Hello,



More of my philosophy about the why of my new model and about social justice and about fairness and about specialization and about my new monotheistic religion and about the efficient way of doing and about Jihadists and about my philosophy and more of
my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So i think i am not like the terrorists of the 9/11 like Mohamed Atta,
so i think i am also a philosopher and a thinker, so now i will answer
why i am saying the following in my below thoughts:


"...Since how to tune correctly this fight for life so that to not be too much savagery ? so then you will say that you have to tune correctly the fight for life by being fight for life, and it becomes circular logic that is not good and that doesn't
solve the problem of how to tune correctly the fight for life"


So you will ask what do i mean by the above, so isay that it is related to what we say in french: "Il faudrait du savoir vivre ensemble" , that we can translate in english by: "We have to know how to live in harmony", and i have also
just invented a new proverb in english and french that also shows it more clearly, and here it is:

"Amidst the world's urgency, patience prevails as a virtuous ally, bearing fruits of sweetness."

"En plein tumulte du monde, la patience prévaut en tant qu'alliée vertueuse, portant des fruits de douceur."

So you are now seeing or understanding more clearly the problem, so how can you bring this necessary patience ? so i think that now you are also understanding the why i have invented my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my below thoughts
of my new model:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i have
to make you understand my new model, so my new model comes in two parts, so there is my new economic model below that i think enhances the economic model of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith the father of Liberalism, and there is also my new
monotheistic religion below that i think is efficient, since you have also to understand what is an Ideal, so i think that an Ideal can not be that we have to return to the archaic model that is to be nationalism, so it is why we have to have something
that unite
people in a kind of way that is satisfactory, and it is why i am coming
with my new monotheistic religion that also has as a goal to unite people
in a kind of way that is satisfactory and to bring decency, other than that i think my new model also solves an important problem and it is the following:

I have just looked at the following video of the indian philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti, i invite you to look at it carefully:

Does God exist? | J. Krishnamurti

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYjYL448-yY

And you can read about Jiddu Krishnamurti here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiddu_Krishnamurti


So i think i am highly smart, and notice the approach of the above indian philosopher in the above video, so he wants humans to not believe
in God , but notice how he is saying that you have to go out the belief in God and not believe in God and then you have to fight for life, and here again there is like a logical contradiction , since how to tune correctly this fight for life so that to
not be too much savagery ? so then you will say that you have to tune correctly the fight for life by being fight for life, and it becomes circular logic that is not good and that doesn't solve the problem of how to tune correctly the fight for life, and
it is the big weakness of philosophy and of the philosophers, and it is why i have constructed quickly my new monotheistic religion that solves the problems and that solves the problems of previous monotheistic religions.


So i invite you to read my thoughts of my new economic model below,
and of my new monotheistic religion below:


So as you have just noticed , i have not talked about social justice , since
it is like inherent, since here is my discussion with ChatGPT so that to understand my views:


Here is my first question to ChatGPT:

"I mean that we can go from capitalism that is not a zero sum game to create peace, and social justice is inherent to the system , since without social justice we can have violence and disorder, so it is like inherent that we have to have it ?"


And here is what answered me ChatGPT:

"I understand your point now. Yes, social justice is indeed crucial for maintaining peace and order within a society. While capitalism is not inherently designed to achieve social justice, it can provide the framework for economic growth and prosperity.
By ensuring that social justice principles are integrated into the functioning of capitalism, it becomes more conducive to fostering peace and stability.

When social justice is prioritized within a capitalist system, it helps mitigate the potential negative consequences of inequality and exploitation. By implementing policies that promote equal opportunities, fair distribution of resources, and protection
of individual rights, a more just and inclusive society can be created.

Social justice within a capitalist framework involves addressing issues such as income inequality, access to education and healthcare, fair wages, worker rights, and environmental sustainability. By actively working towards these goals, capitalism can
contribute to reducing social tensions, enhancing social cohesion, and minimizing the risk of violence or disorder arising from unjust conditions.

It is important to note that achieving social justice within a capitalist system requires proactive efforts, as market forces alone may not necessarily lead to equitable outcomes. Governments, institutions, and civil society play crucial roles in
implementing policies, regulations, and social programs that ensure social justice is upheld.

