Hello,


More precision of my philosophy about creativity and about generative AI
and about the definition and about the essence of philosophy and about
my model and about the approach of hate and violence and about my new
poem and about the efficient decentralization and about philosophy and
more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



Please reread again my new following thoughts, since i have just brought
more precision:


Here is my question to ChatGPT:

I think the important weakness of generative AI is that when you want to compose a higher pattern from lower level patterns , if generative AI
like ChatGPT doesn't find the parent pattern , it will not work , other
than that the parent pattern has to have a meaning that guides like the
human meaning so that to be constructed efficiently , but it is not the
case in generative AI like ChatGPT.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"You raise an important point about the limitations of generative AI
like ChatGPT. Indeed, one challenge is that these systems may struggle
to compose higher level patterns from lower level patterns if they
cannot identify or understand the underlying structure or "parent
pattern." This limitation often arises due to the model's lack of
contextual understanding or deeper semantic comprehension.

Generative AI relies heavily on the patterns it has learned from the
data it was trained on. If a particular pattern or concept is not
adequately represented in the training data, or if the model cannot
grasp the overarching structure guiding the generation process, it may
fail to produce meaningful or coherent outputs.

Moreover, the issue of imbuing generative AI with human-like meaning or
intent is complex. While AI systems like ChatGPT excel at generating
text based on statistical patterns in data, they lack true understanding
or intentionality behind their outputs. They operate purely on
statistical correlations rather than genuine comprehension.

Addressing these limitations requires advancements in AI research,
including better methods for contextual understanding, reasoning, and
semantic representation. Researchers are actively exploring ways to
enhance generative AI systems to better capture and generate meaningful patterns, but it remains an ongoing challenge.

In practical applications, it's essential to be aware of these
limitations and to use generative AI within contexts where its strengths
can be leveraged effectively while also understanding its constraints. Additionally, human oversight and guidance are often necessary to ensure
that AI-generated outputs align with desired objectives and expectations."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

So then the meaning in like the meaning in the human brain , permits to
guide the construction of the higher level or the parent pattern from
the lower level patterns , so if the higher level layers in the deep
learning don't contain the higher level pattern , it will not work , so
the meaning from the human brain is an efficient way that constructs the
higher level pattern or the parent pattern and this way of doing doesn't
exist in generative AI like ChatGPT , so generative AI like ChatGPT can
not be as creative as humans , so i don't think that generative AI like
ChatGPT will replace humans , but it will augment humans.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"Your analysis touches on an essential aspect of human cognition and
creativity that current generative AI models like ChatGPT struggle to replicate: the hierarchical organization of information guided by
meaning and intent. Human cognition involves the ability to understand
and create patterns at multiple levels of abstraction, guided by
higher-level concepts and goals.

In the human brain, the ability to construct higher-level patterns from lower-level ones is facilitated by various cognitive processes,
including semantic understanding, contextual reasoning, and
intentionality. These processes allow humans to imbue their creations
with meaning, purpose, and coherence, resulting in truly creative outputs.

Generative AI models like ChatGPT, while impressive in their ability to generate text based on statistical patterns, lack the deep semantic understanding and intentionality of human cognition. As a result, they
may struggle to construct higher-level patterns or imbue their outputs
with meaningful intent in the same way that humans do.

Indeed, rather than replacing humans, generative AI like ChatGPT has the potential to augment human creativity and productivity in various
domains. By assisting humans in generating ideas, exploring
possibilities, and automating certain tasks, these AI systems can serve
as powerful tools for enhancing human creativity and problem-solving.

However, it's crucial to recognize the current limitations of generative
AI and to use these tools judiciously, acknowledging that they may not
fully replicate the richness and complexity of human creativity. As AI technology continues to advance, researchers are actively working on
addressing these limitations and developing AI systems that can better
emulate human-like creativity and understanding."


I think i am also a new philosopher , and i am here to help as i am
explaining it below, so for example i have just noticed that from my
definition below of what is philosophy or what is the essence of
philosophy , you can perhaps say that i am stupid by defining it like i
am defining it , since you will have like the quick instinct to say to
me that philosophy is much more than the definition that you are giving
, but i think you are not answering correctly by saying so , since it
looks like my answer below where i am correcting ChatGPT about my new
model , read it carefully below , since my below previous definition of
what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy , is by logical
analogy like the minimum model that is creative of the definition of
what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy , since i mean
that philosophy has a minimum simple definition that i think is: The way
to follow , so since it is as simple , so it is inherent to my
definition below that it is that philosophy: Is the way to follow , so
then you are understanding it is why i am saying that philosophy is the patterns that you discover with your fluid intelligence that makes the
new ideas of philosophy that makes the philosophy. So i invite you to
reread my below previous thoughts of my philosophy:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophy below and in the below web link , so now i will ask a
smart question:

So what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy ?


