https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11641737/San-Frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-black-longtime-resident.html
San Francisco's reparations committee proposes $5M payout to
every longtime black resident, debt forgiveness and $97,000
guaranteed income that would cost city $50bn
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11641737/San-Frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-black-longtime-resident.html
San Francisco's reparations committee proposes $5M payout to
every longtime black resident, debt forgiveness and $97,000
guaranteed income that would cost city $50bn
. . .
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
As I recall, institutions (like in city/state govts)
aren't allowed to practice racial discrimination in
their policies .....
In short, their proposal is ILLEGAL - made illegal
by laws their fellow lefties rammed through in the
60s/70s. In short they're RACISTS.
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:34:22 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 6:13 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Oh, is THAT The Narrative ...... ?
Sorry, it's RACE-BASED/BIASED govt policy. No
amount of lipstick will make that pig look pretty.
They better raise taxes to 90% now.
On 1/17/23 6:13 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Oh, is THAT The Narrative ...... ?
Sorry, it's RACE-BASED/BIASED govt policy. No
amount of lipstick will make that pig look pretty.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
Sorry, it's RACE-BASED/BIASED govt policy. No
amount of lipstick will make that pig look pretty.
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
On 1/17/23 10:18 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:34:22 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 6:13 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Oh, is THAT The Narrative ...... ?
Sorry, it's RACE-BASED/BIASED govt policy. No
amount of lipstick will make that pig look pretty.
They better raise taxes to 90% now.
I'm waiting for them to put a 90% "exit tax" on
anybody, any corp, fleeing the state.
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
They generally didn't understand the concept of
"land ownership", ergo we couldn't "steal" it.
Besides, they're getting their revenge at the casinos
every day :-)
On 1/17/23 6:13 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Oh, is THAT The Narrative ...... ?
Sorry, it's RACE-BASED/BIASED govt policy. No
amount of lipstick will make that pig look pretty.
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
On 1/18/2023 8:31 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 1/18/23 8:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
What about those who suffered from Roman Empire "Jim Crow" ?
Egyptian empire ?
Babylonian empire ?
Akkadian empire ?
Quit picking *convenient*, politically-useful, groups and
timeframes for who was oppressor and oppressed.
Humans oppressed, Jim Crowed, likely genocided, the
Neanderthals starting about 60,000 years ago - but you
never mention THEM, never think of THAT timeframe ....
Sorry - but give-back/go-back ... has to be ALL THE WAY
or it's BULLSHIT. No cherry-picking !!!
Don't forget to compensate the "Serfs".
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:13:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why don't we roll it back 80K years to before humans appeared in the
Americas in the first place?
Swill
--
David Letterman interviews Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liooTXAF5Xo (44min English subtitles)
On 1/18/23 8:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
What about those who suffered from Roman Empire "Jim Crow" ?
Egyptian empire ?
Babylonian empire ?
Akkadian empire ?
Quit picking *convenient*, politically-useful, groups and
timeframes for who was oppressor and oppressed.
Humans oppressed, Jim Crowed, likely genocided, the
Neanderthals starting about 60,000 years ago - but you
never mention THEM, never think of THAT timeframe ....
Sorry - but give-back/go-back ... has to be ALL THE WAY
or it's BULLSHIT. No cherry-picking !!!
On 1/18/23 10:43 PM, Vincent wrote:
On 1/18/2023 8:31 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 1/18/23 8:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
What about those who suffered from Roman Empire "Jim Crow" ?
Egyptian empire ?
Babylonian empire ?
Akkadian empire ?
Quit picking *convenient*, politically-useful, groups and
timeframes for who was oppressor and oppressed.
Humans oppressed, Jim Crowed, likely genocided, the
Neanderthals starting about 60,000 years ago - but you
never mention THEM, never think of THAT timeframe ....
Sorry - but give-back/go-back ... has to be ALL THE WAY
or it's BULLSHIT. No cherry-picking !!!
Don't forget to compensate the "Serfs".
Oh yea ... almost forgot them, boring bunch :-)
And then there were all those indentured servants ...
Now I've got a serious 'compensation' issue - the Vikings
seriously oppressed my Brit ancestors ... but half my
ancestry is Viking. Do I compensate/sue myself ???
On 1/18/2023 9:47 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 1/18/23 10:43 PM, Vincent wrote:
On 1/18/2023 8:31 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 1/18/23 8:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
What about those who suffered from Roman Empire "Jim Crow" ?
Egyptian empire ?
Babylonian empire ?
Akkadian empire ?
Quit picking *convenient*, politically-useful, groups and
timeframes for who was oppressor and oppressed.
Humans oppressed, Jim Crowed, likely genocided, the
Neanderthals starting about 60,000 years ago - but you
never mention THEM, never think of THAT timeframe ....
Sorry - but give-back/go-back ... has to be ALL THE WAY
or it's BULLSHIT. No cherry-picking !!!
Don't forget to compensate the "Serfs".
