• More of my philosophy about essence of philosophy and about my model an

    From Amine Moulay Ramdane@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 19 18:10:33 2024
    Hello,


    More of my philosophy about essence of philosophy and about my model and
    about the approach of hate and violence and about my new poem and about
    the efficient decentralization and about philosophy and about climate
    change and about biodiversity and about the future and more of my thoughts..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
    of my philosophy below and in the below web link , so now i will ask a
    smart question:

    So what is philosophy or what is the essence of philosophy ?


    So i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence so that to
    answer the above question , so i think that philosophy can not be that
    you discover patterns that are always the truth that makes the
    philosophy, or as we can say, that are universal , since i think that philosophy has to also be pragmatic , and i think that so that we be
    also pragmatic we can say that it is not just the universal truth that
    has to rule people , since we can for example also say in a pragmatic
    way that not every truth is good to know , so i think that you are now understanding another of the basis idea of philosophy, so then i can
    logically infer that philosophy is also discovering patterns that makes philosophy , "but" you have to use psychology and logic and technicality
    and science and macroeconomics etc. so that to convince people , as i am
    doing it in my below philosophy , so i think it is what we can call
    philosophy , and it is my way of doing here , since i am also
    discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence that makes my new ideas
    of my philosophy below , so i invite you to read my philosophy below and
    in the below web link , and of course i invite you to read my following
    new thoughts of my philosophy that talks about the so important step of philosophy that is the "convincing" the others:


    So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
    of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
    about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
    views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
    is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
    said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
    have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
    have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
    of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
    holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
    smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
    smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
    understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
    philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
    humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
    convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
    think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
    why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
    wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
    you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
    showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
    like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
    notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
    of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
    intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
    way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
    artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
    artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
    views as also a new philosopher:


    I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
    below and in the below web link , and now here is the answer of ChatGPT
    to my question about what it thinks about my below previous model about
    hate and violence and egoism and criminality that you can read just
    below , and notice how i am correcting ChatGPT in my second below smart question to it , so here is the first answer of ChatGPT:


    "It seems like you're delving into philosophical discourse regarding
    themes of egoism, violence, and societal regulation. Your perspective on
    egoism suggests a belief that societal structures and mechanisms play a significant role in regulating individual self-interest, ultimately
    mitigating criminal behavior. You emphasize the importance of societal interests, laws, economic systems like capitalism, and democratic
    competition as tools that deter individuals from engaging in criminal activities.

    Your argument suggests an optimistic view of human nature, positing that
    the majority of people are not inherently "bad" or inclined towards
    criminal behavior, but rather that societal structures incentivize
    cooperation and discourage harmful actions. Additionally, you highlight
    the importance of governmental structures like the separation of powers
    in preventing corruption and maintaining social order.

    However, it's essential to acknowledge that philosophical discussions on
    these topics often invite diverse perspectives and interpretations.
    While your perspective emphasizes societal regulation and the potential
    for positive change, others may argue for different underlying causes of violence and criminality, such as systemic inequality, psychological
    factors, or the influence of cultural norms.

    Engaging in philosophical discourse allows for a deeper exploration of
    these complex issues and encourages critical thinking about the nature
    of society and human behavior. Your willingness to delve into these
    topics and articulate your thoughts suggests a thoughtful and reflective approach to philosophical inquiry."


    And here is my second smart question to ChatGPT where i am correcting
    ChatGPT:

    But i am talking about the minimum model that is creative , so when i am
    saying that the individual interest is regulated or balanced with the
    societal interest , i mean that the societal interest solves the
    problems of the systemic inequality and psychological factors etc. , so
    you are noticing that my model is the minimum model that is creative.


    And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

    "Your perspective indeed presents a minimalist yet creative model for understanding societal dynamics and individual behavior. By asserting
    that societal interests inherently regulate and balance individual
    interests, you propose a solution to various societal issues, including systemic inequality and psychological factors.

    In your model, societal interests serve as a mechanism that naturally
    addresses these complex problems, suggesting a simplified yet effective approach to understanding and potentially solving them. By emphasizing
    the importance of societal structures and norms in shaping individual
    behavior, you provide a framework for optimism and positive change
    within society.

    While some may argue for more nuanced and multifaceted analyses of
    societal issues, your minimalist model offers a clear and
    straightforward perspective that highlights the potential for collective solutions to complex problems. This simplicity can be appealing in its
    clarity and accessibility, making it easier for others to engage with
    and understand your philosophical ideas."


