XPost: alt.culture.indonesia, alt.soc.indonesia, soc.culture.indonesia
XPost: alt.fan.countries.bangladesh

“But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the
sign of the prophet Jonas:” [Matthew 12:39 (KJV)]

#142 - 3 NOVEMBER 2020 as [#6, #20, #10, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#466 - *LIVING* *BEING* (SEE #436 - *SOUL* / ODE TO KANT POEM NATURE
(EGA) METALOGIC #166 + #270 = #436 BELOW) as [#10, #6, #50, #400] /
#476 - *TO* *BRING* *INTO* *ONE'S* *FELLOWSHIP* *OR* *INTIMACY* as [#10,
#6, #50, #400, #10] /
#91 as [#20, #10, #6, #50, #5] = yôwnâh (H3123): {UMBRA: #71 % #41 =
#30} 1) *dove*, *pigeon*;

Jack Guy, Mick Krever and Amy Cassidy (CNN) @ 1718 HOURS ON 2 NOVEMBER
2020: "WHALE OF A RIDE: CRASHED SUBWAY TRAIN LANDS ON GIANT SEA CREATURE SCULPTURE

A subway train in the Netherlands was saved from a spectacular crash
when it burst through buffers and landed on an artwork in the shape of a
whale tail.

The train "shot through on approach" to De Akkers station around 12.30
a.m. local time, RET, the transport operator in the city of Rotterdam,
said in a statement Monday.

"To our relief, the metro operator got out of the vehicle unharmed. He
is doing well under the circumstances. There were no passengers
present," the company said.

An investigation is underway and RET is discussing how best to salvage
the train, the company said." [<https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/02/europe/subway-train-netherlands-buffers-scli-intl/index.html>]

We include herewith relevant DETAILS of our response letter to the
AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as it pertains to our
reasonable objection of 20 YEARS to the AMP SALARY CONTINUANCE INSURANCE
which is that the AB INITIO architecture of the insurance contract
deploys the same #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD / #65 - SOLDIER AT WAR context exclusion together with a #291 - PRINCIPLE OF OBSTRUCTIVE CAUSE being a dichotomy of terms "TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY" made against the
freewill and autonomy of a person.

WHEREIN WE ASK THE REASONABLE QUESTION RELATED [AS #44 - TRIGGER FOR OCCULTATION AGAINST #27 - DUTIES ON #44 - 20 APRIL AS HITLER'S BIRTHDAY
/ #31 - 21 APRIL AS QUEEN'S BIRTHDAY] TO ROMAN CATHOLIC INACTION OVER TERRORISM:

EQUINOX 20 MARCH 1996 [TOTAL ECLIPSE 20 MARCH 2015]: 5 x #364 + #182 =
12 SEPTEMBER 2001 as #2002 DAYS MINUS #1827 DAYS AS *EUCHARIST* = #175 - *MARRIAGE*

WAS IT DUE ENTIRELY TO THEIR PLEASURE WITHIN THE ACTS BECAUSE THEY TOO
WOULD DERIVE POLITICAL GAIN...

That these CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS also comprise matters of an ILLEGALITY
DEFENCE associated with what we reasonably allege was an #1551 -
UNLAWFUL LIQUOR BAN aligned to IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM AS
JINGOISTIC #417 - ANATHEMA and CONTEMPT OF LIFE made against any
notional #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL in accordance with an
ANTHROPOCENTRIC IDENTITY OF CITIZEN having COMPLIANCE to the ONTIC
JURISPRUDENT premise of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT in being a #291
- PRINCIPLE OF OBSTRUCTIVE CAUSE (eg: IRISH GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT v's
VICTORIA BY THE GRACE OF GOD OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, QUEEN, DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, EMPRESS OF INDIA TO ALL TO WHOM
THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME) OCCASIONING THE #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD
STATUE MEMORIAL OF 17 MARCH 2017 / #65 - IMPROPER POPPY WREATH UPON THE
BOER WAR MEMORIAL ON 8 JUNE 2017 BEING CONTEMPORANEOUS EVENTS TO THE
#291 - SOIL SAMPLE #1701 - COLLECTION FOR AN INTERMENT AT THE HYDE PARK
WAR MEMORIAL AS AN IMPIOUS IMPOST MADE DURING THE ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018.

YOUTUBE: "Falco - Vienna Calling (Official Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTlSjRMx5Ic>

TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your #430 - SOUL.

