• You'll never get this kind of premium selling some Chinese scope

    From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 6 00:13:12 2022
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to RichA on Sat Aug 6 03:53:05 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/

    So, watcha gonna do with that telescope?
    Look at the Moon sometime?
    šŸ˜‚šŸ˜

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 6 07:05:19 2022
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. >You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/

    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to RichA on Sat Aug 6 06:20:13 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 3:13:14 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/

    If the Chinese telescope costs half as much, but does even 90% of the same thing, then re-sale value doesn't really matter very much.

    Back in the '80s several "high-end" car makers bragged about "resale value" but glossed over the fact that the vehicles cost three times as much with only marginal improvements as *practical* transportation. Repair, maintenance and insurance costs were
    not mentioned.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sat Aug 6 06:24:29 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 9:05:24 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. >You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    He seems to buy, sell and trade equipment far more frequently than most other amateur astronomers do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 6 21:35:41 2022
    On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 09:24:31 UTC-4, W wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 9:05:24 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo.
    You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.
    He seems to buy, sell and trade equipment far more frequently than most other amateur astronomers do.

    I did my time. I had a 60mm for five years, just a C8 for 10 years and did a LOT of observing, learned the sky. But I have used and bought a lot of telescopes, purely out of interest in what they could provide for observing. If I cared about the money,
    I wouldn't have spent at least six-figures all told, and absolutely didn't make a profit when I sold most stuff.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sat Aug 6 21:33:22 2022
    On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 09:05:24 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. >You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    Not hardly. Optical investment. I can see spending $1000-$2000 on a Chinese scope, but not $5k-$12k, they just do not have the pedigree.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to RichA on Sun Aug 7 00:14:16 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/

    Maybe the AP telescopes or parts are sourced out to China too?
    You don't know!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sat Aug 6 23:49:40 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 7:05:24 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    There are other reasons to be concerned about the resale value of
    a telescope.

    If one is going to use a telescope for years, but then trade up someday
    after one has some more money saved, resale value will help.

    But the resale value of a telescope also tells something about it: what
    is its quality, how long is it expected to last? What kind of a reputation
    has it earned?

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to RichA on Sun Aug 7 03:36:15 2022
    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 12:35:42 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 09:24:31 UTC-4, W wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 9:05:24 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo.
    You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a financial investment.
    He seems to buy, sell and trade equipment far more frequently than most other amateur astronomers do.
    I did my time. I had a 60mm for five years, just a C8 for 10 years and did a LOT of observing, learned the sky. But I have used and bought a lot of telescopes, purely out of interest in what they could provide for observing. If I cared about the money,
    I wouldn't have spent at least six-figures all told, and absolutely didn't make a profit when I sold most >stuff.

    ___
    So you don't worry about financial loss in your telescope dealings, but you think other people should be concerned about the money they might lose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 7 07:18:26 2022
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 21:33:22 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 09:05:24 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. >> >You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for
    astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    Not hardly. Optical investment. I can see spending $1000-$2000 on a Chinese scope, but not $5k-$12k, they just do not have the pedigree.

    Pedigree? No thanks. I'll go with performance. The two are not all
    that well correlated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 7 07:44:20 2022
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:49:40 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 7:05:24 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for
    astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    There are other reasons to be concerned about the resale value of
    a telescope.

    If one is going to use a telescope for years, but then trade up someday
    after one has some more money saved, resale value will help.

    But the resale value of a telescope also tells something about it: what
    is its quality, how long is it expected to last? What kind of a reputation >has it earned?

    There are people who will spend thousands for a little Questar, which
    performs no better than a dozen no name Chinese brands. There are
    people who will spend three times more for equipment to get a 2% boost
    in performance. There are all kinds of reasons that different people
    choose different equipment. Which is just fine. Rich's obsession with
    how other people choose to spend their own money, as well as his
    assumptions about what may or may not actually be high quality, is
    tiresome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sun Aug 7 07:45:34 2022
    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 7:44:25 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    Rich's obsession with
    how other people choose to spend their own money, as well as his
    assumptions about what may or may not actually be high quality, is
    tiresome.

