Hello,


More of my philosophy about Reinforcement learning and about Large
language models and about artificial intelligence and about Jihad in
Islam and about one other law of my new monotheistic religion and about out-of-body experiences and about the laws of my new monotheistic
religion and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ , and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so
i invite you to read my following discussion with ChatGPT so that you understand how i am explaining to ChatGPT that the probabilistic nature
is not only inherent to Large Language Models , but it is also inherent
to Reinforcement learning , so i think it is a limitation of Large
language models such as ChatGPT from OpenAI or such the new Gemini from
Google , so i invite you to carefully read my following discussion with
ChatGPT on this important subject , and of course i invite you to
carefully read the other limitations of artificial intelligence in my
below thoughts:


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:

"So i say that the other limitation of Large language models such as
GPT-4 is that they are probabilistic in nature , so then Large language
models such as GPT-4 are not designed to be highly accurate or
consistent , and it is one of there limitation , so i think that
reinforcement learning can not solve efficiently this problem , since we
can not know for sure when using Reinforcement learning it will be
highly accurate or consistent."


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your statement captures a common characteristic of large language
models like GPT-4, which is their probabilistic nature. Indeed, these
models generate responses based on probabilities learned from training
data, and as a result, they may produce different outputs for the same
input on different occasions.

Reinforcement learning, in the context of language models, is typically
used to fine-tune or guide the model's behavior based on some reward
signal. While reinforcement learning can be applied to improve aspects
of model behavior, it might not inherently address the probabilistic
nature of these models. Reinforcement learning is more focused on
optimizing for a specific objective or reward, and it may not guarantee
high accuracy or consistency in all situations.

It's essential to consider that the limitations you've highlighted are
inherent to the current state of large language models, and ongoing
research aims to address these challenges. Researchers are exploring
various techniques, including refining training strategies,
incorporating reinforcement learning, and developing more sophisticated architectures to enhance the accuracy and consistency of language
models. However, achieving perfect accuracy and consistency in natural
language understanding and generation remains a complex and evolving
area of research."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

"But there is still a problem , since we can not know for sure when Reinforcement learning will make the Large Language Model be high
accuracy or consistency , so we can not confirm it , so it is still probabilistic in nature , so it is a weakness or it is a limitation."


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"You raise a valid point. The integration of reinforcement learning in
large language models does not eliminate the inherent probabilistic
nature of these models. Reinforcement learning can guide the model
towards better performance by optimizing for specific objectives, but it doesn't guarantee deterministic outcomes in all cases.

The probabilistic nature of language models stems from the fact that
they generate responses based on learned probabilities from training
data. Even with reinforcement learning, there is uncertainty involved,
and the model's behavior can still vary depending on the context and
input it receives.

Therefore, it's accurate to view this as a limitation. The challenge is
to strike a balance between the flexibility and creativity provided by probabilistic models and the need for consistent and accurate responses. Researchers are actively exploring ways to mitigate these limitations,
but achieving complete determinism in natural language understanding and generation remains a complex and evolving area of research.

Acknowledging and understanding these limitations is crucial for
deploying language models effectively and ensuring users are aware of
the potential variability in responses. It also underscores the
importance of ongoing research and development to address these
challenges in future iterations of language models."


So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:


The other limitation of Large language models such as GPT-4 is that they
are probabilistic in nature , so then Large language models such as
GPT-4 are not designed to be highly accurate or consistent , and it is
one of there limitation , so i invite you to carefully read the
following interesting article that talks about it:

Are large language models wrong for coding?

https://www.infoworld.com/article/3697272/are-large-language-models-wrong-for-coding.html


Also so that to know the other important limitations of artificial
intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts:

I invite you to take a look at my new model of what is human
consciousness that i have just invented that permits to predict and that
shows the important limitations of artificial intelligence and that
shows that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence (AGI) , but it will become a powerful tool that will
augment humans , so the first prediction of my new model of what is
human consciousness is that artificial intelligence will not attain
artificial general intelligence but it will become a powerful tool,
second prediction of my new model is that artificial intelligence will
then mainly augment humans , but it will not replace humans , and third prediction of my model is that we have to decrypt the human brain so
that we understand deeply the human consciousness so that we augment
artificial intelligence with consciousness so that it solves the problem
and so that artificial intelligence becomes artificial general
intelligence or super intelligence , and fourth prediction is that my
new model shows that until the next step we are more safe , since in the
next step of understanding deeply human consciousness , we will be so
powerful since humanity is progressing in an exponential progress , so i
think then we will be able to help effectively humans even if artificial intelligence will be augmented with consciousness and will replace
humans. So i invite you to read my new model of what is human
consciousness in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s53zucweUIQ


But i think that the other important limitation of artificial
intelligence that also shows that artificial intelligence will not
replace humans , but will mainly augment humans , is the following:

Human intelligence and artificial intelligence do approach pattern
discovery in distinct ways.

