• Drilling into the ice on Europa

    From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 23 18:22:15 2022
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to RichA on Sun Apr 24 14:02:56 2022
    On 24/04/2022 02:22, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html


    If you don't care about being able to transmit a signal back out again
    then being able to maintain a temperature above 1C and wait would
    probably be good enough. The warmer it is the better rate of progress
    but not too hot. Sort of thing a radioisotope thermal generator might be
    good at - you could use the waste heat to soften the ice a bit and
    counter rotating blades to cut into it.

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Relying on acoustic transducers for the probe to talk back to a surface
    lander would be one way of doing it cheaply. Sterilising the probe is
    essential just in case there really is something novel alive deep in the Europan oceans.

    Shades of ACC's 2010...

    --
    Regards,
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk on Sun Apr 24 08:10:38 2022
    On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 14:02:56 +0100, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 24/04/2022 02:22, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C. >>
    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html


    If you don't care about being able to transmit a signal back out again
    then being able to maintain a temperature above 1C and wait would
    probably be good enough. The warmer it is the better rate of progress
    but not too hot. Sort of thing a radioisotope thermal generator might be
    good at - you could use the waste heat to soften the ice a bit and
    counter rotating blades to cut into it.

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Relying on acoustic transducers for the probe to talk back to a surface >lander would be one way of doing it cheaply. Sterilising the probe is >essential just in case there really is something novel alive deep in the >Europan oceans.

    Shades of ACC's 2010...

    You'd also need to pump the meltwater back up to the surface, and keep
    it from freezing on that trip... which might take quite a lot of
    energy. Assuming you want to keep the channel open.

    Or... maybe your probe carries a spool with a few kilometers of fiber
    optic, and unrolls it as you go down, and just lets it freeze back in
    behind it. That essentially gives you another instrument, as well,
    since a fiber in the ice like this produces loads of seismic data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sun Apr 24 15:51:59 2022
    On 24/04/2022 15:10, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 14:02:56 +0100, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 24/04/2022 02:22, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html


    If you don't care about being able to transmit a signal back out again
    then being able to maintain a temperature above 1C and wait would
    probably be good enough. The warmer it is the better rate of progress
    but not too hot. Sort of thing a radioisotope thermal generator might be
    good at - you could use the waste heat to soften the ice a bit and
    counter rotating blades to cut into it.

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Relying on acoustic transducers for the probe to talk back to a surface
    lander would be one way of doing it cheaply. Sterilising the probe is
    essential just in case there really is something novel alive deep in the
    Europan oceans.

    Shades of ACC's 2010...

    You'd also need to pump the meltwater back up to the surface, and keep
    it from freezing on that trip... which might take quite a lot of
    energy. Assuming you want to keep the channel open.

    I was envisaging minimum energy solution which is allow the melt water
    slush to freeze behind the probe.

    Or... maybe your probe carries a spool with a few kilometers of fiber
    optic, and unrolls it as you go down, and just lets it freeze back in
    behind it. That essentially gives you another instrument, as well,
    since a fiber in the ice like this produces loads of seismic data.

    It might well work - certainly a lot more bandwidth that way.

    --
    Regards,
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to RichA on Sun Apr 24 10:17:28 2022
    On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 6:22:16 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html

    Easier than through your skull, for sure!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ninapenda Jibini@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sun Apr 24 19:29:58 2022
    Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in news:2bma6hpjt46e2uktqcg5n3fftd7a5jtu8g@4ax.com:

    On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 14:02:56 +0100, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 24/04/2022 02:22, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice
    at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thoug
    ht.html


    If you don't care about being able to transmit a signal back out
    again then being able to maintain a temperature above 1C and
    wait would probably be good enough. The warmer it is the better
    rate of progress but not too hot. Sort of thing a radioisotope
    thermal generator might be good at - you could use the waste
    heat to soften the ice a bit and counter rotating blades to cut
    into it.

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Relying on acoustic transducers for the probe to talk back to a
    surface lander would be one way of doing it cheaply. Sterilising
    the probe is essential just in case there really is something
    novel alive deep in the Europan oceans.

    Shades of ACC's 2010...

    You'd also need to pump the meltwater back up to the surface,
    and keep it from freezing on that trip... which might take quite
    a lot of energy.

    The pump would be a good source of heat for the melting part.
    Though pumping liquid water for multiple kilometers would take
    quite a lot of energy.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun Apr 24 20:06:53 2022
    On Sunday, 24 April 2022 at 10:52:02 UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 24/04/2022 15:10, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 14:02:56 +0100, Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 24/04/2022 02:22, RichA wrote:
    How more difficult would it be to drill through 4-5km of ice at -160 deg. C.

    https://phys.org/news/2022-04-jupiter-moon-closer-surface-thought.html >>>

    If you don't care about being able to transmit a signal back out again
    then being able to maintain a temperature above 1C and wait would
    probably be good enough. The warmer it is the better rate of progress
    but not too hot. Sort of thing a radioisotope thermal generator might be >> good at - you could use the waste heat to soften the ice a bit and
    counter rotating blades to cut into it.