    Given what the EEEVIL Xi Jinping has been up to in response to Nancy
    Pelosi's visit to Taiwan, l was more inclined to see his bashing of
    cheap Chinese-made telescopes as serving a useful purpose, rather than
    possibly perceiving it as borderline racist.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 7 14:10:01 2022
    On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 7:44:25 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    Rich's obsession with
    how other people choose to spend their own money, as well as his
    assumptions about what may or may not actually be high quality, is
    tiresome.

    Given what the EEEVIL Xi Jinping has been up to in response to Nancy
    Pelosi's visit to Taiwan, l was more inclined to see his bashing of
    cheap Chinese-made telescopes as serving a useful purpose, rather than >possibly perceiving it as borderline racist.

    John Savard

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber rattling
    here, more than I blame the response.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 04:04:02 2022
    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber rattling
    here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 07:27:51 2022
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsnell01@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber rattling
    here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ninapenda Jibini@21:1/5 to wsnell01@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 8 14:17:16 2022
    W <wsnell01@hotmail.com> wrote in news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b-b4fe-a37b0b664493n@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber
    rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done for
    decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to taustinca@gmail.com on Mon Aug 8 08:39:34 2022
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsnell01@hotmail.com> wrote in >news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b-b4fe-a37b0b664493n@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber
    rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done for
    decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.

    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name calling.
    Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do his worshipers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 07:39:58 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 9:27:55 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber rattling
    here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.
    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.

    We'll leave that "making a fool of oneself" stuff to you. You are quite good at it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 08:03:13 2022
    On Sunday, 7 August 2022 at 09:44:25 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:49:40 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 7:05:24 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for
    astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    There are other reasons to be concerned about the resale value of
    a telescope.

    If one is going to use a telescope for years, but then trade up someday >after one has some more money saved, resale value will help.

    But the resale value of a telescope also tells something about it: what
    is its quality, how long is it expected to last? What kind of a reputation >has it earned?
    There are people who will spend thousands for a little Questar, which performs no better than a dozen no name Chinese brands. There are
    people who will spend three times more for equipment to get a 2% boost
    in performance. There are all kinds of reasons that different people
    choose different equipment. Which is just fine. Rich's obsession with
    how other people choose to spend their own money, as well as his
    assumptions about what may or may not actually be high quality, is
    tiresome.

    Simple solution; don't read the posts! They all have subject lines to clue you in.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 08:04:45 2022
    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in >news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber
    rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done for
    decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name calling.
    Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do his worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have.
    Are you planning on changing its course?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 08:02:01 2022
    On Sunday, 7 August 2022 at 06:36:16 UTC-4, W wrote:
    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 12:35:42 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 09:24:31 UTC-4, W wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 9:05:24 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo.
    You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a financial investment.
    He seems to buy, sell and trade equipment far more frequently than most other amateur astronomers do.
    I did my time. I had a 60mm for five years, just a C8 for 10 years and did a LOT of observing, learned the sky. But I have used and bought a lot of telescopes, purely out of interest in what they could provide for observing. If I cared about the
    money, I wouldn't have spent at least six-figures all told, and absolutely didn't make a profit when I sold most >stuff.
    ___
    So you don't worry about financial loss in your telescope dealings, but you think other people should be concerned about the money they might lose.

    Water under the bridge for me. The business has changed. Premium prices for used instruments (some of them) is a relatively new thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 11:14:22 2022
    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in news:pbh2fh9c7g4ha9fds7kcijo0saubm74q9c@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
    <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L
    Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for
    saber rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done
    for decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent
    years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name
    calling. Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do his
    worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded
    with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have. Are
    you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has lost
    its collective mind.

    You make my point with every post.

    And will continue to do so.

    --
    Terry Austin

    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 11:19:22 2022
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for saber
    rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done for
    decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name calling.
    Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do his worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have.
    Are you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has lost its
    collective mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to taustinca@gmail.com on Mon Aug 8 13:24:01 2022
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:14:22 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >news:pbh2fh9c7g4ha9fds7kcijo0saubm74q9c@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
    <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L
    Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for
    saber rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to
    dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has done
    for decades, and which as ramped up considerably in recent
    years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name
    calling. Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do his
    worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded
    with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have. Are
    you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has lost
    its collective mind.