By recognizing the importance of social justice within capitalism and actively working towards it, societies can strive to create a more peaceful, inclusive, and harmonious environment for all individuals."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:


"But i think that competition between capitalism and governance creates the conditions that makes capitalism fair"

And here is what has answered me ChatGPT:

"The interplay between capitalism and governance is indeed important for creating conditions that foster fairness within the system. Competition can be a driving force for innovation, productivity, and economic growth, while governance provides the
necessary framework to ensure that competition remains fair and equitable.

Governance mechanisms, such as regulations, laws, and oversight, help prevent anti-competitive practices, exploitation, and the concentration of power within capitalism. They set the rules of the game, establish safeguards for workers' rights, protect
consumers, and promote a level playing field for businesses.

By creating and enforcing regulations, governments can address market failures, promote social welfare, and ensure that capitalism operates within ethical boundaries. For example, anti-trust laws can prevent monopolistic behavior, labor regulations can
protect workers' rights, and environmental regulations can promote sustainability.

In addition to regulations, governance can also encompass social policies that aim to reduce inequality, provide social safety nets, and ensure access to basic services such as education, healthcare, and housing. These policies help counterbalance the
potential negative consequences of a purely market-driven system.

The relationship between capitalism and governance is dynamic and complex, and striking the right balance is essential. Too little regulation can lead to unfair practices, inequality, and social instability. On the other hand, excessive regulation can
stifle innovation, economic growth, and individual freedoms.

Finding the right equilibrium between competition and governance is an ongoing challenge. It requires a continuous evaluation and adjustment of policies to ensure that capitalism operates in a way that promotes both efficiency and fairness. By creating a
supportive regulatory environment and implementing effective social policies, societies can harness the potential of capitalism while upholding principles of social justice and fairness."


Other than that i invite you to read carefully my following interesting thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


So now i will talk about the division of Labour or specialization in capitalism, so in capitalism , specialization in what we do better lowers the errors in production , so this reduces the waste that occurs during production processes, other than that,
specialization in what we do better increases output, so it can take less hours to produce, so this lower unit costs, so other than that you have to understand my new model below that enhances the Adam Smith economic model, so i think my new model below
creates diversification of economy, since diversification of economy creates resilience of the economy, since i am saying in my below model that the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations are both the inequality of values and of self-interest or
egoism, and both inequality of values and self-interest or egoism diversifies economy, since when you say: The wanting to be rewarded for the values of inequality of values, so notice the pattern that is that the system is not just the wanting to be
rewarded, but it is also the wanting to be rewarded "for" the values of inequality of values, and the wanting to be rewarded is the engine of self-interest or egoism, and the "for the values of inequality of values" is the engine that comes from
inequality of values. And notice that the model is not complete since you have to read my following proverb so that you notice the other requirement, so here is my new proverb:

"As has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that human egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think that this saying of Adam Smith doesn't show the most important thing, since i think that the engine of egoism
alone is not sufficient, since it needs the most important step that makes egoism go in the right direction and it is that you have to give the great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. Since the engine of egoism can make you lose
your way by for example saying to you to give the great importance first to making big money, but giving the great importance first to making big money is not the way of being properly tooled !"


Other than that i invite you to read carefully my following interesting thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


So now i will make something clear about my new monotheistic religion,
and it is when i am saying that the Qur'aan is not the words of God, i mean that Angel Gabriel has enhanced to a certain level prophet Muhammad so that he also invent many parts of the Qur'aan, i mean that Angel Gabriel has put ideas of him in the Qur'
aan, and Angel Gabriel has to certain level controlled prophet Muhammad so that he can put ideas of him in the Qur'aan, so you are now understanding how my new monotheistic religion views Qur'aan and Islam, other than that, my new monotheistic religion
says that not only Adam and Eve and there descendants have been cursed by God, but the Qur'aan and the Bible too have been cursed by God, and it is why we find errors and scientific errors in the Qur'aan, and the fact that Angel Gabriel has controlled
and let prophet Muhammad put his ideas in the Qur'aan, is a curse from God, and you can read my below thoughts so that to understand my new monotheistic religion and so that to understand my views on different subjects:

