• Re: iron is ferromagnetic because...

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 23 10:29:47 2023
    Heat didn't demagnetize Iron.
    On Earth there is both magnetized iron and
    nonmagnetic. What magnetized Iron?
    why is there iron that is both?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Wed Aug 23 10:39:43 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    Heat didn't demagnetize Iron.
    On Earth there is both magnetized iron and
    nonmagnetic. What magnetized Iron?
    why is there iron that is both?

    All this and more is a trivial, free lookup moron, as you have been told
    MANY times before.

    If you are functionally illiterate that is your problem, moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Aug 23 13:14:07 2023
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:46:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Heat didn't demagnetize Iron.
    On Earth there is both magnetized iron and
    nonmagnetic. What magnetized Iron?
    why is there iron that is both?

    Heat was measured not to demagnetize Iron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Wed Aug 23 13:19:29 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:46:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Heat didn't demagnetize Iron.
    On Earth there is both magnetized iron and
    nonmagnetic. What magnetized Iron?
    why is there iron that is both?

    Heat was measured not to demagnetize Iron.

    Babbling, incoherent gibberish, moron.

    Heat has been shown to demagnetize iron.

    You have been told this many, many times over the years, yet it never
    sinks into to your highly damaged brain, moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 23 15:31:09 2023
    Is Folmsbee as crackpot as Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside
    a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1
    axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a
    slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this
    list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

    On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 10:36:32 AM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Nutjob Alan packs 12 apples and says this is how atoms subatomic particles are arranged.

    Alan is this how we got fruitcake to mean nutjob like you?

    1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
    2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
    3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new
    electricity.
    4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

    5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
    6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
    7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
    8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
    Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.



    Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
    Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
    David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
    Arthur B. McDonald
    Francois Englert
    Saul Perlmutter
    Brian P. Schmidt
    Adam G. Riess
    Makoto Kobayashi
    Toshihide Maskawa_
    Yoichiro Nambu_
    John C. Mather
    George F. Smoot
    Roy J. Glauber_
    David J. Gross
    Hugh David Politzer
    Frank Wilczek
    Raymond Davis Jr. _
    Masatoshi Koshiba_
    Riccardo Giacconi_
    Gerardus 't Hooft
    Martinus J.G. Veltman_
    Jerome I. Friedman
    Henry W. Kendall_
    Richard E. Taylor_
    Carlo Rubbia
    Simon van der Meer_
    William Alfred Fowler_
    Kenneth G. Wilson_
    James Watson Cronin_
    Val Logsdon Fitch_
    Sheldon Lee Glashow
    Steven Weinberg_
    .
    .
    little fishes
    .
    .
    Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it
    is 840MeV to 105MeV

    Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
    Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
    more and more layers of error thinking physics
    .
    .
    Edward Witten
    John Baez
    Brian Greene
    Lisa Randall
    Alan H. Guth
    Michael E. Brown
    Konstantin Batygin
    Ben Bullock
    Larry Harson
    Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
    Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views None at all - he was a raving nutter.
    Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
    Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
    Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
    Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater


    #2-1, 137th published book

    Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)



    #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

    This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I
    can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

    Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before
    was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community
    updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to
    AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing
    can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

    Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of
    physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
    And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity
    and Magnetism.
    Length: 64 pages

    Product details
    • File Size : 790 KB
    • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
    • Word Wise : Enabled
    • Print Length : 64 pages
    • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Language: : English
    • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
    • Lending : Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
    ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

    #2-2, 145th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior
    year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that
    so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

    Product details
    • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
    • Publication date : November 29, 2020
    • Language: : English
    • File size : 682 KB
    • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Word Wise : Enabled

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 23 18:28:38 2023
    Folmsbee crackpot?? as bad as Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck
    inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone
    has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that
    a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this
    list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

    On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 10:36:32 AM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Nutjob Alan packs 12 apples and says this is how atoms subatomic particles are arranged.

    Alan is this how we got fruitcake to mean nutjob like you?

    1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
    2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
    3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new
    electricity.
    4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

    5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
    6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
    7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
    8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
    Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.



    Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
    Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
    David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
    Arthur B. McDonald
    Francois Englert
    Saul Perlmutter
    Brian P. Schmidt
    Adam G. Riess
    Makoto Kobayashi
    Toshihide Maskawa_
    Yoichiro Nambu_
    John C. Mather
    George F. Smoot
    Roy J. Glauber_
    David J. Gross
    Hugh David Politzer
    Frank Wilczek
    Raymond Davis Jr. _
    Masatoshi Koshiba_
    Riccardo Giacconi_
    Gerardus 't Hooft
    Martinus J.G. Veltman_
    Jerome I. Friedman
    Henry W. Kendall_
    Richard E. Taylor_
    Carlo Rubbia
    Simon van der Meer_
    William Alfred Fowler_
    Kenneth G. Wilson_
    James Watson Cronin_
    Val Logsdon Fitch_
    Sheldon Lee Glashow
    Steven Weinberg_
    .
    .
    little fishes
    .
    .
    Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it
    is 840MeV to 105MeV

    Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
    Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
    more and more layers of error thinking physics
    .
    .
    Edward Witten
    John Baez
    Brian Greene
    Lisa Randall
    Alan H. Guth
    Michael E. Brown
    Konstantin Batygin
    Ben Bullock
    Larry Harson
    Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
    Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views None at all - he was a raving nutter.
    Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
    Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
    Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
    Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater


    #2-1, 137th published book

    Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)



    #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

    This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I
    can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

    Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before
    was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community
    updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to
    AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing
    can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

    Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of
    physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
    And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity
    and Magnetism.
    Length: 64 pages

    Product details
    • File Size : 790 KB
    • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
    • Word Wise : Enabled
    • Print Length : 64 pages
    • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Language: : English
    • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
    • Lending : Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
    ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

    #2-2, 145th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior
    year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that
    so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

    Product details
    • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
    • Publication date : November 29, 2020
    • Language: : English
    • File size : 682 KB
    • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Word Wise : Enabled

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 23 19:51:44 2023
    History of the Folmsbee crackpot in sci.physics.

    It probably has some link and connection with Porat, an oldtime crank and crackpot with the horrible ugly salacious habit of accusing you of stealing from Porat.

    So Porat would be perched like a bird of prey on sci.physics, and when he saw a post that looks like it may mean something, Porat would swoop down and accuse you of stealing the idea from him.

    Porat was a stealing machine...

    And then Porat had interactions with Folmsbee, where one time Porat said Alan was a baby in a crib when Porat had the iron ferromagnetic.

    But Porat is long gone.. thank goodness for sci.physics, but one has to wonder if Alan Folmsbee is his new recruit-- not to falsely accuse someone of stealing, mind you, but to fill in the Spam Gap that Porat left off with.

    For cranks and crackpots like Alan Folmsbee and Porat, a vacuum of spam is abhorred, especially in this modern era where dumb AI computers start to take the slack of spam acceleration. And perhaps sci,physics needs to construct Speed Bumps on spam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)