I HAVE GIVEN MORE THOUGHT ON THIS:
THERE ARE PROBABLY MULTIPLE APPROACHES HOWEVER AS INFORMAL OPINION GIVEN THE #298 - *ROCK* DIALECTIC OF 13 ELEMENTS CONVEYED BY THE "ODE TO KANT" POEM MIGHT BE A REASONABLE DRIVER, A SINGLE OBJECTIVE POINT MIGHT BE THE TELOS INTERSECTION OF #465 / #205 CENTRE SPIRAL [#46, #41 COMMON ELEMENTS] AS
#FIVE GIZMO PLANE SINCE THERE IS AN INCOMMENSURABILITY BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM DUE TO A COMMON PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL DEPENDENCY AS METASASIS IMPETUS OF MIND
THE RESULTANT NOUMENON ENTRY IS ASSOCIATED TO NOUS #53
THIS IS ALSO EXCEPTION NOUS WITHIN THE TELEOLOGICAL INTERSECTIONS of the
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and their subsequent ONTIC DIALECTIC:
*FACILITATORS* / *ARBITRATORS* OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN >>>>> COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC JINGOISTIC IDENTITY
IT IS *UNEQUIVOCALLY* A PRECEDENCE CLAIM MADE OF SOVEREIGN RIGHT
conveying the IDEA template for those LETTERS PATENT
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
THE OBJECTIVE MIGHT BE *FRAMED* BY TELOS INTERSECTION #405 / #205
[@156, {@1: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75)}
@158, {@2: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER
{%15}); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#152)}
@161, {@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#216); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#232)}
@166] {@4: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#290); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#236)} >>
GRUMBLE (#290, #236)@[75, 75, 71, 77, 70, 80, 74, 4]
MALE: @146 = #146
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146
KANT'S IDEA @290: "Everything that is to be given to us as object must
be given to us in intuition. But all our intuition happens only by means
of the senses; the understanding intuits nothing, but only reflects. Now
since, in accordance with what has just been proven, the senses never
and in no single instance enable us to cognize things in themselves, but
only their appearances, and as these are mere representations of
sensibility, “consequently all bodies together with the space in which
they are found must be taken for nothing but mere representations in us,
and exist nowhere else than merely in our thoughts.” Now is this not
manifest idealism?
Idealism consists in the claim that there are none other than thinking
beings; the other things that we believe we perceive in intuition are
only representations in thinking beings, to which in fact no object
existing outside these beings corresponds. I say in opposition: There
are things given to us as objects of our senses existing outside us, yet
we know nothing of them as they may be in themselves, but are
acquaintedg only with their appearances, that is, with the
representations that they produce in us because they affect our senses.
Accordingly, I by all means avow that there are bodies outside us, that
is, things which, though completely unknownh to us as to what they may
be in themselves, we knowi through the representations which their
influence on our sensibility provides for us, and to which we give the
name of a body – which word therefore merely signifies the appearance of >> this object that is unknown to us but is nonetheless real. Can this be
called idealism? It is the very opposite of it.
That one could, without detracting from the actual existence of outer
things, say of a great many of their predicates: they belong not to
these things in themselves, but only to their appearances and have no
existence of their own outside our representation, is something that was
gener- ally accepted and acknowledged long before Locke’s time, though
more commonly thereafter. To these predicates belong warmth, color,
taste, etc. That I, however, even beyond these, include (for weighty
reasons) also among mere appearances the remaining qualities of bodies,
which are called primarias: extension, place, and more generally space
along with everything that depends on it (impenetrability or
materiality, shape, etc.), is something against which not the least
ground of uncertainty can be raised; and as little as someone can be
called an idealist because he wants to admit colors as properties that
attach not to the object in itself, but only to the sense of vision as
modifications, just as little can my system be called idealist simply
because I find that even more of, nay, all of the properties that make
up the intuition of a body belong merely to its appearance: for the
existence of the thing that appears is not thereby nullified, as with
real idealism, but it is only shown that through the senses we cannot
cognize it at all as it is in itself.
