Hello,



More of my philosophy about price control and about capitalism and about
my philosophy and more of my thoughts

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have not talked about price control by the government in capitalism,
and here is how to solve this problem in capitalism:


What about minimum wages? On the one hand, as Hazlitt stresses, minimum wages are a kind of price control. On the other hand, since they raise the incomes of the poorest group of workers, increasing their ability to purchase all kinds of goods and
services, minimum wages will almost always be a superior alternative to price controls.


And here is the other problem in capitalism:


More of my philosophy about the bad tendency of the shrinking of the middle class in USA and more of my thoughts..


I have to give some statistics so that you understand more
the holistic view of it, and here it is:

"The shrinking of the middle class has been accompanied by an increase in the share of adults in the upper-income tier – from 14% in 1971 to 21% in 2021 – as well as an increase in the share who are in the lower-income tier, from 25% to 29%. These
changes have occurred gradually, as the share of adults in the middle class decreased in each decade from 1971 to 2011, but then held steady through 2021."

Read more here:

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/04/20/how-the-american-middle-class-has-changed-in-the-past-five-decades/


So as you are noticing that the lower-income tier has gone from 25% to 29%, so then there is more poor people in USA. So then you have to
understand that we have to solve the "problematic" of this bad tendency
by implementing progressive capitalism as i am explaining it in my
below thoughts:

More of my philosophy of why americans feel so poor and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to look at the following video:

Why Americans Feel So Poor | CNBC Marathon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCQiywN7pH4


So you have to know that i have just talked about this problematic
of why americans feel so poor, and it is the following, read the
below article of how McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class and you will understand, and i am also giving the way of how to solve the
problem by being progressive capitalism, so read it in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the US problems and world problems and more of my thoughts..

I think that i am highly smart, and the main problem of USA as i am showing it below by posting the web links, is that Management consultants, like of the powerful McKinsey, implemented and rationalized a transformation in the American corporation by
downsizing in response not to particular business problems but rather to a new managerial ethos and methods; they downsized when profitable as well as when struggling, and during booms as well as busts. So i think it is the main problem, since for
example read in the following paper that says that: "In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants of the U.S. manufacturing sector that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth
in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment."

Read more here so that to understand:

Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228705

But about the other problem of part-time employment, i think American corporations have to understand that this way of managing
by part-time employment is limited, since we know that a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about McKinsey and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Became One Of The Most Powerful Companies In The World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBmmMj_maII

And i also invite you to read this interesting article about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/


More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so
notice carefully that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts
carefully so that to understand:


And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic
party about his reforms of his
progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
to understand:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc


And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..

I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI


And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
to understand:

Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “
People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:

Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html



And read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that you understand my views about capitalism and about productivity etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


More of my philosophy about tolerance and about my philosophy and more more of my thoughts..


I think i am a new smart philosopher, and i have just looked to the following video about tolerance from Rajneesh (born Chandra Mohan Jain; 11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh,[2] Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, and later as Osho (/ˈoʊʃoʊ/), that was an Indian godman, mystic, and founder of the
Rajneesh movement,
you can read about him here on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajneesh#:~:text=Rajneesh%20(born%20Chandra%20Mohan%20Jain,movement%20leader%20during%20his%20life.

And here is his video about tolerance:

OSHO: Tolerance Is an Ugly Word

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8ouDk2Mayw


So i am a new smart philosopher that is not in accordance with the indian Rajneesh in the above video, since tolerance can be engendered from a good philosophy that brings hope, so for example the exponential progress of our humanity brings hope as i am explaining it in my below thoughts, but you have of course to know how to
manage correctly this exponential progress of our humanity, and you can also, like i am doing it in my below new ideas of my philosophy, create the meaning of human life or life so that to be successful and so that to bring tolerance , so you are
noticing that i am not in accordance with the indian Rajneesh in the above video that says that we have not to be tolerance, since i am saying that we have to know how to be smart by creating hope that brings tolerance and by creating the meaning of
human life that brings tolerance.

