• Re: Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?

    From Lawyer Daggett@21:1/5 to Matt Beasley on Mon Jan 2 01:02:47 2023
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Matt Beasley wrote:
    Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
    By Allysia Finley, Jan. 1, 2023, WSJ
    Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should
    Americans be worried?

    It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing evidence also suggests that repeated
    vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.

    Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous descendents, many of which have popped
    up in different regions of the world curiously bearing some of the same mutations.

    “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 study in the journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have developed mutations that
    enable it to transmit more easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection.

    "by vaccines and prior infection".

    Yes, viruses mutate. Yes, allele frequencies in the population of a virus will change.
    That's the very definition of evolution. Yes, alleles that are more successful at reproducing
    in the face of a population with immunity from either prior infection or vaccination will
    out compete other alleles. The virus will evolve.

    Will the populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated drive different 'directions' of
    evolution in the virus? Most likely. One of the most remarkable changes seen in
    SARS-CoV-2 has been a remarkable increase in infectivity (R0). Many viruses do that as they adapt to a new host species.

    Omicron in particular appears to have pulled a dastardly trick. There are many indications that an earlier strain did a species crossover to mice, adapted to mouse
    ACE2 protein, but then managed to transfer back to humans and then proceeded
    to again rapidly evolve to this further change in host.

    Meanwhile, sensationalized stories that suggest that because viruses evolve vaccination is bad are grossly irresponsible. Viruses evolve to evade immune responses, whether they are immune responses in convalescent people or in vaccinated people. But vaccinated people have the advantage of not having
    had to get sick.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Lawyer Daggett on Mon Jan 2 12:20:09 2023
    Lawyer Daggett <j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Matt Beasley wrote:
    Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
    By Allysia Finley, Jan. 1, 2023, WSJ
    Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant
    dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some
    studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from
    Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried?

    It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its
    mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and
    vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing
    evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more
    susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.

    Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four
    variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta
    caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous
    descendents, many of which have popped up in different regions of the
    world curiously bearing some of the same mutations.

    “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with
    enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 study in the
    journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus
    appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more
    easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection.

    "by vaccines and prior infection".

    Yes, viruses mutate. Yes, allele frequencies in the population of a virus will change.
    That's the very definition of evolution. Yes, alleles that are more successful at reproducing
    in the face of a population with immunity from either prior infection or vaccination will
    out compete other alleles. The virus will evolve.

    Will the populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated drive different 'directions' of
    evolution in the virus? Most likely. One of the most remarkable changes seen in
    SARS-CoV-2 has been a remarkable increase in infectivity (R0). Many viruses do
    that as they adapt to a new host species.

    Omicron in particular appears to have pulled a dastardly trick. There are many
    indications that an earlier strain did a species crossover to mice, adapted to mouse
    ACE2 protein, but then managed to transfer back to humans and then proceeded to again rapidly evolve to this further change in host.

    Meanwhile, sensationalized stories that suggest that because viruses evolve vaccination is bad are grossly irresponsible. Viruses evolve to evade immune responses, whether they are immune responses in convalescent people or in vaccinated people. But vaccinated people have the advantage of not having
    had to get sick.

    Given the source being WSJ and the whole “The Biden administration’s monomaniacal focus on vaccines” thing I’m taking this opinion screed with a heavy dosage of anti-BS monoclonals. As for the author someone else has
    chimed in on another WSJ piece:

    https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fiction/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 2 17:31:40 2023
    On 2023-01-02 12:20:09 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:

    Lawyer Daggett <j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Matt Beasley wrote:
    Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
    By Allysia Finley, Jan. 1, 2023, WSJ
    Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant >>> dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some
    studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from
    Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried?

    It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its >>> mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and
    vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing
    evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more
    susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.

    Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four
    variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta
    caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous
    descendents, many of which have popped up in different regions of the
    world curiously bearing some of the same mutations.

    “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with
    enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 study in the
    journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus
    appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more
    easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection.

