Okay, so there's all this idiocy regarding Out
of Africa purity and it's savanna fantasy. They
even invented some lame "Mitochondrial Eve."
But it's all a joke and you are the punch line!
Mungo Man!
Actually it has nothing to do with Mungo Man
but nimrods so much as glimpse the name and
whatever sorry excuse for a brain they might be
harboring immediately fries itself out. So..
Mungo Man!
Mungo Man!
There. Have you completely lobotomized yourself
with your emotions now? Good. i like making fun
of you but I'm lazy, so I want you to help me do that.
Okay, so if you know anything about Mungo Man
he's what they call an "Anatomically Modern Man,"
found in Australia, and an examination of his DNA
found a VERY old mtDNA line, one so old that it has
long since gone extinct.
This upsets a great many drones. And they never
ever haven't claimed that it wasn't true, that they
didn't find what they found and all kinds of nonsense
has been used to explain it away.
But it doesn't matter. It's irrelevant.
Like I said, the mtDNA line that Mungo Man appears
to have belonged to is quite old, much older than any
Mitochondrial Eve line used to support "Out of Africa"
purity. But, BILLIONS of people alive right now are
descended from it, and we know this because of a
lucky mutation that copied some of it over to the
Chromosome 11.
With or without Mungo Man nothing changes: This
mtDNA line is real, BILLIONS of people descend from
it, it's far older than any Mitochondrial Eve AND it's
Eurasian.
It's not African.
So this means that if there was an Out of Africa
migration, those who migrated were descended from
an even earlier Eurasian population that had migrated
into Africa.
This mtDNA that's copied to the Chromosome 11 on
billions of people: It's found primarily OUTSIDE of
Africa. It's Eurasian. And by any and every means for
evaluating where mtDNA comes from, it's Eurasian.
If it was primarily found in Africa then nobody from the
peanut gallery would so much as question it's origins.
THEY WOULD INSIST THAT IT HAS TO BE AFRICAN!
But it's not. It's Eurasian.
"Nooooo! Saying that an African population traces
it's ancestry to Eurasia is RACIST! It's RACIST, I tell
you! Exactly the same way saying that an Eurasian
population traces it's origins to Africa is not."
Yeah, paleo anthropology honestly is that fucked
up...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 422 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 197:01:38 |
Calls: | 8,951 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,352 |
Messages: | 5,992,477 |