I think i am a new smart philosopher, but now i will ask a philosophical question of:


Is mathematics invented or discovered ?


So i think that it also depends on the what is it that we call creativity that can be called invention ? so it depends on the standards that permit to measure if it is an invention or not, since discovering a pattern with your fluid intelligence can
become an invention by the this or that standard, so then i think in mathematics we discover patterns in the reality or in the world of ideas that construct mathematics , but discovering patterns can be an invention and it can be creativity that is not
an invention, so i think that mathematics is both discovered and invented.


More of my philosophy about the difficulty of human life or life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a new smart philosopher, so when you are a smart philosopher , you will not say that humans are smart, since the difficulty of human life is like greater, i mean that the bar of difficulty of human life is like set high by also the fact that
the genetics of humans is not apt at managing correctly this bar of difficulty of human life that is like set high, and it is like the absolute measure, so human smartness doesn't come from just relative smartness, but it comes "greatly" from the fact
that the genetics of humans is not apt at managing correctly this bar of difficulty of human life that is like set high, so you are noticing that it like shows that humans are fallible(that means being erroneous) or as the french saying says: "L'erreur
est humaine" or in Latin language it means: "errare humanum est". So i think i am a highly smart new philosopher, but you have to understand more deeply the essence of my philosophy, so i will explain it to you:

So my philosophy says that the problem is not self-interest or self-interest that creates competition that is the problem, but it is how to "tune" "correctly" self-interest and competition, so notice carefully how i am smart by saying "try" to enhance
the value in my below thoughts , since you can for example try to tune correctly self-interest and competition by enhancing the value by giving "hope" by making humans conscious about the exponential progress of humanity that will rapidly enhance much
more the value, but as i am saying that you have to know how to manage correctly the exponential progress of our humanity, and i think that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, and it means that in about 10 years to 15 years
from now, the value will be enhanced much more, so then i have also said that you can also "try" to tune correctly self-interest and competition by enhancing more the conditions like for example the collective imaginary of for example humans that look at
movies of fights between the good and bad or look at violent movies and think that humans are violent or the like, so i think that you have just to make humans conscious about the fact that most humans are apt to be good so that to enhance the conditions,
but of course you have to understand the new ideas of my philosophy that want to solve the problem of the lack of meaning of human life or life by another philosophical way, and here is the new ideas of my philosophy that you can read in the following
web link so that you understand my views as a new philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/887x_MB7Cbk

And i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand what is the exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the following web links:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/M-DJ1mPW9ss


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/887x_MB7Cbk



More of my philosophy about political philosophy and more of my thoughts..


More of my philosophy about optimism and about the exponential progress
of our humanity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I have just looked at the following song in the following youtube video of a black american singer called Flo Rida, so i invite you to look at it:

Flo Rida - I Cry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLuWHr6-0YQ


So i think that this black american singer is like too much pessimistic about USA, so i invite you to read my following new proverbs so that to understand that we have to be optimistic about the exponential progress of our humanity and about the
exponential growth of capitalism because of digitalization and the like, since i also think that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower
to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, and it means that in about 10 years to 15 years from now we will be much more advanced, and of
course that even if you are not well educated by the way of schools or universities, you can use internet so that to educate yourself and you can use ChatGPT and the like so that to do it, so i think that we have to be optimistic about USA and not as
pessimistic as the this black american singer, so i invite you to read my following two proverbs so that you notice that we have to be optimistic about it:


Here is my new proverb:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."



Here is my new poem (and read my below thoughts):

---

I don't want to disconnect

Since i think i am the beautiful intellect

I don't want to disconnect

Since i want to talk the beautiful subject

I don't want to disconnect

So is the past or the present the so perfect ?

Since notice that they are not free from the defect

So we have to know how to debug and correct !

So I don't want to disconnect !

Since i am wanting to be as the good architect

So i also want to be the good philosophy so that to protect

So I don't want to disconnect !

So notice my beautiful way of how to interconnect !

---


More of my philosophy about the Egoist school of philosophy and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I think i am a new smart philosopher, and i have just read the following
web page of the other french philosopher of the Egoist school of philosophy that is called Claude Adrien Helvétius

Tere, t(h)ree ........


