It is coming up to 30 years since I first began dealing with the scientific method people and the subculture they subscribe to, with climate change modelling being just another symptom of that dangerous empiricism.Let me quote a friend of mine on the day of his retirement. “Thirty wasted years!”.
The defence mechanisms of this subculture are similar to scientology as are the type of people who are capable of being swayed by very narrow and contrived views appealing to the false satisfaction of anxiety, doom and dire predictions-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-Washing_(book)
Instead of making an effort to seek out the source of these modelling convictions from their origins with Isaac Newton in the late 17th century, many media publications want to double down on the subculture and its declarations of doom.
Reducing climate science to human behaviour is as bad as reducing human behaviour to evolutionary science, as the Victorian academics attempted to do via natural selection.
Let me quote a friend of mine on the day of his retirement. “Thirty wasted years!”.
On Tuesday, 29 November 2022 at 10:56:17 UTC, kellehe...@gmail.com wrote:
It is coming up to 30 years since I first began dealing with the scientific method people and the subculture they subscribe to, with climate change modelling being just another symptom of that dangerous empiricism.
The defence mechanisms of this subculture are similar to scientology as are the type of people who are capable of being swayed by very narrow and contrived views appealing to the false satisfaction of anxiety, doom and dire predictions-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-Washing_(book)
Instead of making an effort to seek out the source of these modelling convictions from their origins with Isaac Newton in the late 17th century, many media publications want to double down on the subculture and its declarations of doom.
Reducing climate science to human behaviour is as bad as reducing human behaviour to evolutionary science, as the Victorian academics attempted to do via natural selection.
Let me quote a friend of mine on the day of his retirement. “Thirty wasted years!”.
It is coming up to 30 years since I first began dealing with the scientific method people and the subculture they subscribe to, with climate change modelling being just another symptom of that dangerous empiricism.
The defence mechanisms of this subculture are similar to scientology as are the type of people who are capable of being swayed by very narrow and contrived views appealing to the false satisfaction of anxiety, doom and dire predictions-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-Washing_(book)
Instead of making an effort to seek out the source of these modelling convictions from their origins with Isaac Newton in the late 17th century, many media publications want to double down on the subculture and its declarations of doom.
Reducing climate science to human behaviour is as bad as reducing human behaviour to evolutionary science, as the Victorian academics attempted to do via natural selection.
The world has wasted 250+ years on mathematicians/experimental theorists
who never did have a feel for what they were observing and couldn't care less either.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 403 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 111:17:43 |
| Calls: | 8,465 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,181 |
| Messages: | 5,909,866 |