Human Fluid Intelligence:

1- Adaptability: Human fluid intelligence refers to the ability to
quickly adapt and solve new problems. Humans can recognize patterns and
make connections based on relatively limited data or experiences.

2- Contextual Understanding: Humans often rely on contextual
understanding, drawing on a wide range of knowledge and experiences to
identify patterns. This ability to bring diverse information into play
is a hallmark of human intelligence.

3- Innate Creativity: Humans can be highly creative and draw on
intuition, imagination, and abstract thinking to identify patterns. This creativity allows for the recognition of novel patterns or the
application of existing patterns in new contexts.

Artificial Intelligence:

1- Data Dependency: AI systems, including machine learning models, often require substantial amounts of data to identify patterns effectively.
The learning process for AI involves analyzing large datasets to discern underlying patterns and relationships.

2- Algorithmic Approach: AI relies on algorithms and mathematical models
to analyze data and identify patterns. The effectiveness of AI in
pattern recognition depends on the quality of the algorithms and the
quantity and representativeness of the training data.

3- Narrow Specialization: While AI can excel in specific tasks and
domains, it may lack the broader adaptability and creativity seen in
human fluid intelligence. AI systems are often designed for specific
purposes and may struggle with tasks outside their predefined scope.

In summary, while humans can quickly adapt, understand contexts, and
exhibit creativity in pattern recognition, AI systems depend on vast
amounts of data and algorithms.


During the Meccan period (c. 610–622 CE), when the Prophet Muhammad
received revelations of the Qurʾān at Mecca, the emphasis was on the
internal dimension of jihad, termed ṣabr, which refers to the practice
of “patient forbearance” by Muslims in the face of life’s vicissitudes and toward those who wish them harm. So you have to understand that in
Islam there is the way of Jihad of ṣabr and of qitāl that were renamed jihād al-nafs (the internal, spiritual struggle against the lower self)
and jihād al-sayf (the physical combat with the sword), respectively, so
when you hear the word Jihad in Islam , it is not just Jihad of the
physical combat with the sword , and i say that you have to understand
Islam , since i say that the way of Al-Qaeda or ISIS were not the way of prophet Muhammad , since i say that prophet Muhammad has started jihād
al-sayf (the physical combat with the sword) until muslims faced a lot
of persecution and oppression , since in the early years of Islam, when
Prophet Muhammad and his followers were in Mecca, they faced persecution
and oppression from the ruling Quraysh tribe. During this period, the
emphasis was on enduring hardships with patience and engaging in
peaceful propagation of the message of Islam. Later, when the Muslims
migrated to Medina, they faced continued hostility from various groups.
It was during this time that the permission to engage in physical
combat, or armed struggle, was granted to the Muslims. This was a
defensive measure to protect themselves and their right to practice
their religion. The Quran acknowledges the right of self-defense, as
stated in Surah Al-Baqarah (2:190): "Fight in the way of Allah those who
fight you but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like
transgressors." , so it's crucial to note that even during armed
conflict, Islam lays down strict rules of engagement, emphasizing the protection of non-combatants and the humane treatment of prisoners. The
primary objective of armed struggle in Islam is self-defense and the preservation of justice, not aggression or conquest. The historical
context and circumstances surrounding specific verses in the Quran and
the actions of Prophet Muhammad are essential for a comprehensive
understanding of the concept of jihad in Islam. So i think that the 9/11
attack of Al-Qaeda on USA was not the way of Prophet Muhammad , since
muslims were "not" facing persecution and oppression from USA "like" in
the time of Prophet Muhammad, so i hope you are understanding now the
way of Jihad in Islam.