    You make my point with every post.

    And will continue to do so.

    As you have no point, that is objectively false.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 12:28:28 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 7:27:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.

    Maybe many other things he has written here are in that category, but here
    he just said the plain truth. Xi Jinping, the evil tyrant of the repressive, totalitarian
    communist regime of the Chinese mainland, does not have any right to limit
    the relations between the United States and the Republic of China in Taiwan.

    Of course, from a practical standpoint, instead of a moral standpoint, one has to take the mainland regime's position into account because it has nukes.

    But we don't have to like it, or pretend that we do.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 13:35:58 2022
    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in news:0mo2fh1j8lkr1nk3g3q6gh3g69e1mmjn4a@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:14:22 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
    Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >>news:pbh2fh9c7g4ha9fds7kcijo0saubm74q9c@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
    <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L
    Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for
    saber rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get
    to dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has
    done for decades, and which as ramped up considerably in
    recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name
    calling. Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do
    his worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded
    with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have.
    Are you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has
    lost its collective mind.

    You make my point with every post.

    And will continue to do so.

    As you have no point, that is objectively false.

    QED. You can't help yoruself.

    --
    Terry Austin

    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 17:39:19 2022
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:

    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 7:27:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.

    Maybe many other things he has written here are in that category, but here
    he just said the plain truth. Xi Jinping, the evil tyrant of the repressive, totalitarian
    communist regime of the Chinese mainland, does not have any right to limit >the relations between the United States and the Republic of China in Taiwan.

    Of course, from a practical standpoint, instead of a moral standpoint, one has >to take the mainland regime's position into account because it has nukes.

    But we don't have to like it, or pretend that we do.

    And we don't need irresponsible politicians who go against what the
    State Deparment advises.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to taustinca@gmail.com on Mon Aug 8 17:40:25 2022
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:35:58 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >news:0mo2fh1j8lkr1nk3g3q6gh3g69e1mmjn4a@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:14:22 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
    Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >>>news:pbh2fh9c7g4ha9fds7kcijo0saubm74q9c@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
    <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L
    Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi for
    saber rattling here, more than I blame the response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get
    to dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has
    done for decades, and which as ramped up considerably in
    recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but name
    calling. Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and so do
    his worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been bombarded
    with endless leftwing threads by spammers like others have.
    Are you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has
    lost its collective mind.

    You make my point with every post.

    And will continue to do so.

    As you have no point, that is objectively false.

    QED. You can't help yoruself.

    I'm sure the irony of your comment is totally lost on you!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 17:10:29 2022
    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 13:19:53 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Sunday, 7 August 2022 at 09:44:25 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:49:40 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 7:05:24 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> >
    You sure are obsessed with what other people are willing to pay for
    astronomical equipment. You seem to think of it as nothing but a
    financial investment.

    There are other reasons to be concerned about the resale value of
    a telescope.

    If one is going to use a telescope for years, but then trade up someday >> >after one has some more money saved, resale value will help.

    But the resale value of a telescope also tells something about it: what >> >is its quality, how long is it expected to last? What kind of a reputation
    has it earned?
    There are people who will spend thousands for a little Questar, which
    performs no better than a dozen no name Chinese brands. There are
    people who will spend three times more for equipment to get a 2% boost
    in performance. There are all kinds of reasons that different people
    choose different equipment. Which is just fine. Rich's obsession with
    how other people choose to spend their own money, as well as his
    assumptions about what may or may not actually be high quality, is
    tiresome.

    Simple solution; don't read the posts! They all have subject lines to clue you in.
    Or better, don't post your drivel in the first place.

    Sorry woke lefty. We aren't going to censor everything until it meets with your approval. Tough luck there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony Peterson@21:1/5 to RichA on Mon Aug 8 17:04:56 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 3:13:14 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo. You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/


    Iā€™m not sure how this thread started - I just arrived to this group - but Iā€™m eager to put my 6ā€ Esprit, which I purchased for 6K new years ago, against the Astrotech at FLO. If this would settle any arguments, why not get together one night and
    compare double stars with them?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to tony.d....@gmail.com on Mon Aug 8 17:12:48 2022
    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 20:04:57 UTC-4, tony.d....@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 3:13:14 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
    Though if you are insane, you can pay $12,000 new for a six in Chinese apo.
    You'll be lucky to get 1/2 you money back if you resell.

    https://www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/item/303918-astro-physics-130gtx-and-accessories/
    Iā€™m not sure how this thread started - I just arrived to this group - but Iā€™m eager to put my 6ā€ Esprit, which I purchased for 6K new years ago, against the Astrotech at FLO. If this would settle any arguments, why not get together one night and
    compare double stars with them?