#436 - SUNDAY 25 OCTOBER 2020 as [#50, #80, #300, #6] /
#436 as [#6, #50, #80, #300] /
#446 as [#6, #50, #80, #300, #10] /
#456 as [#20, #50, #80, #300, #6] /
#456 as [#6, #20, #50, #80, #300] /
#466 as [#30, #50, #80, #300, #6] /
#430 - QUESTION OF LAW / #393 - CASUS DATAE LEGIS as [#50, #80, #300] =
nephesh (H5315): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) soul, self, life,
creature, person, appetite, mind, living being, desire, emotion,
passion; 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being,
soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with
life in the blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e)
seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity
of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i)
activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;

You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE (or #339 - SEPULCHRE / CENOTAPH)."

TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past treatment of me that as of the new #713 - *YEAR* we will not be having
another contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and
we will are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you
are going to have to recognise the fact that you are a #288 - *BLASPHEMER*.

Your religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."

PERTAINING TO THE SUBSTANCE AND VERACITY OF TWO TELEPHONE CALLS GIVEN
THEIR DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION BY CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE
INSURER AND OUR SUBSEQUENT ALLEGATIONS OF UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT AGAINST ANOTHER PARTY AS AN INSURER WITHIN CASE NUMBER: 740507. AS A MATTER
WHICH HAS BEEN JEOPARDISED BY THE UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF AFCA IN DELIBERATELY SABOTAGING THAT CASE NUMBER.

A #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW RELATED TO #261 - BINOMIAL CLAMPING /
#268 - TESTIMONY FROM EXPERIENCE AND FIDELITY TO #288 - TEMPORAL EVENTS (HISTORICAL REVISIONISM)

5 x #41 = #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE SUBSTANCE:

[#27, {@1: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#27); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#27)}

#61, {@2: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#34); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#88)}

#63, {@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego:
63 - WATCH: SHIH (#151)}

#75, {@4: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING
TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#226)}

#21, {@5: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#172); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#247)}

#71, {@6: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#247); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#318)}

#20, {@7: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#261: BINOMIAL CLAMPING BY THE
ROMAN / TORAH GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL STASIS); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN
(#338: REMEMBRANCE DAY 11 NOVEMBER)}

#41, {@8: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#316); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#379)}

#81] {@9: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#371: NOTE ECCLESIASTICAL
CALENDAR #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - EUCHARIST); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#460)}

4 x #41 = #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (TIME): #2184 - FABRIC OF TIME HEURISTIC




<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>

MALE: @104 + @157 = #261 - LAWFULNESS OF BINOMIAL CLAMPING {ie. #141 +
#120 = #261} RELATED TO #268 - TESTIMONY FROM EXPERIENCE AND FIDELITY TO
#288 - TEMPORAL EVENTS (HISTORICAL REVISIONISM)

FEME: @146 + @148 + @192 = #486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70,
#10, #200] = bárbaros (G915): {UMBRA: #72 as #476 - *TO* *BRING* *INTO* *ONE'S* *FELLOWSHIP* *OR* *INTIMACY* % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is
rude, rough and harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language
which is not understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF*
*ANY* *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER*
*MENTAL* *OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of
rudeness and brutality. The word is used in the N.T. without the idea of reproachfulness.;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #747 as [#1, #40, #6, #700] = ʼâmôwn (H527):
{UMBRA: #5 as #97 % #41 = #15} 1) artificer, architect, master workman;
2) (CLBL) throng, multitude;

YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
(doctor who)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5Aui3Zu9E>

— BLESSED IRISH —

"ONCE A GIRL NAMED MARY,
PREGNANT WITH A DISEASE.
BEING SO QUITE CONTRARY.
DID EVERYONE DISPLEASE.

BUT AMONGST THE IRISH.
‘TWAS KILLER OF A DAME.
REMEMBRANCE FLOURISH.
THE DAY NEVER THE SAME." {@9: Sup: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#333); Ego:
45 - GREATNESS: TA (#409)}

#409 as [#1, #300, #8, #100] = sâchaq (H7832): {UMBRA: #0 as #408 % #41
= #39} 1) to laugh, play, mock; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *LAUGH* (*USUALLY*
*IN* *CONTEMPT* *OR* *DERISION*); 1a2) to sport, play; 1b) (Piel); 1b1)
to make sport; 1b2) to jest; 1b3) to play (including instrumental music, singing, dancing); 1c) (Hiphil) to laugh mockingly;

That poem is actually a historical and factual statement about typhoid
Mary an Irish woman who died on 11 NOVEMBER 1938 and not an idealism
purveyed by a chimeric reality: #476 as [#6, #5, #200, #5, #200, #10,
#700] / #410 as [#5, #200, #5, #200] = harhôr (H2031): {UMBRA: #7 as
#410 % #41 = #41} 1) mental conception, fantasy, image, mental picture,
fancy, imagining;

But you can probably guess what sort of appalling shadow it casts...