On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:33:11 PM UTC+2, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:

Hello,

More of my philosophy about price control and about capitalism and about
my philosophy and more of my thoughts

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have not talked about price control by the government in capitalism,
and here is how to solve this problem in capitalism:

What about minimum wages? On the one hand, as Hazlitt stresses, minimum wages are a kind of price control. On the other hand, since they raise the incomes of the poorest group of workers, increasing their ability to purchase all kinds of goods and

services, minimum wages will almost always be a superior alternative to price controls.

And here is the other problem in capitalism:

More of my philosophy about the bad tendency of the shrinking of the middle class in USA and more of my thoughts..

I have to give some statistics so that you understand more
the holistic view of it, and here it is:

"The shrinking of the middle class has been accompanied by an increase in the share of adults in the upper-income tier – from 14% in 1971 to 21% in 2021 – as well as an increase in the share who are in the lower-income tier, from 25% to 29%. These

changes have occurred gradually, as the share of adults in the middle class decreased in each decade from 1971 to 2011, but then held steady through 2021."

Read more here:

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/04/20/how-the-american-middle-class-has-changed-in-the-past-five-decades/

So as you are noticing that the lower-income tier has gone from 25% to 29%, so then there is more poor people in USA. So then you have to
understand that we have to solve the "problematic" of this bad tendency
by implementing progressive capitalism as i am explaining it in my
below thoughts:

More of my philosophy of why americans feel so poor and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why Americans Feel So Poor | CNBC Marathon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCQiywN7pH4

So you have to know that i have just talked about this problematic
of why americans feel so poor, and it is the following, read the
below article of how McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class and you will understand, and i am also giving the way of how to solve the
problem by being progressive capitalism, so read it in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the US problems and world problems and more of my thoughts..

I think that i am highly smart, and the main problem of USA as i am showing it below by posting the web links, is that Management consultants, like of the powerful McKinsey, implemented and rationalized a transformation in the American corporation by

downsizing in response not to particular business problems but rather to a new managerial ethos and methods; they downsized when profitable as well as when struggling, and during booms as well as busts. So i think it is the main problem, since for
example read in the following paper that says that: "In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants of the U.S. manufacturing sector that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth
in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment."

Read more here so that to understand:

Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228705

But about the other problem of part-time employment, i think American corporations have to understand that this way of managing
by part-time employment is limited, since we know that a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about McKinsey and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Became One Of The Most Powerful Companies In The World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBmmMj_maII

And i also invite you to read this interesting article about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/

More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so

notice carefully that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities

that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below

thoughts carefully so that to understand:

And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic

party about his reforms of his

progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
to understand:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc

And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..

I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI

And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
to understand:

Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of �

�People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:

Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html

And read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that you understand my views about capitalism and about productivity etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU

More of my philosophy about tolerance and about my philosophy and more more of my thoughts..

I think i am a new smart philosopher, and i have just looked to the following
video about tolerance from Rajneesh (born Chandra Mohan Jain; 11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh,[2] Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, and later as Osho (/ˈoʊʃoʊ/), that was an Indian godman, mystic, and founder of the

Rajneesh movement,

you can read about him here on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajneesh#:~:text=Rajneesh%20(born%20Chandra%20Mohan%20Jain,movement%20leader%20during%20his%20life.

And here is his video about tolerance:

OSHO: Tolerance Is an Ugly Word

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8ouDk2Mayw

So i am a new smart philosopher that is not in accordance with the indian Rajneesh in the above video, since tolerance can be engendered from a good philosophy that brings hope, so for example the exponential progress of our humanity brings hope as i am explaining it in my below thoughts, but you have of course to know how

to manage correctly this exponential progress of our humanity, and you can also, like i am doing it in my below new ideas of my philosophy, create the meaning of human life or life so that to be successful and so that to bring tolerance , so you are
noticing that i am not in accordance with the indian Rajneesh in the above video that says that we have not to be tolerance, since i am saying that we have to know how to be smart by creating hope that brings tolerance and by creating the meaning of
human life that brings tolerance.

