• Re: Jan. 6 panel warned Bannon of possible charges, staffer testifies

    From kron@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 20 18:16:39 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.skunks
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

    On 20 Jul 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:FiXBK.493096$J0r9.284823@fx11.iad:

    On 7/20/2022 10:46 AM, >>> Jack-off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell <dip@shit.invalid>, HIV+ cocksucker and convicted child molester,
    stupidly bawled and lied:

    On 7/20/2022 9:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    Stephen K. Bannon’s contempt of Congress trial resumed Wednesday
    with testimony from a Jan. 6 committee staffer, who told jurors that
    the panel warned Bannon of possible criminal charges after his
    lawyer first indicated that he would not comply with a congressional
    subpoena.

    Testimony from committee general counsel Kristin Amerling continued
    on the first full day of testimony after a rocky start to the
    proceeding. Bannon’s lawyers had sought a delay over questions
    about what evidence was allowed, but U.S. District Judge Carl J.
    Nichols ordered that the trial proceed, and opening statements took
    place Tuesday.

    The judge warned defense lawyers Wednesday that he would intervene
    during the questioning of witnesses to keep them from turning the
    trial into a “political circus.”

    Federal prosecutors raised concerns that Bannon’s legal defense
    seems built around the claim that the subpoena issued by the House
    committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol
    attack was “illegitimate” because it was motivated by politics.

    Bannon, the former political strategist for Donald Trump, was
    indicted on two misdemeanor contempt charges and accused of refusing
    to comply with an order from the House select committee to turn over
    records and testify about his actions ahead of the attack.

    Bannon’s lawyers have argued that their client did not
    “ignore” the committee’s formal request but was in
    negotiations with the panel.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/20/steve-bannon-trial
    -live-updates/

    Bannon was not "negotiating" with the select committee. He simply
    and flatly refused to appear and to produce the documents.

    *LOCK HIM UP*

    No ome [sic] cares anymore Ruby.

    Bannon sure the fuck cares, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell, you
    stupid HIV+ lying fat fuck.

    Still waiting for Hillary Clinton to be charged with destroying evidence, slander, libel, general all-around perjury, and election fraud.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From governor.swill@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 20 20:55:05 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.skunks
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

    On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:16:39 -0000 (UTC), kron <kron@239.10.18.46>
    wrote:

    On 20 Jul 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some >news:FiXBK.493096$J0r9.284823@fx11.iad:

    On 7/20/2022 10:46 AM, >>> Jack-off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
    <dip@shit.invalid>, HIV+ cocksucker and convicted child molester,
    stupidly bawled and lied:

    On 7/20/2022 9:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    Stephen K. Bannon’s contempt of Congress trial resumed Wednesday
    with testimony from a Jan. 6 committee staffer, who told jurors that
    the panel warned Bannon of possible criminal charges after his
    lawyer first indicated that he would not comply with a congressional
    subpoena.

    Testimony from committee general counsel Kristin Amerling continued
    on the first full day of testimony after a rocky start to the
    proceeding. Bannon’s lawyers had sought a delay over questions
    about what evidence was allowed, but U.S. District Judge Carl J.
    Nichols ordered that the trial proceed, and opening statements took
    place Tuesday.

    The judge warned defense lawyers Wednesday that he would intervene
    during the questioning of witnesses to keep them from turning the
    trial into a “political circus.?

    Federal prosecutors raised concerns that Bannon’s legal defense
    seems built around the claim that the subpoena issued by the House
    committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol
    attack was “illegitimate? because it was motivated by politics.

    Bannon, the former political strategist for Donald Trump, was
    indicted on two misdemeanor contempt charges and accused of refusing
    to comply with an order from the House select committee to turn over
    records and testify about his actions ahead of the attack.

    Bannon’s lawyers have argued that their client did not
    “ignore? the committee’s formal request but was in
    negotiations with the panel.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/20/steve-bannon-trial
    -live-updates/

    Bannon was not "negotiating" with the select committee. He simply
    and flatly refused to appear and to produce the documents.

    *LOCK HIM UP*

    No ome [sic] cares anymore Ruby.

    Bannon sure the fuck cares, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell, you
    stupid HIV+ lying fat fuck.

    Still waiting for Hillary Clinton to be charged with destroying evidence, >slander, libel, general all-around perjury, and election fraud.

    Hold your breath.

    Swill
    --
    Pizzagate, Fostergate, CattleFuturesgate, Travelgate,
    Filegate, Troopergate, Whitewater, Benghazi,
    EmailGate, Uraniumgate - the list of GOP manufactured "scandals"
    involving Hillary that have never amounted to
    anything goes back for decades. The rightwing fear
    of her just goes on and on............
    - On "Hillarygate" from Usenet poster

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)