1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ECON

  • social evolution

    From Dale@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 14 23:42:15 2015
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism
    XPost: sci.skeptic

    if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
    be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?

    wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?

    seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the regulation that is evolving/changing

    <maximize_production>

    declare supply and demand as economics
    declare labor as a subset of economics
    declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
    declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
    produce it

    while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
    reward the jobs wanted least most
    reward the jobs wanted more least
    endwhile

    </maximize_production>

    I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick
    addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.


    maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise

    --
    Dale
    http://www.dalekelly.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Checkmate, DoW #1@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 15 00:09:46 2015
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.philosophy.checkmate, alt.talk.creationism
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, sci.skeptic

    In article <8rjsrq.hs0.17.1@news.alt.net>, dale@dalekelly.org says...



    if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
    be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?

    wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?

    seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the regulation that is evolving/changing

    <maximize_production>

    declare supply and demand as economics
    declare labor as a subset of economics
    declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
    declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
    produce it

    while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
    reward the jobs wanted least most
    reward the jobs wanted more least
    endwhile

    </maximize_production>

    I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.


    maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise


    Are you trying to get all philosophical and shit on Usenet?

    --
    Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
    Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
    Copyright © 2015
    all rights reserved

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From %@21:1/5 to Dale on Wed Oct 14 22:35:47 2015
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism
    XPost: sci.skeptic

    Dale wrote:
    if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise
    would be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?

    wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?

    seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just
    the regulation that is evolving/changing

    <maximize_production>

    declare supply and demand as economics
    declare labor as a subset of economics
    declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
    declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
    produce it

    while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
    reward the jobs wanted least most
    reward the jobs wanted more least
    endwhile

    </maximize_production>

    I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.


    maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded
    enterprise

    it's a self invitation , you do it and so shall i

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From raven1@21:1/5 to Dale on Thu Oct 15 05:55:16 2015
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism
    XPost: sci.skeptic

    On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:42:15 -0400, Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote:

    Dude, don't Bogart that joint.

    if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
    be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?

    wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?

    seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the >regulation that is evolving/changing

    <maximize_production>

    declare supply and demand as economics
    declare labor as a subset of economics
    declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
    declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
    produce it

    while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
    reward the jobs wanted least most
    reward the jobs wanted more least
    endwhile

    </maximize_production>

    I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick >addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.


    maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)