Hello,




More of my philosophy about artificial Intelligence from a psychologist's point of view and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



Artificial Intelligence from a psychologist's point of view

Read more here on ScienceDaily:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/03/230301101527.htm


More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT passes Google coding interview for Level 3 Engineer with $183K salary and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


ChatGPT Passes Google Coding Interview for Level 3 Engineer With $183K salary

Read more here:

https://www.pcmag.com/news/chatgpt-passes-google-coding-interview-for-level-3-engineer-with-183k-salary?fbclid=IwAR3OilgtuBdzRBNRDNm1W4hGNN_pQL2fCNqZoLq1-kTImp1l6j6-vKirsrE

ChatGPT passes Wharton Business School's MBA exam, gets a B

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chatgpt-passes-wharton-business-schools-mba-exam-gets-a-b


More of my philosophy about how Google's ChatGPT rival to be released in coming 'weeks and months' and more about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



Google's ChatGPT rival to be released in coming 'weeks and months'

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/google-ai-companion-to-search-release


More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT may be the fastest growing consumer app in internet history and more of my thoughts..


ChatGPT may be the fastest growing consumer app in internet history

"ChatGPT may have become the fastest growing app in history after hitting 100 million monthly active users, or MAUs, in late January, according to a report from Swiss banking giant UBS. The OpenAI-owned chatbot surpassed 100 million MAUs just over two
months after its launch – comfortably beating the growth speeds of leading apps like TikTok and Instagram, according to the UBS note."

Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/341115/ChatGPT-est-peut-etre-l-application-grand-public-a-la-croissance-la-plus-rapide-de-l-histoire-d-Internet-atteignant-100-millions-d-utilisateurs-en-un-peu-plus-de-2-mois-selon-un-rapport-d-UBS/


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


OpenAI launches ChatGPT Plus at $20 per month: what to know

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/openai-launches-chatgpt-subscription


More of my philosophy about how Meta's AI expert says that ChatGPT is not revolutionary but 'nicely done' and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



Meta's AI expert: ChatGPT is not revolutionary but 'nicely done'

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/metas-ai-expert-chatgpt-is-not-revolutionary-but-nicely-done


More of my philosophy about Google LaMDA and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


"Google LaMDA is trained on 137 Billion parameters and with 1.56 Trillion publicly available words, dialogue data, and documents on the internet. On top of that, LaMDA is also fine-tuned to always mold its response on three key parameters – Safety,
Quality, and Groundedness.
Riley Goodside from Scale AI reports that LaMDA’s responses are more authentic and closer to human speech than ChatGPT. It will be easier for LaMDA to integrate with applications like Google Assistant, Workspace, and even the search engine itself."

Read more here:

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/01/google-lamda-versus-chatgpt.html


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT rival to launch in China and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


ChatGPT rival to launch in China, reports claim

"Chinese tech giant Baidu is planning to launch its own version of the controversial AI chatbot ChatGPT, according to reports.

Baidu, often referred to as China’s Google, has reportedly been developing an artificial intelligence platform with the aim of integrating it into its search engine.

The AI bot could be ready to launch as early as March, claimed separate reports from Reuters and Bloomberg, which both claimed it would rival the capabilities of OpenAI’s technology."

Read more here:

https://sports.yahoo.com/chatgpt-rival-launch-china-reports-133400577.html


More of my philosophy about Google MusicLM and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

"Google has created a new artificial intelligence (AI) system called MusicLM that can produce music in any genre from a text description.

"Whoa, this is bigger than ChatGPT to me. Google almost solved music generation, I'd say," Keunwoo Choi, an AI Scientist at Gaudio Lab, Tweeted on Friday.

The algorithm can produce songs that make sense for descriptions of "substantial complexity" after being trained on a dataset of 280,000 hours of music."

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/google-creates-new-text-to-music-ai


So from the above article and from my below thoughts , we can notice
that Google will in the future still be a powerful company even with the coming of ChatGPT or the next GPT-4.


More of my philosophy about the problems of ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..


I think that the other problems of ChatGPT is that computer networking speeds are improving but they are not increasing at the speed AI people want them to as the models are growing at a faster rate than the speed is increasing, and i think that
supercomputers bandwidth so that to train the next ChatGPTs will not be enough as the AI models are coming with trillions upon trillions of parameters.

Read the following article so that to notice it:

https://techmonitor.ai/technology/ai-and-automation/chatgpt-ai-compute-power


And the other problem of ChatGPT is the following:

I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:

"High cost of computational power

Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."


