In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder
we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint, leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
would you be here to complain about it?
Matt Beasley wrote:------------------
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.Cite your quote.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:35:46 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for
transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about
hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder
we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes >>> it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive,
negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for
transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about
hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder
we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes >>> it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
would you be here to complain about it?
We didn't have MMR shots when I grew up, so I got measles, mumps, and
chicken pox, like everyone else, and it was normal, so not a problem!
It's hard to know specifically what would have happened if we hadn't developed
the other early vaccines (and YOU certainly don't know, too), but I'm not saying
we should ban all vaccines, so your question is just some more silly poop!
--
--
jillery wrote:
Matt Beasley wrote:------------------
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.Cite your quote.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
July 20, talk.origins:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder
we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something >doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that >we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint, >leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
would you be here to complain about it?
We didn't have MMR shots when I grew up, so I got measles, mumps, and chicken pox, like everyone else, and it was normal, so not a problem!
It's hard to know specifically what would have happened if we hadn't developed
the other early vaccines (and YOU certainly don't know, too), but I'm not saying
we should ban all vaccines, so your question is just some more silly poop! --
--
MMR shots don’t protect from chickenpox…WTF are you smoking.
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:35:46 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution.
No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive, negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
So you admit to being an RFK Jr groupie antivaxxer? Not surprising.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:35:46 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>> Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:So you admit to being an RFK Jr groupie antivaxxer? Not surprising.
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>>>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>>>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>>>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>>>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution. >>>>> No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or
secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive,
negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
Your responses and lack of them are what is not surprising.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:20:48 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:MMR shots don’t protect from chickenpox…WTF are you smoking.
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>>>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>>>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>>>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>>>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
would you be here to complain about it?
We didn't have MMR shots when I grew up, so I got measles, mumps, and
chicken pox, like everyone else, and it was normal, so not a problem!
It's hard to know specifically what would have happened if we hadn't developed
the other early vaccines (and YOU certainly don't know, too), but I'm not saying
we should ban all vaccines, so your question is just some more silly poop! >>> --
--
Why do you even post?
"Children may also get MMRV vaccine, which protects against measles,
mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox)." https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/mmr/public/index.html
There, a quote and a cite. jillery will be proud.
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:35:46 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>> Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:So you admit to being an RFK Jr groupie antivaxxer? Not surprising.
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>>>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>>>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the
usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>>>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution. >>>>> No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or >>> secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive,
negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
Your responses and lack of them are what is not surprising.
Parse that sentence please.
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:20:48 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:MMR shots don’t protect from chickenpox…WTF are you smoking.
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>>>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>>>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the
usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>>>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
would you be here to complain about it?
We didn't have MMR shots when I grew up, so I got measles, mumps, and >>> chicken pox, like everyone else, and it was normal, so not a problem! >>> It's hard to know specifically what would have happened if we hadn't developed
the other early vaccines (and YOU certainly don't know, too), but I'm not saying
we should ban all vaccines, so your question is just some more silly poop!
--
--
Why do you even post?
"Children may also get MMRV vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox)." https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/mmr/public/index.html
There, a quote and a cite. jillery will be proud.
Beasley didn’t mention MMRV vaccine, dipshit, now did he? Get a room.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 8:30:48 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>> Glenn <GlennS...@msn.com> wrote:Parse that sentence please.
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:35:46 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>>>> Matt Beasley <less...@gmail.com> wrote:So you admit to being an RFK Jr groupie antivaxxer? Not surprising.
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>>>>>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>>>>>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the
usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>>>>>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution. >>>>>>> No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or >>>>> secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive,
negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
Your responses and lack of them are what is not surprising.
Your responses and lack of them are what is not surprising.
*Hemidactylus* wrote:--------------------
Glenn wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley wrote:
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the
usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
--
--
"Yeah, immunization couldn't have had any effect on human evolution. >>> No way, not even possible. And not just no,......HECK no!"
---Jillery
would you be here to complain about it? Enjoy your irony lung.
"DR. SALEEBY divides eugenics into natural or primary and nurtural or secondary. Natural eugenics is further sub-divided into positive, negative, and preventive."
https://www.nature.com/articles/093527b0
And now for some irony lung:
"Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16968086/
So you admit to being an RFK Jr groupie antivaxxer? Not surprising.Your responses and lack of them are what is not surprising.
Matt Beasley wrote:--------------------
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Matt Beasley wrote:---------------------
In another newsgroup, Charlie M. 1958 wrote:If the oxymoron of “natural eugenics” hadn’t been thwarted by vaccinations
It's really not that simple, Mike. If you Google "biological basis for >>> transsexualism" you'll get a lot of links to scientific articles about >>> hormonal and genetic variations. If you want to be open-minded, try this one:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
------------------------
Then I wrote:
We've been interfering with Natural Eugenics for over 200 years with the >>> usage of vaccines to suppress communicable diseases, so it's no wonder >>> we're getting all kinds of freaky critters! Just because we can do something
doesn't mean the benefits will outweigh the costs in perpetuity! Sometimes
it takes awhile until all the true costs become apparent and realized, so that
we have to "turn back the clock", like we did with lead paint, radium paint,
leaded gasoline, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, Thalidomide, etc.
would you be here to complain about it?
We didn't have MMR shots when I grew up, so I got measles, mumps, and chicken pox, like everyone else, and it was normal, so not a problem!
It's hard to know specifically what would have happened if we hadn't developed
the other early vaccines (and YOU certainly don't know, too), but I'm not saying
we should ban all vaccines, so your question is just some more silly poop!
MMR shots don’t protect from chickenpox…WTF are you smoking. I did recently
get two shingles shots. I had chicken pox as a kid…so a no-brainer on that one though the second one sucked ass hard!
I had a measles shot in late 60s then again before university in early 90s and MMR in 2019 BECAUSE I CAN so fuck you.
Now kids can and should get HPV vaccines because…cancers. Not that you fucking care. You probable bemoan the reduction in suffering such shots confer later in life because you hate people living life. Death…mass death…to people, eugenically inferior people. I will eventually get an RSV shot BECAUSE I CAN so fuck you misanthrope.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 376 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 53:04:52 |
| Calls: | 8,041 |
| Files: | 13,037 |
| Messages: | 5,832,016 |