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Relying on acoustic transducers for the probe to talk back to a surface
    lander would be one way of doing it cheaply. Sterilising the probe is
    essential just in case there really is something novel alive deep in the >> Europan oceans.

    Shades of ACC's 2010...

    You'd also need to pump the meltwater back up to the surface, and keep
    it from freezing on that trip... which might take quite a lot of
    energy. Assuming you want to keep the channel open.
    I was envisaging minimum energy solution which is allow the melt water
    slush to freeze behind the probe.

    It would be almost impossible to get enough energy to keep the entire channel open, especially at those temps
    and those depts. The Russians had enough trouble doing it on Earth.
    Your idea of a probe that simply melts its way through and lets it freeze behind is a good one and by far the least
    expensive solution. The probe could also hold comms and cameras, as long as they were miniature.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Sun Apr 24 21:54:22 2022
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.
    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun Apr 24 21:45:55 2022
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to StarDust on Mon Apr 25 07:40:32 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:54:24 AM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!

    Granite is hard enough that it can be used as aggregate in concrete and asphalt and
    used to build highway pavement that can carry thousands of large trucks per day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?fred__k._engels=C2=AE?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 25 07:58:35 2022
    Ok, goodnight folks. lock.gif
    This topic has obviously run its course.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 25 11:11:08 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 10:58:42 AM UTC-4, fred k. engels® wrote:
    Ok, goodnight folks. lock.gif
    This topic has obviously run its course.

    The chemical characteristics of water ice at cryogenic temperatures
    is definitely on-topic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From palsing@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 25 19:56:23 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:58:42 AM UTC-7, fred k. engels® wrote:
    Ok, goodnight folks. lock.gif
    This topic has obviously run its course.

    Who died and made you King?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From palsing@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Mon Apr 25 19:58:28 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 11:11:10 AM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 10:58:42 AM UTC-4, fred k. engels® wrote:
    Ok, goodnight folks. lock.gif
    This topic has obviously run its course.

    The chemical characteristics of water ice at cryogenic temperatures
    is definitely on-topic.

    I'm pretty sure that talking about planetary exploration falls under the very broad subject of 'astronomy'...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Mon Apr 25 20:13:16 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:40:34 AM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:54:24 AM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!
    Granite is hard enough that it can be used as aggregate in concrete and asphalt and
    used to build highway pavement that can carry thousands of large trucks per day.

    Da!
    Is asphalt hard?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 25 22:56:16 2022
    On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:56:23 -0700 (PDT), palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:58:42 AM UTC-7, fred k. engels® wrote:
    Ok, goodnight folks. lock.gif
    This topic has obviously run its course.

    Who died and made you King?

    It's just some kind of bot. Ignore it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to StarDust on Tue Apr 26 20:13:53 2022
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 11:13:17 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:40:34 AM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:54:24 AM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!
    Granite is hard enough that it can be used as aggregate in concrete and asphalt and
    used to build highway pavement that can carry thousands of large trucks per day.
    Da!
    Is asphalt hard?

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Wed Apr 27 09:20:52 2022
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 11:13:17 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 7:40:34 AM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:54:24 AM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.

    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!
    Granite is hard enough that it can be used as aggregate in concrete and asphalt and
    used to build highway pavement that can carry thousands of large trucks per day.
    Da!
    Is asphalt hard?

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    --
    Regards,
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 27 07:33:27 2022
    On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 21:54:22 -0700 (PDT), StarDust <csoka01@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-7, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:03:01 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:

    Ice has considerable strength at cryogenic temperatures.
    Water ice at cryogenic temperatures is almost as hard and tough as granite.

    Actually, granite is not that hard!
    Diamond coring drill goes through it like butter.
    Done that, when through holes had be drilled into precision granite surface plate, because measuring instruments were mounted to it!

    "Hardness" is one aspect of material strength. Granite is very hard.
    But that doesn't mean it's difficult to drill into. Some hard
    materials are easy to work with, some softer ones are difficult.