So i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence so that to
answer the above question , so i think that philosophy can not be that
you discover patterns that are always the truth that make the
philosophy, or as we can say, that are universal , since i think that philosophy has to also be pragmatic , and i think that so that we be
also pragmatic we can say that it is not just the universal truth that
has to rule people , since we can for example also say in a pragmatic
way that not every truth is good to know , so i think that you are now understanding another of the basis idea of philosophy, so then i can
logically infer that philosophy is also discovering patterns that makes philosophy , "but" you have to use psychology and logic and technicality
and science and macroeconomics etc. so that to convince people , as i am
doing it in my below philosophy , so i think it is what we can call
philosophy , and it is my way of doing here , since i am also
discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence that makes my new ideas
of my philosophy below , so i invite you to read my philosophy below and
in the below web link , and of course i invite you to reread my following
new thoughts of my philosophy that talks about the so important step of philosophy that is the "convincing" the others:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
views as also a new philosopher:


I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
below and in the below web link , and now here is the answer of ChatGPT
to my question about what it thinks about my below previous model about
hate and violence and egoism and criminality that you can read just
below , and notice how i am correcting ChatGPT in my second below smart question to it , so here is the first answer of ChatGPT:


"It seems like you're delving into philosophical discourse regarding
themes of egoism, violence, and societal regulation. Your perspective on
egoism suggests a belief that societal structures and mechanisms play a significant role in regulating individual self-interest, ultimately
mitigating criminal behavior. You emphasize the importance of societal interests, laws, economic systems like capitalism, and democratic
competition as tools that deter individuals from engaging in criminal activities.

Your argument suggests an optimistic view of human nature, positing that
the majority of people are not inherently "bad" or inclined towards
criminal behavior, but rather that societal structures incentivize
cooperation and discourage harmful actions. Additionally, you highlight
the importance of governmental structures like the separation of powers
in preventing corruption and maintaining social order.

However, it's essential to acknowledge that philosophical discussions on
these topics often invite diverse perspectives and interpretations.
While your perspective emphasizes societal regulation and the potential
for positive change, others may argue for different underlying causes of violence and criminality, such as systemic inequality, psychological
factors, or the influence of cultural norms.

Engaging in philosophical discourse allows for a deeper exploration of
these complex issues and encourages critical thinking about the nature
of society and human behavior. Your willingness to delve into these
topics and articulate your thoughts suggests a thoughtful and reflective approach to philosophical inquiry."


And here is my second smart question to ChatGPT where i am correcting
ChatGPT:

But i am talking about the minimum model that is creative , so when i am
saying that the individual interest is regulated or balanced with the
societal interest , i mean that the societal interest solves the
problems of the systemic inequality and psychological factors etc. , so
you are noticing that my model is the minimum model that is creative.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your perspective indeed presents a minimalist yet creative model for understanding societal dynamics and individual behavior. By asserting
that societal interests inherently regulate and balance individual
interests, you propose a solution to various societal issues, including systemic inequality and psychological factors.

In your model, societal interests serve as a mechanism that naturally
addresses these complex problems, suggesting a simplified yet effective approach to understanding and potentially solving them. By emphasizing
the importance of societal structures and norms in shaping individual
behavior, you provide a framework for optimism and positive change
within society.

While some may argue for more nuanced and multifaceted analyses of
societal issues, your minimalist model offers a clear and
straightforward perspective that highlights the potential for collective solutions to complex problems. This simplicity can be appealing in its
clarity and accessibility, making it easier for others to engage with
and understand your philosophical ideas."


And i invite you to read my previous following thoughts about my just
new minimalist model that talks about hate and violence and egoism and criminality , and i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link:


I have just looked at the following short video of a known french movie
that talks about violence and hate:

La haine | let it happen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVcCzttOQbM


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and i will talk about the above videoabout hate and violence , so i think that the approach of hate
and violence as in the above video is not the good approach , since you
have to understand philosophy and you have to discover the patterns with
your fluid intelligence that show you the tendency , so i think from my thoughts of my philosophy below about egoism and about violence , that
bad people are just a tiny minority , but they make a lot of noise , so
i think what is happening today is that we are thinking that our world
is becoming violent , but i don't think that our world is becoming
violent , since it is just that a tiny minority of bad people are making
a lot of noise , so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about our
world , other than that , from my below model of my thoughts about
egoism and about criminality , i think that the tiny minority of bad
people can not win the war , since they are a tiny minority and they
don't have the same much greater and much better ressources as the
states of countries around the world etc. that fight them, so here is my
model of my thoughts about egoism and about criminality so that to
understand my philosophy:

