution >> transformed us into more stable cumulative political and economic entities. >>
Stuff that didnt exist until recently such as Mount Pelerin and/or Chicago >> school style neoliberalism and debt based structural adjustment regimes do >> now. Given its a Washington Consensus, the US doesnt quite have to abide >> by the same rules set for other struggling developing nations. But problems >> like offshoring and the opiate crisis do inject a populist sense of
foreboding that is easily coopted and manipulated into bizarre mass
delusions about shape shifting vampiric lizard cabals, 5G, and
adrenochrome. The evils of globalism tend to be projected and scapegoated
onto people like Bill Gates and George Soros.
in August, and the textbook that I had to order for it says somethings
that made me want to ask some questions. I didn't know precisely where
to ask. Next, I'll ask something like this to my school's forum, which
is what I should had done to begin with, and I will try to leave you
all alone. I am sorry.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:15:54 PM UTC-4, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:The reason why I ask is because I am taking a class on Global Ethics
On 26/07/2023 14:15, Jonathan Gresham wrote:Such discontinuity could be provided for by formulated social constructions >> humans lacked long ago, such as a bill of “rights”, universal suffrage, >> corporate personhood, sovereignty conflicts etc and the social reflexivity >> such concepts unleash upon the world.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote: >>>>> What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say >>>>> about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has >>>>> been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global >>>>> Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized >>>> life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
You need to define your terms. Human life could refer to anything from
behaviourally modern humans (a term I am skeptical is meaningful*) to
the whole of the genus Homo, or even more. The ice age could refer to
the Wurm/Wisconsin( glaciation, or to the whole Pleistocene. (For some
combinations of definitions there were no humans before the ice age.)
Organised life strikes me as tautological - all life is organised. I
presume you intend a different definition, but I hesitate to guess your
meaning.
* I suspect that behaviourally modern human is a sigmoid fraud - that
there is no discontinuity between behaviourally modern humans and
earlier anatomically modern humans.
People feel vaguely resentful their rights and sense of personal and
national sovereignty are being encroached upon by impersonal multinational >> corporations that capture and supersede elected governments. Thus people
tend to invent stories about globalists that often enough dovetail with
medieval bogeys about the Jews.
The same long held tendencies in human nature are there such as outgrouping >> and xenophobia, but the historical particulars were a bit more small scale >> when we were unsettled roving bands long before the agricultural revolution >> transformed us into more stable cumulative political and economic entities. >>
Stuff that didn’t exist until recently such as Mount Pelerin and/or Chicago
school style neoliberalism and debt based structural adjustment regimes do >> now. Given it’s a Washington Consensus, the US doesn’t quite have to abide
by the same rules set for other struggling developing nations. But problems >> like offshoring and the opiate crisis do inject a populist sense of
foreboding that is easily coopted and manipulated into bizarre mass
delusions about shape shifting vampiric “lizard” cabals, 5G, and
adrenochrome. The evils of globalism tend to be projected and scapegoated
onto people like Bill Gates and George Soros.
in August, and the textbook that I had to order for it says somethings
that made me want to ask some questions. I didn't know precisely where
to ask. Next, I'll ask something like this to my school's forum, which
is what I should had done to begin with, and I will try to leave you
all alone. I am sorry.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:15:54 PM UTC-4, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:The reason why I ask is because I am taking a class on Global Ethics
On 26/07/2023 14:15, Jonathan Gresham wrote:Such discontinuity could be provided for by formulated social constructions >> humans lacked long ago, such as a bill of “rights”, universal suffrage, >> corporate personhood, sovereignty conflicts etc and the social reflexivity >> such concepts unleash upon the world.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 8:25:53 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Gresham wrote: >>>>> What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say >>>>> about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has >>>>> been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global >>>>> Ethics used by scientists?
This board is about the origin of life but what the origin of organized >>>> life? (To paraphrase) there might had been organized human life before the the ice age.
You need to define your terms. Human life could refer to anything from
behaviourally modern humans (a term I am skeptical is meaningful*) to
the whole of the genus Homo, or even more. The ice age could refer to
the Wurm/Wisconsin( glaciation, or to the whole Pleistocene. (For some
combinations of definitions there were no humans before the ice age.)
Organised life strikes me as tautological - all life is organised. I
presume you intend a different definition, but I hesitate to guess your
meaning.
* I suspect that behaviourally modern human is a sigmoid fraud - that
there is no discontinuity between behaviourally modern humans and
earlier anatomically modern humans.
People feel vaguely resentful their rights and sense of personal and
national sovereignty are being encroached upon by impersonal multinational >> corporations that capture and supersede elected governments. Thus people
tend to invent stories about globalists that often enough dovetail with
medieval bogeys about the Jews.
The same long held tendencies in human nature are there such as outgrouping >> and xenophobia, but the historical particulars were a bit more small scale >> when we were unsettled roving bands long before the agricultural revolution >> transformed us into more stable cumulative political and economic entities. >>
Stuff that didn’t exist until recently such as Mount Pelerin and/or Chicago
school style neoliberalism and debt based structural adjustment regimes do >> now. Given it’s a Washington Consensus, the US doesn’t quite have to abide
by the same rules set for other struggling developing nations. But problems >> like offshoring and the opiate crisis do inject a populist sense of
foreboding that is easily coopted and manipulated into bizarre mass
delusions about shape shifting vampiric “lizard” cabals, 5G, and
adrenochrome. The evils of globalism tend to be projected and scapegoated
onto people like Bill Gates and George Soros.
in August, and the textbook that I had to order for it says somethings
that made me want to ask some questions. I didn't know precisely where
to ask. Next, I'll ask something like this to my school's forum, which
is what I should had done to begin with, and I will try to leave you
all alone. I am sorry.
What do the various natural sciences and of course social sciences say
about "globalization"? Is this the first time the worlds population has
been interconnected and interdependent? What are the theories in Global Ethics used by scientists?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 376 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 53:52:20 |
| Calls: | 8,041 |
| Files: | 13,037 |
| Messages: | 5,832,018 |