1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Re: iEinstein (1939): Schwarzschild singularities don't exist in physic

    From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 31 18:39:12 2024
    Mr. Hertz: I think all reasonable and intelligent people understand the singularity is a mathematical fiction. John Michell already knew there
    must be black holes if light is affected by gravity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 31 20:53:41 2024
    Mr. Hertz: I was just reminded of this point by Smulsky in this article:
    "Real Forces and Unreal Hypotheses" -Joseph J. Smulsky.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 31 20:55:42 2024
    Mr. Hertz: In other words, gravitation itself would not have escape
    velocity sufficient to escape a "black hole" star if its speed was c.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 31 20:41:08 2024
    Mr. Hertz: If gravity moves at the speed of light, how can it escape
    black holes and draw anything in? It cannot, so gravity cannot move at c contrary to relativistic pseudoscience. It doesn't take a genius to
    understand this kazu.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 1 10:48:07 2024
    W dniu 01.11.2024 o 10:29, J. J. Lodder pisze:


    Einstein's result is correct of course,
    but it applies only to a special (and unphysical) model,

    Just like marxism-leninism, creationism and
    many others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to rhertz on Fri Nov 1 10:29:49 2024
    rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

    If Einstein didn't approve any physical interpretation of these singularities, it has to be accepted that black holes are an HOAX.

    Unless post-einstenians think that Einstein was a fucking retarded who
    didn't recognize his own work, as well as the other three physicists
    that were involved in the writing of the 1939 paper.

    Hard choice, isn't it?

    Einstein right or Einstein wrong?

    Einstein was wrong about the physics of it,
    and Oppeheimer and Volkov showed so in the same year.
    (following a lead by Tolman)
    Einstein's result is correct of course,
    but it applies only to a special (and unphysical) model,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)