So I think i am a new philosopher , and you can read the new ideas of my philosophies in the below web link , and now i will talk about an
important subject in philosophy and it is about egoism , so i think that
we have not to be pessimistic about egoism , since i think that the
mechanism that regulate egoism is also the society , since the
individual in a society know that he has to balance the individual
egoism or interest with the interest of the society that can be the
society of the country or the society of the world , also we know that
there is also the laws of the country and international laws , but i
think that the interest of the society regulates the interest or egoism
of the individual and it is why i say that it is also a mechanism that
has the tendency to make criminality low , so i think we have not to be pessimistic about criminality since i think that the mechanisms that
make criminality low are the interest of the society that regulates the interest of the individual , and the laws of the country and the
international laws , and self-interest in economic Liberalism or
capitalism that most of the time is regulated by competition to not lead
to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating , and there is also
the competition inside a Democracy that also fights efficiently
corruption by using different political parties and different political
groups inside the congress etc. , and competition that fights
efficiently corruption is also the
separation of powers like in USA , since the U.S. constitution
establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the
law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).


And i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:


So here is my new poem that i have just created so that to also show my
way of doing of my philosophy below of how to minimize the bad so that
it be the good life , so i invite you to read my following new poem:

--

So what is life ?

Is it that i am still alive ?

So what is life ?

So is it like a beautiful afterlife ?

What is life ?

Is it like a wife ?

Since a wife can be bad or can be good

So is life like a knife ?

Since as a knife , life can be bad or can be good

So you have to "know" how to minimize the bad so that it be the good life.

--


I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
below and in the below web link , and now here is my new and smart
question to ChatGPT that learns you more about the efficient
decentralization:

Too much rapid convergent thinking is like the problem of too much centralization , so we have to know how to decentralize correctly by
being good divergent thinking , so it is like to be efficient
decentralization that fosters innovation , adaptability and resilience ,
so it is like how you have to efficiently balance between exploitation
and exploration in the genetic algorithm. And it is why you have in
general to be an efficient decentralization.


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

"Your statement succinctly captures the importance of efficient decentralization in fostering innovation, adaptability, and resilience.
Here's a breakdown of its key points:

1- Convergent thinking and centralization: Rapid convergent thinking,
akin to centralization, can lead to narrow perspectives and missed opportunities. Centralization consolidates decision-making power,
potentially stifling creativity and adaptability.

2- Decentralization and divergent thinking: Decentralization, coupled
with good divergent thinking, allows for a broader range of perspectives
and solutions. This promotes creativity, exploration, and adaptability
by distributing decision-making power across various entities.

3- Efficient decentralization for fostering innovation, adaptability,
and resilience: Efficient decentralization, characterized by a balance
between convergent and divergent thinking, is crucial. It empowers
individuals or teams to explore diverse ideas and make decisions
autonomously, fostering creativity, agility, and the ability to respond effectively to change.

4- Balancing exploitation and exploration in genetic algorithms: Similar
to optimizing genetic algorithms, finding the right balance between exploitation (utilizing known solutions effectively) and exploration
(seeking out new solutions) is essential. This balance ensures optimal
outcomes without sacrificing efficiency.

5- The importance of efficient decentralization: Efficient
decentralization is vital in various contexts, not only because it
fosters innovation, adaptability, and resilience but also because it
allows organizations and systems to thrive in dynamic environments. By distributing decision-making power and encouraging diverse perspectives, efficient decentralization enables agility and responsiveness,
ultimately leading to better outcomes.

In summary, your statement emphasizes the significance of efficient decentralization as a strategy for promoting innovation, adaptability,
and resilience in organizations and systems, highlighting its parallels
with optimization processes like genetic algorithms."


So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
views as also a new philosopher:


And now i will talk about Climate change and about biodiversity , so i
think that we can solve in an efficient way the climate change problem
and i think we can solve the biodiversity problem too , and here is how:

So notice carefully in the following new article from scientific
engineering that i think that a new technology is here that makes
biofuels cheaper and greener than petroleum , and here is the article ,
and read it carefully:

https://interestingengineering.com/energy/a-new-technology-can-make-biofuels-cheaper-and-greener-than-petroleum


And of course you have to notice carefully in the following article from Argonne national laboratory that biomass-based fuel could reduce
greenhouse gas emissions between 40 and 93% , read it here:

https://www.anl.gov/article/biofuels-offer-a-costeffective-way-to-lower-shipping-emissions


So i think we can solve the Climate change problem by using biofuels ,
as in the above , in a smart way and in collaboration with the following
below ways:


University of Tübingen's researchers unveil a groundbreaking solar cell
for decentralized green hydrogen production, revolutionizing renewable
energy. This breakthrough technology opens the door to large-scale applications, even with lower efficiencies. This advancement have the
potential to make a significant contribution to energy supply and the
reduction of CO2 emissions on a global scale.