THUSLY WE WOULD PRUDENTLY AND SIMILARLY CONCLUDE THAT THE MARION / CHILD
STATUE IS A PUBLIC INDECENCY BY ITS POSE IN ACTUALLY EMBODYING AS
GROUNDING (#298: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA / *ROCK*) THIS SAME CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING #1934 - *TO* *PRESENT* *A* *PERSON* *FOR* *ANOTHER* *TO*
*SEE* AND THAT THE PAPAL STATEMENT ON EUROPEAN LEADERS EXHIBITING CHARACTERISTICS OF HITLER IN 1934 AS THE LEADUP TO WORLD WAR II IS
SUBTERFUGE BY ITS ANALOGIES TO EATING AND #491 - PATER FAMILIAS (BY
MEANS OF SINISTER #419 - CONTROLLING ACTION AS MANUS THUGGERY) AS AN
ERECTION OF THE STATUE UPON SAINT PATRICK’S DAY WITHOUT REGARD FOR 800 NEWBORN BODIES SUBSEQUENTLY BEING EXHUMED IN IRELAND AS A ROMAN CATHOLIC TRAVESTY MADE AGAINST HUMAN DIGNITY

"THINKEST THOU THAT I CANNOT NOW PRAY TO MY FATHER, AND HE SHALL PRESENTLY-G3936 GIVE-G3936 ME MORE THAN TWELVE LEGIONS OF ANGELS?"
[Matthew 26:53]

It is simple logic that if the feral Tunisian slum dog used both the
QURAN occasioning claims of adherence to the greatest of ISLAMIC ideals
then by what prerogative excepting RAPACIOUS BLASPHEMY would JOKO WIDODO
take an OATH of OFFICE as INDONESIAN PRESIDENT with a QURAN held above
his head.

They both claim the same value such that the QURAN rules the will as
being above the head.

YOUTUBE: “Hello, Future (Moby “Be The One”)”

<https://youtu.be/aT8OUOiXtIQ>

Furthermore the NICE attack as *SCRAG* within a place of worship was by
an adherent of belief having an intention to slaughter conveying a
manner of life which is unchanged since 11 September 2001.

YOUTUBE: "Imagine Dragons - Demons (Official Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWRsgZuwf_8>

scrag (verb)
1 informal, mainly British handle roughly; beat up: my brothers were
hoping he'd put a foot wrong so they could scrag him.
• Rugby grasp (an opponent) by placing an arm around the neck: he was scragged by Budd and Cooper came away with the ball.
2 archaic or US kill by strangling or hanging: many an honester man than
her has been scragged.
• US informal, dated kill; murder: you can think up a nicer way of
scragging me than by drowning, because you know I loathe water.

(noun)
1 an unattractively thin person or animal: his companion was a thin
scrag of a man.
2 archaic, informal a person's neck.

ORIGIN: mid 16th century (as a noun): perhaps an alteration of Scots and northern English crag ‘neck’. The verb (mid 18th century) developed the sense ‘handle roughly’ from the early use ‘hang, strangle’.

WISDOM IS JUSTIFIED BY HER CHILDREN

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Dark%20Raven.pdf>

Initial Post: 3 November 2020

THUS WE REASONABLY CONCLUDE THAT THE ONTIC CONTEXT #259 - SLITTING THE
THROAT ACCOMPANIED BY A VOTIVE *EXPLETIVE*: Allahu Akbar as a phrase
meaning ‘*GOD* IS MOST *GREAT*', is NOT AN INTRINSIC PIETY but evidence
of a #215 - SELF CONTRADICTION which is also due to an INHERENT LOGICAL
FALLACY as being the product of an encapsulated mindset subject to the STOICHEION impetus ...

