1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ASTRO.RESEARCH

  • I'm still getting s.a.r submissions despite deactivating

    From Jonathan Thornburg@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 2 16:48:54 2022
    From: SMTP%"dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com" 1-OCT-2022 16:04:10.68
    To: Phillip Helbig <helbig@astro.multivax.de>
    CC:
    Subj: I'm still getting s.a.r submissions despite deactivating

    --MgWmdFb7JREVWTQ9
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline

    Hi Phillip,

    Despite being deactivated as an s.a.r moderator, I'm still getting
    s.a.r submissions at <dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com>. Here (attached) are
    the two submissions that I got last night, with all their headers.
    Could you handle moderating these two?

    I expect to reactivate monday my time.

    ciao, -- Jonathan

    --MgWmdFb7JREVWTQ9
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mbox.spr"

    --MgWmdFb7JREVWTQ9
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sar1.txt"

    From news@aioe.org Fri Sep 30 01:32:56 2022
    Delivered-To: dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com
    Received: by 2002:a05:651c:488:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s8csp1233500ljc;
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4Xt4CmIbYmUpSi5Eg6934iYwTgD+cxOzzr0jeIaV3TVwKcA4EILy9+vc9ykSj68HzYASap
    X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75c1:b0:783:a093:2d34 with SMTP id jl1-20020a17090775c100b00783a0932d34mr5792135ejc.454.1664526776293;
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
    ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664526776; cv=none;
    d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
    b=kWoN7C74fAHCrKGLJAwi76fS4aIRraB0rs83tnBiKZv/AdSKaUnx+C5JckPVEXzEqA
    BDRCU/ngTO3SOjU6dLV4lHq0jaHX8ElchlPFMz1bDGfWZeDojn2D5r3UdcGyzBeL4fLD
    Q3s96dd26AecBJ1m1Uk4doxsN5v7GkttFvhDx2kVYyURhyO8nc2wxLG5zrUfFjY3fc8a
    SS9ZmiU81UfrHn2Vyf+9DVpuGP13lgRsXh45LqaByETTEB3pH5+2G8tlUEvZpkN4gHve
    JdHif/pykb3c3jmYyAWyZE+FxUU9ombk0u0LdpnuiwaahaAxcnhePDFo0dxR3LDK7Uay
    pTWQ==
    ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
    h=injection-info:message-id:organization:date:subject:newsgroups:from
    :path:to:delivered-to;
    bh=3O2qUmVSVlT1KhrrUPScCQDJBWf2HfZ5FqbHg+alP0U=;
    b=zGcIS42G6dEOl4gHEE6rIr262ex5T3VajC2fsGRNzX0x22c1omRU33Kwe+Hv+fGd85
    gojCjKAea6O7myXX0+t7o70zLBy6mcFEZRABBKi//yApj8Gtfu/rL0DE2EY/pre4g5iu
    hFSAnOjLni27oAO1HstE6S64Hegw2gnDhzsqYGVZ2q9a5R32/BvpHyiMjq7tOYEWmjgZ
    hNKBmcZw+jw8Qnv1KXdnmXQPqBvUp6czVdFy4LvZOLUyxqy1+JtUtaHsrTTjaFFK5r3R
    tyCxj0exWMQZnws2m586K9fAq4UfjzJ7GIIDvABo4qEYIDafeLmCZqTobZrEaORQmfgW
    E5Gg==
    ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
    spf=neutral (google.com: 217.114.73.94 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of news@aioe.org) smtp.mailfrom=news@aioe.org;
    dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=flesch.org
    Return-Path: <news@aioe.org>
    Received: from da4.smtp-relay.de (da4.smtp-relay.de. [217.114.73.94])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5-20020aa7db05000000b00457463dfcddsi1322261eds.70.2022.09.30.01.32.55
    for <dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com>
    (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 01:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
    Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 217.114.73.94 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of news@aioe.org) client-ip=217.114.73.94;
    Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
    spf=neutral (google.com: 217.114.73.94 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of news@aioe.org) smtp.mailfrom=news@aioe.org;
    dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=flesch.org
    Received: from jander.robots.multivax.de (i6DFA3467.versanet.de [109.250.52.103])
    by da4.smtp-relay.de (8.14.8/8.14.8/AIS 03-2014) with SMTP id 28U8WpO1031757
    for <dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:32:54 GMT
    Received: from mod-relay-1.kamens.us (198.58.96.67)
    by jander.robots.multivax.de (V5.7-ECO5, OpenVMS V8.4 Alpha);
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:31:46 +0200 (CEST)
    Received: by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix)
    id A5B1760CB1; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
    Delivered-To: sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org
    Received: from gioia.aioe.org (unknown [46.165.242.91])
    by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DD65FE6F
    for <sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
    Received: from news by gioia.aioe.org with local (Exim 4.89)
    (envelope-from <news@aioe.org>)
    id 1oeBRq-000G0v-93
    for sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:32:43 +0200
    To: sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org
    Path: fC49CJtWpUxcqcPZ+lRiWw.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: eric@flesch.org (Eric Flesch)
    Newsgroups: sci.astro.research
    Subject: Seeing is not Earendel
    Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:31:31 GMT
    Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
    Message-ID: <6336a515.877272593@news.aioe.org>
    Injection-Info: ; logging-data=""; posting-host="fC49CJtWpUxcqcPZ+lRiWw.user."; mail-complaints-to="";
    X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
    X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
    Status: RO
    Content-Length: 1198
    Lines: 23

