• Light velocity includes relative velocity proven by Io's Eclipses.

    From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 15 23:47:04 2025
    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13 https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Sun Mar 16 00:51:03 2025
    On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 23:47:04 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13 https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812
    Just look at his graphs at the end.
    "Approximately 100 years have passed since the theory of Special
    Relativity (SR) appeared in
    1905. The SR postulate that the velocity of light is constant in all
    inertial systems implied the
    necessity to revise the ideas of length, time and simultaneity. The data provided here indicates
    that this postulate is not compatible with the actual characteristics of
    light. This empirical data
    demonstrates that the speed of emitted light is isotropic and at c in
    relation to the source, and
    the observed light speed will be modified depending on the relative
    motion of the observer and
    the source. Newton's, Faraday's and Maxwell's concepts of physical
    systems, length, time,
    simultaneity, radiation and energy remain unchanged when the system of
    light (EM)
    transportation is recognized to function as the above data
    demonstrates."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 16 23:12:08 2025
    Den 16.03.2025 00:47, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13 https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers- Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812

    In the following are the statements in quotation marks
    quotations from the the paper above:

    "The given facts in this analysis are:"

    "The light from Jupiter takes 1003 seconds to cross from
    the near point of Earth's orbit to the far point at the speed
    of 300,000 km/sec, (c) in relation to Jupiter."

    My comment:
    The light from Jupiter will cross Earth's orbit twice.
    The light will use the time 2AU/c = 998 seconds.

    "It is known that Earth takes about 200 days to make this same trip.
    The Earth's average retreating speed in relation to Jupiter is
    17.361 km/sec."

    My comment:
    The orbital speed of Jupiter is 13.1 km/s, and the orbital
    speed of the Earth is 29.8 km/s.
    Since the orbits are two concentric circles the retreating
    speed varies from 0, to 29.8 km/s, back to 0, to -29.8 km/s,
    and back to 0.
    The average is ~0. Which is utterly irrelevant.

    "When two things race between two points at the same time at differing
    speeds,... they have a relative speed that is equal to the difference
    between the highest and lowest speed. Therefore the average relative
    speed is approximately 300,000 minus 17.361 km/sec."

    This is an awkward way of stating:
    If the speed of light relative to Jupiter is c, then the speed of light
    will vary between c + 29.8 km/s and c - 29.8 km/s relative to the Earth.

    Let us express it correctly:

    In the inertial rest frame of Jupiter the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of the Earth is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s. (sometimes called "closing speed")

    In the inertial rest frame of the Earth the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of Jupiter is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s.

    That the speed of light is invariant means that it is c in all
    inertial frames of reference.

    If you express it as "the speed of light is c relative to all
    objects", it may be right, but is prone to be misunderstood,
    as Saraiva did.

    But what Savira really did, was to claim: The speed of light
    is not invariant, because the speed of light isn't invariant.

    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Paul.B.Andersen on Mon Mar 17 21:31:56 2025
    On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:12:08 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

    Den 16.03.2025 00:47, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13
    https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-
    Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812

    In the following are the statements in quotation marks
    quotations from the the paper above:

    "The given facts in this analysis are:"

    "The light from Jupiter takes 1003 seconds to cross from
    the near point of Earth's orbit to the far point at the speed
    of 300,000 km/sec, (c) in relation to Jupiter."

    My comment:
    The light from Jupiter will cross Earth's orbit twice.
    The light will use the time 2AU/c = 998 seconds.

    "It is known that Earth takes about 200 days to make this same trip.
    The Earth's average retreating speed in relation to Jupiter is
    17.361 km/sec."

    My comment:
    The orbital speed of Jupiter is 13.1 km/s, and the orbital
    speed of the Earth is 29.8 km/s.
    Since the orbits are two concentric circles the retreating
    speed varies from 0, to 29.8 km/s, back to 0, to -29.8 km/s,
    and back to 0.
    The average is ~0. Which is utterly irrelevant.

    "When two things race between two points at the same time at differing
    speeds,... they have a relative speed that is equal to the difference
    between the highest and lowest speed. Therefore the average relative
    speed is approximately 300,000 minus 17.361 km/sec."

