How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?A real interesting scandal about the intellectuality of mathematicians FOR SURE
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 8:14:06 PM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 13:01:36 UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote:fallacy, FOR SURE
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:42:41 PM UTC+3, Mike Hart wrote:
Ignoring you is the best reaction to your nonsense.
What's your new nonsensense claim? Ah, I see, now you think 1=0.
Can't you see you are ridiculous?
With a good faith in people generally, let me assume that you still clue less
Therefore let us give you this only one page in the hope you get the so silly idea very quickly
http://archive.is/O2f0A
This is a SO rigorous proof about the main human mind famous fallacy of
(1 = 0.999...), and if one passes it, then all other fallacies in mathematics would be easier to understand and FOR SURE
And if this is still not helpful (especially for Doctors in mathematics), then we would offer you more links to many other older proofs
However, JG and maybe few others had also PUBLISHED and correct proofs, FOR SURE
It would be interesting for school students to DEVELOP and provide their own proofs for this most famous fallacy in the history of mathematics despite many existing and alleged fake proofs by so many professionals to the truthness of this so obvious
the following:BKKProof: Assume: (1 = 0)
1 = 0, add 9 to both sides, you get
10 = 9, similarly add 90 to both sides, you get
100 = 99, repeat the addition in the same manner, continuously, you arrive at:
1000 = 999
----- = -----
----- = -----
-----= -------, and finally, you easily arrive at this interesting result?
10^n = 999…999
(*Note :( n) is the number of repeated digits of 9’s), It is also true by for (n+1) digits,therefore, using induction method, we conclude it is true for any number of digits (n), then , let (n) tends to infinity & divide both sides by (10^n), you get
1 = 0.999…, (PROVED).
Well done Bassam! That is a lesson on what happens when you start off with the WRONG assumptions. But do you think these morons will get it? Chuckle. Too funny.by assuming 1 = 0. Tsk, tsk.
BTW: That is the first BIG FLAW in their "proofs", that is, they assume an equality to be true and in some cases like the 10x fake proof, it works to their favour, but as you've CORRECTLY demonstrated, in this case, you can arrive at the same nonsense
Highly stupid academics who are allergic to facts. No wonder...
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:09:14 PM UTC+2, Jew Lover wrote:fallacy, FOR SURE
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 13:01:36 UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:42:41 PM UTC+3, Mike Hart wrote:
Ignoring you is the best reaction to your nonsense.
What's your new nonsensense claim? Ah, I see, now you think 1=0.
Can't you see you are ridiculous?
With a good faith in people generally, let me assume that you still clue less
Therefore let us give you this only one page in the hope you get the so silly idea very quickly
http://archive.is/O2f0A
This is a SO rigorous proof about the main human mind famous fallacy of
(1 = 0.999...), and if one passes it, then all other fallacies in mathematics would be easier to understand and FOR SURE
And if this is still not helpful (especially for Doctors in mathematics), then we would offer you more links to many other older proofs
However, JG and maybe few others had also PUBLISHED and correct proofs, FOR SURE
It would be interesting for school students to DEVELOP and provide their own proofs for this most famous fallacy in the history of mathematics despite many existing and alleged fake proofs by so many professionals to the truthness of this so obvious
get the following:BKKProof: Assume: (1 = 0)
1 = 0, add 9 to both sides, you get
10 = 9, similarly add 90 to both sides, you get
100 = 99, repeat the addition in the same manner, continuously, you arrive at:
1000 = 999
----- = -----
----- = -----
-----= -------, and finally, you easily arrive at this interesting result? >>
10^n = 999…999
(*Note :( n) is the number of repeated digits of 9’s), It is also true by for (n+1) digits,therefore, using induction method, we conclude it is true for any number of digits (n), then , let (n) tends to infinity & divide both sides by (10^n), you
by assuming 1 = 0. Tsk, tsk.
1 = 0.999…, (PROVED).
Well done Bassam! That is a lesson on what happens when you start off with the WRONG assumptions. But do you think these morons will get it? Chuckle. Too funny.
BTW: That is the first BIG FLAW in their "proofs", that is, they assume an equality to be true and in some cases like the 10x fake proof, it works to their favour, but as you've CORRECTLY demonstrated, in this case, you can arrive at the same nonsense
Highly stupid academics who are allergic to facts. No wonder...