    Just a very short comment on the so-called "highly magnified z=6.2
    star" Earendel. ArXiv:2208.09007 Figure 1 shows a JWST photo of this
    "Sunrise Arc" which displays about 8 point sources along the
    pencil-thin arc, one of which is said to be the star Earendel.

    I'm quite skeptical of this, however, because of the configuration of
    those 8 point sources. They are arrayed in a regular lattice of
    expanding offsets from right to left. The point sources must all be
    related to each other, and are probably caused by some cosmic-level
    magnetic manifestation not yet understood. This explanation springs
    to mind because of an Aurora Australis that I saw back in 1988, which
    looked like rustling curtains 100 miles high which would spark at the
    top whenever two rustles collided. There was a regaularity to them
    that I see here as well. Thus I speculate this is a magnetic emission
    caused by some alignment of the cluster galaxies.

    Furthermore, the "Sunrise Arc" has not varied over 3 years of
    observation. But the magnification of a z=6.2 star would need to be a million-fold. In no way could such a lensing configuration remain
    stable.

    Thought this needed to be mentioned, cheers.

    --MgWmdFb7JREVWTQ9
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sar2.txt"

    From news@google.com Fri Sep 30 15:44:36 2022
    Delivered-To: dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com
    Received: by 2002:a05:651c:488:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s8csp1576160ljc;
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6KCbiT3/6lPpDhDCCGmv6W7dblkrJ/0jsTfXVk7z9IsliVW4Aa9nBdxM+Ylv2wjbiAmQdX
    X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4792:b0:782:c426:621 with SMTP id cw18-20020a170906479200b00782c4260621mr7991789ejc.478.1664577876937;
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
    ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664577876; cv=none;
    d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
    b=KQCupwgW0ftez9m50LmCmSvJP9BTWJ0cCcS2pFOi9eFIDnS8j8G4WOncCE1NiA3cu4
    olM8WhC64XHugBa8VzpJ9+7Gqt4SNZZkakPOoUOFBr168uzGFHLilntvlxzDyWJk0JTu
    Da1Jea9XWxa05orMTkaXB9LZSccxQATDqR2gyH3AMjChRTb2WWcsZJ9MMiv4d+1Qjxlg
    5FxuZ3gOHo4KuztYFyQpHPy0Gz5s9q5WgekRSPv4h+k7ehJSzPokfRxS3XaBWWqS0gby
    6NaTyX4QxKcF0GGz/EisDRY855fOXx2KT0TAYrS8AVD5ufJ6IfZluXhqwYF8vRelE1zn
    3fuA==
    ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
    h=content-transfer-encoding:to:injection-date:from:subject:message-id
    :mime-version:user-agent:nntp-posting-host:injection-info:date
    :newsgroups:path:delivered-to;
    bh=kOILOPRBX0G90QEphhvmP0j5mq5ubCneRpzUhvQuQ5I=;
    b=j+d1i3ieNQ1VUMvhHNPITXt2408wSnjCfwaIxDE9oYE0zG6QvUXh5AnRn/v7lIBjds
    KbSKPIuLD+Rnc5uNgiV98BCLuTeOZH/zkQzikwd6s53Pn1qfVVsn64YDnlWs0S57wy04
    YiFhdn841Iqoq6xWn6LemLlNLFgcpy9YtbjjyX8uFcaYuSKisE1JQGNp6spijaIuO7NW
    L4xypozSw1azC5IWVuZ9ZBxmZ4dtQD20LQprCJ3EpWtOsfJEG+JJb2mUA9L22tBi8C/N
    fC2fTR0+aw8d2BjJV1jUaySScPZYyH7rcVOo/LblgQ5tPA6NXp1y9ZedlLweH8RBa1Xg
    jJEA==
    ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
    spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning news@google.com does not designate 217.114.73.94 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=news@google.com;
    dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: <news@google.com>
    Received: from da4.smtp-relay.de (da4.smtp-relay.de. [217.114.73.94])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9-20020a1709064fc900b00787b30fb919si3051076ejw.874.2022.09.30.15.44.36
    for <dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com>
    (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
    Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning news@google.com does not designate 217.114.73.94 as permitted sender) client-ip=217.114.73.94;
    Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
    spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning news@google.com does not designate 217.114.73.94 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=news@google.com;
    dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from jander.robots.multivax.de (i6DFA3467.versanet.de [109.250.52.103])
    by da4.smtp-relay.de (8.14.8/8.14.8/AIS 03-2014) with SMTP id 28UMiXcP008671
    for <dr.j.thornburg@gmail.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:44:36 GMT
