1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.MATH

  • Re: Slightly infinite

    From bassam karzeddin@21:1/5 to bassam karzeddin on Thu Sep 14 07:16:33 2023
    On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:39:16 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    Ahah, after people finally realized that infinity is purely a abird brains fiction concept, made solely for too lengthy and so unnecessary buissness, they recently started thinking in the same old way as introducing many more alike of bird brains
    concepts like, potential infinity, slightly infinite, and probably we may hear soon about more of alike bird brains concepts like, effective infinity, real infinity, half infinity, ..., etc

    As if there isn't any other way for inferior infedes of the whole sciences and true knowledge other than making new pure mind fictions like we note

    No, and never but the way to superior knowledge is too difficult for them even though it is in fact much easier than they may always imagine

    In other words, even imaginations must have the minimum sensible logic For sure

    And the axioms of uncountable choices must never be given freely for magicians to keep sh*tting meaningles theorems and results that have overflowed and stinking

    True superior mathematics is purely a matter of discovery and nothing else FOR SURE

    Good Luck

    Bassam King karzeddin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Sergio on Thu Sep 14 10:16:24 2023
    On Monday, July 13, 2020 at 12:30:48 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
    On 7/13/2020 12:52 PM, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Monday, July 13, 2020 at 3:46:12 AM UTC-7, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 9:46:45 PM UTC+3, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 8:27:38 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
    On 7/8/2020 8:51 PM, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 1:07:38 AM UTC-7, Peter wrote:
    Any suggestion for what "The full list of games we've worked on is >>>>>> slightly infinite" might mean. See
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53248321.

    There is a fundamental unlimited.

    Mitchell Raemsch


    is that Math for Zeros ?

    The no quantity is the beginning.
    It is necessary to set bases for quantity representation.
    Zero is the name for the empty of quantity.

    There is no beginning for numbers

    No moron. Zero is the name for it...
    Calculus followed it by first or infinitely small.

    it cant be "Zero", because that is something.

    if there is no beginning for numbers, how did they start ?

    Zero is the no quantity beginning before the absolute positive.
    Zero is the beginning of math win.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bassam karzeddin@21:1/5 to Sergio on Thu Sep 14 11:27:32 2023
    On Monday, July 13, 2020 at 10:30:48 PM UTC+3, Sergio wrote:
    On 7/13/2020 12:52 PM, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Monday, July 13, 2020 at 3:46:12 AM UTC-7, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 9:46:45 PM UTC+3, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 8:27:38 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
    On 7/8/2020 8:51 PM, Mitch Raemsch wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 1:07:38 AM UTC-7, Peter wrote:
    Any suggestion for what "The full list of games we've worked on is >>>>>> slightly infinite" might mean. See
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53248321.

    There is a fundamental unlimited.

    Mitchell Raemsch


    is that Math for Zeros ?

    The no quantity is the beginning.
    It is necessary to set bases for quantity representation.
    Zero is the name for the empty of quantity.

    There is no beginning for numbers

    No moron. Zero is the name for it...
    Calculus followed it by first or infinitely small.

    it cant be "Zero", because that is something.

    if there is no beginning for numbers, how did they start ?

    What??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)