    I think ice is one of the easiest materials to drill into because it
    doesn't do much damage to most conventional drill bit materials.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Wed Apr 27 19:42:04 2022
    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 10:39:43 PM UTC-4, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.
    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for

    Correction
    138 to 166 C

    production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Wed Apr 27 19:39:41 2022
    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to kozelsm@yahoo.com on Wed Apr 27 22:43:51 2022
    On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <kozelsm@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html >>
    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point
    formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for >production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported >to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Thu Apr 28 11:50:06 2022
    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html >>
    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point
    formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for >production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported >to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an asphalt pavement liquify.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to kozelsm@yahoo.com on Thu Apr 28 14:29:28 2022
    On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <kozelsm@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point
    formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for >> >production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported >> >to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot. >>
    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an >asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?iso-8859-1?Q?fred__k._engels=AE?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 29 05:58:25 2022
    Prime Minister Justin Blackface has just tweeted his condolences
    Three massive spy satellites Chicom launches expected in three days

    So, How's that pretty picture astro photography horseshit® working out for
    ya?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EoAHdwGBvU

    "

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Fri Apr 29 21:13:59 2022
    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:29:33 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense. >> >>
    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to >> >> crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point >> >> formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for >> >production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an
    asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    You mean like atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a clear day?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to kozelsm@yahoo.com on Sat Apr 30 07:22:04 2022
    On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:59 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <kozelsm@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:29:33 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense. >> >> >>
    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to >> >> >> crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point >> >> >> formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for
    production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an
    asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    You mean like atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a clear day?

    I doubt it was that hot. But over 100 F, and mid-day, for sure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Chris L Peterson on Sat Apr 30 22:05:58 2022
    On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 9:22:10 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:59 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:29:33 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote: >> >> >> On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces.
    Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point
    formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for
    production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt >> >> in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban
    heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an
    asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    You mean like atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a clear day?

    I doubt it was that hot. But over 100 F, and mid-day, for sure.

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    Concrete pavement has been known to expand and blow out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kelleher.gerald@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Sun May 1 01:48:00 2022
    On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 6:06:00 AM UTC+1, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 9:22:10 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:59 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:29:33 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense.

    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to
    crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces. >> >> >> Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point
    formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for
    production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt
    in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban >> >> heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an
    asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    You mean like atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a clear day?

    I doubt it was that hot. But over 100 F, and mid-day, for sure.
    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    Concrete pavement has been known to expand and blow out.

    Different materials expand at different rates depending on how much radiation they absorb as the Earth turns daily to the Sun-

    http://prairieecosystems.pbworks.com/f/1179343887/crerar%20temperature%20variation.jpg

    It is unfortunate that, due to a misguided allegiance to a poor conclusion made centuries ago, some contributors to this newsgroup don't accept the planet turns once every 24 hours and a thousand times in a thousand 24 hour days. Research for all
    topics return to a stable foundation rather than coming to a dead stop once the adjustment is made.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Sun May 1 10:37:53 2022
    On 01/05/2022 06:05, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 9:22:10 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:59 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:29:33 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:43:56 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <koz...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:20:56 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote: >>>>>>>> On 27/04/2022 04:13, Scott Kozel wrote:

    Asphalt concrete is hard.

    Concrete is lot harder than Asphalt at STP in a Young's modulus sense. >>>>>>>>
    https://www.slowtwitch.com/Training/Running/Concrete_or_Asphalt__4793.html

    Once the road surface gets to 60+C then asphalt is little different to >>>>>>>> crushed gravel in wet tar and it tears apart under shear forces. >>>>>>>> Happens sometimes even in the UK on the hottest sunny days.

    I presume that tropical countries use a different higher melting point >>>>>>>> formulation for their asphalt and/or cast concrete slab roads.

    Asphalt concrete mix designs are in the 280 - 330 F (536-636 C) range for
    production at the plant to create a molten material that can be transported
    to the job site.

    60 C is 140 F and that would be rare if ever that a pavement got that hot.

    Asphalt commonly gets well over 140F on hot, sunny days. Fresh asphalt >>>>>> in places like Phoenix can reach 180F. It's a big part of the urban >>>>>> heat island effect.

    Well if the atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a
    clear day, the radiant heat the Sun could boost the pavement temp over 140 F.

    I live in an area that occasionally reaches 100 F, and I have not yet seen an
    asphalt pavement liquify.

    When I lived in California, on hot days you could pick off blobs of
    tar out of the asphalt and manipulate it like chewing gum.

    You mean like atmospheric temp is 115-120 F, and the Sun is at high elevation on a clear day?

    I doubt it was that hot. But over 100 F, and mid-day, for sure.

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    It doesn't liquify as such but it no longer has any shear strength and
    is torn apart by HGVs and agricultural vehicles in the mid afternoon
    when the air and road temperature is hottest. It doesn't help that the
    silage and harvest periods coincide with the hottest weather.

    Ordinary cars don't usually do much damage by comparison unless they
    brake hard or turn abruptly.

