India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 5:10:43 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924I'm sure they have some back up system?
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same batteries.
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough. >> The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough. The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. Theysimply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and survived the lunar night because of that.
You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability to understand facts is even more evident.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
In any case, they had no option. Rich's hard-on for RTGs was not an
option, since launching them requires following a lot of international treaty laws (fortunately!) which would have dramatically increased the
cost of the mission. And as the mission plan only required one
daylight operation cycle, the mission goals were achieved.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:10:43?PM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
It's time for you to respond to peterson, the village idiot.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:16:32 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:10:43?PM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
It's time for you to respond to peterson, the village idiot.Glad to see you are now properly signing your comments.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same >> >> >> batteries.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan >> >> that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and survived the lunar night because of that.
You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability to understand facts is even more evident.It wasn't intended to survive the night. By design.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:45:19 AM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same >> >> batteries.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
In any case, they had no option. Rich's hard-on for RTGs was not an option, since launching them requires following a lot of international treaty laws (fortunately!) which would have dramatically increased the cost of the mission. And as the mission plan only required oneApparently, this mission was not designed to survive the lunar night...
daylight operation cycle, the mission goals were achieved.
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/isros-chandrayaan-3-confronts-cold-lunar-odds-heres-why
... and they "chose not to equip these robotic pioneers with the commonly used radioisotope heater units (RHUs)."
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:42:50 PM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:45:19 AM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They >> simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan >> that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
In any case, they had no option. Rich's hard-on for RTGs was not an option, since launching them requires following a lot of international treaty laws (fortunately!) which would have dramatically increased the cost of the mission. And as the mission plan only required oneApparently, this mission was not designed to survive the lunar night...
daylight operation cycle, the mission goals were achieved.
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/isros-chandrayaan-3-confronts-cold-lunar-odds-heres-why
... and they "chose not to equip these robotic pioneers with the commonly used radioisotope heater units (RHUs)."
The mission planners did not "choose not to use" radioistopes, they could not AFFORD to.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:51:18?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:It wasn't intended to survive the night. By design.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same >> >> >> >> batteries.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan >> >> >> that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and survived the lunar night because of that.
You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability to understand facts is even more evident.
You just used circular reasoning. That is to be expected from you.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:51:18?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:It wasn't intended to survive the night. By design.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com> >> >> >> wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They >> >> >> simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an >> >> >> environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and survived the lunar night because of that.
You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability to understand facts is even more evident.
You just used circular reasoning. That is to be expected from you.You don't know what circular reasoning is, either.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:34:01 AM UTC-7, W wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:42:50 PM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:45:19 AM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com> >> wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They >> simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an >> environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
batteries.
The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable parts warm enough.
that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
problem.
Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
In any case, they had no option. Rich's hard-on for RTGs was not an option, since launching them requires following a lot of international treaty laws (fortunately!) which would have dramatically increased the cost of the mission. And as the mission plan only required one daylight operation cycle, the mission goals were achieved.Apparently, this mission was not designed to survive the lunar night...
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/isros-chandrayaan-3-confronts-cold-lunar-odds-heres-why
... and they "chose not to equip these robotic pioneers with the commonly used radioisotope heater units (RHUs)."
The mission planners did not "choose not to use" radioistopes, they could not AFFORD to.You are clearly making this up. From the article I referenced...
"... ISRO has remained silent on why Chandrayaan-3 lacks these heating elements"
You might be correct but then again, you might be incorrect.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 103:06:54 |
| Calls: | 6,851 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,355 |
| Messages: | 5,415,473 |