Read more here:

https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69


And read also the following article so that to understand more:

https://bdtechtalks.com/2023/01/02/chatgpt-google-search/


And the other problem of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is the following:


ChatGPT goes straight into the wall of knowledge!

Read more here (You can translate the web page from french to english):

https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-fonce-droit-mur-connaissance-103073/


More of my philosophy about automation and about Google and more of my thoughts..


I have just added the thoughts on the effective tax on robots, please read again:


"A study by researchers from MIT and Boston University claims that automation is responsible for more than half of the increase in the income gap between the most educated and the least educated workers in the United States. The study estimates that
automation reduced the wages of men without a high school diploma by 8.8% and of women without a high school diploma by 2.3%. These figures have been adjusted for inflation. According to the study by Acemoglu and Restrepo, growing income inequality could
also stem from, among other things, the decline in the prevalence of unions (a highly sensitive topic today in technology companies), market concentration resulting in a lack of competition for labour, or other types of technological change.
Acemoglu and Restrepo's study comes at a time when the debate over whether or not to tax robots is heating up. More and more voices rise to call for a tax on robots to combat the effects of automation on income inequality. In this regard, a study
published last month by economists at MIT suggests that introducing a tax on robot labor, preferably a modest tax, would incentivize companies to retain workers, while offsetting some of the payroll taxes lost through downsizing. Of course, the
conclusions of the study are not unanimous.

According to economists' calculations, an effective tax on robots would probably be between 1% and 3.7%. The report estimates that if the tax is much higher, it would exaggerate the role that robots play in the operational routines of companies; and if
it is lower, companies would have no incentive to retain human employees at all."

Read more here (and you can translate the web page from french to english):

Study claims automation has caused more than half of US income inequality since 1980

https://embarque.developpez.com/actu/340711/Une-etude-affirme-que-l-automatisation-est-a-l-origine-de-plus-de-la-moitie-de-l-inegalite-des-revenus-aux-Etats-Unis-depuis-1980-les-personnes-les-moins-diplomees-semblent-les-plus-touchees/

And following are some of the advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.

More of my philosophy about Google and about ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..


Google is preparing its response to ChatGPT: developed by its subsidiary DeepMind, Sparrow will go into private beta later this year.

"Sparrow is based on Deepmind's Chinchilla language model, which has fewer parameters than OpenAI's larger models (but was trained with lots of data). The language model, which was introduced in April 2022, outperformed GPT-3 in common language
benchmarks. However, ChatGPT is based on the more advanced version 3.5 of GPT."

Read more here (and you can translate the webpage from french to english)

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/340683/Google-prepare-sa-reponse-a-ChatGPT-developpe-par-sa-filiale-DeepMind-Sparrow-passera-en-beta-privee-plus-tard-cette-annee-Contrairement-a-l-IA-d-OpenAI-ce-dernier-devrait-citer-ses-sources/


So then i think that even with the ChatGPT or GPT-4 , Google will still
be powerful, since Google has well diversified its revenues that are composed from the Google Cloud that is 7.5% of Google revenue, and from
Apps and hardware and content that are 10.9% of Google revenue
and from Youtube ads that are 11.2% of Google revenue ..., so there remain the Ads from Google search, but since Google will soon come with Sparrow that will compete with ChatGPT and with Microsoft, so i think Google will still be a powerful company.

ChatGPT passes Wharton Business School's MBA exam, gets a B

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chatgpt-passes-wharton-business-schools-mba-exam-gets-a-b


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have looked more and more at how ChatGPT composes poems of Love, and i think that ChatGPT can write poems of Love and it can be good, but
i think ChatGPT and artificial intelligence have a great difficulty at inventing new things such as inventing new algorithms, since ChatGPT can only detect or discover patterns and learn them on the data in wich it has been trained, and so that to
understand how to beat artificial intelligence, here is my following thoughts about it:

More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness is by
logical analogy like the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification
by our brain, since we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousness of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level,
so it is the same for what i am explaining below, since so that to compose the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, we have to understand the meaning of the low level constructs such as: If a then b and if b then c then a then
c, so then it is like a reification that we do, since when for example we say: a then b, we are like reifying from the low level constructs of consciousness of time and space and matter to the upper levels.


More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have just explained more what is consciousness, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:

So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and reality with wich
you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is consciousness.


