1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.MATH

  • Math zero

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 3 10:34:41 2023
    the expanding hypersphere dimension came first...
    a universal singularity would have infinite gravity
    and could not become an accretion disc..
    Did an original singularity become an accretion
    disc? If so how?

    Then how did that become smaller
    galactic accretion discs...? then stars?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Golden@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Nov 3 15:17:15 2023
    On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 1:34:47 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    the expanding hypersphere dimension came first...
    a universal singularity would have infinite gravity
    and could not become an accretion disc..
    Did an original singularity become an accretion
    disc? If so how?

    Then how did that become smaller
    galactic accretion discs...? then stars?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    Wow. Seven lines. Bravo, sir.

    Exactly how hyper is your sphere? Were you merely thinking four?
    Or perhaps were you going to stop at ten, or eleven maybe?
    Or did you have stronger plans in that unitary form?
    Were there to be types? subtypes?
    Hah. Less than seven for me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Timothy Golden on Fri Nov 3 16:37:20 2023
    On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 3:17:21 PM UTC-7, Timothy Golden wrote:
    On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 1:34:47 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    the expanding hypersphere dimension came first...
    a universal singularity would have infinite gravity
    and could not become an accretion disc..
    Did an original singularity become an accretion
    disc? If so how?

    Then how did that become smaller
    galactic accretion discs...? then stars?

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Wow. Seven lines. Bravo, sir.

    Exactly how hyper is your sphere? Were you merely thinking four?
    Or perhaps were you going to stop at ten, or eleven maybe?
    Or did you have stronger plans in that unitary form?
    Were there to be types? subtypes?
    Hah. Less than seven for me.

    Science is wrong. A singularity cannot form an accretion disc....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)