1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. TALK.ORIGINS

  • The Cosmic Vacuum

    From israel socratus@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 6 09:07:21 2023
    Mathematical formulas reflect the processes that take place
    in the physical world. They help to understand the beginning
    and the further development of the physical process. All objects
    exist in the Cosmic Vacuum and therefore, at first, it needs
    to understand the math and physical structure of Cosmic Vacuum
    and then step by step the evolution of everything.
    #
    ‘'The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
    is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
    describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
    of something more complex?''
    / Paul Dirac / https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-paul-dirac.htm?fbclid=IwAR20AknS_mVMN5LHabTydXyzGpUaFFvXRft9R3f5315hRDzRilFCWeIDSUM#:~:text=And%20Dirac%20is%20pretty%20spot,description%20of%20something%20more%20complex%3F

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From israel sadovnik@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 16 23:50:15 2023
    The Cosmic Vacuum
    1- Classic physics: the energy of cosmic vacuum is zero (0)
    2- Quantum physics: the energy of cosmic vacuum is infinite (∞)
    3- Physics: the reference frame for relativity theories and quantum mechanics is an infinite, "absolutely empty" cosmic space.
    Why?
    a) The infinite cosmic vacuum is not "absolutely empty" space.
    According to Dirac, this "vacuum sea" is filled with "virtual particles". Constant fluctuations of "virtual particles" change the absolute zero temperature
    (T=0K) of cosmic vacuum, and the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift proved this effect.
    b) According to SRT, a quantum of light can travel in vacuum with constant speed (c)
    c) According to General relativity, gravitational effects manifest themselves in a comic vacuum.
    d) LHC machines can only work in "pure vacuum" (copy of cosmic vacuum).
    Without a "pure vacuum" the LHC is a useless machine.
    ======.
    ‘'The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
    is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
    describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
    of something more complex?'' / Paul Dirac /
    =========.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)