• 14m views Univ Western Ontario & Dan Christensen appreciation of TEACHI

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Dan Christensen on Sun Nov 5 12:20:18 2023
    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus. Because the Power Rule
    is merely add or subtract 1 from exponent so we can teach calculus in High School.

    Only Math textbooks with the true numbers of mathematics-- Decimal Grid Numbers, not the insane silly Reals & Complex with their crank crackpot imaginary b.s.


    I doubt the two math cranks Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao will ever understand mathematics for they continue to refuse to admit to even the most simple truths of mathematics-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse. A cylinder slant cut is ellipse, never
    cone.


    On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 7:35:05 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
    STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

    Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
    By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM


    Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
    by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021


    Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
    by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM

    Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
    by Dan Christensen
    Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM

    Old Math is in a world of hurt for it does not even have the correct numbers of mathematics. Old Math was arrogant and ignorant starting year 1900 when Quantum Mechanics in physics took off and it means the world is discrete and not continuous. Yet the
    foolish bozos of Old Math stuck with their continuous Reals and even had the idiotic notion of going further out on the limb of madness with Cohen's continuum hypothesis, while Quantum Mechanics gave us a new age in physics with their discrete world. One
    would think the idiots of Old Math would finally look at physics and pay attention and learn something. No. They never did. And so today in October of 2023 we still have idiots of math teaching calculus with never a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of
    Calculus, because Reals are not the true numbers of mathematics, the Decimal Grid Number System is the true numbers of math for they are discrete, and they make calculus, a billion, perhaps a trillion times easier to study , to learn to understand. In
    fact, we TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, teaches calculus to 13 and 14 year olds. Because calculus is as easy as add or subtract 1 from the exponent.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS the fake calculus of Thomas Hales, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet, Ruth Charney, Terence Tao, John Stillwell with their fake "limit analysis" for a true proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) has to be a geometry proof for the
    integral is area under a graphed function. This is why only a polynomial can be a valid function of math, for the polynomial is a function of the straightline Y --> mx + b. All the other so called functions have no straightline-- they are curves of
    continuum and cannot give a proof of the fundamental theorem of calculus.

    The proof of FTC needs a empty space Discrete Geometry from one point to the next point so as to allow for the construction of a midpoint between point A to point B and thus to hinge up from A at the midpoint and to determine the next point B in the
    derivative. This is why Calculus is so enormously a tool for physics, as point A predicts point B.

    Discrete Geometry is required for the proof of FTC and that requires the true numbers of mathematics be Decimal Grid Numbers, for they cannot be the continuum idiocy of Reals and Complex.

    To make a half circle function in True Math, we have to go out to something like 10^6 Grid to make the points close enough together for the function visual to start looking like a half circle. But still there are holes in between one point and the next
    point to allow the existence of calculus.

    On a downward slope function, we have a different graphics than the usual upward slope function. For the upward slope requires the midpoint in the empty space to predict the next point of the thin rectangle that occupies that empty space (see the
    graphics below and in my books TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS). In a downward slope function graph we still have those thin rectangles occupy the empty space for integral but we do not need to construct the midpoint, we simply shave away a right triangle that
    reveals-- predicts point B starting from point A on the other side.



    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus. Because the Power Rule
    is merely add or subtract 1 from exponent so we can teach calculus in High School.

    Old Math makes and keeps Calculus as classroom torture chambers with their 1,000s of different functions yet the polynomial is the only valid function of math, and makes it super super easy to learn calculus

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus.

    If you come to me with a pathetic non polynomial especially that ugly trig functions, I have you go home and convert your nonsense to a polynomial. The Lagrange interpolation converts stupid nonfunctions like trig, into valid functions of polynomials.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering-backs of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them. Psychology teaches us that when a kook goes through a torture chamber and comes out of it as a math professor-- they want to be vindictive and sado masochists and love to torture others and put them through the same torture
    chamber that they went through. AP says-- stop this cycle of torture and teach TRUE CORRECT MATH.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them.

    Old Math calculus textbooks like Stewart are more than 1,000 pages long and they need that because they have a mindless thousand different functions and no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. AP's calculus is less than 300 pages, because we
    have a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which demands the only valid function of math be a polynomial function. We can teach calculus in Junior High School for the calculus is reduced to adding or subtracting 1 from the exponent.
    The only hard part of calculus in New Math is to convert the boneheaded function into a polynomial that was brought to the table by the boneheaded math professor who thinks that a function does not need to be a polynomial.

    AP calculus transforms the calculus classroom. It is no longer vomiting during exams. No longer a torture chamber for our students of youth, and no longer a nightmare nor nervous breakdown for our youthful students, who, all they ever wanted was the
    truth of mathematics.

    Teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. The great power of Calculus is integral is area under function graph thus physics energy, and its prediction
    power of the derivative to predict the next future point of function graph thus making the derivative a "law of physics as predictor". Stupid Old Math makes the derivative a tangent line, while New Math makes the derivative the predictor of next point of
    function graph. No wonder no-one in Old Math could do a geometry, let alone a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for no-one in Old Math even had the mind to realize Calculus predicts the future point in the derivative.


    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- only math textbooks with a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus--teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. This is
    why calculus is so important for physics, like a law of physics-- predicts the future given nearby point, predicts the next point. And of course the integral tells us the energy. Silly stupid Old Math understood the integral as area under the function
    graph curve, but were stupid silly as to the understanding of derivative-- predict the next point as seen in this illustration:


    From this rectangle of the integral with points A, midpoint then B


    ______
    | |
    | |
    | |
    ---------


    To this trapezoid with points A, m, B

    B
    /|
    / |
    m /----|
    / |
    | |
    |____|


    The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)
    so that it can be hinged at m, and swiveled down to form rectangle for integral.

    Or going in reverse. From rectangle, the right triangle predicts the next successor point of function graph curve of B, from that of midpoint m and initial point of function graph A.


    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I
    suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go
    back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to
    write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

    Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus
    geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist
    because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)



    #5-2, My 45th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

    Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

    Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

    This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every
    other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

    It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text.
    Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

    Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic &
    transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.



    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 2024 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 423 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    #15 in General Geometry
    #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


    #5-3, 55th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

    Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

    Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

    The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the
    math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st
    year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the
    text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those
    college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole
    and gap in Old Math education.

    And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar
    magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM
    Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

    But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

    Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it
    in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

    The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry
    them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
    • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)



    #5-4, 56th published book

    COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads


    This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process
    of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
    Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To
    prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
    Length: 54 pages


    Product details
    File Size: 1035 KB
    Print Length: 64 pages
    Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
    Publication Date: August 18, 2019
    Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
    Language: English
    ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
    Text-to-Speech: Enabled
    X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

    Word Wise: Not Enabled
    Lending: Enabled
    Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #318 in Calculus (Books)
    #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

    #5-5, 72nd published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism,
    because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and
    magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry,
    for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding
    of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

    Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
    Length: 105 pages

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)


    #5-6, 75th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

    This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity
    and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on
    logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do
    math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many
    ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the
    math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all
    scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and
    Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

    Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

    Length: 175 pages


    Product details
    ASIN : B0836F1YF6
    Publication date : December 26, 2019
    Language : English
    File size : 741 KB
    Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    Screen Reader : Supported
    Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    X-Ray : Not Enabled
    Word Wise : Not Enabled
    Print length : 175 pages
    Lending : Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)



    #5-7, 89th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

    Last revision was 6Feb2021.
    Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school
    is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

    Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil,
    clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is
    there only to hold up the erector set model.

    Length: 110 pages

    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

    #5-8, 90th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

    Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

    Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course,
    we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

    My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

    So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1),
    2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited
    some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or
    plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

    Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

    Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It
    is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is
    the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
    Length: 296 pages

    Product details
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
    Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
    Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
    Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #13 in General Geometry
    ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


    #5-9, 221st published book

    An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors
    because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and
    students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their
    brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.


    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Dan Christensen on Sun Nov 5 19:51:24 2023
    Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
    by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

    On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 11:19:09 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
    STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim


    Re: 4-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
    by Volney Aug 24, 2023, 11:34:08 AM 

    Re: 5-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,James Kibo Parry, Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin, with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
    by Volney Aug 24, 2023, 11:49:47 AM


    Re: 6-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,James Kibo Parry, Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen,with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtract
    by
    Volney Aug 24, 2023, 11:49:15 AM 


    Re: 8-Partial List of World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//Dan Christensen,Jan Burse,JamesKiboParry, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting,with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
    by Volney Aug 24, 2023, 11:54:10 AM 


    Re: Markus Klyver greatest math fool of Sweden-- thinks an ellipse is a conic section
    by
    Dan Christensen Aug 2, 2017, 11:52:21 PM

    Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
    by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

    Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
    by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM


    Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
    by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM

    Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
    By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM


    Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
    by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021


    Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
    by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM

    Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
    by Dan Christensen
    Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM


    On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...