Oh yea ... almost forgot them, boring bunch :-)
And then there were all those indentured servants ...
Now I've got a serious 'compensation' issue - the Vikings
seriously oppressed my Brit ancestors ... but half my
ancestry is Viking. Do I compensate/sue myself ???
Sure, go ahead. Don't do it in public though. :-)
Aren't Vikings and regular British Teutons offspring of the original
Germanic tribes? It would be all in the family over a simple Irish type discussion.
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their ancestors home of about 1300.
Don't forget to compensate the "Serfs".
On 1/18/23 8:44 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <hP6dnfDis9Tc9lr-nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
What does that have to do with Americans alive today who
sufferred due to Jim Crow?
What about those who suffered from Roman Empire "Jim Crow" ?
Egyptian empire ?
Babylonian empire ?
Akkadian empire ?
Quit picking *convenient*, politically-useful, groups and
timeframes for who was oppressor and oppressed.
Humans oppressed, Jim Crowed, likely genocided, the
Neanderthals starting about 60,000 years ago - but you
never mention THEM, never think of THAT timeframe ....
Sorry - but give-back/go-back ... has to be ALL THE WAY
or it's BULLSHIT. No cherry-picking !!!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11641737/San-Frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-black-longtime-resident.html
San Francisco's reparations committee proposes $5M payout to
every longtime black resident, debt forgiveness and $97,000
guaranteed income that would cost city $50bn
"Vikings" ... Teutonics did do a little of that, but the Angles
and Saxons weren't exactly "Vikings". Those kinda came up thru
Russia and west until they hit the scandies.
The Teutonics took
a left turn a bit earlier. Genetic migration maps are getting
better and better these days.
On 1/18/2023 8:42 PM, governor.swill@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:13:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why don't we roll it back 80K years to before humans appeared in the
Americas in the first place?
Swill
Well Hell! Why not all the way back to the 2 fruit pickers in the
garden. The way Nuclear threats are being tossed around, That and worse
might be on the agenda.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11641737/San-Frans-reparations-committee-proposes-5-million-black-longtime-resident.html
San Francisco's reparations committee proposes $5M payout to
every longtime black resident, debt forgiveness and $97,000
guaranteed income that would cost city $50bn
. . .
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
As I recall, institutions (like in city/state govts)
aren't allowed to practice racial discrimination in
their policies .....
In short, their proposal is ILLEGAL - made illegal
by laws their fellow lefties rammed through in the
60s/70s. In short they're RACISTS.
In article <tqae8q$189aq$2@dont-email.me>,
Vincent <Vine@Letuci.org> wrote:
Don't forget to compensate the "Serfs".
Any surviving serfs can trying suing under the 13th amendment.
On 1/18/23 2:13 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why does everybody wanna pick a convenient, politically
useful, time frame for "go back/give back" ??? :-)
Hey, the moment humans left Africa ... why not that ?
And those evil Neanderthals ... they left Africa even
earlier, probably oppressed some of the even earlier
sub-sub-species !!!
So ... how about "home of about 500,000-BC" instead ? :-)
What, no useful political spin to that ???
On 1/18/2023 8:42 PM, governor.swill@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:13:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why don't we roll it back 80K years to before humans appeared in the
Americas in the first place?
Swill
Well Hell! Why not all the way back to the 2 fruit pickers in the
garden. The way Nuclear threats are being tossed around, That and worse
might be on the agenda.
--
David Letterman interviews Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liooTXAF5Xo (44min English subtitles)
In article <zHWdndlnVN6TN1X-nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
The dead don't have standing in US courts to sue anyone. If their
immediate families are still alive, they might be able sue for
wrongful death.
Then you oppose reparations?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:48:54 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 1/18/2023 8:42 PM, governor.swill@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:13:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to >>>>>>> build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their >>>>>>> homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why don't we roll it back 80K years to before humans appeared in the
Americas in the first place?
Swill
Well Hell! Why not all the way back to the 2 fruit pickers in the
garden. The way Nuclear threats are being tossed around, That and worse
might be on the agenda.
Swill is just racist against Native Americans. We aren't dark
enough.
You do have a point about the Nuclear threats. Doubt if we would
wipe out the Human race but greatly reduce population, even China
would feel the results.
--
David Letterman interviews Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liooTXAF5Xo (44min English subtitles)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:25:17 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/18/23 2:13 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to
build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their
homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why does everybody wanna pick a convenient, politically
useful, time frame for "go back/give back" ??? :-)
I'm Native American that would be a good time for us. ;-)))
Hey, the moment humans left Africa ... why not that ?
Would you want to live in Africa?
And those evil Neanderthals ... they left Africa even
earlier, probably oppressed some of the even earlier
sub-sub-species !!!
So ... how about "home of about 500,000-BC" instead ? :-)
What, no useful political spin to that ???
You do have a point about the Nuclear threats. Doubt if we would
wipe out the Human race but greatly reduce population, even China
would feel the results.
