• Skeletal proportions in Humans

    From RonO@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 08:12:06 2023
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf8009

    This study published in science looked at skeletal differences within a
    portion of the UK human biobank that has skeletal bone measurements.
    They did a GWAS (genome wide association study) to identify genes
    associated with skeletal differences and looked into what these genes do
    and what phenotypes and diseases they have been associated with. This confirmed the association with bone morphology.

    They also did an evolutionary analysis because humans have a lot of
    skeletal changes compared to our primate ancestors. They looked at HAR
    genomic sequences (regions of the genome that show accelerated change
    compared our evolutionary relatives, and associated genes with things
    like our leg length and arm length change in ratio compared to apes and
    other skeletal changes like our hip morphology.

    There will likely be Science news articles on the research. They seem
    to have found some of the genes that had to change to make us humans, at
    least, in the morphological sense of what we look like.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to RonO on Sun Jul 23 10:07:06 2023
    On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 08:12:06 -0500, RonO <rokimoto@cox.net> wrote:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf8009

    This study published in science looked at skeletal differences within a >portion of the UK human biobank that has skeletal bone measurements.
    They did a GWAS (genome wide association study) to identify genes
    associated with skeletal differences and looked into what these genes do
    and what phenotypes and diseases they have been associated with. This >confirmed the association with bone morphology.

    They also did an evolutionary analysis because humans have a lot of
    skeletal changes compared to our primate ancestors. They looked at HAR >genomic sequences (regions of the genome that show accelerated change >compared our evolutionary relatives, and associated genes with things
    like our leg length and arm length change in ratio compared to apes and >other skeletal changes like our hip morphology.

    There will likely be Science news articles on the research. They seem
    to have found some of the genes that had to change to make us humans, at >least, in the morphological sense of what we look like.

    Ron Okimoto


    What is "HAR"?

    --
    You're entitled to your own opinions.
    You're not entitled to your own facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RonO@21:1/5 to jillery on Sun Jul 23 10:49:13 2023
    On 7/23/2023 9:07 AM, jillery wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 08:12:06 -0500, RonO <rokimoto@cox.net> wrote:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf8009

    This study published in science looked at skeletal differences within a
    portion of the UK human biobank that has skeletal bone measurements.
    They did a GWAS (genome wide association study) to identify genes
    associated with skeletal differences and looked into what these genes do
    and what phenotypes and diseases they have been associated with. This
    confirmed the association with bone morphology.

    They also did an evolutionary analysis because humans have a lot of
    skeletal changes compared to our primate ancestors. They looked at HAR
    genomic sequences (regions of the genome that show accelerated change
    compared our evolutionary relatives, and associated genes with things
    like our leg length and arm length change in ratio compared to apes and
    other skeletal changes like our hip morphology.

    There will likely be Science news articles on the research. They seem
    to have found some of the genes that had to change to make us humans, at
    least, in the morphological sense of what we look like.

    Ron Okimoto


    What is "HAR"?


    I think that I defined it. It looks like I did not close the
    parenthetical phrase. HAR means human accelerated regions of the genome.
    These are genomic sequence that have had a faster rate of change than
    the same sequences in other great apes.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to RonO on Sun Jul 23 12:51:50 2023
    On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:49:13 -0500, RonO <rokimoto@cox.net> wrote:

    On 7/23/2023 9:07 AM, jillery wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 08:12:06 -0500, RonO <rokimoto@cox.net> wrote:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf8009

    This study published in science looked at skeletal differences within a
    portion of the UK human biobank that has skeletal bone measurements.
    They did a GWAS (genome wide association study) to identify genes
    associated with skeletal differences and looked into what these genes do >>> and what phenotypes and diseases they have been associated with. This
    confirmed the association with bone morphology.

    They also did an evolutionary analysis because humans have a lot of
    skeletal changes compared to our primate ancestors. They looked at HAR
    genomic sequences (regions of the genome that show accelerated change
    compared our evolutionary relatives, and associated genes with things
    like our leg length and arm length change in ratio compared to apes and
    other skeletal changes like our hip morphology.

    There will likely be Science news articles on the research. They seem
    to have found some of the genes that had to change to make us humans, at >>> least, in the morphological sense of what we look like.

    Ron Okimoto


    What is "HAR"?


    I think that I defined it. It looks like I did not close the
    parenthetical phrase. HAR means human accelerated regions of the genome.
    These are genomic sequence that have had a faster rate of change than
    the same sequences in other great apes.

    Ron Okimoto


    Thank you for identifying the acronym.

    --
    You're entitled to your own opinions.
    You're not entitled to your own facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RonO@21:1/5 to RonO on Mon Jul 24 17:33:14 2023
    On 7/23/2023 8:12 AM, RonO wrote:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf8009

    This study published in science looked at skeletal differences within a portion of the UK human biobank that has skeletal bone measurements.
    They did a GWAS (genome wide association study) to identify genes
    associated with skeletal differences and looked into what these genes do
    and what phenotypes and diseases they have been associated with.  This confirmed the association with bone morphology.

    They also did an evolutionary analysis because humans have a lot of
    skeletal changes compared to our primate ancestors.  They looked at HAR genomic sequences (regions of the genome that show accelerated change compared our evolutionary relatives, and associated genes with things
    like our leg length and arm length change in ratio compared to apes and
    other skeletal changes like our hip morphology.

    There will likely be Science news articles on the research.  They seem
    to have found some of the genes that had to change to make us humans, at least, in the morphological sense of what we look like.

    Ron Okimoto


    Nature News article:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02345-7

    ScienceDaily:
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113156.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)