Loose Cannon <efberg73@gmx.com> wrote in news:9emqti9pukj3vtsnvnhegn19n8qcpc63es@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:31:06 -0800, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/02/25/how-greedy-parents-pimp-out-their-d
aughters-on-the-web/
How Greedy Parents Pimp Out Their Daughters on the Web
FEBRUARY 25, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
Those are some of the comments that the New York Times found on
Instagram in response to the photo of a pretty nine-year-old girl
posing in a bikini. Her parents posted the photo to attract attention,
and they are not as rare as you might think. In one of the
investigative reporting projects that periodically justifies the
Times’ existence, the paper found many juvenile “Instagram
influencers” whose accounts are managed by their parents. “Although
the site prohibits children under 13, parents can open so-called
mom-run accounts for them, and they can live on even when the girls
become teenagers,” the story reports. “But what often starts as a
parent’s effort to jump-start a child’s modeling career, or win favors >> >from clothing brands, can quickly descend into a dark underworld
dominated by adult men, many of whom openly admit on other platforms
to being sexually attracted to children.”
Ethics Alarms has long taken the position that parents posting
revealing, embarrassing or provocative photos of their children on the
web without a child’s informed consent (and children cannot give
informed consent) is per se unethical, and that was before even
considering this disgusting phenomenon.
The Times examined thousands of such accounts with parents operating
the sale of their daughters’ photos, exclusive chat sessions and even
offering their girls’ worn leotards and cheerleading outfits to
followers. It’s profitable, for the parents, and the girls don’t
understand the implications of what they have been thrust into. Some
customers—pedophiles—- spend thousands of dollars nurturing the
underage relationships. A demographics firm hired by the Times found
32 million connections to male followers on the 5,000 accounts
examined by the paper.
This is all ethics rot, an unforeseen consequence of the World Wide
Web colliding with the same unethical instincts that prompt parents to
guide their young children into modeling, acting, gymnastics and other
sports for their vicarious pleasure and profits. Here is the worst
news in the piece:
“The troubling interactions on Instagram come as social media
companies increasingly dominate the cultural landscape and the
internet is seen as a career path of its own. Nearly one in three
preteens lists influencing as a career goal, and 11 percent of those
born in Generation Z, between 1997 and 2012, describe themselves as
influencers. The so-called creator economy surpasses $250 billion
worldwide, according to Goldman Sachs, with U.S. brands spending more
than $5 billion a year on influencers.”
What the Times found is not an internet problem but an irresponsible,
incompetent, greedy and abusive parent problem that has been around as
long as there have been families. Social media only is giving it a new
and revolting place to thrive. I was especially annoyed by the
response of one of the mother/pimps whose daughter has been promoted
on the web from a young age. “But she’s been doing this so long now,” >>> the mother says. “Her numbers are so big. What do we do? Just stop it
and walk away?”
Yes, you stupid, stupid woman. Just stop it.
Do read the whole piece. It is long and horrifying. This link lets you
avoid the paywall.
Who would know better about pimping out their underage daughter than a
nigger? Marshall should feel ashamed
Mothers are using their daughters to get a wider selection of young dicks. Lots of mom whores on social media besides kids.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 128:05:45 |
Calls: | 6,854 |
Files: | 12,360 |
Messages: | 5,417,576 |