    This is an awkward way of stating:
    If the speed of light relative to Jupiter is c, then the speed of light
    will vary between c + 29.8 km/s and c - 29.8 km/s relative to the Earth.

    Let us express it correctly:

    In the inertial rest frame of Jupiter the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of the Earth is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s. (sometimes called "closing speed")

    In the inertial rest frame of the Earth the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of Jupiter is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s.

    That the speed of light is invariant means that it is c in all
    inertial frames of reference.

    If you express it as "the speed of light is c relative to all
    objects", it may be right, but is prone to be misunderstood,
    as Saraiva did.

    But what Savira really did, was to claim: The speed of light
    is not invariant, because the speed of light isn't invariant.
    Saraiva showed by the two graphs that the time between the eclipses of
    Io varies in trends. When Earth and Jupiter move apart, the eclipses are increasingly further apart in time, and vice versa. This would require
    that the relative speeds of Jupiter and Earth affect the relative speed
    of light.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Tue Mar 18 16:46:06 2025
    On 2025-03-17 21:31:56 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:

    On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:12:08 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

    Den 16.03.2025 00:47, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13
    https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-
    Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812

    In the following are the statements in quotation marks
    quotations from the the paper above:

    "The given facts in this analysis are:"

    "The light from Jupiter takes 1003 seconds to cross from
    the near point of Earth's orbit to the far point at the speed
    of 300,000 km/sec, (c) in relation to Jupiter."

    My comment:
    The light from Jupiter will cross Earth's orbit twice.
    The light will use the time 2AU/c = 998 seconds.

    "It is known that Earth takes about 200 days to make this same trip.
    The Earth's average retreating speed in relation to Jupiter is
    17.361 km/sec."

    My comment:
    The orbital speed of Jupiter is 13.1 km/s, and the orbital
    speed of the Earth is 29.8 km/s.
    Since the orbits are two concentric circles the retreating
    speed varies from 0, to 29.8 km/s, back to 0, to -29.8 km/s,
    and back to 0.
    The average is ~0. Which is utterly irrelevant.

    "When two things race between two points at the same time at differing
    speeds,... they have a relative speed that is equal to the difference
    between the highest and lowest speed. Therefore the average relative
    speed is approximately 300,000 minus 17.361 km/sec."

    This is an awkward way of stating:
    If the speed of light relative to Jupiter is c, then the speed of light
    will vary between c + 29.8 km/s and c - 29.8 km/s relative to the Earth.

    Let us express it correctly:

    In the inertial rest frame of Jupiter the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of the Earth is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s. (sometimes called "closing speed")

    In the inertial rest frame of the Earth the speed of light is c,
    and the speed of Jupiter is -29.8 km/s.
    The speed difference is c-29.8 km/s.

    That the speed of light is invariant means that it is c in all
    inertial frames of reference.

    If you express it as "the speed of light is c relative to all
    objects", it may be right, but is prone to be misunderstood,
    as Saraiva did.

    But what Savira really did, was to claim: The speed of light
    is not invariant, because the speed of light isn't invariant.

    Saraiva showed by the two graphs that the time between the eclipses of
    Io varies in trends. When Earth and Jupiter move apart, the eclipses are increasingly further apart in time, and vice versa. This would require
    that the relative speeds of Jupiter and Earth affect the relative speed
    of light.

    No, it does not. It is sufficient that light travels at some finite speed.
    You need more numbers if you want to show that that speed is or is not
    always the same.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 18 22:50:22 2025
    Den 17.03.2025 22:31, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    Den 16.03.2025 00:47, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    "Light Speed and Special Relativity"
    António Saraiva – 2009-09-13
    https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-
    Relativity%20Theory/Download/2812


    Saraiva showed by the two graphs that the time between the eclipses of
    Io varies in trends. When Earth and Jupiter move apart, the eclipses are increasingly further apart in time, and vice versa. This would require
    that the relative speeds of Jupiter and Earth affect the relative speed
    of light.

    The two graphs are real measurements, not made by Saraiva.

    If you don't understand that the visually measured
    (through a telescope) orbital frequency of Io will increase
    when Jupiter is retreating from Earth _because_ the speed of
    light relative to the Earth is constant, then you are as stupid
    as Saraiva.

    I won't bother to explain.

    Look up Rõmer's experiment.

    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)