I would very much like to know how then my claims must be *framed* so as
not to contain any idealism. Without doubt I would have to say: that the
representation of space not only is perfectly in accordance with the
relation that our sensibility has to objects, for I have said that, but
that it [IDEA @290] is even fully similar to the object; an assertion to
which I can attach no sense, any more than to the assertion that the
sensation of red is similar to the property of cinnabar that excites
this sensation in me." [pages 40 - 41]
THERE ARE PROBABLY MULIPLE APPROACHES HOWEVER AS INFORMAL OPINION GIVEN
THE #298 - *ROCK* DIALECTIC OF 13 ELEMENTS CONVEYED BY THE "ODE TO KANT"
POEM MIGHT BE A REASONABLE DRIVER, A SINGLE OBJECTIVE POINT MIGHT BE THE
TELOS INTERSECTION OF #465 / #205 CENTRE SPIRAL [#46, #41 COMMON
ELEMENTS] AS #FIVE GIZMO PLAIN SINCE THERE IS AN INCOMMENSURABILITY
BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM DUE TO A COMMON PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
DEPENDENCY AS METASASIS IMPETUS OF MIND
TELOS: #465 with TELOS intersection: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE (1 record)
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS(zen: 1, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 53)@{
@1: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#53); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#53), >> @2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#105); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#133),
@3: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#145); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG >> (#202),
@4: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#205); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#222),
@5: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#283); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI >> (#240),
@6: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#338); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: >> HSI (#298 - *ROCK*),
@7: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#372); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#358),
} // Male: #372; Feme: #358
HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#386); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT:
SHIH (#419 - *SLAUGHTER*),
@9: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#420); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#439),
} // Male: #420; Feme: #439
HETEROS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#449); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#401),
@9: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#465); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#421),
} // Male: #465; Feme: #421
TORAH PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#419 - *SLAUGHTER*); Ego: 13 -
INCREASE: TSENG (#371: ***),
@9: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#486); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#391 >> - *HOMOGENEITY*),
} // Male: #486; Feme: #391
RIGHTS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#380); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN >> (#413: *IMPROPER* *ANZAC* 2018 *CENTENNIAL* *WREATH* *AT* *BOER* *WAR*
*MEMORIAL* on 8 JUNE 2017),
@9: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#408); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#433), >> } // Male: #408; Feme: #433
#FIVE (SHOWN ABOVE): [#56, #68, #46, #35, #80 - LABOURING (CH'IUNG),
#77, #51, #30, #41] - VALUE JUXTAPOSITION (#205)
#413 - *IMPROPER* *ANZAC* 2018 *CENTENNIAL* *WREATH* *AT* *BOER* *WAR*
*MEMORIAL* on 8 JUNE 2017
#355 - *BIGGEST* *BLOKES* *BBQ* on 25 AUGUST 2017
#443 - *MEAT* *IN* *MAILBOX* on 15 NOVEMBER 2017
#FIVE: [#56, #68, #46, #35, #80 - LABOURING (CH'IUNG), #77, #51, #30,
#41] - VALUE JUXTAPOSITION (#205)
[#56, {@1: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#56); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH:
CHIN (#56)}
#68, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#99); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#124)}
#46, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#107); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO
(#170)}
#35, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER
{%28}); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#205)}
#80, {@5: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH
PRIDE {%39}); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#285: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
SECTION 12)}
#77, {@6: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#230); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#362: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 59)}