So i think you are understanding now that i am an inventor of many
philosophies that you can read in the below web links , and i am
an inventor of many proverbs that you can read in the below web links ,
and i am an inventor of a new model of what is human consciousness that
you can read below , and i am also a new inventor , that is inspired by
God , of a new monotheistic religion that i think is smart , and i am an inventor of many other things , so i think you are also understanding
that i am an inventor and i have to explain one more thing about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand it correctly , so from the thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the below web link , i think
you can logically infer another rule or law and it is that God in my new monotheistic religion doesn't need our prayers in one or another form ,
so what God in my new monotheistic religion requires so that he rewards
you is that you become enough believer in Him that makes
you enough faith in Him that makes you enter the "community" of God , so
when in my new monotheistic religion you become enough believer in God
that makes you faith in God you become a new and transformed man or
women that follows the laws and rules of my new monotheistic religion ,
and notice that from my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion you
notice that when you become enough believer in God that makes you faith in
God, it makes you think more about God , and this think more about God
is in my new monotheistic religion like the prayers to God and it is
sufficient
, other than that you can also Glorify God and say to Him that he is
beautiful 5 minutes per day or so , and not too much , and it is
the requirements of my new monotheistic religion , other than that an
essence and nature of God in my new monotheistic religion is that
God is greatly arrogant , but being greatly arrogant is not being
satanistic or being a sadist , so you have to read my thoughts
of my new monotheistic religion below so that you understand it correctly.


So now i will talk about an important subject , and it is about
out-of-body experiences , so science says the following about
out-of-body experience:

"In the fields of cognitive science and psychology OBEs are considered dissociative experiences arising from different psychological and
neurological factors. Scientists consider the OBE to be an experience
from a mental state, like a dream or an altered state of consciousness
without recourse to the paranormal."

Read more here so that you notice it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-body_experience#:~:text=In%20the%20fields%20of%20cognitive,without%20recourse%20to%20the%20paranormal.


So i have just read in the other articles , and i think science is
saying the same thing as the above , but i think that science is not
correct by saying so ,
and here is the pattern that shows that science is not correct:

I think that God is related to the the following patterns in the
following articles about the Out-Of-Body Experiences, and the pattern is
that the outer-body-experience can also "see" what is going on around
him or her even if he or her is technically dead, so it means that it is
not only a consciousness , but it is what we call a soul, and a soul
can see and think and feel as you will notice it in the following articles:

So look for example in the following interesting article that one
57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy while he was technically dead.

Read more here:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven


And read the following that also talks about study the two per cent of
outer body experience that exhibited full awareness with explicit recall
of “seeing” and “hearing” events – or out-of-body )

Read more here:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html


So i think that since it is like a soul, so i think that there is
something like a God of the monotheistic religions that exists. So i
think that the souls of humans are from God , so i think it looks like
my following new monotheistic religion that says that God has not
created the universe, but i think that he has created souls of humans.


So i have to explain more the laws of my new monotheistic religion , so
i have logically inferred the laws of my new monotheistic religion from
the nature and the essence of God in my new monotheistic religion , so
here is the nature and the essence of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So you have to understand the following two laws of my new monotheistic religion that are logically inferred from the above nature and essence
of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but after
this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being better
and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God in your
day to day life.

2 - My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

So from the above two laws of my new monotheistic religion , you can
understand that the being presentable in front of God and not being
arrogant in front of God is the being the right Love of others and the
being righteous and you have not to be a kind of violence since God
doesn't like this kind of arrogance and since God wants you to be
presentable in front of Him.

And here is the other laws of my new monotheistic religion that i have logically inferred from the above nature and essence of God:

3- In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness
since he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love
the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or
actions in the way of God, so then God can be curious like a human and
wanting to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is
surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God,
so i think that
with the other engines below logically inferred from the characteristics
of God, this is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection.


4- From those above characteristics of God we can logically infer that
when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and you have
to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have to be a beautiful patience with God and you have to be "presentable" in front of
Him when you communicate with Him, i mean that you have to be an effort
of being decently "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt
"symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful patience with God
since he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must behave with God in my
new monotheistic religion.