So you have to understand my way of doing, so i will be more clear, so i have just looked more at the Jihadist like Mohamed Atta , and you have to know that i am not like those terrorists of the 9/11, since i think that they are idiotic, since i think
that they don't know how to think correctly, and there way of doing shows clearly that they are not well educated, so i think that the weakness of there ideology is that they are not well educated, as most of people are not well educated, so the best way
to fight against terrorism like the one of Mohamed Atta, is to well educate people, so i will give you an example so that you understand me: So take for example capitalism and competition in capitalism, so when you are not well educated you can also
think that capitalism and competition of capitalism are evil, so you can
then start to be like a Jihadist and attack USA that is this capitalism, so you are noticing the weakness of it that is: That most of people are not well educated, since they are not even able to understand correctly why the private sector of capitalism
is necessary and why competition of it is necessary, so it is why i am explaining it to you in my below thoughts, and it is why i am explaining my new model that i think enhances the model of Adam Smith the father of Liberalism, so then you are noticing
my way of doing that has also as a goal to avoid this kind of terrorism and violence that comes from lack of education, so i invite you to reread my below thoughts so that you understand my views on different subjects and so that to understand my way of
doing:

So i have just looked at the following video of Jihadists like Mohamed Atta:

A Mission To Die For

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqhaju79y5I


I think Jihadists like Mohamed Atta in the above video, are not thinkers, so you have to know that i am not like them, since the weakness of there ideology is that it is like they are reacting too quickly to the way of life of this kind of Liberty of sex
etc. in for example the West like America, but it is not the right way, since you have to know that most of humans are not well educated and that they are weak humans, since they are not equipped correctly, so you have to be compassionate towards the
West like America, so the best way to do is to well educate people correctly and to make them well equipped , and it is my way of doing, since i have invented a new monotheistic religion , and you can read about it in my below thoughts, and i have made
you understand my views on different subjects of technology and economics and politics and philosophy, and of course you can read them in my following thoughts:


So you can read my thoughts about my new monotheistic religion and about
Islam and the Hadith in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/w_3tJ_myplc


And I will now explain an important thing, so in economy and in business, you have to look at the economic model from a higher level point of view, i mean when for example there is competition in the private sector in the low level layer between
individuals around the world or inside a country , you have not to look at it pessimistically, since you have to look at the model from a higher level point of view that says that capitalism is not a zero sum game, and with a reasonable level of growth,
capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, so then it shows that we have to be optimistic, since even if americans in USA buy from arabs in arab countries or
arabs in arab countries buy from americans in USA, so i think it is a win-win situation, since capitalism is not a zero sum game, and with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a
relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, so then i think we have to be optimistic about capitalism since i think that capitalism brings Liberty, other than that we have to be optimistic since i have also invented a new monotheistic
religion that i think is efficient, so i think that it also brings Liberty , and you can read about it in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/w_3tJ_myplc


Other than that , i have just said that self-interest is controlled by competition so that to not lead to corruption, so then the good
idea is to make the competitive market of the private sector the powerful
motor of the economy, and speaking about competition , i invite you
to read about my new economic model below so that to understand my views:

So I have to emphasize the importance of competition. So i think that when multiple individuals or businesses compete for the same resources or customers, they are motivated to provide better quality goods and services at competitive prices. In a
competitive market, self-interest becomes regulated by the forces of supply and demand, consumer choice, and the desire to attract and retain customers.

Through this competition, we can argue that individuals are compelled to operate within the boundaries of fair and ethical behavior. If one party engages in corrupt practices, cheats customers, or engages in fraudulent activities, they risk losing their
competitive advantage as consumers will prefer alternatives. Therefore, the pressure to maintain market share and profitability acts as a check on self-interest, preventing it from devolving into harmful practices.

So it is why i say that the private sector is an attractive choice to make as the powerful motor of the economy, since it is a competitive market, but of course we have to know how to "regulate" it with anti-trust laws etc.

But of course notice in my above thoughts that competition is a higher level abstraction, since competition can create also transparency that is needed so that to fight against corruption, so you are understanding that the good information of the
products and services so that we make a good choice is important, and we can enlarge the point of view of economic competition by being competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different
political groups inside the congress etc. and by being competition that fights efficiently corruption that is for example the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).