#51, {@7: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#238); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#413: 8 JUNE 2017 AS *IMPROPER* PRE ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 WREATH
PLACEMENT COINCIDING WITH THE COMMEMORATION PLAQUE INSTALLATION AT THE
#1554 / #728 - MARION STATUE BEING A DEFERENTIAL ALLEGIANCE GIVEN TO
#491 - PATER FAMILIAS)}
#30, {@8: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#276: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION
5); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#443: MAILBOX ACTION OF #473 - PIECE
OF FLESH OR MEAT AS PICTURED @ 1228 HOURS ON 15 NOVEMBER 2017)}
#41] {@9: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#355: BIGGEST BLOKES BBQ ON 25
AUGUST 2017 AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT EIDOMAI: G1492 (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING / KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA SECTION 57); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#484)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @192 = #342: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 52 as
[#30, #10, #6, #90, #200, #6] = yâtsar (H3335): {UMBRA: #11 as #300:
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 20 % #41 = #13} 1) to form, fashion, *frame*;
1a) (Qal) to form, fashion; 1a1) of human activity; 1a2) of divine
activity; i) of creation; 1) of original creation; 2) of individuals at
conception; 3) of Israel as a people; ii) to frame, pre-ordain, plan
(fig. of divine) purpose of a situation); 1a3) (Niphal) to be formed, be
created; 1a4) (Pual) to be predetermined, be pre-ordained; 1a5) (Hophal)
to be formed;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?zen:1,row:9,col:3>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 53 [DATE: 2020.2.10, TIME: 21:20
hrs, SUPER: #420 / #53 - Increasing Evidence, Gaining Insight; I-Ching:
H13 - Fellowship, Companionship, Concording People, Fellowship with men,
Gathering men; Tetra: 53 - ETERNITY (YUNG), EGO: #439 / #53 - Increasing
Evidence, Gaining Insight; I-Ching: H13 - Fellowship, Companionship,
Concording People, Fellowship with men, Gathering men; Tetra: 53 -
ETERNITY (YUNG)]
On 2/11/20 6:04 pm, dolf wrote:
CORRECTION:
#1607 - *IZMIR* BEING THE LOCATION OF THE EARTHQUAKE ON 30 OCTOBER 2020
as [#200, #40, #400, #100, #50, #10, #7, #800] = smyrnízō (G4669):
{UMBRA: #1607 % #41 = #8} 1) to be like myrrh; 2) to mix and so flavour
with myrrh; 2a) wine with myrrh: i.e. wine flavoured with myrrh. The
ancients used to infuse myrrh into wine to give it a more agreeable
fragrance and flavour;
The notional difference is between these four concepts:
APO (G575 / @150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
DIDOMI (G1325 / @104 - PRESENTS)
APODIDOMI (G591 / @181 - TO GIVE BACK / RESTORE
paradidomi (G3860 / @185 - COMPLIANCE TO THE FIVE SHIH)
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 - SOVEREIGN'S APO (G575)
RIGHT AS THE RESERVE (APODIDOMI: G591) ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY OF SECTION
IX / #37} by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
THE CONSIDERATION OF PARA EQUATES TO AN ONTIC PREMISE: #541 as [#5, #40, >>> #40, #30, #20, #6, #400] = mamlâkâh (H4467): {UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12} >>> 1) kingdom, *dominion*, reign, sovereignty; 1a) kingdom, realm; 1b)
sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
HOWEVER THIS IS AN ONTIC #135 SUBSTITUTION TO THE ISLAMIC #45 - METHOD
AS MIND CONTROL WHICH ARE THE STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS
[π, {@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#80)}
α, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES
{%9}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#81)}
ρ, {@3: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#100)}
α] {@4: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#101)}
GRUMBLE (#200, #101)@[80, 80, 81, 1, 19, 19, 20, 1]
MALE: @161 + @180 + @200 = #541
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #541
#541 as [#30, #5, #40, #10, #400, #50, #6] /
#541 as [#5, #40, #6, #40, #400, #10, #600] = mûwth (H4191): {UMBRA:
#446 % #41 = #36} 1) to die, kill, *have* *one* *executed*; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to die; 1a2) to die (as penalty), be put to death; 1a3) to die,
perish (of a nation); 1a4) to die prematurely (by neglect of wise moral
conduct); 1b) (Polel) to kill, put to death, dispatch; 1c) (Hiphil) to
kill, put to death; 1d) (Hophal); 1d1) to be killed, be put to death; i) >>> to die prematurely;
----------
46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS
NORTH}
[#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49] = #405 as [#100, #300, #5] >>> = qâsheh (H7186): {UMBRA: #405 % #41 = #36} 1) hard, cruel, severe,
obstinate; 1a) hard, difficult; 1b) severe; 1c) fierce, intense,
vehement; 1d) stubborn, stiff of neck, stiff-necked; 1e) rigorous (of
battle);
#FIRE@[#41, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#41); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41)}
#42, {@2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#43); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
YING (#83)}
#43, {@3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#88); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#126)} >>> #44, {@4: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#96); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#170)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#149); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 >>> - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}
#46, {@6: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#167); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO
(#261)}
#47, {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#232); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#308)}
#48, {@8: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#264); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#356)}
#49] {@9: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#345); Ego: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#405)} >>>
GRUMBLE (#345, #405)@[41, 41, 2, 42, 45, 43, 8, 44, 53, 45, 18, 46, 65,
47, 32, 48, 81, 49]
FEME: @215 = #215 - SELF CONTRADICTION WHICH ISN'T IN THE ROMAN PROTOTYPE >>>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #215
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:345>
METALOGIC (#624, #750)@[41, 41, 1, 41, 3, 2, 45, 42, 9, 45, 52, 43, 60,
8, 23, 44, 76, 53, 40, 45, 58, 18, 23, 46, 7, 65, 54, 47, 5, 32, 53, 48, >>> 53, 81, 21, 49]
#FOUR: #183 as #21 - RELEASE (SHIH)
#FIVE: #275 as #32 - LEGION (CHUANG) = #458
#FOUR: #141 as #60 - ACCUMULATION (CHI)
#FIVE: #162 as #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) = #303
#FOUR: #174 as #12 - YOUTHFULNESS (T'UNG)
#FIVE: #180 as #18 - WAITING (HSI) = #354
TOTAL: #1115
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:624,750,458,303,354,1115>
#1115 as [#5, #50, #60, #400, #200, #400] = çâthar (H5641): {UMBRA: #660 >>> % #41 = #4} 1) to hide, conceal; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to hide oneself;
1a2) to be hidden, be concealed; 1b) (Piel) to hide carefully; 1c)
(Pual) to be hidden carefully, be concealed; 1d) (Hiphil) to conceal,
hide; 1e) (Hithpael) to hide oneself carefully;
#1115 as [#300, #400, #400, #10, #5] = shâthâh (H8356): {UMBRA: #1100 % >>> #41 = #34} 1) foundation, support, stay;
#1115 as [#1, #50, #4, #100, #70, #500, #70, #50, #70, #200] =
androphónos (G409): {UMBRA: #1115 % #41 = #8} 1) a murderer;
#1115 as [#1, #9, #5, #300, #800] = athetéō (G114): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 >>> = #13} 1) to do away with, to set aside, disregard; 2) to thwart the
efficacy of anything, nullify, *make* *void*, frustrate; 3) to reject,
to refuse, to slight;
#1115 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #700, #1, #300, #5] = gráphō (G1125):
{UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with reference to the form of
the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a tablet, parchment,
paper, or other material; 2) to write, *WITH* *REFERENCE* *TO* *THE*
*CONTENTS* *OF* *THE* *WRITING*; 2a) to express in written characters;
2b) to commit to writing (things not to be forgotten), write down,
record; 2c) used of those things which stand written in the sacred books >>> (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by writing (in a written epistle) >>> to give information, directions; 3) to fill with writing; 4) to draw up
in writing, compose;
#1115 as [#500, #400, #200, #5, #10] = phýsis (G5449): {UMBRA: #1310 %
#41 = #39} 1) nature; 1a) the nature of things, the force, laws, order
of nature; 1a1) as opposed to what is monstrous, abnormal, perverse;
1a2) *AS* *OPPOSED* *WHAT* *HAS* *BEEN* *PRODUCED* *BY* *THE* *ART* *OF* >>> *MAN*: the natural branches, i.e. branches by the operation of nature;
1b) birth, physical origin; 1c) a mode of feeling and acting which by
long habit has become nature; 1d) the sum of innate properties and
powers by which one person differs from others, distinctive native
peculiarities, natural characteristics: the natural strength, ferocity,
and intractability of beasts;
THERE ARE PROBABLY MULTIPLE APPROACHES HOWEVER AS INFORMAL OPINIONGIVEN THE