So the first idea of my new monotheistic religion is that God is not an evolutionary thing that comes from a type 4 or type 5 civilization,
since he can self-improve and not curse the descendants of Adam and Eve
and so he has to help humanity , and the other idea of my new
monotheistic religion is that the nature of God is "special" and God
doesn't look like an evolutionary thing like a God of type 4 or 5
civilization , so then after that my other important idea of my new monotheistic religion is that God is "special" God as his nature is
greatly arrogant and he can not self-improve it since he is a special
God as he is, since if he is not greatly arrogant, he can for example self-improve and not for example curse the descendants of Adam and Eve,
the other new idea of my new monotheistic religion is that not only Adam
and Eve and there descendants were cursed by God, but the Bible and
Qur'aan too were cursed by God, and it is why they contain scientific
errors etc., so the other idea of my new monotheistic religion is that
prophet Muhammed has been enhanced by God so that he can invent many
parts of the Qur'aan , so i say that the Qur'aan is not all the words of
God, i mean that Angel Gabriel has enhanced to a certain level prophet
Muhammad so that he also invent many parts of the Qur'aan, i mean that
Angel Gabriel has put ideas of him in the Qur'aan, and Angel Gabriel has
to certain level controlled prophet Muhammad so that he can put ideas of
him in the Qur'aan, so you are now understanding the my new ideas ,
other than that, the fact that Angel Gabriel has controlled and let
prophet Muhammad put his ideas in the Qur'aan, is a curse from God ,
other than that i think that the universe and the bodies of a humans
have not been created by God , but the souls of the humans have been
created by God, and the other idea of my new monotheistic religion is
that prophet Muhammed is not the last prophet from God, since saying
that he is the last prophet from God is part of the curse from God, and
the other ideas of my new monotheistic religion is that the laws of my
new monotheistic religion have to be universal, and of course you have
to notice how i have smartly done it by coming with universal laws and
by logically inferring them from the nature of God, and of course there
is many new ideas in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to
read them carefully so that to notice how i have done it, so you can
read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following web
link, and of course you have to notice that i am saying that i am a new
prophet from God that is inspired by God, and you can read my thoughts
of my new monotheistic religion in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/HegBjuXMQPU


I invite you to read the following interesting article from Big Think:

3 pieces of historical evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ

https://bigthink.com/thinking/was-jesus-real/


So i think i am also a new smart philosopher and you can read my new
ideas of my philosophy below, and of course you are noticing that i have
just invented a new other philosophy and you can read it in my below
previous thoughts, but i think as a new philosopher that philosophy is
not enough since i think it still needs another layer , and it is the
layer of a new efficient and smart monotheistic religion , and it is why
i have just invented quickly a new efficient and smart monotheistic
religion , and of course notice how in the thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion in the below web link i am explaining the why
philosophy is not enough , so of course my new monotheistic religion is
one of my contributions here , and you can look at my other
contributions in the below web links , so i invite you to read carefully
the thoughts of my interesting new monotheistic religion in the
following web link so that to understand how it is efficient and smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/HegBjuXMQPU


So i have just talked about Solar storms like the Carrington Event etc.
, read it in my below thoughts , but you have to know that Solar storms
like the one called Carrington Event that happened in year 1859 happen
only about every 500 years—thankfully. But smaller storms happen
frequently, and storms half as intense as the 1859 storm happen about
every 50 years , but i think we have not to be pessimistic about it
since if we have warning that a solar storm is on its way, we can take
steps to protect electrical grids, communications systems, and
satellites in Earth orbit. And we can warn astronauts on the
International Space Station. During a solar storm would not be a good
time to go for a space walk. And you have to know that there are
satellites called GOES satellites that monitor the Sun for solar storms
and warn us of incoming danger. So i think we have not to be pessimistic
about it.

You can read more here about it:

https://scijinks.gov/what-was-the-carrington-event/


I have just looked at the following new video of a known techlead , and
i invite you to look at it:

CES 2024: Top Tech Trends. AI. "Coding is Dead"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu6i2lgc-uY


So this known techlead is saying in the above video that coding is dead
because of the way of low code and no code using AI , but i think he is
not smart by saying so , since no code and low code development
platforms use "rigid" templates that are available to all. You can’t
offer any advanced features or differentiated capabilities, which makes
it hard to stand out from the crowd. No wonder the top developers don’t
use low code platforms to innovate, despite the hype associated with
them. Also you have to take a look in the following web link at my new
model that i have just invented that explains what is human
consciousness and that permits to predict , and you can read it
carefully in the following web link , so the first prediction of my new
model of what is human consciousness is that artificial intelligence
will not attain artificial general intelligence but it will become a
powerful tool, second prediction of my new model is that artificial intelligence will then mainly augment humans , but it will not replace
humans , and third prediction of my model is that we have to decrypt the
human brain so that we understand deeply the human consciousness so that
we augment artificial intelligence with consciousness so that it solves
the problem and so that artificial intelligence becomes artificial
general intelligence or super intelligence , and fourth prediction is
that my new model shows that until the next step we are more safe ,
since in the next step of understanding deeply human consciousness , we
will be so powerful since humanity is progressing in an exponential
progress , so i think then we will be able to help effectively humans
even if artificial intelligence will be augmented with consciousness and
will replace humans. So i invite you to read my new model of what is
human consciousness in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s53zucweUIQ


