https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235891950_The_Polonnaruwa_meteorite_oxygen_isotope_crystalline_and_biological_composition
What i find in life is that very often I am NOT convinced
by the arguments in favor of something, even if they
can be compelling, but the arguments AGAINST.
A throw back here but, take for example the <ahem>
"Arguments" against Neanderthal "interbreeding."
It was really all horrible. I mean, super bad!
There was a lot of "Different species" thrown around,
i.e. "Circular Reasoning," and of course the fake DNA
evidence.
Yes, "Fake" DNA evidence.
The claim was that Neanderthal mtDNA didn't exist
in modern populations thus there was no mixing. And
this was bullshit. In fact, OTHER studies jumped to the
exact opposite assumption -- mtDNA would NOT reflect
interbreeding -- and were supposedly confirmed by
efforts to duplicate the result.
Wilson & Cann, their landmark use of mtDNA to "Find"
an alleged Mitochondrial Eve used African Americans
for their African mtDNA, despite centuries of mixing.
Populations rarely interact as equals.
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals. Paleoanthropology
was assuming one thing in the case of Mitochondrial Eve
and the opposite in the case of Neanderthals. As the
Wilson & Cann results were duplicated using African
subjects to represent African populations, it seemed
apparent that the claims regarding Neanderthals had to
be false... leaving SQUAT as "evidence" against
interbreeding.
Evidence for/no decent evidence against... all but
dogmatic turds could see that interbreeding was the
answer.
Now let's look at this "Alien Life" inside the meteorite...
The "Arguments" against align perfectly with my
position: NOT that the conclusions are wrong, assuming
that the evidence is real, but that the evidence has to be
confirmed.
This is not unreasonable. It's not even all that difficult.
We are speaking of a physical object, something that can
be touched, examined and tested. It's not a "Theory." It's
not a "Lost Treasure."
If the people in possession of the meteorite feel it's too
important, too valuable to send elsewhere, people could
travel to it. Equipment could be shipped, or found locally.
But, nothing in the opposition discounts the conclusions.
IF it is a meteorite.. IF it really fell in 2012.. IF the structures
are there.. IF the testing can be replicated.. they found alien
life. They confirmed Panspermia, or at least some flavor
thereof.
Doesn't THAT warrant something other than picking your
nose & hurling ad hominem? Doesn't that provoke a
greater response than "But the status quo hasn't told me
to believe it?"
This is a case where there isn't science, where AUTHORITY
speaks and the devout obey.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/705742582064496640
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235891950_The_Polonnaruwa_meteorite_oxygen_isotope_crystalline_and_biological_composition
What i find in life is that very often I am NOT convinced
by the arguments in favor of something, even if they
can be compelling, but the arguments AGAINST.
A throw back here but, take for example the <ahem>
"Arguments" against Neanderthal "interbreeding."
It was really all horrible. I mean, super bad!
There was a lot of "Different species" thrown around,
i.e. "Circular Reasoning," and of course the fake DNA
evidence.
Yes, "Fake" DNA evidence.
The claim was that Neanderthal mtDNA didn't exist
in modern populations thus there was no mixing. And
this was bullshit. In fact, OTHER studies jumped to the
exact opposite assumption -- mtDNA would NOT reflect
interbreeding -- and were supposedly confirmed by
efforts to duplicate the result.
Wilson & Cann, their landmark use of mtDNA to "Find"
an alleged Mitochondrial Eve used African Americans
for their African mtDNA, despite centuries of mixing.
Populations rarely interact as equals.
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals. Paleoanthropology
was assuming one thing in the case of Mitochondrial Eve
and the opposite in the case of Neanderthals. As the
Wilson & Cann results were duplicated using African
subjects to represent African populations, it seemed
apparent that the claims regarding Neanderthals had to
be false... leaving SQUAT as "evidence" against
interbreeding.
Evidence for/no decent evidence against... all but
dogmatic turds could see that interbreeding was the
answer.
Now let's look at this "Alien Life" inside the meteorite...
The "Arguments" against align perfectly with my
position: NOT that the conclusions are wrong, assuming
that the evidence is real, but that the evidence has to be
confirmed.
This is not unreasonable. It's not even all that difficult.
We are speaking of a physical object, something that can
be touched, examined and tested. It's not a "Theory." It's
not a "Lost Treasure."
If the people in possession of the meteorite feel it's too
important, too valuable to send elsewhere, people could
travel to it. Equipment could be shipped, or found locally.
But, nothing in the opposition discounts the conclusions.
IF it is a meteorite.. IF it really fell in 2012.. IF the structures
are there.. IF the testing can be replicated.. they found alien
life. They confirmed Panspermia, or at least some flavor
thereof.
Doesn't THAT warrant something other than picking your
nose & hurling ad hominem? Doesn't that provoke a
greater response than "But the status quo hasn't told me
to believe it?"