So i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my new models and so that to understand my views:


So notice that in my just below model, i am saying that the engine
of prosperity and happiness of nations are both the inequality of values
and of self-interest or egoism, since when you say: The wanting to be rewarded for the values of inequality of values, so notice the pattern that is that the system is not just the wanting to be rewarded, but it is also the wanting to be rewarded "for"
the values of inequality of values, and the wanting to be rewarded is the engine of self-interest or egoism, and the "for the values of inequality of values" is the engine that comes from inequality of values. And notice that the model is not complete
since you have to read my following proverb so that
you notice the other requirement, so here is my new proverb:


"As has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that human egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think that this saying of Adam Smith doesn't show the most important thing, since i think that the engine of egoism
alone is not sufficient, since it needs the most important step that makes egoism go in the right direction and it is that you have to give the great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. Since the engine of egoism can make you lose
your way by for example saying to you to give the great importance first to making big money, but giving the great importance first to making big money is not the way of being properly tooled !"


And I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think my new just below model also shows that the engine that is the source that is inequality of values
also pushes us to be specialized in what we do better when for example we have or we are equipped with the good value(s) that make(s) the efficiency, so then the specialization in what we do better also permits to make much less errors and it permits to
higher much more productivity and quality, so then my new model is smart since it shows the fundamental engines of prosperity and happiness of nations that are both the inequality of values and of self-interest or egoism and it shows more. So i invite
you to reread my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views and so that to notice how i am also smart abstract thinking by for example smartly abstracting with my new below proverbs, since i mean that in philosophy you have also to know how
to abstract efficiently with new proverbs, since i think that the being smart is also the knowing how to smartly and efficiently abstract, so i invite you to also read carefully my below thoughts by noticing my way of smartly abstracting:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think you have to understand that i am also a new philosopher, so from my previous model just below, you will
notice that i am not saying that the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations is survival, since to survive is just the keeping oneself alive, so it is not about prosperity and happiness of nations, so it is why i am also in my model below speaking
about the engine of self-interest or egoism and about the engine that is the source that is inequality of values, and notice carefully that in my model , it is the wanting the reward that creates capitalism. So i think that my model shows more clearly
what is the engines etc. so i invite you to reread my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and i invite you to read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link,
and now i will talk about a philosophical subject of why do we have to be competition ? , so i think that competition comes from the fact that the options from where you have to choose come from the fact that we are a diversity of values of quality and/
or quantity and/or cost etc., i mean that the value comes from this diversity of values that want to be "rewarded", so the source of from where comes competition is inequality of values, so when we are conscious about the inequality of values, we start
wanting to be rewarded for the values, so then the wanting to be rewarded is the engine that we call self-interest or egoism , so then i can logically infer that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith the father of Liberalism has not been correct by
saying that the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations is only egoism, since i think that the engine from my above logical thinking is also the inequality of values, so the good reward is so important so that to be an efficient system, since
without the good reward, people will have the tendency to not be efficient, so then you can not just say to optimise by for example being the working hard that creates a lot of quantity, but you have to be the good diversity of values of the being smart
and/or the working hard etc. so that to be an efficient system. After that we have to ask a philosophical question of wich value is the most important? is it the working hard or is it the being smart etc. so that to be the good hierarchy?, since without
the good hierarchy we will be disorder and inefficiency, so we know that the being smart is important for becoming a leader, but i also think that the being smart permits to "transcend" our human living conditions and become powerful or so powerful , so
look for example at our exponential progress and you will notice it, and i also invite you to read my below thoughts about the exponential progress of our humanity, so i think that the being smart is so important,


And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


So i also invite you to look at the following web link with my thoughts about the new and future technologies:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/lfnlD52jDzI


And of course, i invite you to read all my below thoughts about artificial intelligence and about technology and more , so that to understand my views:

I invite you to read the following new article about the new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi:

After Bard, Google’s DeepMind hopes Gemini will truly surpass ChatGPT

https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/artificial-intelligence/deepmind-claims-gemini-will-rival-chatgpt-8688846/


And here is my questions to ChatGPT about the limitations of the above new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi:


And here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"So the hybrid model of AlphaGO techniques and large language models such ChatGPT, used by new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi,
can still lack on creativity , since the exploration is limited by the data ?"


