Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
it's sane.
Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
it's 99% drug-resistant.
If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
TOO many.
It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P- nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
it's sane.
Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
it's 99% drug-resistant.
If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
TOO many.
It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
it's sane.
Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
it's 99% drug-resistant.
If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
TOO many.
It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
  "28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
   I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
   it's sane.
   Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
   has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
   it's 99% drug-resistant.
   If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
   WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
   TOO many.
   It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
  Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
On 3/1/23 10:19 AM, Frank wrote:
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
  "28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
   I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
   it's sane.
   Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
   has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
   it's 99% drug-resistant.
   If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
   WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
   TOO many.
   It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
  Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
 The ardent anti-maskers were mostly paranoids and/or
 fanatic dumb-asses. By "ardent" I mean "against masks
 under ALL circumstances, Just Because". It was "political".
 The other, much larger, "anti" sentiment faction was more
 practically oriented, no masks were reason says they will
 serve little or no purpose. That was not "political",
 just sensible.
 The "pro" side also had its own fanatics - unfortunately
 a few to many of them were in influential public positions
 and thus amplified the fanaticism of their opposite numbers.
 Idiocy/fanaticism is EASY to create/amplify ... sensible takes
 a LONG time to re-establish, usually after the damage is done.
On 3/1/2023 7:40 PM, 28A.I873 wrote:
On 3/1/23 10:19 AM, Frank wrote:
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
  "28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
   I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
   it's sane.
   Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
   has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
   it's 99% drug-resistant.
   If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
   WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
   TOO many.
   It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
  Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
  The ardent anti-maskers were mostly paranoids and/or
  fanatic dumb-asses. By "ardent" I mean "against masks
  under ALL circumstances, Just Because". It was "political".
  The other, much larger, "anti" sentiment faction was more
  practically oriented, no masks were reason says they will
  serve little or no purpose. That was not "political",
  just sensible.
  The "pro" side also had its own fanatics - unfortunately
  a few to many of them were in influential public positions
  and thus amplified the fanaticism of their opposite numbers.
  Idiocy/fanaticism is EASY to create/amplify ... sensible takes
  a LONG time to re-establish, usually after the damage is done.
I believe the rational on TB is well established. Masking and
vaccination for Covid is just getting there and neither have stopped it.
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
I believe the rational on TB is well established. Masking and
vaccination for Covid is just getting there and neither have stopped it.
In article <ttnqel$3vr2j$1@dont-email.me>,
Frank <"frank "@frank.net> wrote:
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
How do you feel about Fox boasting how their work is to lie to
their viewers?
On 3/1/23 11:15 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <ttnqel$3vr2j$1@dont-email.me>,
Frank <"frank "@frank.net> wrote:
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
How do you feel about Fox boasting how their work is to lie to
their viewers?
At least they boast ... MSNBC/CNN *never* admit anything :-)
Frank <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in news:ttnqel$3vr2j$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and drugged
against her will after refusing treatment for a year — so is
it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I think
it's sane.
Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That disease
has thousands of years of history fucking-up people and NOW
it's 99% drug-resistant.
If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
TOO many.
It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
They believe what Trump tells them to believe.
On 3/1/23 10:19 AM, Frank wrote:
On 3/1/2023 8:57 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote in news:j5ednYetZKrtb2P-
nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com:
On 2/28/23 11:57 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <XJKdnfuR38EhUWP-nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
  "28A.I873" <28A.I873@noabzba.net> wrote:
Woman with tuberculosis to be arrested this Friday and
drugged against her will after refusing treatment for a
year — so is it government overreach or fair enough?
This has been part of public health law for a long time.
   I listed my POV on the subject quite clearly - and I
think    it's sane.
   Just CAN'T have live TB cases wandering around. That
disease    has thousands of years of history fucking-up
people and NOW Â Â Â it's 99% drug-resistant.
   If she doesn't want treatment, fine - but she CANNOT BE
   WANDERING THE STREETS in that case. TOO dangerous to
   TOO many.
   It was called "The Consumption" for an actual REASON.
  Watch for the conservative "I have a right to
spread a fatal disease" anti maskers to step in
on this one.............
Doubt it. They generally believe in things that work.
The ardent anti-maskers were mostly paranoids and/or
fanatic dumb-asses. By "ardent" I mean "against masks
under ALL circumstances, Just Because". It was "political".
The other, much larger, "anti" sentiment faction was more
practically oriented, no masks were reason says they will
serve little or no purpose. That was not "political",
just sensible.
The "pro" side also had its own fanatics - unfortunately
a few to many of them were in influential public positions
and thus amplified the fanaticism of their opposite numbers.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 86:37:32 |
| Calls: | 6,922 |
| Files: | 12,382 |
| Messages: | 5,433,685 |