This is a case where there isn't science, where AUTHORITY
speaks and the devout obey.
There are no material for being vocal asshole, it
all comes from inside of you.
Yes, "Fake" DNA evidence.
The claim was that Neanderthal mtDNA didn't exist
in modern populations thus there was no mixing. And
this was bullshit. In fact, OTHER studies jumped to the
exact opposite assumption -- mtDNA would NOT reflect
interbreeding -- and were supposedly confirmed by
efforts to duplicate the result.
Wilson & Cann, their landmark use of mtDNA to "Find"
an alleged Mitochondrial Eve used African Americans
for their African mtDNA, despite centuries of mixing.
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals.
Denial of the DNA evidence is just sad at this time.
What is even
sadder is that you aren't talking about your "10 years ago" thread
He’s just another narcissistic abusive assclown quite easily ignored.
What is here to obey? Good that we have few examples of
neanderthal DNA.
Good that we have some rocks that indicate panspermia.
Ron O wrote:
Yes, "Fake" DNA evidence.
The claim was that Neanderthal mtDNA didn't exist
in modern populations thus there was no mixing. And
this was bullshit. In fact, OTHER studies jumped to the
exact opposite assumption -- mtDNA would NOT reflect
interbreeding -- and were supposedly confirmed by
efforts to duplicate the result.
Wilson & Cann, their landmark use of mtDNA to "Find"
an alleged Mitochondrial Eve used African Americans
for their African mtDNA, despite centuries of mixing.
Their results were duplicated using African subjects.
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals.
This is fact. It's history. Done. She sang...
Denial of the DNA evidence is just sad at this time.
And yet that "Evidence" really wasn't "Evidence" for what
jackasses like you claimed. Neanderthals weren't a dead
end. There was interbreeding. The "Evidence" isn't just
denied but completely debunked.
What is even
sadder is that you aren't talking about your "10 years ago" thread
You're a fraud, you have no reading comprehension, but I am
talking about how arguments AGAINST a view are often what
turns out to be the most convincing arguments IN FAVOR OF
that exact same view.
The arguments against "Interbreeding" were mostly non
existing, or incredibly pathetic such as in the case of the DNA
"Evidence" which your mental disorder causes you to defend,
even knowing it was debunked.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/705742582064496640
You seem to be talking to yourself again.
You
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals. Paleoanthropology
was assuming one thing in the case of Mitochondrial Eve
and the opposite in the case of Neanderthals. As the
Wilson & Cann results were duplicated using African
subjects to represent African populations, it seemed
apparent that the claims regarding Neanderthals had to
be false... leaving SQUAT as "evidence" against
interbreeding.
Denial of the DNA evidence is just sad at this time.
A cereal* masturbator Jerking To Egotistical Mirages? I wonder how often he cleans his mirror after the money shot.
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
A cereal* masturbator Jerking To Egotistical Mirages? I wonder how often he >> cleans his mirror after the money shot.
The world is still regretting the day they granted internet access to
you inmates.
But, keep trying. This is the "Academic" you've managed in quite a
long time.
Ubiquitous comments like that show that you, JTEM, do not want people to
take you seriously,
A cereal* masturbator Jerking To Egotistical Mirages? I wonder how often he cleans his mirror after the money shot.
Mark Isaak wrote:
Ubiquitous comments like that show that you, JTEM, do not want people to
take you seriously,
Wow. New sock puppet for today! What an honor!
Tell me, because you give EVERY reason to be taken seriously, which
reaction oops I mean "Response" to me did you take the most
serious? Because you clearly believe, or so this disorder causes you
to state, that if there is anything less than serious it is coming from
me, and not the emotional basket case I am replying to.
Oo! I know! You thought THIS was serious science, didn't you?
A cereal* masturbator Jerking To Egotistical Mirages? I wonder how often he >> cleans his mirror after the money shot.
Since you mention it, THIS was likely a reaction to YOUR comment:
"You're a fraud, you have no reading comprehension,"
Mark Isaak wrote:
Ubiquitous comments like that show that you, JTEM, do not want people to
take you seriously,
Wow. New sock puppet for today! What an honor!
[...]
Get over yourself. You talk shit, I point out that you talk shit. The only >solution here is that you stop talking shit.
You
stop
Okay, you
So Wilson & Cann proved that mtDNA is not an indictor
of interbreeding (or lack there of) but the opposite was
assumed in the case of Neanderthals. Paleoanthropology
was assuming one thing in the case of Mitochondrial Eve
and the opposite in the case of Neanderthals. As the
Wilson & Cann results were duplicated using African
subjects to represent African populations, it seemed
apparent that the claims regarding Neanderthals had to
be false... leaving SQUAT as "evidence" against
interbreeding.
Denial of the DNA evidence is just sad at this time.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 122:30:01 |
| Calls: | 6,854 |
| Files: | 12,360 |
| Messages: | 5,417,120 |