I think i am a new smart philosopher, but now i will ask a philosophical question of:

Is mathematics invented or discovered ?

So i think that it also depends on the what is it that we call creativity that can be called invention ? so it depends on the standards that permit to measure if it is an invention or not, since discovering a pattern with your fluid intelligence can

become an invention by the this or that standard, so then i think in mathematics we discover patterns in the reality or in the world of ideas that construct mathematics , but discovering patterns can be an invention and it can be creativity that is not
an invention, so i think that mathematics is both discovered and invented.

More of my philosophy about the difficulty of human life or life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a new smart philosopher, so when you are a smart philosopher , you will not say that humans are smart, since the difficulty of human life is like greater, i mean that the bar of difficulty of human life is like set high by also the fact

that the genetics of humans is not apt at managing correctly this bar of difficulty of human life that is like set high, and it is like the absolute measure, so human smartness doesn't come from just relative smartness, but it comes "greatly" from the
fact that the genetics of humans is not apt at managing correctly this bar of difficulty of human life that is like set high, so you are noticing that it like shows that humans are fallible(that means being erroneous) or as the french saying says: "L'
erreur est humaine" or in Latin language it means: "errare humanum est". So i think i am a highly smart new philosopher, but you have to understand more deeply the essence of my philosophy, so i will explain it to you:

So my philosophy says that the problem is not self-interest or self-interest that creates competition that is the problem, but it is how to "tune" "correctly" self-interest and competition, so notice carefully how i am smart by saying "try" to enhance

the value in my below thoughts , since you can for example try to tune correctly self-interest and competition by enhancing the value by giving "hope" by making humans conscious about the exponential progress of humanity that will rapidly enhance much
more the value, but as i am saying that you have to know how to manage correctly the exponential progress of our humanity, and i think that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, and it means that in about 10 years to 15 years
from now, the value will be enhanced much more, so then i have also said that you can also "try" to tune correctly self-interest and competition by enhancing more the conditions like for example the collective imaginary of for example humans that look at
movies of fights between the good and bad or look at violent movies and think that humans are violent or the like, so i think that you have just to make humans conscious about the fact that most humans are apt to be good so that to enhance the conditions,
but of course you have to understand the new ideas of my philosophy that want to solve the problem of the lack of meaning of human life or life by another philosophical way, and here is the new ideas of my philosophy that you can read in the following
web link so that you understand my views as a new philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/887x_MB7Cbk

And i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand what is the exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

And you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the following web links:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/M-DJ1mPW9ss

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/887x_MB7Cbk

More of my philosophy about political philosophy and more of my thoughts..

More of my philosophy about optimism and about the exponential progress
of our humanity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following song in the following youtube video of a black american singer called Flo Rida, so i invite you to look at it:

Flo Rida - I Cry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLuWHr6-0YQ

So i think that this black american singer is like too much pessimistic about USA, so i invite you to read my following new proverbs so that to understand that we have to be optimistic about the exponential progress of our humanity and about the

exponential growth of capitalism because of digitalization and the like, since i also think that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower
to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, and it means that in about 10 years to 15 years from now we will be much more advanced, and of
course that even if you are not well educated by the way of schools or universities, you can use internet so that to educate yourself and you can use ChatGPT and the like so that to do it, so i think that we have to be optimistic about USA and not as
pessimistic as the this black american singer, so i invite you to read my following two proverbs so that you notice that we have to be optimistic about it:

Here is my new proverb:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."

Here is my new poem (and read my below thoughts):

---

I don't want to disconnect

Since i think i am the beautiful intellect

I don't want to disconnect

Since i want to talk the beautiful subject

I don't want to disconnect

So is the past or the present the so perfect ?

Since notice that they are not free from the defect

So we have to know how to debug and correct !

So I don't want to disconnect !

Since i am wanting to be as the good architect

So i also want to be the good philosophy so that to protect

So I don't want to disconnect !

So notice my beautiful way of how to interconnect !