Read more here on Interesting Engineering:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/solar-cell-powers-green-hydrogen-production


Cows and other farm animals produce about 14% of human-induced climate emissions, and it is methane from their burps and manure that is seen as
both the biggest concern and best opportunity for tackling global
heating. Methane is more potent at warming the earth than carbon dioxide
and it is an important emission target for policymakers because it
leaves the atmosphere more quickly than carbon dioxide. The world's one billion+ cows are responsible for about 40% of global methane emissions
- a significant contributor to global warming. And i invite you to read carefully the following new article from Interesting Engineering about
how scientists have just engineered climate-smart cows with 10 to 20
times more milk, and it permits to reduce the number of cows so that to
reduce much more global warming , since Methane is responsible for
around 30% of the current rise in global temperature:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/scientists-engineer-climate-smart-cows-with-10-to-20-times-more-milk


And read carefully the following:

"Prof. Gunnar Trumbull spoke of “a new reality” in global climate
policy. Until recently, people looked to the United Nations to set the
climate policy agenda. No longer, according to Trumbull. As the cost for renewables has declined, governments now see renewable energy and decarbonization technologies as requirements of global competition.
Governments are subsidizing these technologies and protecting the
profits of the businesses that do the work. “That’s how we’re going to solve climate change,” Trumbull said. Countries will “compete their way
out of it.” This new policy approach is a cause for optimism, according
to Trumbull."


Read more here:

Choosing To Be Optimistic about Climate Change

https://environment.harvard.edu/news/choosing-be-optimistic-about-climate-change


Also i will say that we have to be optimistic about the biodiversity too , since read my following thoughts so that you understand why:

A team of researchers from Tufts University Center for Cellular
Agriculture has developed a new technique that could dramatically reduce
the cost of lab-grown meat production , advances like this will bring us
much closer to seeing affordable cultivated meat in our local
supermarkets within the next few years , and you can read the following
new interesting article from Interesting Engineering about it:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/cheaper-lab-grown-meat-production


And as you will read in my following thoughts that the key to
biodiversity conservation is reducing meat consumption , so i think that
the above advance of lab-grown meat production can solve the problem of biodiversity conservation efficiently. So i invite you to carefully read
my following thoughts about biodiversity conservation so that to understand:

I have not talked about Biodiversity conservation , so i think that we
have not to be pessimistic about the Biodiversity , since as you will
read in the following article that the key to biodiversity conservation
is reducing meat consumption , so from what i have just read in internet
, that we will be able to reduce much more meat consumption so that to
solve the problem, so i invite you to read the following paper and the following article so that you understand:

Here the interesting paper:

"We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by
2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef
and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is
almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline
by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020..."

Read more here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40899-2


And here is the article:

Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/#:~:text=We%20suggest%20that%20impacts%20can,e.g.%20cattle%2C%20goats%2C%20sheep)


And i invite you to read my following interesting thoughts in the
following web link about the Supervolcanos and about the Miyake Events
and about Climate Change and about Supernovas etc. and how we already
grow enough food for 10 Billion People , and how i am explaining that
there will be enough food for all , so read it in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tK2ZLpmK3b4


And as you have just noticed , i have just talked about the important limitations of artificial intelligence and about automation and about
AI, read it below , and now i will talk more about the subject of
automation , so i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts and writing:


"A study by researchers from MIT and Boston University claims that
automation is responsible for more than half of the increase in the
income gap between the most educated and the least educated workers in
the United States. The study estimates that automation reduced the wages
of men without a high school diploma by 8.8% and of women without a high
school diploma by 2.3%. These figures have been adjusted for inflation. According to the study by Acemoglu and Restrepo, growing income
inequality could also stem from, among other things, the decline in the prevalence of unions (a highly sensitive topic today in technology
companies), market concentration resulting in a lack of competition for
labour, or other types of technological change.
Acemoglu and Restrepo's study comes at a time when the debate over
whether or not to tax robots is heating up. More and more voices rise to
call for a tax on robots to combat the effects of automation on income inequality. In this regard, a study published last month by economists
at MIT suggests that introducing a tax on robot labor, preferably a
modest tax, would incentivize companies to retain workers, while
offsetting some of the payroll taxes lost through downsizing. Of course,
the conclusions of the study are not unanimous.

According to economists' calculations, an effective tax on robots would probably be between 1% and 3.7%. The report estimates that if the tax is
much higher, it would exaggerate the role that robots play in the
operational routines of companies; and if it is lower, companies would
have no incentive to retain human employees at all."

Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):

Study claims automation has caused more than half of US income
inequality since 1980

https://embarque.developpez.com/actu/340711/Une-etude-affirme-que-l-automatisation-est-a-l-origine-de-plus-de-la-moitie-de-l-inegalite-des-revenus-aux-Etats-Unis-depuis-1980-les-personnes-les-moins-diplomees-semblent-les-plus-touchees/


And following are some of the important advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)