    "by vaccines and prior infection".

    Yes, viruses mutate. Yes, allele frequencies in the population of a
    virus will change.
    That's the very definition of evolution. Yes, alleles that are more
    successful at reproducing
    in the face of a population with immunity from either prior infection
    or vaccination will
    out compete other alleles. The virus will evolve.

    Will the populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated drive different
    'directions' of
    evolution in the virus? Most likely. One of the most remarkable changes seen in
    SARS-CoV-2 has been a remarkable increase in infectivity (R0). Many viruses do
    that as they adapt to a new host species.

    Omicron in particular appears to have pulled a dastardly trick. There are many
    indications that an earlier strain did a species crossover to mice,
    adapted to mouse
    ACE2 protein, but then managed to transfer back to humans and then proceeded >> to again rapidly evolve to this further change in host.

    Meanwhile, sensationalized stories that suggest that because viruses evolve >> vaccination is bad are grossly irresponsible. Viruses evolve to evade immune >> responses, whether they are immune responses in convalescent people or in
    vaccinated people. But vaccinated people have the advantage of not having
    had to get sick.

    Given the source being WSJ and the whole “The Biden administration’s monomaniacal focus on vaccines” thing I’m taking this opinion screed with a
    heavy dosage of anti-BS monoclonals. As for the author someone else has chimed in on another WSJ piece:

    https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fiction/

    I used to follow Science-based Medicine and its sister blog Respectful Insolence, but I stopped after the two chief editors retracted a review
    by Harriet Hall, one of their senior editors, in fact one of their
    founding editors, of Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage. This
    was apparently because the review didn't accept the Woke orthodoxy that
    the chief editors had determined to be The Truth. Now I don't agree
    with some of the more idiotic posts that appear in this group, but I do
    agree with Jillery's view that everyone is entitled to their opinions,
    and I would strongly oppose any decision not to allow Ron Dean, for
    example, to say what he thinks. Apparently the people in charge of Science-based Medicine don't believe in allowing all opinions to be
    heard.


    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawyer Daggett@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Mon Jan 2 09:21:22 2023
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:35:37 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2023-01-02 12:20:09 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:

    Lawyer Daggett <j.nobel...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Matt Beasley wrote:
    Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
    By Allysia Finley, Jan. 1, 2023, WSJ
    Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant >>> dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some
    studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from >>> Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried?

    It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its
    mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and
    vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing
    evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more >>> susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution. >>>
    Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four >>> variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta >>> caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous >>> descendents, many of which have popped up in different regions of the >>> world curiously bearing some of the same mutations.

    “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with
    enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 study in the >>> journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus >>> appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more
    easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection. >>
    "by vaccines and prior infection".

    Yes, viruses mutate. Yes, allele frequencies in the population of a
    virus will change.
    That's the very definition of evolution. Yes, alleles that are more
    successful at reproducing
    in the face of a population with immunity from either prior infection
    or vaccination will
    out compete other alleles. The virus will evolve.

    Will the populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated drive different
    'directions' of
    evolution in the virus? Most likely. One of the most remarkable changes seen in
    SARS-CoV-2 has been a remarkable increase in infectivity (R0). Many viruses do
    that as they adapt to a new host species.

    Omicron in particular appears to have pulled a dastardly trick. There are many
    indications that an earlier strain did a species crossover to mice,
    adapted to mouse
    ACE2 protein, but then managed to transfer back to humans and then proceeded
    to again rapidly evolve to this further change in host.

    Meanwhile, sensationalized stories that suggest that because viruses evolve
    vaccination is bad are grossly irresponsible. Viruses evolve to evade immune
    responses, whether they are immune responses in convalescent people or in >> vaccinated people. But vaccinated people have the advantage of not having >> had to get sick.