---

More of my philosophy about the Egoist school of philosophy and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am a new smart philosopher, and i have just read the following
web page of the other french philosopher of the Egoist school of philosophy that is called Claude Adrien Helvétius, and i invite you to read it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Adrien_Helv%C3%A9tius

So i think i am smart and i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above web page of the french philosopher and it
is that the french philosopher Claude Adrien Helvétius says that Self-interest, founded on the love of pleasure and the fear of pain, is the sole spring of judgment, action, and affection, so then we have no freedom of choice between good and evil,

but i think that this french philosopher is not wise enough, since i think that he is, like the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, thinking that humans are egoistic, so i think that it is an extremist conception since it is a generalization that is
not the truth, since humans also know that they have to be responsability so that to "adapt" and "survive", since the adapt and survive is also the engine, so then we can not say that humans have no freedom of choice between good and evil, so i think
that i am a new philosopher that says that we have not to be as pessimistic about humans as those philosophers from the Egoist school of philosophy.

More philosophy about the invisible hand and regulation of Adam Smith philosophy and more about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to read the following about Adam Smith philosophy in the following web page:

The Role of Self-Interest and Competition in a Market Economy

Read more here:

https://www.stlouisfed.org/education/economic-lowdown-podcast-series/episode-3-the-role-of-self-interest-and-competition-in-a-market-economy

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you are noticing that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith is
the father of economic Liberalism, but notice in the above
web page that Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they

do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so it is the basis

of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but i think that the philosophy
of Adam Smith is lacking on efficient thinking, since in the invisible hand we can not generalize as Adam Smith is generalizing by saying that the producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, also

notice how the above web page asks the question of: Doesn't self-interest lead to price gouging, corruption and cheating? and it says that sometimes it does, but most often it is held in check by competition and the above web page is explaining it more.
Other than that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith is not just about economic Liberalism , but it is also about morality, and here is what i have just said about it:

More of my philosophy about Libertarianism and about Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following video from USA about Libertarianism and i invite you to look at it:

TAKE IT TO THE LIMITS: Milton Friedman on Libertarianism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSumJxQ5oy4

So i think i am a philosopher, and i think that Libertarianism and Liberalism have a problem, and it is about morality, so i think that Libertarianism and Liberalism are extremist conceptions of morality since they want to give people moral autonomy (

the ability to pursue one’s own conception of happiness) , so you can read about it in the following web link:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/libertarianism-politics ,
but i think that it is an extremist conception since happiness is not only individual happiness , but it is also societal happiness, so it is why i think that not all people have the ability to pursue this societal happiness, so it is why the

government has to intervene and it is why we have to have laws and enforce laws so that to prevent individuals from hurting themselves and/or hurting the society, also Libertarianism and Liberalism have another problem since they are like the Liberty of
the national motto of France that consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like the being free speech, since how can we for example be free to harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for
example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between adults ? so read my following thoughts so that to understand my views about it:

More of my philosophy about the Liberty of the national motto of France and more of my thoughts..

I have just said the following:

"In the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like the being free speech, since how can we be for example free to

harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between adults ?"

And so that to understand that i am truthful , so read the following
article that explains the kind of Liberty of the national motto of France, and here is how it explains the Liberty of the national motto of France:

“Liberty consists of being able to do anything that does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of every man or woman has no bounds other than those that guarantee other members of society the enjoyment of these same rights“.

And here is the article and read it carefully:

https://frenchmoments.eu/national-motto-of-france/

More of my philosophy of is the national motto of France an ideal and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
as you have just noticed that i have just said that the national motto
of France of "Liberty, equality, fraternity" is an ideal, so i say
that it is an ideal since Fraternity – or brotherhood – is about moral obligations and harmony, so i think the being harmony of it makes it an ideal, so it is why i say that it makes the national motto an ideal, and i think that so that to attain

harmony we have also to create a good meaning of human life, also in the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like
the being free speech, since how can we be for example free to harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between
adults ?