#142 - 3 NOVEMBER 2020 as [#6, #20, #10, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#91 as [#20, #10, #6, #50, #5] = yôwnâh (H3123): {UMBRA: #71 % #41 =
#30} 1) *dove*, *pigeon*;

— ODE TO KANT —

“THERE IS A ROCK.
RIGHT BY THE SEA.
ONE TOOK STOCK.
PLACED IT FOR ME.

FOR SUCH A DAY.
AS THIS EVER BE.
BUT WHAT’S IT SAY.
OF LIBERTY FREE?

WE MIGHT KNOW.
IF WE COULD READ.
OF FRATERNITY SOW.
AND EGLATE PLEAD."

FIRSTLY WE NOTE THAT THE NATURAL EGO HAS A #CENTRE OF VALUE #45 - I AM
NOT A DOER OF WRONG AS ONTIC NECESSITY CONSTITUTED BY ELEMENTS #41, #43,
#45, #46 AS BEING A *LOGICAL* *FALLACY* INHERENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN
BINOMIAL STOICHEION:

[#41, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41)}

#43, {@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#44); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#84 - I
AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2})}

#45, {@3: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#92); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#129)}

#46] {@4: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#105); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO
(#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

GRUMBLE (#105 - *STONE*, #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD)@[41, 41, 3, 43, 48,
45, 13, 46]

FEME: @84 + @175 = #259

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #259

#259 as [#3, #200, #6, #50] /
#259 as [#3, #200, #6, #700] = gârôwn (H1627): {UMBRA: #259 % #41 = #13}
1) *neck*, *throat*; 1a) neck; 1b) throat; 1b1) of open sepulchre (fig.);

#259 as [#50, #2, #200, #1, #6] /
#259 as [#2, #200, #1, #50, #6] = bârâʼ (H1254): {UMBRA: #203 % #41 =
#39} 1) to create, shape, form; 1a) (Qal) to shape, fashion, create
(always with God as subject); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of
individual man; 1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth;
1b2) of birth; 1b3) of something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1)
to *cut* *down*; 1c2) to *cut* *out*; 1d) to be fat; 1d1) (Hiphil) to
make yourselves fat;

#303 - 3 NOVEMBER 2020 as [#5, #8, #200, #10, #40, #600] /
#259 as [#6, #5, #8, #200, #600] = châram (H2763): {UMBRA: #248 % #41 =
#2} 1) to ban, devote, destroy utterly, completely destroy, dedicate for destruction, exterminate; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to prohibit (for common
use), ban; 1a2) to consecrate, devote, dedicate for destruction; 1a3) to exterminate, completely destroy; 1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be put under the
ban, be devoted to destruction; 1b2) to be devoted, be forfeited; 1b3)
to be completely destroyed; 1c) to *split*, *slit*, *mutilate* (*a*
*part* *of* *the* *body*); 1c1) (Qal) to mutilate; 1c2) (Hiphil) to divide;

#214 as [#10, #4, #200] /
#284 - 3 NOVEMBER 2020 as [#30, #50, #4, #200] /
#259 as [#5, #50, #4, #200] = nâdar (H5087): {UMBRA: #254 % #41 = #8} 1)
*to* *vow*, make a vow; 1a) (Qal) to vow a vow;

#259 as [#70, #100, #40, #8, #40, #1] = hórmēma (G3731): {UMBRA: #259 %
#41 = #13} 1) a rush, impulse; 2) that which is *impelled* or *hurried*
*away* by *impulse*;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.

#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.

#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.

#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.

 #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.

 #CANON: #45

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{

@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),

 @2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#3); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#2),

 @3: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#46); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#43),

 @4: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#91); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#45 -
I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),

Male: #91; Feme: #45

} // #45

THE METALOGIC #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY TO THE POEM IS AS FOLLOWS

NATURE: {Ego}
8 22 24 #54 +
39 45 28 #112 = #166 +
37 34 33 #104 = #270

#166 + #270 = #436 - EQUINOX ET AL AS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION

NURTURE: {Supernal}
6 12 13 #31 +
34 40 23 #97 = #128 +
32 29 28 #89 = #217

#128 + #217 = #345 AS THE SUPERNAL PAIRING TO #405 - FIRE WHICH IS THE
#291 - PRINCIPLE OF OBSTRUCTIVE CAUSE WHICH WE DETERMINE BY AN
INSTANTIATION OF BINOMIAL STOICHEION SUPERNAL ELEMENTS