    Given the source being WSJ and the whole “The Biden administration’s monomaniacal focus on vaccines” thing I’m taking this opinion screed with a
    heavy dosage of anti-BS monoclonals. As for the author someone else has chimed in on another WSJ piece:

    https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fiction/
    I used to follow Science-based Medicine and its sister blog Respectful Insolence, but I stopped after the two chief editors retracted a review
    by Harriet Hall, one of their senior editors, in fact one of their
    founding editors, of Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage. This
    was apparently because the review didn't accept the Woke orthodoxy that
    the chief editors had determined to be The Truth. Now I don't agree
    with some of the more idiotic posts that appear in this group, but I do agree with Jillery's view that everyone is entitled to their opinions,
    and I would strongly oppose any decision not to allow Ron Dean, for
    example, to say what he thinks. Apparently the people in charge of Science-based Medicine don't believe in allowing all opinions to be
    heard.


    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    I think your criticism misfires.
    For reference, one can ignore my comments and decide for yourself.
    start here https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/irreversible-damage-the-transgender-craze-seducing-our-daughters/
    don't miss this link https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-science-of-transgender-treatment/

    My disagreement with Athel's post isn't based on an opinion about the
    book being reviewed, or the quality of the book review. It's about his criticism that those managing the website science-basedmedicine
    retracted an article. And whether or not they were being 'Woke' or
    what qualifies as 'Woke' is beside the point.

    I say it's their website, they can choose to retract any article they
    want. Not including something they don't like is as valid an opinion
    (in the free speech sense) as including an opinion. They just removed
    their stamp-of-approval. Note that the review still exists, is available
    on the web, is essentially linked to on their website. It hasn't been
    censored.

    Somewhat similarly, I criticize the Wall Street Journal for that editorial. They should not have published it. This is distinct from saying it should
    be scrubbed from the internet. It means it falls below the standards
    of 'reasonable disagreement' by which a newspaper can justify
    presenting opposing viewpoints. Yes, there should be standards.
    Establishing and maintaining standards for what one publishes isn't
    censorship except in the sense of self-censorship, and that's allowed.

    Usenet generally works differently. It's common carrier free-for-all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt Beasley@21:1/5 to Lawyer Daggett on Mon Jan 2 12:49:55 2023
    Lawyer Daggett wrote:
    Matt Beasley wrote:
    Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
    By Allysia Finley, Jan. 1, 2023, WSJ
    Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should
    Americans be worried?

    It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing evidence also suggests that repeated
    vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.

    Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous descendents, many of which have
    popped up in different regions of the world curiously bearing some of the same mutations.

    “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 study in the journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have developed mutations that
    enable it to transmit more easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection.
    "by vaccines and prior infection".

    Yes, viruses mutate. Yes, allele frequencies in the population of a virus will change.
    That's the very definition of evolution. Yes, alleles that are more successful at reproducing
    in the face of a population with immunity from either prior infection or vaccination will
    out compete other alleles. The virus will evolve.

    Will the populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated drive different 'directions' of
    evolution in the virus? Most likely. One of the most remarkable changes seen in
    SARS-CoV-2 has been a remarkable increase in infectivity (R0). Many viruses do
    that as they adapt to a new host species.

    Omicron in particular appears to have pulled a dastardly trick. There are many
    indications that an earlier strain did a species crossover to mice, adapted to mouse
    ACE2 protein, but then managed to transfer back to humans and then proceeded to again rapidly evolve to this further change in host.

    Meanwhile, sensationalized stories that suggest that because viruses evolve vaccination is bad are grossly irresponsible. Viruses evolve to evade immune responses, whether they are immune responses in convalescent people or in vaccinated people. But vaccinated people have the advantage of not having had to get sick.
    --------------------
    Most people think we can do whatever we want and get away with it,
    numbers don't matter, the more the merrier, no limits. You can get
    away with that for awhile, but not forever...
    --
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ernest Major@21:1/5 to Lawyer Daggett on Mon Jan 2 21:22:29 2023
    On 02/01/2023 17:21, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
    Usenet generally works differently. It's common carrier free-for-all.

    And yet talk.origins is (very lightly) moderated.

    --
    alias Ernest Major

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)