Python must read it fron here
He is a common global case of many incurable delusional 🧌 Trolls for sure
Bkk
Le 28/09/2023 à 23:43, bassam karzeddin a écrit :obvious fallacy, FOR SURE
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:09:14 PM UTC+2, Jew Lover wrote:
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 13:01:36 UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:42:41 PM UTC+3, Mike Hart wrote:
Ignoring you is the best reaction to your nonsense.
What's your new nonsensense claim? Ah, I see, now you think 1=0.
Can't you see you are ridiculous?
With a good faith in people generally, let me assume that you still clue less
Therefore let us give you this only one page in the hope you get the so silly idea very quickly
http://archive.is/O2f0A
This is a SO rigorous proof about the main human mind famous fallacy of >>> (1 = 0.999...), and if one passes it, then all other fallacies in mathematics would be easier to understand and FOR SURE
And if this is still not helpful (especially for Doctors in mathematics), then we would offer you more links to many other older proofs
However, JG and maybe few others had also PUBLISHED and correct proofs, FOR SURE
It would be interesting for school students to DEVELOP and provide their own proofs for this most famous fallacy in the history of mathematics despite many existing and alleged fake proofs by so many professionals to the truthness of this so
get the following:BKKProof: Assume: (1 = 0)
1 = 0, add 9 to both sides, you get
10 = 9, similarly add 90 to both sides, you get
100 = 99, repeat the addition in the same manner, continuously, you arrive at:
1000 = 999
----- = -----
----- = -----
-----= -------, and finally, you easily arrive at this interesting result?
10^n = 999…999
(*Note :( n) is the number of repeated digits of 9’s), It is also true by for (n+1) digits,therefore, using induction method, we conclude it is true for any number of digits (n), then , let (n) tends to infinity & divide both sides by (10^n), you
nonsense by assuming 1 = 0. Tsk, tsk.
1 = 0.999…, (PROVED).
Well done Bassam! That is a lesson on what happens when you start off with the WRONG assumptions. But do you think these morons will get it? Chuckle. Too funny.
BTW: That is the first BIG FLAW in their "proofs", that is, they assume an equality to be true and in some cases like the 10x fake proof, it works to their favour, but as you've CORRECTLY demonstrated, in this case, you can arrive at the same
Highly stupid academics who are allergic to facts. No wonder...
Python must read it fron here
He is a common global case of many incurable delusional 🧌 Trolls for sure
Bkk
This is "Jew Lover" aka John Gabriel posting, definitely not a
mathematician but one of your buddy, Bassam ...
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:42:41 PM UTC+3, Mike Hart wrote:fallacy, FOR SURE
Ignoring you is the best reaction to your nonsense.
What's your new nonsensense claim? Ah, I see, now you think 1=0.
Can't you see you are ridiculous?With a good faith in people generally, let me assume that you still clue less
Therefore let us give you this only one page in the hope you get the so silly idea very quickly
http://archive.is/O2f0A
This is a SO rigorous proof about the main human mind famous fallacy of
(1 = 0.999...), and if one passes it, then all other fallacies in mathematics would be easier to understand and FOR SURE
And if this is still not helpful (especially for Doctors in mathematics), then we would offer you more links to many other older proofs
However, JG and maybe few others had also PUBLISHED and correct proofs, FOR SURE
It would be interesting for school students to DEVELOP and provide their own proofs for this most famous fallacy in the history of mathematics despite many existing and alleged fake proofs by so many professionals to the truthness of this so obvious
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?This subject wasn't made purposely to show the disappointment & disabilities of academic mainstreams proffessional mathematicians & mathematickers as well
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?They would take few more centuries
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
How many centuries did it take for the alleged top most genius historical professional mathematicians to discover SUDDENLY that (1 = 0)?Abd Guess how many centuries they would take to discover suddenly that (1 = - 1)? No wonders!
NO WONDER and FOR SURE
Oops, I swear that I had answered this question quite many times earlier in my posts, with references and so irrefutable proofs also
But frankly, I feel quite lazy now to search for it again, but many of you definitely read it and FOR SURE
So, can you believe it? wonder!
Also one should avoid the meaningless answers produced strictly by so many alleged PHILOSOPHERS, FOR SURE
BKK
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 45:23:58 |
| Calls: | 6,910 |
| Files: | 12,377 |
| Messages: | 5,429,445 |