SYNCRETIC: {Amalgam}
28 34 53 #115 +
22 23 6 #51 = #166 +
13 12 8 #33 = #199

#166 + #199 = #365

TOTAL: #436 + #345 + #365 = #1511

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:1511>

#1511 as [#1, #400, #300, #800, #10] /
#1371 as [#1, #400, #300, #70, #400, #200] = autós (G846): {UMBRA: #971
% #41 = #28} 1) himself, herself, themselves, itself; 2) he, she, it; 3)
the same;

#1511 as [#2, #30, #1, #200, #500, #8, #40, #70, #400, #200, #10, #50] = blasphēméō (G987): {UMBRA: #1586 % #41 = #28} 1) to speak reproachfully, rail at, revile, calumniate, *blaspheme*; 2) to be evil spoken of,
reviled, railed at;

WE WONDER WHY THESE ISLAMISTS DON'T CONSIDER THEIR *ARSENOKOITE* MANNER
TO BE BLASPHEMY IN AN OF ITSELF?

----------

42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}

[#47, #44, #41, #48, #45, #42, #49, #46, #43] = #405

#EARTH@[#47, {@1: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#47); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN
(#47)}
#44, {@2: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#57); Ego: 44 -
STOVE: TSAO (#91 - *TRIGGER* *FOR* *ONTIC* *BREACH*)}
#41, {@3: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#108); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#132)}
#48, {@4: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#126); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#180 - I
COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})}
#45, {@5: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#189); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#225)}
#42, {@6: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#213); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#267)}
#49, {@7: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#286); Ego: 49
- FLIGHT: T'AO (#316)}
#46, {@8: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#324); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO
(#362)}
#43] {@9: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#405); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#405)}

GRUMBLE (#405, #405)@[47, 47, 10, 44, 51, 41, 18, 48, 63, 45, 24, 42,
73, 49, 38, 46, 81, 43]

FEME: @180 = #180

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #180

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:405>

METALOGIC (#837 - *ARSENOKOITE*, #810 - *IMAGINATION*, *IMAGE*, *IDOL*, *PICTURE*)@[47, 47, 13, 47, 23, 10, 67, 44, 37, 51, 78, 41, 15, 18, 63,
48, 45, 63, 9, 45, 33, 24, 75, 42, 67, 73, 35, 49, 73, 38, 38, 46, 38,
81, 81, 43]

#FOUR: #186 as #24 - JOY (LE)
#FIVE: #307 as #64 - SINKING (CH'EN) = #493

#FOUR: #199 as #37 - PURITY (TS'UI)
#FIVE: #270 - *HETEROS* *CONTRADICTION* as #27 - *DUTIES* (SHIH) = #469

#FOUR: #212 as #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG)
#FIVE: #433 as #28 - CHANGE (KENG) = #645

TOTAL: #1607

#1607 as [#1, #200, #300, #1, #300, #5, #800] = astatéō (G790): {UMBRA:
#1607 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *WANDER* *ABOUT*, *TO* *ROVE* *WITHOUT* *A*
*SETTLED* *ABODE*;

1607 as [#40, #5, #300, #1, #30, #30, #1, #200, #200, #800] = metallássō (G3337): {UMBRA: #1607 % #41 = #8} 1) to exchange, *CHANGE*;

#1607 - *IZMIR* BEING THE LOCATION OF THE EARTHQUAKE ON 20 OCTOBER 2020
as [#200, #40, #400, #100, #50, #10, #7, #800] = smyrnízō (G4669):
{UMBRA: #1607 % #41 = #8} 1) to be like myrrh; 2) to mix and so flavour
with myrrh; 2a) wine with myrrh: i.e. wine flavoured with myrrh. The
ancients used to infuse myrrh into wine to give it a more agreeable
fragrance and flavour;

#1607 as [#200, #300, #100, #1, #300, #5, #400, #40, #1, #200, #10, #50]
= stráteuma (G4753): {UMBRA: #1347 % #41 = #35} 1) an army; 2) a *BAND*
*OF* *SOLDIERS*; 3) bodyguard, guards men;

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:837,810,493,469,645,1607>

MALE: @150 = #150

FEME: @104 + @148 = #252

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #402

----------

#1511 as [#70, #100, #20, #800, #40, #70, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
horkōmosía (G3728): {UMBRA: #1311 % #41 = #40} 1) *affirmation* *made*
*on* *oath*, the taking of an oath, an oath;