And here is what answered me ChatGPT:


"Yes, the hybrid model of combining AlphaGo techniques with large language models like ChatGPT may still face limitations when it comes to creativity, and one of the factors contributing to this limitation is the reliance on available data.

Creativity often involves thinking beyond the existing patterns and generating novel, innovative solutions. While large language models like ChatGPT have shown impressive language generation capabilities, they are fundamentally trained on vast amounts of
existing text data. The model's responses are primarily influenced by the patterns, examples, and language conventions present in the training data.

If the training data does not sufficiently capture a wide range of creative or unconventional approaches, the model may struggle to generate truly creative outputs. The model's exploration is indeed limited by the data it has been exposed to during
training, which can constrain its ability to think "outside the box" and produce highly imaginative or innovative responses.

To enhance creativity, it may be necessary to provide the model with additional diverse and creative training data or employ techniques like reinforcement learning with suitable reward mechanisms that encourage creative outputs. However, achieving truly
human-level creativity in language generation remains a challenging goal for current AI models, and they may not match the level of inventive thinking and imagination exhibited by human beings."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:


"And what you are saying is also true for the hybrid model of AlphaGO techniques and large language models such ChatGPT ?"


"Yes, the limitations I mentioned regarding creativity and the influence of available data still apply to the hybrid model that combines AlphaGo techniques with large language models like ChatGPT.

The hybrid model inherits the data limitations from the underlying large language model component. It heavily relies on the patterns and examples present in the training data to generate responses. Therefore, if the training data does not contain diverse
and creative examples, the hybrid model may struggle to exhibit high levels of creativity in its outputs.

While integrating AlphaGo techniques can enhance decision-making and exploration capabilities, it does not fundamentally change the limitations related to creativity imposed by the available training data. The hybrid model may still face challenges in
generating highly creative or innovative responses that go beyond what it has seen during training.

Achieving true human-level creativity in AI models remains an ongoing research challenge."


And so that to understand more the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 and of the next new Google AI model called
Gemimi, i invite you to read my following thoughts:


Also i want you to understand another important thing about Large Language Models such as GPT-4, and here is what has answered me ChatGPT so that you understand it:


"Capturing long-range dependencies and global patterns efficiently is an ongoing research area, and while significant progress has been made, it is a complex problem that may not have a definitive "solution" in the traditional sense. The field of deep
learning and natural language processing continues to evolve, and researchers are continuously exploring new techniques and architectures to improve the efficiency of capturing long-range dependencies.

The timeline for achieving optimal efficiency in handling long-range dependencies is difficult to predict. It depends on various factors, including the complexity of the problem, available resources for research and development, and breakthroughs in the
field. While some advancements may be made in the near future, it is possible that further refinements and optimizations could take several years or even a decade to fully address the challenges associated with computational expense.

It's important to note that progress in artificial intelligence research is often iterative, with incremental improvements over time. Researchers continually propose new techniques, architectures, and optimizations to enhance the efficiency of models. It
is a collaborative effort involving academia, industry, and open-source communities.

Therefore, while it is challenging to provide a definitive timeline for solving the problem of efficiently capturing long-range dependencies, ongoing research and innovation in the field suggest that improvements and advancements will continue to be made
over time."


And here is what thinks ChatGPT about the pattern that i have just discovered with my fluid intelligence:


Here is my following question to ChatGPT:


"What do you think of my following thoughts:

So i have to explain something important, so since i have just discovered an important pattern with my fluid intelligence and read about it in my below previous thoughts, so i think that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are capturing causality
indirectly from the language and much more easily in the languages like french or english , so in professions like psychology or the law or philosophy that use the language like french or english, it is easy for Large Language Models to capture causality,
but in software development , it is more difficult, since for example in GitHub where you find the open source software projects, Large Language Models are not able to capture causality correctly, since those software projects in GitHub are not
languages like french and english, so causality in them is not specified and modeled with a language like french or english, so you are understanding more the important pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence below that explains a so
important thing, so then you are understanding that it is important to help Large Language Models such as GPT-4 to capture causality by modeling it with a language like french or english , by specifying it enough and clearly. So then you are
understanding this important limitation of Large Language Models such as GPT-4."



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)