    Dan


    Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker
    by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM 



    Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
    11:53 AM 10Apr2021
    by Wayne Decarlo

    Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
    by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM 

    Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
    by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM


    Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
    May 10, 2021
    by Professor Wordsmith

    Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
    May 10, 2021
    by Michael Moroney



    Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
    by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM


    Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
    by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,



    Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
    by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM 

    Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
    by Mutt Buncher



    Re: 2-fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Dan Christensen, Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP??
    Earl Biggs


    Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
    Earl Biggs



                                  ..
                .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-..
               ,      . `.'            '        `.
             .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ;
             .   ;  .'                     . `.    ;
             ;   . '                       `.  .   '
              . '                            ` `.  |
            . '.                                  '
           .          0              0            ' `.
          '                                          `
         ;                                            `     .'                                             `     ;                      U                        `     ;    ';                                         `     :   | ;..                                 :`     `
        :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    '
        '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    '
         ;       `        ;'..          ..-''    '     '  I am Christensen,I am such a stupid insane imp of math and logic that I thought a vertex has a derivative, that distinct means not-distinct, and that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as
    subtraction. And I love spam reading of vvgra and tomato hello, and I am a failure of academics and so I spend most days making out hate-lists of people who actually succeed in science for my pea sized brain is envious and jealous of those who succeed in
    science yet I failed in science.
          `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    '
           `       `        ;            ;      '    '
            `       `        ;          ;      '    '
             `       `.       ````''''''      '    '
               `       .                     '    '
             /  `       `.                  '    '        .
            /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...'
           /   .`   `       ``........-'     .'` .....'''
          / .'' ;     `                    .'   `
      ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      `
       ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       `
               ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       `
               :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     `
                      |    '     `      '     `.    `
                      `   '       `     ;       `.  |
                      `.'          `    ;         `-'
                                    `...'

    Here is an example of where Dan Christensen seems to act out his classroom fantasies, and whether he is a threat to students along with being a bully in sci.math.

    On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...

    Dan

    Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.

    The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction.

    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
    Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector

    The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.

    The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."


    What a monsterous fool you are


    OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.

    And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
    be one) and it is not necessary to say so.



    Apparently Dan Christensen never took calculus or flunked it with this statement.
    On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,

    From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed.


    Dan


    AP writes: well I guess at least two Canadian schools of higher education never wants to change to the truth of science, where they teach logic of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction. And teach that a ellipse is a slant cut in a single cone when really
    that is a oval. And no-one at these two Canadian Universities even able to fathom that the real electron is the muon of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, nor able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Oh,
    sure, everyone in the math dept of UT and UWO knows calculus is geometry, but the fools never wanting to wean themselves off of a con artist scam that is "limit analysis". You see, "limits" were invented by the Frenchman Cauchy back in 1800s, and Cauchy
    was sick and tired of hearing from his smartest students, that Cauchy was summing up zero width rectangles. So instead of Cauchy being a "real mathematician" and looking for a geometry proof, no, Cauchy invented a con artist trick called "limits" and
    ever since Cauchy, the professors of mathematics such as Harvard math professors have been con artists of math, and not teachers of math.


    Christensen Quotes

    On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...

    Dan


    Dr. Tao seems to favor an insane Canadian named Christensen, for Dr. Tao does not reject ellipse as conic nor reject Either..Or..Or..Both

    On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 4:31:35 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:


    You ARE are a sicko,

    Dan


    AP writes: Christensen is a education parasite-- a person who knows little next to nothing about a subject, but wants to redneck-- twist every student into believing whatever Christensen believes in. A education parasite never corrects mistakes and
    errors-- for that costs him time and money.

    Dr. Conway apparently accepts contradictions into his mathematical understanding of the world

    On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 4:22:59 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
    YOU are a sicko,

    Dan

    If the topic were whether flys had 4 legs or 6 legs, the low class insane bozo of Christensen would say 4 legs only because Aristotle said as much and Dan's entire knowledge is based not on reason and proof, but  based on what someone has published.
    Publication to an insane Christensen bozo is the highest truth value, not whether it is truly true.

    Same thing goes for OR truth table by Boole, where he published OR was Either..Or..Or..Both with table as TTTF.

    It does not matter whether that is a living Contradiction, and that Either..Or can never be mixed with Or..Both, lumped together as a logic connector, that does not matter to a low class insane bozo like Christensen. All that matters to his insanity is
    that Boole published it and thus-- eternal truth never to be changed, never to be fixed.

    And anyone thinking of going over to a newsgroup controlled by the insane bozo Christensen is a insane bozo themselves.

    Apparently Dr. Tao is in the same boat as Christensen, for Dr. Tao has never protested against the error of ellipse is a conic, nor the error that Either..Or..Or..Both is a living contradiction only accepted by insane fools.

    On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 4:40:58 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
    fail like he did.

    On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 9:46:13 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
    do they really not teach about geometric series


    On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 10:50:15 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:> your Wacky

    David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias  Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire// Are you as ignorant and a education parasite as Christensen on the ELLIPSE is never a conic?? proof below


    Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to teach the truth.

    7:52:34 Christensen wrote:>Warning// Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop too stupid to understand real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow Chemistry bonding


       /\-------/\
       \::O:::O::/
      (::_  ^  _::)
       \_`-----'_/
    You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada.
    And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better.