    Which Astrotech?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Mon Aug 8 17:11:29 2022
    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 19:39:25 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 7:27:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.

    Maybe many other things he has written here are in that category, but here >he just said the plain truth. Xi Jinping, the evil tyrant of the repressive, totalitarian
    communist regime of the Chinese mainland, does not have any right to limit >the relations between the United States and the Republic of China in Taiwan.

    Of course, from a practical standpoint, instead of a moral standpoint, one has
    to take the mainland regime's position into account because it has nukes.

    But we don't have to like it, or pretend that we do.
    And we don't need irresponsible politicians who go against what the
    State Deparment advises.

    HAHAHA! Like Biden??! Always saying something that gets "walked back" by the State Department!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ninapenda Jibini@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Tue Aug 9 04:25:25 2022
    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in news:lm73fh14c6rh646vjke6g0oshcoks2no9f@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:35:58 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
    Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >>news:0mo2fh1j8lkr1nk3g3q6gh3g69e1mmjn4a@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:14:22 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
    Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in >>>>news:pbh2fh9c7g4ha9fds7kcijo0saubm74q9c@4ax.com:

    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 08:04:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
    <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:39:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson
    wrote:
    On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:16 GMT, Ninapenda Jibini
    <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

    W <wsne...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:755a0090-fcc3-4a4b...@googlegroups.com:

    On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 4:10:05 PM UTC-4, Chris L
    Peterson wrote:

    He pretty much hates everything. And I blame Pelosi
    for saber rattling here, more than I blame the
    response.

    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not
    get to dictate otherwise.

    Not to mentione that amount of saber rattling China has
    done for decades, and which as ramped up considerably in
    recent years.

    But Chris loves the tase of his Chineses masters' dicks.
    So typical of the wingnut right these days. Nothing but
    name calling. Trump had the behavior of a 5-year old, and
    so do his worshipers.

    We've been fairly lucky that this group hasn't been
    bombarded with endless leftwing threads by spammers like
    others have. Are you planning on changing its course?

    It isn't "leftwing" to point out that the wingnut right has
    lost its collective mind.

    You make my point with every post.

    And will continue to do so.

    As you have no point, that is objectively false.

    QED. You can't help yoruself.

    I'm sure the irony of your comment is totally lost on you!

    I know you are, but what am I?

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From W@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Tue Aug 9 06:33:31 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 3:28:30 PM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 7:27:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:04:02 -0700 (PDT), W <wsne...@hotmail.com>
    Pelosi has every right to visit Taiwan. CCP does not get to dictate otherwise.

    And you have every right to say whatever you want here. It doesn't
    make you less of a fool for doing so.
    Maybe many other things he has written here are in that category,

    You are about the biggest **** fool there is, short of peterson.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Aug 9 17:40:28 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:10:30 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote:

    Sorry woke lefty.

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    Being aware of the real problems that black people face, and
    understanding them properly, is a good thing.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Aug 9 17:38:28 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:11:30 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote:

    HAHAHA! Like Biden??! Always saying something that gets "walked back" by the State Department!!!

    It is puzzling to me why some people seem to think that "strategic ambiguity" is preferable to
    an unequivocal commitment to the defense of Taiwan.
    After all, we might defend Taiwan if it is attacked. And China might attack Taiwan _if_ it thinks we
    won't defend it. Since defending Taiwan might start a nuclear World War III, therefore, surely it
    is best if it is very clear that it will be defended if it is attacked... so that no attack will ever take
    place.

    Actually, let's all just move our Chinese embassies to Taipei from Beijing, where they used to be
    before Trudeau and Nixon got their bright ideas. And have the UN go back to the status quo ante
    as well - or the U.S. can just leave the existing UN and start a new one.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)