On Saturday 11 February 2023 at 00:29:49 UTC+1 ernesto gastaldi wrote:

On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 21:04:19 UTC+1 pnn calmagorod wrote:

Understand this

https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/en/pnn

or not?

THE reasoning runs, at least in theory, relative to my distant memories.. I have studied the Lorenz forces in mass spectrometers, in the particle gun: calculating whether an electromagnetic thrust can lift a large load and accelerate it until it orbit

would >strain my memories of vector calculus, so I don't know.

The most unacceptable thing about the PNN (forces between open circuits) is not so much the violation of the principle of action and reaction foreseen for centuries and never realized before of the PNN ..... how much this in this figure http://www.asps.
it/trustgra1.jpg or that the PNN thrust increases over time. Or horror of horrors also the II law of dynamics is "BYPASSED" ... I myself have not accepted this fact for about 6 years .... but then since it ALWAYS happened ... I had to accept.
A four-dipole V-shaped PNN system powered by an electricity-producing nuclear reactor takes off after about 1 hour under electric power.
What heart attack for current physics ... and for scientists who live with the profits of the trumpets (rockets). Mass layoffs they told me at Alenia space :-) .... 99% rockets only know how to make war on Earth ..... outside they are slow mass loser bins

If gravity is a distortion of masses on space-time it obviously has nothing to do with electromagnetism, the much sought-after graviton should not hesitate because there is no "force", however the universe >expands and accelerates, this means that

spacetime contains >antigravity.
unfortunately they are philosophical and theoretical aspects that do not find applications for now in experiments

You've patented your device but science doesn't seem to think it's useful.

Unfortunately PNN silences those who believe in official science and as a reaction they RUN away :-)
A not painless revolution for those who live on trumpets and artemis missions that don't colonize shit .... the PNN Spaceship starts whole and comes back whole. Of Artemis, only 0.3% of the starting mass returned to the ground, 99.7% was lost. A comic:
it's like if you go for a ride in your car and come back with only the steering wheel. :-)
With rockets you can't PHYSICALLY colonize anything http://www.asps.it/contiserva.pdf
We Asps estimate that we only need to sell 1 prototype of what in https://www.propulsion-revolution.com .to cause the collapse of the missiles
I have no problem giving you 10% if you get us a buyer.... look at the costs and do your own math.
Pecunia non olet

E.Laureti

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)