On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:01:19 -0700, Pro Plyd <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
jillery wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:12:52 -0500, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com>
wrote:
On Nov 25, 2022, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<moq1oh140pflh85lanmfsbrg90cm6t7ppe@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:52:27 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan<akwolffan@zoho.com>:
OK.
New machine. Can I post? Testing, testing...
Took three tries before it went through.
Ah, but do you know which one of the three went through?
The wave functions of the other two collapsed when the one (/*The* One?/) >> made it through. Perhaps checking the quantum time signature...
Ah, but do you know which two collapsed?
As an Everettian, I would say there exist parallel realities where
every combination did and did not get through. We just happen to live
in this reality where just one went through...
... and we still don't know which one.
jillery wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:01:19 -0700, Pro Plyd <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
jillery wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:12:52 -0500, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com>
wrote:
On Nov 25, 2022, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<moq1oh140pflh85lanmfsbrg90cm6t7ppe@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:52:27 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan<akwolffan@zoho.com>:
OK.
New machine. Can I post? Testing, testing...
Took three tries before it went through.
Ah, but do you know which one of the three went through?
The wave functions of the other two collapsed when the one (/*The* One?/) >>> made it through. Perhaps checking the quantum time signature...
Ah, but do you know which two collapsed?
Yes, by having the Observer check the system logs and match sends with >receives ;)
(what, realities have logs? why not!)
As an Everettian, I would say there exist parallel realities where
every combination did and did not get through. We just happen to live
in this reality where just one went through...
... and we still don't know which one.
I pick - THIS one
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 22:45:42 -0700, Pro Plyd <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
jillery wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:01:19 -0700, Pro Plyd <invalid@invalid.invalid>
jillery wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:12:52 -0500, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com>
On Nov 25, 2022, Bob Casanova wrote
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:52:27 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan<akwolffan@zoho.com>:
OK.
New machine. Can I post? Testing, testing...
Took three tries before it went through.
Ah, but do you know which one of the three went through?
The wave functions of the other two collapsed when the one (/*The* One?/) >>>> made it through. Perhaps checking the quantum time signature...
Ah, but do you know which two collapsed?
Yes, by having the Observer check the system logs and match sends with
receives ;)
You comment above illustrates why quantum entanglement doesn't allow
FTL transmission; no one observer has access to both send and receive
logs untill the missing log is sent at ordinary lightspeed.
(what, realities have logs? why not!)
As an Everettian, I would say there exist parallel realities where
every combination did and did not get through. We just happen to live
in this reality where just one went through...
... and we still don't know which one.
I pick - THIS one
Like they say, you can pick your friends, you can pick your nose, but
you ought not pick your friend's nose.
T.O. down again?
T.O. down again?
T.O. down again?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 73:42:06 |
Calls: | 6,915 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,432,372 |