My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious >contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:15:04 AM UTC-8, martin...@gmail.com wrote: >> My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious
contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
I'd be surprised if anyone other than those you mentioned have any reason to >doubt your faith is what you say it is, not that it's anyone else's business. Opinions
based on ignorance are what they are; not worth very much.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:13:26 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com>:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly byInteresting; thanks.
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious >>contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two >>years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of >>little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the >>religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
You *do* realize that neither Glenn nor Peter is qualified
to pass judgement on anyone else's honesty or beliefs,
right?
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:30:34 -0800 (PST), erik simpsonI think that's generally true, but when the opinions are simply personal opinions about another individual then I don't much see the point. Who cares what they say about you here? Anybody whose opinion of you is even remotely worth thinking about is
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:15:04 AM UTC-8, martin...@gmail.com wrote:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious
contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
I'd be surprised if anyone other than those you mentioned have any reason toYes, but showing opinions to be based on ignorance is a fundamental
doubt your faith is what you say it is, not that it's anyone else's business. Opinions
based on ignorance are what they are; not worth very much.
part of TO's raison d'être.
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
On 25/01/2023 17:13, Martin Harran wrote:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious
contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The strange thing is that according to Peter he is an apostate Catholic,
at least in so far as he says that he is an (explicit, but not dogmatic) atheist (though he prefers the term agnostic as a self-identification).
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 2:35:05 AM UTC-5, martin...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:30:34 -0800 (PST), erik simpsongoing to form that opinion based on what you yourself post, not what somebody else's post says about you.
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:I think that's generally true, but when the opinions are simply personal opinions about another individual then I don't much see the point. Who cares what they say about you here? Anybody whose opinion of you is even remotely worth thinking about is
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:15:04 AM UTC-8, martin...@gmail.com wrote:Yes, but showing opinions to be based on ignorance is a fundamental
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious
contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
I'd be surprised if anyone other than those you mentioned have any reason to
doubt your faith is what you say it is, not that it's anyone else's business. Opinions
based on ignorance are what they are; not worth very much.
part of TO's raison d'être.
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of
little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the
religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:13:26 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Martin Harran
<martin...@gmail.com>:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious >contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two >years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The articles are purely religious with no scientific content so are of >little or no direct interest to most people here but if anyone wants
to discuss any of them, feel free to do so - probably better by
commenting at the site rather than creating a distraction here.
I hope to add some material at a later stage relating to the >religion/science interface. If and when I do so, I may link to it
here.
The site itself is a bit basic at the moment and does need some
polishing up which I will work on gradually.
https://www.martinharran.com/net-reflections/
Interesting; thanks.
You *do* realize that neither Glenn nor Peter is qualified
to pass judgement on anyone else's honesty or beliefs,
right?
--
On 1/26/2023 4:09 PM, Ernest Major wrote:
On 25/01/2023 17:13, Martin Harran wrote:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by
Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious
contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two
years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims
are by those two posters.
The strange thing is that according to Peter he is an apostate Catholic,
at least in so far as he says that he is an (explicit, but not dogmatic) atheist (though he prefers the term agnostic as a self-identification).
He also claimed that he attended church regularly, but he was the creationists that tried to defend Pascal's wager on TO. Beats me how
anyone would think that they could lie to the god that they were
supposed to be worshiping.
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 6:25:05 PM UTC-5, Ron O wrote:
On 1/26/2023 4:09 PM, Ernest Major wrote:
On 25/01/2023 17:13, Martin Harran wrote:
My religious beliefs have occasionally been discussed here, mainly by >> Glenn who insists that I am really an atheist and Peter who has
claimed I am an apostate Catholic. The link below is to some religious >> contributions I have made to our diocesan periodical over the last two >> years or so; if nothing else, the articles show how vacuous the claims >> are by those two posters.
The strange thing is that according to Peter he is an apostate Catholic, at least in so far as he says that he is an (explicit, but not dogmatic) atheist (though he prefers the term agnostic as a self-identification).
He also claimed that he attended church regularly, but he was the creationists that tried to defend Pascal's wager on TO. Beats me how anyone would think that they could lie to the god that they wereTo me, that was always the biggest flaw in pascals wager - If this god is as omniscient as they claim, what makes them think anyone could bullshit it?
supposed to be worshiping.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 126:57:07 |
| Calls: | 6,854 |
| Files: | 12,360 |
| Messages: | 5,417,485 |