Here is the Chez Watt ballot for December. Vote!
Happy New Year! Let us celebrate by reviewing some parts of the last
year that are perhaps best left behind.

================
In the category of Complexities of time travel:

This is sufficiently non-sectarian to not violate the clause of
the first Amendment to the US Constitution about established
religion. The Declaration of Independence would not exist,
were this not so.

================
In the category of: "quote", he said disapprovingly.

I reserve my disapproval for those believe they have an excuse to
misunderstand the obvious.


================
chez watt nomination under the category:
1: They broke the chalice from the palace?
2: And replaced it with a flagon.

Martin is deliberately ignoring the post where I canceled the post to
which he
is replying, and which contains a correction to what I posted next:


================
Perhaps Ediacarian?

There
is no
definitive evidence of eye evolution and no complex animals with

mouths, guts

or
an anus in animals during the epicurian: eyes simply appeared

abruptly during

the early Cambrian.

Eat, drink, and be merry without a mouth, gut, or anus for tomorrow we go extinct?


================
Category: Presumption of facts not in evidence

No creationist would use "not fully formed" without reference to
a specific goal, and neither would a ***competent ID theorist***.

[emphasis added]


--
Mark Isaak
"Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That
doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 4:00:36 PM UTC-5, Mark Isaak wrote:

Here is the Chez Watt ballot for December. Vote!
Happy New Year! Let us celebrate by reviewing some parts of the last
year that are perhaps best left behind.

================
In the category of Complexities of time travel:

This is sufficiently non-sectarian to not violate the clause of
the first Amendment to the US Constitution about established
religion. The Declaration of Independence would not exist,
were this not so.

================
In the category of: "quote", he said disapprovingly.

I reserve my disapproval for those believe they have an excuse to misunderstand the obvious.

================
chez watt nomination under the category:
1: They broke the chalice from the palace?
2: And replaced it with a flagon.

Martin is deliberately ignoring the post where I canceled the post to
which he
is replying, and which contains a correction to what I posted next:

I cast my vote for the following one while mumbling disparaging sleights
about the other choices. And regarding any streaks that may be broken:
Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

================
Perhaps Ediacarian?

There
is no
definitive evidence of eye evolution and no complex animals with

mouths, guts

or
an anus in animals during the epicurian: eyes simply appeared

abruptly during

the early Cambrian.

Eat, drink, and be merry without a mouth, gut, or anus for tomorrow we go extinct?

================
Category: Presumption of facts not in evidence

No creationist would use "not fully formed" without reference to
a specific goal, and neither would a ***competent ID theorist***.

[emphasis added]

--
Mark Isaak
"Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That
doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This one please, which would have been a contender in the golden days of
CW too

================
Perhaps Ediacarian?

There
is no
definitive evidence of eye evolution and no complex animals with

mouths, guts

or
an anus in animals during the epicurian: eyes simply appeared

abruptly during

the early Cambrian.

Eat, drink, and be merry without a mouth, gut, or anus for tomorrow we go extinct?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, 1 Jan 2023 12:59:38 -0800, Mark Isaak
<specimen@curioustaxonomy.net> wrote:

This one:

================
Perhaps Ediacarian?

There
is no
definitive evidence of eye evolution and no complex animals with

mouths, guts

or
an anus in animals during the epicurian: eyes simply appeared

abruptly during

the early Cambrian.

Eat, drink, and be merry without a mouth, gut, or anus for tomorrow we go >extinct?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)