Also here is how i am explaining in a sophisticated manner the genetic algorithm:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
of course so that to know from where comes the human being, i am
explaining in the above web link the genetic algorithm , so of course
you have to read it carefully above , so notice that the genetic
algorithm explains how human being has been constructed by nature , i
mean that there is two things in human genetics , so there is the
mutations and there is the crossover of the human genes and there is the selection process like with the natural selection , so the selection
process can be elitistic or more elitistic so that it looks like the
natural selection in the evolution process of humans , and notice
carefully that the human genetic mutations comes from two things: from
the solar storms that can mutate our genetics and from the genetic
mutations that can happen inside the body , and of course the two can
happen with a low probability , but it permits to explore , and of
course you have to read my following thoughts of what is the genetic
algorithm so that to understand the rest:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i
think i am also a new philosopher and i will now discover important
patterns with my fluid intelligence about the genetic algorithm, and
they are the following: So i think that the most important thing to
understand in the genetic algorithm is that when you do a crossover of
the genes of the parents, you have the tendency to obtain new childs
that look like the parents, so it is why in optimization we can say that
the genetic algorithm explores locally near the local optima with the
crossover steps and we call it exploitation, and in the genetic
algorithm , with the mutations of the genes after the crossover steps
that can be of a probability of around 5% or so, permits to explore far
away for better genes and it permits to not get stuck in a local optima
and to continu to converge towards the global optima and it permits to
not lack on diversity of the genes of the population, so this way in the genetic algorithm of balancing the exploitation with the crossover steps
and with the exploration with mutations is a much better search than
brute force search, and it is why the genetic algorithm is also used in optimization problems with success, and of course you have to understand
that the the crossover steps can be elitistic, i mean that you can
crossover the parents that have the best genes.

So i have just talked more about stocks investing , so i think that cryptocurrency investing is much less interesting than stocks investing ,
since i think that the main problem is that you can not forecast better
as i am explaining it below , so the problematic is on the value , since
in cryptocurrency the value comes from the supply and demand rule , but
it is
not sufficient , since the supply and demand rule is not a good
indicator that permits you to forecast better , but in stocks investing
, for example when you know that a startup has come with something
interesting , so you can forecast better by saying that people will
start to buy much more stocks from it , so you will know that it will
increase more and more the stock price , and it will permit to forecast
in a better way and in a good way that will make you "rich" , so i think
that stocks investing is much more interesting than cryptocurrency
investing , so it is why i think that cryptocurrency investment has to
be done for only small amount of money since it is "too" risky , so i
invite you to read my below previous thoughts so that to understand my
views as a new philosopher:


So i think i am understanding more cryptocurrency investment by
discovering important patterns with my fluid intelligence, so i think
from the important pattern of the tendency below of the average daily percentage change for the important cryptocurrencies , that the
problematic is that of the "volatility" of cryptocurrency price that can
go down and can go up , but you can not forecast better as we are doing
it in the stock investing , since when in the stocks investing we are
investing in a company that is doing well , so the stock price can go up
and up , so we can better forecast , also if you are investing in stocks
in index funds by diversifying your investment, so it is the same , so
you can be more safe with both investing in stocks in companies that are
doing well or in index funds by diversifying your investments , but in cryptocurrency investment there is no such mechanisms , so it is why i
think that cryptocurrency investment has to be done for only small
amount of money since it is "too" risky , so it is not so interesting.
So i invite you to read my below previous thoughts:


So i think i am also a new philosopher and you can read my new ideas of
my philosophies in the below web links , but now i will talk about two
subjects , and it is about cryptocurrency investing and about will there
be any De-Dollarization , so , and firstly , i will say that
cryptocurrency investing is not so interesting , since i think that the
main problem is to notice that the most important pattern is that the
average daily percentage change for the important cryptocurrencies

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)