--
David Letterman interviews Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liooTXAF5Xo (44min English subtitles)
Yes, the human pop COULD be seriously, SERIOUSLY, diminished
in a single stroke. But is this a GOOD thing, or just the
latest short-sighted eco-fanaticism ???
Let's just say the survivors would live HORRIBLY .....
On 1/20/23 11:41 AM, Mattb wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:25:17 -0500, "26C.Z968" wrote:
On 1/18/23 2:13 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" wrote:
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why does everybody wanna pick a convenient, politically
useful, time frame for "go back/give back" ??? :-)
I'm Native American that would be a good time for us. ;-)))
Got documentation as to which tribes occupied exactly
which spreads of land in 1300 ???
All 'reparations/pay-back/go-back' activists cherry-pick
some very very convenient date - it's total bullshit.
As I said, to be completely fair, all humans MUST go back
to Africa immediately.
On 1/20/23 11:45 AM, Mattb wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:48:54 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 1/18/2023 8:42 PM, governor.swill@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:13:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> >>>>> wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to >>>>>>>> build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like >>>>>>>> the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens >>>>>>>> and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their >>>>>>>> homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all
land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why don't we roll it back 80K years to before humans appeared in the
Americas in the first place?
Swill
Well Hell! Why not all the way back to the 2 fruit pickers in the
garden. The way Nuclear threats are being tossed around, That and worse
might be on the agenda.
Swill is just racist against Native Americans. We aren't dark
enough.
I spent lots of time partying with NA's back in the
day. I like them - a sorta 'alien' psychology, but
that just makes them all the more interesting. Very
solid people all in all.
BUT ... let's pick 10,000-BC as the arbitrary
give-back/go-back date. Why ? Just Because !
Any date will do as well as any other ! Tribes
invaded/genocided/enslaved and stole land and
resources from other tribes so THEY all have to
give-back/go-back, right ???
You do have a point about the Nuclear threats. Doubt if we would
wipe out the Human race but greatly reduce population, even China
would feel the results.
--
David Letterman interviews Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liooTXAF5Xo (44min English subtitles)
Yes, the human pop COULD be seriously, SERIOUSLY, diminished
in a single stroke. But is this a GOOD thing, or just the
latest short-sighted eco-fanaticism ???
Let's just say the survivors would live HORRIBLY .....
On 1/20/23 11:41 AM, Mattb wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:25:17 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/18/23 2:13 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:45:00 -0500, "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net>
wrote:
On 1/17/23 10:17 PM, Mattb wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:13:57 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
In article <GfydnVR5w754v1v-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote:
Hmm ... lots of 'blacks' fought for the Confederacy
No. Slaves were forced to accompany masters who were too lazy to >>>>>>> build defensive earthworks themselves.
and lots of 'whites' fought with the Union. Yet this
righteous committee proposes to hand out literal
megabucks, gigabucks, based solely on skin tone.
Yes, don't bother finding the truth.
The proposal is in essence a legal settlement for years of
provable discrimination against still living people. Much like
the settlement payments to interred japanese-american citizens
and residents. The 442nd regiment were not allowed to visit their >>>>>>> homes when on leave.
Native Americans should get 10 million each plus the return of all >>>>>> land.
Just thinking ... what if the moral high-road was for
EVERYBODY to "go back to where they came from" ???
I guess that means eight billion humans in Africa
then, right ?
Depends on the time frame. I'd say let them go back to their
ancestors home of about 1300.
Why does everybody wanna pick a convenient, politically
useful, time frame for "go back/give back" ??? :-)
I'm Native American that would be a good time for us. ;-)))
Got documentation as to which tribes occupied exactly
which spreads of land in 1300 ???
All 'reparations/pay-back/go-back' activists cherry-pick
some very very convenient date - it's total bullshit.
As I said, to be completely fair, all humans MUST go back
to Africa immediately.
"Humans", as we kinda define them, are known to have
existed in Morocco around 300,000 years ago. There's
really no such thing as a "human" - we're a composite
species - but 300,000 years is a pretty good reference.
Hey, the moment humans left Africa ... why not that ?
Would you want to live in Africa?
But it's FAIR ! In keeping with give-back/go-back !!!
We can probably genetically reconstruct Neanderthals
at this point - make more. I'd suggest we're OBLIGATED
to un-extinct them and populate Europe and west Asia
with them !!!
And those evil Neanderthals ... they left Africa even
earlier, probably oppressed some of the even earlier
sub-sub-species !!!
So ... how about "home of about 500,000-BC" instead ? :-)
What, no useful political spin to that ???
We can probably genetically reconstruct Neanderthals
at this point - make more. I'd suggest we're OBLIGATED
to un-extinct them and populate Europe and west Asia
with them !!!
I think the best thing is to forget this reparations bullshit
totally.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 308 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 92:51:30 |
| Calls: | 6,923 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,382 |
| Messages: | 5,434,104 |