More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness gives
like the true meaning by composing with our feelings of what is reality and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification, i mean that when
you have an "idea", so an idea can be just a word, but if you add like the true meaning to this word by using your feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter, so it become like an idea that is "alive" with consciousness, so then
if you have a sentence or many sentences or a text, so this kind of reification can become like a "movie" of meanings of consciousness that is played in your brain and that gives a consciousness of the text or sentence, so it is why my model says that
the human brain compose with those meanings of feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so then my model of what is consciousness permits to make you understand how artificial intelligence is limited as i am
explaining it above and below, and it permits to do predictions like i am doing it below, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about the essence of smartness and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video of a french arab Algerian called Idriss Aberkane, so Idriss Aberkane has obtained three doctorate degrees in management science from Paris Saclay, in comparative literature from University of Strasbourg, and in
diplomacy from Centre d'Études Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, you can read about him in
wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idriss_Aberkane


And here is his video about IQ, so i invite you to look at it:

Pourquoi le QI est une ESCROQUERIE ? | Idriss Aberkane


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpA1dSHdqRQ


So i am not in accordance with Idriss Aberkane in the above video,
and i am finding him not so smart as me, since he is saying that the IQ is not important, but i think that the IQ is also important, but notice how i am defining smartness in my below proverb, and here is my proverb and read it carefully:

"Smartness is not just smartness of the IQ and smartness of the culture, but it is also the being precision in thinking that is not precision of smartness of the IQ and of the culture, and it is also the smartness of the being intellectually lively and
well attentive and it is also emotional smartness."


So I think i am a new smart philosopher, so I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will talk more about the essence of smartness, so i will ask a
philosophical question of:


What is smartness ?


So i think that you have to discover a pattern or patterns with your fluid intelligence that answers the question more precisely, and the patterns are the following:

Smartness is the quality of intellectual meaning of a pattern that you can discover with your fluid intelligence or of a system that permits to adapt well, since i think that the goal of smartness is that it permits to adapt well, so then we can define a
mechanism in the material reality that is mapped to an intellectual mechanism that brings precision as a smartness, so then you are noticing that in my above proverb i am defining the precision that is not the precision of smartness of the IQ or of the
culture as a smartness, and it is understandable by my way of defining smartness, so as you notice that we can not neglect the fact that the quality of human intellectual meaning enhances smartness, so then it is not logical to say that artificial
intelligence without the human intellectual meaning can be the same smartness or level of smartness as the human smartness, and i have given a logical proof of it by saying the following:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:


How to beat artificial intelligence ?


So i think i am smart and i will start by giving you a good example so that you understand:

So if i say:

If a then b
and
if b then c

A human can logically infer that it means: then a then c

But the problem in artificial intelligence is that the patterns
comes from the data on wich artificial intelligence was trained ,
so how for example artificial intelligence does "generalize" the above example and make it a theorem in mathematics?, i mean that so that a human generalizes from the above example he also use the "meaning" from human consciousness, so i think that it is
the weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, i mean that human consciousness is able to make such generalizations with the help of the meaning from human consciousness when the pattern to be discovered is unknown to artificial
intelligence, so you have to understand that human consciousness is also consciousness of space and time and matter that permits to "compose" the meaning , so then you are understanding from my explanation that what is lacking to artificial intelligence
is this meaning from the human consciousness that permits smartness to be such sophisticated smartness such as constructing a mathematical theorem from the above example, so now i think you are getting more the bigger picture of it. So i will give you an
example of my interactions with ChatGPT so that you understand more,so here it is:

So i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:

"Make a theorem of the following: if a then b and if b then c then a then c"

And here is what answered ChatGPT:

"The theorem can be stated as follows:

If a implies b, and if b implies c, then a implies c.

This theorem is known as the transitive property of implication, or the principle of transitivity. It states that if a statement (a) implies another statement (b), and if that statement (b) in turn implies a third statement (c), then the original
statement (a) must also imply the third statement (c). This principle holds for all statements that have the logical structure of implication, regardless of the specific content of the statements."

So if you are smart you will notice that in the above answer of ChatGPT, ChatGPT is not understanding the meaning of the theorem, and it has
not constructed the theorem from the low level constructs such as in my above example, but it is just discovering the theorem from the patterns on the data on wich it has been trained, so now you are understanding the limit of the smartness of ChatGPT
and of artificial intelligence, and of course i think you are now understanding how to beat artificial intelligence, since i think that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT needs patterns that help it compose other new patterns, but it can not compose
a pattern if the patterns that compose it are lacking from the data on wich it has been trained, so you can compose this pattern by using the meaning from human consciousness as in my above example.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)