    The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV.

    And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.

    Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or
    less of Sun and stars.

    But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.

    What answer did they give?


    Univ Western Ontario math dept
    Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon


    Amit Chakma (chem engr)

    Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
    Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey
    L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang


    Christensen asks Univ Western Ontario Drs  Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic
    monopole

    Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R.
    Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong

    Univ Toronto math dept
    Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam,
    Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny


    Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen"

    Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming, Justin Trudeau


    Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by
    Archimedes Plutonium
    --------------------
    AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works

    Let us analyze AP's Proof

    On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

     
      Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic
      section = Oval, never ellipse
     
      Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out
      that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the
      best of all.
     
      That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then
      implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so
      that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I
      poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone
      made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or
      Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes
      into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I
      can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need
      a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you
      lose clarity.
     
      ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
     
     
                    E
                   __
            .-'              `-.
          .'                    `.
        /                         \
       ;                           ;
      | G          c              | H
       ;                           ;
        \                         /
         `.                     .'
            `-.    _____  .-'
                      F
     


    Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E

    In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.

    The side view of a cylinder is this

    |    |
    |    |
    |    |

    That allows cE to be the same distance as cF


    But the side view of the cone is

         /\E
        /c \
    F /     \


    The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE

      The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the
      Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to
      the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than
      the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the
      cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of
      symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c.
     
      Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit
      point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder
      and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of
      cylinder
     
      |                              |
      |                              | E
      |                              |
      |                              |
      |x            c              |x
      |                              |
      |                              |
      |                              |
      |F                            |
      |                              |
      |                              |
      |                              |
     
     

    So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry

    But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of EF. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one
    axis of symmetry.

      So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the
      cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle
      base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such
      that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from
      the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle
      these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second
      axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED
     
     
     
      Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse
     
      ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse::  
     
               A
            ,'"   "`.
         /            \
      C |     c       | D
       \               /
          ` . ___ .'
               B
     
      The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with
      center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of
      a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as
      long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line).
      What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an
      ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of
      symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis
      of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major
      diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD.
     
      Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the
      center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder,
      only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way
      between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in
      between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the
      slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than
      the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered
      at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in
      cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the
      case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments-
      are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are
      not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB,
      leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD.
     
           /  \A
       x/  c  \x
      B/         \
     
      Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a
      circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse.
     
      QED
     
      --Archimedes Plutonium


    Christensen streamlined

    On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 4:40:58 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:


    SPOILER ALERT: Poor, demented


    On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 9:29:52 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Outrageous errors

    On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 8:30:22 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Not interested

    8:30:22education parasite Christensen > Not interested//is Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming, Justin Trudeau also not caring? , with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both


    7:52:34 education parasite Christensen reflecting on UWO,,,Amit Chakma,Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron//is Univ Western Ontario a parasitic education institute? , with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..
    Both

    7:52:34 education parasite Christensen wrote: >Warning//Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both


    7:52:34 education parasite Christensen wrote: >Warning//Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart,with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both

    On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 at 7:52:34 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:

    Dan

    Download my DC Proof 2.0,,,,
    Visit my Math Blog,,,
    (be foolish and download that worthless moneygrub parasite of Logic-- Christensen)
    - show quoted text -
    Scientists that are just memorization not masters Re: Analysis of failures..Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV


    Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to fix errors and teach the truth.

    Dan Christensen (the stalking insane Canadian of 6 years) wrote on 20Dec2018 8:19 AM (11 hours ago)

    WARNING TO PARENTS

    Archie Pu's fake logic

    A    B    A & B
    T    T        T
    T    F        T
    F    T        T
    F    F        F

    Real logic:

    A    B    A & B
    T    T        T
    T    F        F
    F    T        F
    F    F        F

    A    B    A OR B
    T    T        T
    T    F        T
    F    T        T
    F    F        F


    AP's fake math:

    “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
    --June 3, 2015

    Dan Christensen, 6 year insane stalker Canadian


    AP writes: Christensen failed calculus, or never took it, for all students quickly learn a vertex has no derivative:


    On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,

    From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed.


    Dan

    AP writes: Christensen failed Logic for any person with a microgram of Logic is not confused over distinct--

    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
    Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector

    The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.

    The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."


    What a monsterous fool you are


    OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.

    And yet Mr Plutonium is right.  Two points are distinct (else they would
    be one) and it is not necessary to say so.



                                  ..
                .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```....'`-..
               ,      . `.'            '        `.
             .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ;
             .   ;  .'                     . `.    ;
             ;   . '                       `.  .   '
              . '                            ` `.  |
            . '.                                  '
           .          0              0            ' `.
          '                                          `
         ;                                            `     .'                                             `     ;                      U                        `     ;    ';                                         `     :   | ;..                                 :`     `
        :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    '
        '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    '

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)