[continued from previous message]
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.
More of my philosophy about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism and
more..
I think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and
first, i invite you to read my following new thoughts about
Utilitarianism and more here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wgPJkwdGrqc
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart
or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance"
to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have
to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also
a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will
say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society
is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind
of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the
poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such
places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other
antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under
Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside
a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have
to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist
contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a
proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and
here they are:
More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..
As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about
Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as
you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:
"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to
bring good sageness and good soundness"
So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it
that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as
you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a
system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA
congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following
thoughts so that to understand:
Here is my new proverb:
"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and
better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and
after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern
correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why
Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the
USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."
And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:
And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..
Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable
amount of natural light.
So here is my new poem:
Darkness for me is not madness
Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas
Darkness for me is not madness
Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice
Darkness for me is not madness
Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess
Darkness for me is not madness
Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)