#298 - *ROCK* DIALECTIC OF 13 ELEMENTS CONVEYED BY THE "ODE TO KANT" POEM MIGHT BE A REASONABLE DRIVER, A SINGLE OBJECTIVE POINT MIGHT BE THE TELOS INTERSECTION OF #465 / #205 CENTRE SPIRAL [#46, #41 COMMON ELEMENTS] AS #FIVE GIZMO PLANE SINCE THERE IS AN INCOMMENSURABILITY BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM DUE TO A COMMON PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL DEPENDENCY AS METASASIS IMPETUS OF MINDMATERIALITY
THE RESULTANT NOUMENON ENTRY IS ASSOCIATED TO NOUS #53
THIS IS ALSO EXCEPTION NOUS WITHIN THE TELEOLOGICAL INTERSECTIONS of the #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and their subsequent ONTIC DIALECTIC:AUSTRALIAN
*FACILITATORS* / *ARBITRATORS* OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN /
(#75)}COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC JINGOISTIC IDENTITY
IT IS *UNEQUIVOCALLY* A PRECEDENCE CLAIM MADE OF SOVEREIGN RIGHT
conveying the IDEA template for those LETTERS PATENT
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
THE OBJECTIVE MIGHT BE *FRAMED* BY TELOS INTERSECTION #405 / #205
[@156, {@1: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH
(#236)}
@158, {@2: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER
{%15}); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#152)}
@161, {@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#216); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#232)}
@166] {@4: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#290); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN
(#133),
GRUMBLE (#290, #236)@[75, 75, 71, 77, 70, 80, 74, 4]
MALE: @146 = #146
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146
KANT'S IDEA @290: "Everything that is to be given to us as object must
be given to us in intuition. But all our intuition happens only by means
of the senses; the understanding intuits nothing, but only reflects. Now
since, in accordance with what has just been proven, the senses never
and in no single instance enable us to cognize things in themselves, but
only their appearances, and as these are mere representations of
sensibility, “consequently all bodies together with the space in which
they are found must be taken for nothing but mere representations in us,
and exist nowhere else than merely in our thoughts.” Now is this not
manifest idealism?
Idealism consists in the claim that there are none other than thinking
beings; the other things that we believe we perceive in intuition are
only representations in thinking beings, to which in fact no object
existing outside these beings corresponds. I say in opposition: There
are things given to us as objects of our senses existing outside us, yet
we know nothing of them as they may be in themselves, but are
acquaintedg only with their appearances, that is, with the
representations that they produce in us because they affect our senses.
Accordingly, I by all means avow that there are bodies outside us, that
is, things which, though completely unknownh to us as to what they may
be in themselves, we knowi through the representations which their
influence on our sensibility provides for us, and to which we give the
name of a body – which word therefore merely signifies the appearance of
this object that is unknown to us but is nonetheless real. Can this be
called idealism? It is the very opposite of it.
That one could, without detracting from the actual existence of outer
things, say of a great many of their predicates: they belong not to
these things in themselves, but only to their appearances and have no
existence of their own outside our representation, is something that was
gener- ally accepted and acknowledged long before Locke’s time, though
more commonly thereafter. To these predicates belong warmth, color,
taste, etc. That I, however, even beyond these, include (for weighty
reasons) also among mere appearances the remaining qualities of bodies,
which are called primarias: extension, place, and more generally space
along with everything that depends on it (impenetrability or
materiality, shape, etc.), is something against which not the least
ground of uncertainty can be raised; and as little as someone can be
called an idealist because he wants to admit colors as properties that
attach not to the object in itself, but only to the sense of vision as
modifications, just as little can my system be called idealist simply
because I find that even more of, nay, all of the properties that make
up the intuition of a body belong merely to its appearance: for the
existence of the thing that appears is not thereby nullified, as with
real idealism, but it is only shown that through the senses we cannot
cognize it at all as it is in itself.