    And i invite you to read my previous following thoughts about my just
    new minimalist model that talks about hate and violence and egoism and criminality , and i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link:


    I have just looked at the following short video of a known french movie
    that talks about violence and hate:

    La haine | let it happen

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVcCzttOQbM


    So i think i am also a new philosopher , and i will talk about the above videoabout hate and violence , so i think that the approach of hate
    and violence as in the above video is not the good approach , since you
    have to understand philosophy and you have to discover the patterns with
    your fluid intelligence that show you the tendency , so i think from my thoughts of my philosophy below about egoism and about violence , that
    bad people are just a tiny minority , but they make a lot of noise , so
    i think what is happening today is that we are thinking that our world
    is becoming violent , but i don't think that our world is becoming
    violent , since it is just that a tiny minority of bad people are making
    a lot of noise , so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about our
    world , other than that , from my below model of my thoughts about
    egoism and about criminality , i think that the tiny minority of bad
    people can not win the war , since they are a tiny minority and they
    don't have the same much greater and much better ressources as the
    states of countries around the world etc. that fight them, so here is my
    model of my thoughts about egoism and about criminality so that to
    understand my philosophy:

    So I think i am a new philosopher , and you can read the new ideas of my philosophies in the below web link , and now i will talk about an
    important subject in philosophy and it is about egoism , so i think that
    we have not to be pessimistic about egoism , since i think that the
    mechanism that regulate egoism is also the society , since the
    individual in a society know that he has to balance the individual
    egoism or interest with the interest of the society that can be the
    society of the country or the society of the world , also we know that
    there is also the laws of the country and international laws , but i
    think that the interest of the society regulates the interest or egoism
    of the individual and it is why i say that it is also a mechanism that
    has the tendency to make criminality low , so i think we have not to be pessimistic about criminality since i think that the mechanisms that
    make criminality low are the interest of the society that regulates the interest of the individual , and the laws of the country and the
    international laws , and self-interest in economic Liberalism or
    capitalism that most of the time is regulated by competition to not lead
    to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating , and there is also
    the competition inside a Democracy that also fights efficiently
    corruption by using different political parties and different political
    groups inside the congress etc. , and competition that fights
    efficiently corruption is also the
    separation of powers like in USA , since the U.S. constitution
    establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
    legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the
    law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).


    And i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:


    So here is my new poem that i have just created so that to also show my
    way of doing of my philosophy below of how to minimize the bad so that
    it be the good life , so i invite you to read my following new poem:

    --

    So what is life ?

    Is it that i am still alive ?

    So what is life ?

    So is it like a beautiful afterlife ?

    What is life ?

    Is it like a wife ?

    Since a wife can be bad or can be good

    So is life like a knife ?

    Since as a knife , life can be bad or can be good

    So you have to "know" how to minimize the bad so that it be the good life.

    --


    I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my philosophy
    below and in the below web link , and now here is my new and smart
    question to ChatGPT that learns you more about the efficient
    decentralization:

    Too much rapid convergent thinking is like the problem of too much centralization , so we have to know how to decentralize correctly by
    being good divergent thinking , so it is like to be efficient
    decentralization that fosters innovation , adaptability and resilience ,
    so it is like how you have to efficiently balance between exploitation
    and exploration in the genetic algorithm. And it is why you have in
    general to be an efficient decentralization.


    And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:

    "Your statement succinctly captures the importance of efficient decentralization in fostering innovation, adaptability, and resilience.
    Here's a breakdown of its key points:

    1- Convergent thinking and centralization: Rapid convergent thinking,
    akin to centralization, can lead to narrow perspectives and missed opportunities. Centralization consolidates decision-making power,
    potentially stifling creativity and adaptability.

    2- Decentralization and divergent thinking: Decentralization, coupled
    with good divergent thinking, allows for a broader range of perspectives
    and solutions. This promotes creativity, exploration, and adaptability
    by distributing decision-making power across various entities.

    3- Efficient decentralization for fostering innovation, adaptability,
    and resilience: Efficient decentralization, characterized by a balance
    between convergent and divergent thinking, is crucial. It empowers
    individuals or teams to explore diverse ideas and make decisions
    autonomously, fostering creativity, agility, and the ability to respond effectively to change.