@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE [24x7 / PROTOTYPE #EIGHT]

@215 <— SELF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* MINUS #81 - *JUXTAPOSED*
*PRINCIPLES* *OF* *SOVEREIGN* {6.5.5.41.0} / *AUTONOMY* {3.5.5.41.0}}
EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 -
#215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}} {ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @215 -
12 MAY 1942}

@157 <— IMPETUS FOR VEXATIOUS IMPERATIVES {#360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL
2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT {#360 - #157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203 % #41 = #39} 1) well, *PIT*, spring as *RITUAL* *CONJURING* *PIT* impetus for #381 - *NECROMANCY*}

@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA

@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)

@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)

@181 <-- *TO* *CAUSE* *ONESELF* *TO* *BE* *BLESSED* *OF* *GOD* / @180 -
I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
@45 = #1371 as [#70, #200, #500, #400, #1, #200] = osphŷs (G3751):
{UMBRA: #2 as #1370 % #41 = #17} 1) the hip (loin); 1a) to gird, gird
about, the loins; 2) a loin, the (two) loins; 2a) *THE* *PLACE* *WHERE*
*THE* *HEBREWS* *THOUGHT* *THE* *GENERATIVE* *POWER* (*SEMEN*) *RESIDED*;

G591@{
@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#82); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#81),
@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#152); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#151),
@4: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#226); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#155),
@5: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#290); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#226),
@6: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#311); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#264),
@7: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#337); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#269),
@8: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#373); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#279),
@9: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#447); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#317),
Male: #447; Feme: #317
} // #1370

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1019 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
I am not one who curseth the king.

#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#100); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#119); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN
(#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM
NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#1370 as [#1, #80, #70, #4, #800, #200, #5, #10, #200] = *apodídōmi*
(G591): {UMBRA: #0 as #1019 % #41 = #35} 1) to deliver, to give away for
one's own profit what is one's own, to sell; 2) to pay off, discharge
what is due; 2a) a debt, wages, tribute, taxes, produce due; 2b) things promised under oath; 2c) conjugal duty; 2d) to render account; 3) to
give back, restore; 4) to requite, recompense in a good or a bad sense;

"AGAIN, YE HAVE HEARD THAT IT HATH BEEN SAID BY THEM OF OLD TIME, THOU
SHALT NOT FORSWEAR THYSELF, BUT SHALT PERFORM-G591 UNTO THE LORD THINE
OATHS:" [Matthew 5:33]

---------

46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}

[#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49] = #405 as [#100, #300, #5]
= qâsheh (H7186): {UMBRA: #405 % #41 = #36} 1) hard, cruel, severe,
obstinate; 1a) hard, difficult; 1b) severe; 1c) fierce, intense,
vehement; 1d) stubborn, stiff of neck, stiff-necked; 1e) rigorous (of
battle);

#FIRE@[#41, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41)}
#42, {@2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#43); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
YING (#83)}
#43, {@3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#88); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#126)}
#44, {@4: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#96); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#170)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#149); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215
- I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}
#46, {@6: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#167); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#261)} #47, {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#232); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#308)}
#48, {@8: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#264); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#356)}
#49] {@9: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#345); Ego: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#405)}

GRUMBLE (#345, #405)@[41, 41, 2, 42, 45, 43, 8, 44, 53, 45, 18, 46, 65,
47, 32, 48, 81, 49]

FEME: @215 = #215 - SELF CONTRADICTION WHICH ISN'T IN THE ROMAN PROTOTYPE

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #215

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:345>

INSTANTIATION OF SUPERNAL ELEMENTS: [41, 2, 45, 8, 53, 18, 65, 32, 81]

[41, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41)}

2, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE
{%2}); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#43)}

45, {@3: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#91); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#88)}

8, {@4: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#106); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#96)}

53, {@5: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#174); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#149)}

18, {@6: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#179); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#167)}

65, {@7: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#249); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#232)}

32, {@8: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#270); Ego: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#264)}

81] {@9: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#291); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#345)}

GRUMBLE (#291, #345)@[41, 41, 43, 2, 7, 45, 15, 8, 68, 53, 5, 18, 70,
65, 21, 32, 21, 81]