I would very much like to know how then my claims must be *framed* so as
not to contain any idealism. Without doubt I would have to say: that the
representation of space not only is perfectly in accordance with the
relation that our sensibility has to objects, for I have said that, but
that it [IDEA @290] is even fully similar to the object; an assertion to
which I can attach no sense, any more than to the assertion that the
sensation of red is similar to the property of cinnabar that excites
this sensation in me." [pages 40 - 41]
THERE ARE PROBABLY MULIPLE APPROACHES HOWEVER AS INFORMAL OPINION GIVEN
THE #298 - *ROCK* DIALECTIC OF 13 ELEMENTS CONVEYED BY THE "ODE TO KANT"
POEM MIGHT BE A REASONABLE DRIVER, A SINGLE OBJECTIVE POINT MIGHT BE THE
TELOS INTERSECTION OF #465 / #205 CENTRE SPIRAL [#46, #41 COMMON
ELEMENTS] AS #FIVE GIZMO PLAIN SINCE THERE IS AN INCOMMENSURABILITY
BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM DUE TO A COMMON PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
DEPENDENCY AS METASASIS IMPETUS OF MIND
TELOS: #465 with TELOS intersection: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE (1 record)
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS(zen: 1, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 53)@{
@1: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#53); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#53),
@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#105); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#439),@3: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#145); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG
(#202),
@4: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#205); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#222),
@5: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#283); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI
(#240),
@6: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#338); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN:
HSI (#298 - *ROCK*),
@7: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#372); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#358),
} // Male: #372; Feme: #358
HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#386); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT:
SHIH (#419 - *SLAUGHTER*),
@9: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#420); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN
(#421),} // Male: #420; Feme: #439
HETEROS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#449); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#401),
@9: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#465); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN
(#124)}} // Male: #465; Feme: #421
TORAH PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#419 - *SLAUGHTER*); Ego: 13 -
INCREASE: TSENG (#371: ***),
@9: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#486); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#391
- *HOMOGENEITY*),
} // Male: #486; Feme: #391
RIGHTS PROTOTYPE@{
@8: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#380); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#413: *IMPROPER* *ANZAC* 2018 *CENTENNIAL* *WREATH* *AT* *BOER* *WAR*
*MEMORIAL* on 8 JUNE 2017),
@9: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#408); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#433),
} // Male: #408; Feme: #433
#FIVE (SHOWN ABOVE): [#56, #68, #46, #35, #80 - LABOURING (CH'IUNG),
#77, #51, #30, #41] - VALUE JUXTAPOSITION (#205)
#413 - *IMPROPER* *ANZAC* 2018 *CENTENNIAL* *WREATH* *AT* *BOER* *WAR*
*MEMORIAL* on 8 JUNE 2017
#355 - *BIGGEST* *BLOKES* *BBQ* on 25 AUGUST 2017
#443 - *MEAT* *IN* *MAILBOX* on 15 NOVEMBER 2017
#FIVE: [#56, #68, #46, #35, #80 - LABOURING (CH'IUNG), #77, #51, #30,
#41] - VALUE JUXTAPOSITION (#205)
[#56, {@1: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#56); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH:
CHIN (#56)}
#68, {@2: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#99); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
#46, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#107); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO
(#170)}
#35, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER
{%28}); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#205)}
#80, {@5: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH
PRIDE {%39}); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#285: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
SECTION 12)}
#77, {@6: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#230); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#362: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 59)}
#51, {@7: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#238); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#413: 8 JUNE 2017 AS *IMPROPER* PRE ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 WREATH
PLACEMENT COINCIDING WITH THE COMMEMORATION PLAQUE INSTALLATION AT THE
#1554 / #728 - MARION STATUE BEING A DEFERENTIAL ALLEGIANCE GIVEN TO
#491 - PATER FAMILIAS)}
#30, {@8: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#276: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION
5); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#443: MAILBOX ACTION OF #473 - PIECE
OF FLESH OR MEAT AS PICTURED @ 1228 HOURS ON 15 NOVEMBER 2017)}
#41] {@9: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#355: BIGGEST BLOKES BBQ ON 25
AUGUST 2017 AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT EIDOMAI: G1492 (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING / KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA SECTION 57); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#484)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @192 = #342: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 52 as
[#30, #10, #6, #90, #200, #6] = yâtsar (H3335): {UMBRA: #11 as #300:
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 20 % #41 = #13} 1) to form, fashion, *frame*;
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 422 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 183:25:57 |
Calls: | 8,946 |
Calls today: | 13 |
Files: | 13,352 |
Messages: | 5,991,289 |