    4- Balancing exploitation and exploration in genetic algorithms: Similar
    to optimizing genetic algorithms, finding the right balance between exploitation (utilizing known solutions effectively) and exploration
    (seeking out new solutions) is essential. This balance ensures optimal
    outcomes without sacrificing efficiency.

    5- The importance of efficient decentralization: Efficient
    decentralization is vital in various contexts, not only because it
    fosters innovation, adaptability, and resilience but also because it
    allows organizations and systems to thrive in dynamic environments. By distributing decision-making power and encouraging diverse perspectives, efficient decentralization enables agility and responsiveness,
    ultimately leading to better outcomes.

    In summary, your statement emphasizes the significance of efficient decentralization as a strategy for promoting innovation, adaptability,
    and resilience in organizations and systems, highlighting its parallels
    with optimization processes like genetic algorithms."


    So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
    of my philosophies below and in the below web link , but now i will talk
    about a very important thing in philosophy so that you understand my
    views as a new philosopher , so i think that the approach in philosophy
    is also the pragmatic way , since it is understandable that it can be
    said that life is not beautiful or life is shit or the like , but you
    have to understand philosophy , since as i am explaining below that you
    have to know how to be the pragmatic way so that to not be the failure
    of philosophy , i mean that when for example you measure like
    holistically , you can for example say that the smart human IQs are not
    smart human IQs , as i am explaining it below , but when you measure it relatively to the distribution of human IQs , you will say that the
    smart human IQs are in fact smart human IQs , so i think you are
    understanding the way of philosophy , since i think that so that
    philosophy not be a failure , you have to know how to like "convince"
    humans that the smart human IQs are smart human IQs , so now you are understanding that the way of convincing can also be the way of
    convincing that it is enough truth , even if it is not 100% truth , so i
    think you are understanding this new idea of my philosophy , so it is
    why you are noticing that i am by my way of doing philosophy here also
    wanting to convince , and i am optimistic about my way of doing , and
    you have to know that i am showing to you my kind of personality by
    showing you my philosophy below and in the below web link that looks
    like my personality , and of course you have to understand too that i am wanting to help people by making them understand my philosophy , so
    notice for example how i am showing below the important limitations of artificial intelligence and how i have just invented below a new model
    of what is human consciousness so that to show how artificial
    intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence , and by my
    way of doing i am wanting to help people compete and survive against
    artificial intelligence by knowing the important limitations of
    artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy below and in the below web link so that to understand my
    views as also a new philosopher:


    And now i will talk about Climate change and about biodiversity , so i
    think that we can solve in an efficient way the climate change problem
    and i think we can solve the biodiversity problem too , and here is how:

    So notice carefully in the following new article from scientific
    engineering that i think that a new technology is here that makes
    biofuels cheaper and greener than petroleum , and here is the article ,
    and read it carefully:

    https://interestingengineering.com/energy/a-new-technology-can-make-biofuels-cheaper-and-greener-than-petroleum


    And of course you have to notice carefully in the following article from Argonne national laboratory that biomass-based fuel could reduce
    greenhouse gas emissions between 40 and 93% , read it here:

    https://www.anl.gov/article/biofuels-offer-a-costeffective-way-to-lower-shipping-emissions


    So i think we can solve the Climate change problem by using biofuels ,
    as in the above , in a smart way and in collaboration with the following
    below ways:


    University of Tübingen's researchers unveil a groundbreaking solar cell
    for decentralized green hydrogen production, revolutionizing renewable
    energy. This breakthrough technology opens the door to large-scale applications, even with lower efficiencies. This advancement have the
    potential to make a significant contribution to energy supply and the
    reduction of CO2 emissions on a global scale.


    Read more here on Interesting Engineering:

    https://interestingengineering.com/science/solar-cell-powers-green-hydrogen-production


    Cows and other farm animals produce about 14% of human-induced climate emissions, and it is methane from their burps and manure that is seen as
    both the biggest concern and best opportunity for tackling global
    heating. Methane is more potent at warming the earth than carbon dioxide
    and it is an important emission target for policymakers because it
    leaves the atmosphere more quickly than carbon dioxide. The world's one billion+ cows are responsible for about 40% of global methane emissions
    - a significant contributor to global warming. And i invite you to read carefully the following new article from Interesting Engineering about
    how scientists have just engineered climate-smart cows with 10 to 20
    times more milk, and it permits to reduce the number of cows so that to
    reduce much more global warming , since Methane is responsible for
    around 30% of the current rise in global temperature:

    https://interestingengineering.com/science/scientists-engineer-climate-smart-cows-with-10-to-20-times-more-milk