    Received: from mod-relay-1.kamens.us (198.58.96.67)
    by jander.robots.multivax.de (V5.7-ECO5, OpenVMS V8.4 Alpha);
    Sat, 1 Oct 2022 00:43:27 +0200 (CEST)
    Received: by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix)
    id 68C3360CB1; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
    Delivered-To: sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org
    Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198])
    by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E4F5FE6F
    for <sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
    Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id n13-20020a05620a294d00b006cf933c40feso4836439qkp.20
    for <sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
    h=content-transfer-encoding:to:injection-date:from:subject:message-id
    :mime-version:user-agent:nntp-posting-host:injection-info:date
    :newsgroups:path:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date;
    bh=kOILOPRBX0G90QEphhvmP0j5mq5ubCneRpzUhvQuQ5I=;
    b=0u3AG40DZWHon6HMta/sMkyoEt4sczTqVxrVpuG2ngkIS3qWH25GiKRwxY6wPhFFiV
    7dZLPhn981awF4VDoQU2Dq7vlWKBLxbldv9hE7HbY9wcZ43LejRU/KW7sPejenYksZCC
    vOq/ADXlLJYq3Iiteoqd5+w9BhuGrbVufqaQQyj7VmcU+pmbNNROQQz2i0XetQdFS2HP
    MQ7BrCLPT0VF3TeEB54N0Wk0jEnaVEKyLtNr7plhkmEinU3JLrBjy7sexzJkMoNsGzks
    09NDt5cI049W9VeYrxE+ciLdkR/a3/mZbaFiwRHlVMPqJOX/1JFrgOoXGwj8Vr7LgiPl
    W83g==
    X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf04zIZnDkW4GiKaAHb3RDyquFWSTLZGKW7kILRsKfK3j8s0ikGE
    dOh3SBJYpHx+gmq+orgn4WwT8ZeYQRnjSVnC198=
    X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d49:0:b0:35b:b660:161f with SMTP id g9-20020ac85d49000000b0035bb660161fmr8947313qtx.678.1664577868820;
    Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e54:0:b0:35c:c7f1:7234 with SMTP id
    i20-20020ac85e54000000b0035cc7f17234mr9034611qtx.656.1664577868649; Fri, 30
    Sep 2022 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.astro.research
    Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.134.158.8; posting-account=XS5sXwoAAABKU0kHcsk_nashWaidAu0Q
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.134.158.8
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <3cd616cc-be85-4c3e-bd7f-5e12dad204efn@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Wolf's sunspot number is low science, old science fake and should
    replaced by measure of volcanic activity on the Sun, measure of volcanic
    energy ejected by the Sun.
    From: a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
    Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:44:28 +0000
    To: sci-astro-research@moderators.isc.org
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Status: RO
    Content-Length: 1556
    Lines: 52

    Wolf's sunspot number is low science, old science fake and should replaced
    by measure of volcanic activity on the Sun, measure of volcanic energy ejected by the Sun.

    Just look at formula used to calculated number of sunspots.

    For the same telescope "K" is contant, less than 1.

    ======
    Case 1

    Number of sunspots groups = 1
    Number of sunspots = 10

    ======

    R = (10*G + S)*K

    10*1 + 10 = 20*K

    Case 2

    Number of sunspots groups = 2
    Number of sunspots in each group = 5

    10*2 + 10 = 30*K

    But actually, number of sunspots in Case 1 and Case 2 is the same

    So I opt for the topological definition of sunspots index, as the sum of the volcanic activity on the Sun, calculating total volcanic energy ejected by every sunspot in total towards the Earth,
    since what matters is mass and energy of coronal/coronary plasma ejected toward the Earth ,
    since CMEs exactly fluctuate solar activity,
    resulting in Short Term Climate Changes
    one-month/year Climate Changes

    Since pictuire of the Sun is no more 2D
    and we can study solar surface activity in 3D
    there is no need to calculate number of sunspots, which is fake index, as explained above.

    =========================
    The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K. Where: R = the sunspot number. G = the number of sunspot groups observed.
    How do you calculate the n…
    edaboard.co.uk
    The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K

    --MgWmdFb7JREVWTQ9--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)