In 17th century style I wrote it on paper.My proof of FLT has been approved by my Indian colleagues, who are highly trained and discerning scientists and engineers.
I posted it just now in my facebook timeline. Now that is publication so far as I am concerned.
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/
Basically the idea is that the interior angles should sum up to pi/2 if there is a solution for n=3 for the famous relation.
I did an Excel sheet, and the nearest I got was 1.569155609
That was using Taylor expansion using 5 terms.
Going by the spread I doubt if we could make it to 1.570796
Don't know if the world will accept this as a proof, just that it may be a new approach which could lead to ways to find multiple solutions (non-integer) for a^n+b^n=c^n by targeting on the most like a/c ratio.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
In 17th century style I wrote it on paper.
I posted it just now in my facebook timeline. Now that is publication so far as I am concerned.
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/
Basically the idea is that the interior angles should sum up to pi/2 if there is a solution for n=3 for the famous relation.
I did an Excel sheet, and the nearest I got was 1.569155609
That was using Taylor expansion using 5 terms.
Going by the spread I doubt if we could make it to 1.570796
Don't know if the world will accept this as a proof, just that it may be a new approach which could lead to ways to find multiple solutions (non-integer) for a^n+b^n=c^n by targeting on the most like a/c ratio.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
On Tuesday, 5 April 2022 at 18:40:06 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
In 17th century style I wrote it on paper.
I posted it just now in my facebook timeline. Now that is publication so far as I am concerned.
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/
Basically the idea is that the interior angles should sum up to pi/2 if there is a solution for n=3 for the famous relation.
I did an Excel sheet, and the nearest I got was 1.569155609
That was using Taylor expansion using 5 terms.
Going by the spread I doubt if we could make it to 1.570796
Don't know if the world will accept this as a proof, just that it may be a new approach which could lead to ways to find multiple solutions (non-integer) for a^n+b^n=c^n by targeting on the most like a/c ratio.
Cheers,https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=5686846731343077&set=a.3856470274380741&type=3&comment_id=5715352665159150&reply_comment_id=5717829131578170&force_theater=true¬if_id=1650063854713120¬if_t=photo_comment&ref=notif
Arindam Banerjee
provided comments, about clarifying the method and future work
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 308 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 93:03:13 |
Calls: | 6,923 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,434,161 |