More of my philosophy about Nietzsche’s reactionary doctrine of the morality of masters and the morality of slaves and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a new smart philosopher and as you have noticed i have just talked about the concept of will to power that is central to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, read my below thoughts about it, and now i will talk about Nietzsche’s

reactionary doctrine of the morality of masters and the morality of slaves ( Read about it in the following

web link: https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-will-to-power-in-nietzsches-philosophy/ ), so i think that the morality of the masters in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche has a big disadvantage and it is that it is too much open or too much free

since it has not a guard rail that prevent it from being dangerous, it is why i am explaining below in the new ideas of my philosophy that the master laws of my new monotheistic religion are like a guard rail or like a framework of the other laws that
are created by humans or such, since the master laws of my new monotheistic religion are here so that to "guide" or so that to guide humans or so that to guide the other laws in the good way, since they are the master laws, and hence you are noticing how
i have become convinced that without this kind of guard rail , it will not work, and notice how the laws of my new monotheistic religion are not rigid laws that make a monotheistic religion rigid and not efficient, and notice how i am logically inferring
or logically deriving them from the nature of God or the essence of God, so then you have to take a look carefully at the laws of my new monotheistic religion, that i think are smart, in my below thoughts about my new monotheistic religion.

More of my philosophy about the will to power of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a new smart philosopher and now i will talk about the will to power of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, and here is what it means:

The concept of will to power in Nietzsche’s Philosophy

"The concept of will to power is central to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. According to Nietzsche, the will to power is an integral part of all life phenomena, which cannot be squeezed into the framework of a philosophical category since it is

broader than any category. According to the philosopher, the will to power is the constant affirmation of life and the realization of creative potential. Therefore, it opposes another will, which is limited by the existing and cannot transform it,
leading to self-denial."

Read more here:

https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-will-to-power-in-nietzsches-philosophy/

But i think i am a new smart philosopher, so i think that the will to power in Nietzsche’s Philosophy that is is the constant affirmation of life and the realization of creative potential is too much abstraction, since i am for example saying below

that equal opportunities in political philosophy is not a finality since it is for example the to be able to express your abilities correctly, but what is it to be able to express correctly your abilities? it is then about unequal competition and about
human identity, so then what i mean that it is not a finality since my new ideas of my philosophy are explaining what is lacking in the philosophical way , and i am explaining the ideas of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and life and about
what is lacking in philosophy, so i invite you so that to read my below thoughts of

my new ideas of my philosophy so that to understand my views:

And you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the following web links:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/M-DJ1mPW9ss

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/887x_MB7Cbk

And you can read my previous thoughts in the following:

More of my philosophy about marriage and self-sacrifice and responsability and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have not to force a man and a women to marry between them, but you have to organize and encourage marriage between a man and a women, and of course there is the laws of the country and there is for example

the way of the government that helps the weakest members of the society and the poor and the needy, but i think it is not sufficient, so it is why in Islam you have also to be an organized Islamic community that organize and encourage marriage between a
man and a women and that encourage and organize the helping the weakest members of the society and the poor and needy and that knows how to help others, and my new monotheistic religion says that you have to do the same.

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about sex and about the collective imaginary and more of my thoughts..

And what do i think about sex ? so i think that there is the collective imaginary of humans that makes us think that sex is like this or like that, i mean that sexual porno movies or too much sexual movies and the like are not the sexual behavior of

humans, but of a really small minority of humans, and the being porno sex is not the sexual behavior of humans, but of a really small minority of humans, so i think that we have to be realistic and make a difference between the collective imaginary of
humans and the reality of it, so for example you can think that arabs are not civilized, but i think it is not so realistic to think so, since notice how i am an arab that is civilized, so you have to make a difference between the appearances of a
reality and the truth of a reality and you have to make a difference between the collective imaginary and the truth of the reality, and here is an interesting proverb of mine that makes you understand this problematic and how you have to be careful about
it:

"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, and it is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, so that to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom."

More of my philosophy of what is Love and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a new smart philosopher, but how to abstract Love so that to understand what is Love ? so i think that Love is the positive energy
that attracts, so the positive energy also creates a kind of trust

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)