MALE: @84 = #84

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #84

On 3/11/20 5:50 am, dolf wrote:> I HAVE GIVEN MORE THOUGHT ON THIS:>

THERE ARE PROBABLY MULTIPLE APPROACHES HOWEVER AS INFORMAL OPINION

GIVEN THE> #298 - *ROCK* DIALECTIC OF 13 ELEMENTS CONVEYED BY THE "ODE
TO KANT" POEM

MIGHT BE A REASONABLE DRIVER, A SINGLE OBJECTIVE POINT MIGHT BE THE TELOS INTERSECTION OF #465 / #205 CENTRE SPIRAL [#46, #41 COMMON ELEMENTS] AS #FIVE GIZMO PLANE SINCE THERE IS AN INCOMMENSURABILITY BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM DUE TO A COMMON PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL DEPENDENCY AS METASASIS IMPETUS OF MIND

THE RESULTANT NOUMENON ENTRY IS ASSOCIATED TO NOUS #53

THIS IS ALSO EXCEPTION NOUS WITHIN THE TELEOLOGICAL INTERSECTIONS of the #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF

MATERIALITY> to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and their subsequent
ONTIC DIALECTIC:

*FACILITATORS* / *ARBITRATORS* OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN>>>>> COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC JINGOISTIC IDENTITY

IT IS *UNEQUIVOCALLY* A PRECEDENCE CLAIM MADE OF SOVEREIGN RIGHT
conveying the IDEA template for those LETTERS PATENT

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

THE OBJECTIVE MIGHT BE *FRAMED* BY TELOS INTERSECTION #405 / #205

[@156, {@1: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH

(#75)}>>

@158, {@2: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER
{%15}); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#152)}

@161, {@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#216); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#232)}

@166] {@4: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#290); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#236)}>>
GRUMBLE (#290, #236)@[75, 75, 71, 77, 70, 80, 74, 4]

MALE: @146 = #146

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146

KANT'S IDEA @290: "Everything that is to be given to us as object must
be given to us in intuition. But all our intuition happens only by means
of the senses; the understanding intuits nothing, but only reflects. Now
since, in accordance with what has just been proven, the senses never
and in no single instance enable us to cognize things in themselves, but
only their appearances, and as these are mere representations of
sensibility, “consequently all bodies together with the space in which
they are found must be taken for nothing but mere representations in us,
and exist nowhere else than merely in our thoughts.” Now is this not
manifest idealism?

Idealism consists in the claim that there are none other than thinking
beings; the other things that we believe we perceive in intuition are
only representations in thinking beings, to which in fact no object
existing outside these beings corresponds. I say in opposition: There
are things given to us as objects of our senses existing outside us, yet
we know nothing of them as they may be in themselves, but are
acquaintedg only with their appearances, that is, with the
representations that they produce in us because they affect our senses.
Accordingly, I by all means avow that there are bodies outside us, that
is, things which, though completely unknownh to us as to what they may
be in themselves, we knowi through the representations which their
influence on our sensibility provides for us, and to which we give the
name of a body – which word therefore merely signifies the appearance of
this object that is unknown to us but is nonetheless real. Can this be
called idealism? It is the very opposite of it.

That one could, without detracting from the actual existence of outer
things, say of a great many of their predicates: they belong not to
these things in themselves, but only to their appearances and have no
existence of their own outside our representation, is something that was
gener- ally accepted and acknowledged long before Locke’s time, though
more commonly thereafter. To these predicates belong warmth, color,
taste, etc. That I, however, even beyond these, include (for weighty
reasons) also among mere appearances the remaining qualities of bodies,
which are called primarias: extension, place, and more generally space
along with everything that depends on it (impenetrability or
materiality, shape, etc.), is something against which not the least
ground of uncertainty can be raised; and as little as someone can be
called an idealist because he wants to admit colors as properties that
attach not to the object in itself, but only to the sense of vision as
modifications, just as little can my system be called idealist simply
because I find that even more of, nay, all of the properties that make
up the intuition of a body belong merely to its appearance: for the
existence of the thing that appears is not thereby nullified, as with
real idealism, but it is only shown that through the senses we cannot
cognize it at all as it is in itself.

I would very much like to know how then my claims must be *framed* so as
not to contain any idealism. Without doubt I would have to say: that the
representation of space not only is perfectly in accordance with the
relation that our sensibility has to objects, for I have said that, but
that it [IDEA @290] is even fully similar to the object; an assertion to
which I can attach no sense, any more than to the assertion that the
sensation of red is similar to the property of cinnabar that excites

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)