• "Ghostbusters Afterlife"

    From 68g.1499@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 02:02:40 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.hollywood, soc.culture
    XPost: alt.entertainment

    Late-Nite Reviews :

    Not a terrible movie - the expected mix of comedy/drama
    with one unexpected surprise.

    However, credits ... the entire movie was carried by
    the very talented Mckenna Grace, all others were
    merely supporting characters. So, why does Carrie Coon
    get top billing ???

    Grace has since become a teen hottie - and is into
    selling her music vids. Only avg imho ... and she
    may be Bi. Whatever.

    ANYway, olde-tyme actors aside, Grace WAS the movie
    and did it very well.

    This movie DID have one interesting angle - Harold
    Ramis had DIED before it was made ... yet they did
    a CGI version of him to fill-in critical scenes.
    Was this his wish ? What's the $$$ angle for his
    relatives/agents/etc ? Do the dead, computer-
    resurrected, actors have copywrite/residuals ???

    That angle becomes more relevant every day as "AI"
    improves. Current tech CAN do a pretty damned good
    rendition - including voice/nuances - of human
    actors dead or alive. As Hollywood and Big Money
    are nearly synonymous, where does this lead ?

    This WAS a facet of the last actors strike, but was
    it really resolved ? In a couple of years - really
    THAT soon - "AI" will be able to create totally
    believable on-screen characters ... who are NOT
    Union, demand NO paychecks/perks/etc. We saw
    hints of this going well back. The computer
    power is MUCH greater now and will be MUCH greater
    in the next few years.

    In Japanese anime-derivisions completely fake
    'actors' are oft more important/compelling
    than flesh-n-blood actors. Is this now the
    pattern for Hollywood ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)