    And read carefully the following:

    "Prof. Gunnar Trumbull spoke of “a new reality” in global climate
    policy. Until recently, people looked to the United Nations to set the
    climate policy agenda. No longer, according to Trumbull. As the cost for renewables has declined, governments now see renewable energy and decarbonization technologies as requirements of global competition.
    Governments are subsidizing these technologies and protecting the
    profits of the businesses that do the work. “That’s how we’re going to solve climate change,” Trumbull said. Countries will “compete their way
    out of it.” This new policy approach is a cause for optimism, according
    to Trumbull."


    Read more here:

    Choosing To Be Optimistic about Climate Change

    https://environment.harvard.edu/news/choosing-be-optimistic-about-climate-change


    Also i will say that we have to be optimistic about the biodiversity too , since read my following thoughts so that you understand why:

    A team of researchers from Tufts University Center for Cellular
    Agriculture has developed a new technique that could dramatically reduce
    the cost of lab-grown meat production , advances like this will bring us
    much closer to seeing affordable cultivated meat in our local
    supermarkets within the next few years , and you can read the following
    new interesting article from Interesting Engineering about it:

    https://interestingengineering.com/science/cheaper-lab-grown-meat-production


    And as you will read in my following thoughts that the key to
    biodiversity conservation is reducing meat consumption , so i think that
    the above advance of lab-grown meat production can solve the problem of biodiversity conservation efficiently. So i invite you to carefully read
    my following thoughts about biodiversity conservation so that to understand:

    I have not talked about Biodiversity conservation , so i think that we
    have not to be pessimistic about the Biodiversity , since as you will
    read in the following article that the key to biodiversity conservation
    is reducing meat consumption , so from what i have just read in internet
    , that we will be able to reduce much more meat consumption so that to
    solve the problem, so i invite you to read the following paper and the following article so that you understand:

    Here the interesting paper:

    "We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by
    2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef
    and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is
    almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline
    by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020..."

    Read more here:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40899-2


    And here is the article:

    Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/#:~:text=We%20suggest%20that%20impacts%20can,e.g.%20cattle%2C%20goats%2C%20sheep)


    And i invite you to read my following interesting thoughts in the
    following web link about the Supervolcanos and about the Miyake Events
    and about Climate Change and about Supernovas etc. and how we already
    grow enough food for 10 Billion People , and how i am explaining that
    there will be enough food for all , so read it in the following web link:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tK2ZLpmK3b4


    And as you have just noticed , i have just talked about the important limitations of artificial intelligence and about automation and about
    AI, read it below , and now i will talk more about the subject of
    automation , so i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts and writing:


    "A study by researchers from MIT and Boston University claims that
    automation is responsible for more than half of the increase in the
    income gap between the most educated and the least educated workers in
    the United States. The study estimates that automation reduced the wages
    of men without a high school diploma by 8.8% and of women without a high
    school diploma by 2.3%. These figures have been adjusted for inflation. According to the study by Acemoglu and Restrepo, growing income
    inequality could also stem from, among other things, the decline in the prevalence of unions (a highly sensitive topic today in technology
    companies), market concentration resulting in a lack of competition for
    labour, or other types of technological change.
    Acemoglu and Restrepo's study comes at a time when the debate over
    whether or not to tax robots is heating up. More and more voices rise to
    call for a tax on robots to combat the effects of automation on income inequality. In this regard, a study published last month by economists
    at MIT suggests that introducing a tax on robot labor, preferably a
    modest tax, would incentivize companies to retain workers, while
    offsetting some of the payroll taxes lost through downsizing. Of course,
    the conclusions of the study are not unanimous.

    According to economists' calculations, an effective tax on robots would probably be between 1% and 3.7%. The report estimates that if the tax is
    much higher, it would exaggerate the role that robots play in the
    operational routines of companies; and if it is lower, companies would
    have no incentive to retain human employees at all."

    Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):

    Study claims automation has caused more than half of US income
    inequality since 1980

    https://embarque.developpez.com/actu/340711/Une-etude-affirme-que-l-automatisation-est-a-l-origine-de-plus-de-la-moitie-de-l-inegalite-des-revenus-aux-Etats-Unis-depuis-1980-les-personnes-les-moins-diplomees-semblent-les-plus-touchees/


    And following are some of the important advantages of automation:

    1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
    the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
    thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

    2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
    there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
    production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

    3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
    has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
    conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
    be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
    examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
    significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
    TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

    4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
    as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
    Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
    These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
    companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
    needed to use and operate the computers.

    5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
    through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
    will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
    increase productivity.


    "In its research, Forrester predicts that automation and AI will replace
    4.9% of US jobs by 2030. This means that 0.6% of workers in the US might
    lose their jobs annually. Of this percentage of jobs lost to automation, generative AI specifically will account for 30% of the losses."

    Read more here in the following article:

    Generative AI “will replace 2.5 million jobs in the U.S. by 2030”

    https://www.techopedia.com/generative-ai-will-replace-2-5-million-jobs-in-the-u-s-by-2030


    And i invite you to read my below interesting thoughts:


    So i think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas
    of my philosophy below and in the below web link, and now i will talk
    about an important subject and it is the following:

    The service sector in USA is contributing around 80% or more to the
    country's GDP (Gross Domestic Product) , and the manufacturing sector,
    while still significant, represented a smaller portion of the GDP,
    typically around 10-20% , the manufacturing sector in USA and other
    western countries etc. has declined and the service sector has grown,
    the tendency of the service sector growing and the manufacturing sector shrinking is not unique to the USA but is observed globally,
    particularly in many advanced economies , and several factors have
    contributed to the decline of the manufacturing sector in the USA and
    the growth of the service sector:

    1- Globalization: The advent of globalization has led to increased
    competition from low-wage countries, making it cheaper for companies to outsource manufacturing operations to countries with lower labor costs ,
    but i invite you to carefully look at the benefits or advantages of
    outsourcing in my thoughts just below so that you understand.

    2- Technological advancements: Automation and technological innovations
    have significantly increased productivity in manufacturing, leading to a reduced need for human labor in many manufacturing processes. This has
    resulted in job losses and decreased employment in the manufacturing sector.

    3- Shift in consumer preferences: There has been a shift in consumer preferences towards services such as healthcare, education,
    entertainment, and information technology. This has increased demand for services and reduced demand for manufactured goods.

    4- Rise of the knowledge economy: The growth of the knowledge economy,
    driven by advancements in technology and the increasing importance of intellectual capital, has led to a greater emphasis on services such as research and development, consulting, and information technology services.

    5- Government policies: Government policies, such as trade agreements
    and taxation policies, have also played a role in shaping the relative
    sizes of the manufacturing and service sectors. Policies that promote
    free trade may encourage outsourcing of manufacturing, while policies
    that support the service sector may contribute to its growth.

    6- Cost of labor and regulation: The cost of labor and regulatory
    burdens in the USA, such as environmental regulations and labor laws,
    can make it more expensive for companies to manufacture goods
    domestically compared to outsourcing production to countries with lower
    labor costs and fewer regulatory requirements.

    Overall, a combination of these factors has led to the decline of the manufacturing sector and the growth of the service sector in the USA.

    And outsourcing manufacturing operations to countries like China can
    offer several benefits to companies:

    1- Lower Labor Costs: One of the primary reasons for outsourcing to
    countries like China is the significantly lower labor costs compared to developed countries like the USA. This allows companies to produce goods
    at a much lower cost, thus increasing profit margins or enabling them to
    offer products at competitive prices in the global market.

    2- Access to Skilled Workforce: Countries like China have large
    populations with a growing number of skilled workers, particularly in industries like electronics, textiles, and manufacturing. Outsourcing to
    these countries allows companies to tap into this skilled labor pool,
    often at a fraction of the cost of employing similarly skilled workers
    in developed countries.

    3- Economies of Scale: Outsourcing to countries with well-developed manufacturing infrastructures allows companies to benefit from economies
    of scale. Manufacturing facilities in countries like China often have
    the capacity to produce goods in large quantities efficiently, reducing per-unit production costs.

    4- Proximity to Suppliers: Many manufacturing facilities in countries
    like China are located close to suppliers of raw materials and
    components. This proximity can reduce transportation costs and lead
    times, making the supply chain more efficient and responsive to changes
    in demand.

    5- Infrastructure and Technology: Some countries, like China, have

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)