    Air temperature in the UK seldom gets above 30C but when it does older
    tarmac roads can still get globs of molten tar on and soften badly. Last
    year was particularly bad (as was 2018 when the rail lines buckled too).

    https://www.driving.co.uk/news/roads/roads-melting-uk-heatwave/

    There is a S facing hill near me that does it almost every year and it
    has been resurfaced relatively recently so I don't believe the claims of
    the CEO of the road surfaces association about bitumen fixing it.

    The trains also fail under these circumstances as the rails buckle!

    Concrete pavement has been known to expand and blow out.

    Never seen that in the UK. There are a few very old bypass/motorways of
    that concrete slab construction dating from the 1950's. Very noisy to
    drive on since each slab joint generates a sharp noise.

    Concrete slab roads moving is more likely due to mining subsidence or
    sink holes.

    --
    Regards,
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun May 1 21:08:52 2022
    On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 01/05/2022 06:05, Scott Kozel wrote:

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    It doesn't liquify as such but it no longer has any shear strength and
    is torn apart by HGVs and agricultural vehicles in the mid afternoon
    when the air and road temperature is hottest. It doesn't help that the
    silage and harvest periods coincide with the hottest weather.

    Ordinary cars don't usually do much damage by comparison unless they
    brake hard or turn abruptly.

    Air temperature in the UK seldom gets above 30C but when it does older
    tarmac roads can still get globs of molten tar on and soften badly. Last
    year was particularly bad (as was 2018 when the rail lines buckled too).

    87 F, not hot at all. Something must be wrong with the mix designs.

    Concrete pavement has been known to expand and blow out.

    Never seen that in the UK. There are a few very old bypass/motorways of
    that concrete slab construction dating from the 1950's. Very noisy to
    drive on since each slab joint generates a sharp noise.

    Pretty rare here but it has happened, usually on the older pavements (1970s, 1980s).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Scott Kozel on Mon May 2 10:49:28 2022
    On 02/05/2022 05:08, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 01/05/2022 06:05, Scott Kozel wrote:

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    It doesn't liquify as such but it no longer has any shear strength and
    is torn apart by HGVs and agricultural vehicles in the mid afternoon
    when the air and road temperature is hottest. It doesn't help that the
    silage and harvest periods coincide with the hottest weather.

    Ordinary cars don't usually do much damage by comparison unless they
    brake hard or turn abruptly.

    Air temperature in the UK seldom gets above 30C but when it does older
    tarmac roads can still get globs of molten tar on and soften badly. Last
    year was particularly bad (as was 2018 when the rail lines buckled too).

    87 F, not hot at all. Something must be wrong with the mix designs.

    It isn't the air temperature that matters. It is the surface temperature
    of the black tarmac road which can get too hot to touch and melts. It
    really only takes a nice still day and a clear blue sky in the summer
    months and after two or three days some tarmac roads will fail.

    I don't doubt that some of it is due to global warming making summer temperatures higher than they have ever been and taking older roads
    beyond their design expectations for the older formulation.

    Allegedly they have fixed it with more bitumen and less tar but the
    roads near me are recently redone and still melt on hot summers days.
    (we only have half a dozen or so really hot days in a year)

    Concrete pavement has been known to expand and blow out.

    Never seen that in the UK. There are a few very old bypass/motorways of
    that concrete slab construction dating from the 1950's. Very noisy to
    drive on since each slab joint generates a sharp noise.

    Pretty rare here but it has happened, usually on the older pavements (1970s, 1980s).


    --
    Regards,
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Kozel@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Mon May 2 19:39:39 2022
    On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 5:49:32 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 02/05/2022 05:08, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 01/05/2022 06:05, Scott Kozel wrote:

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    It doesn't liquify as such but it no longer has any shear strength and
    is torn apart by HGVs and agricultural vehicles in the mid afternoon
    when the air and road temperature is hottest. It doesn't help that the
    silage and harvest periods coincide with the hottest weather.

    Ordinary cars don't usually do much damage by comparison unless they
    brake hard or turn abruptly.

    Air temperature in the UK seldom gets above 30C but when it does older
    tarmac roads can still get globs of molten tar on and soften badly. Last >> year was particularly bad (as was 2018 when the rail lines buckled too).

    87 F, not hot at all. Something must be wrong with the mix designs.

    It isn't the air temperature that matters. It is the surface temperature
    of the black tarmac road which can get too hot to touch and melts. It
    really only takes a nice still day and a clear blue sky in the summer
    months and after two or three days some tarmac roads will fail.

    I don't doubt that some of it is due to global warming making summer temperatures higher than they have ever been and taking older roads
    beyond their design expectations for the older formulation.

    You mentioned 30 C (87F). Even over 100F here it does not do that. Surface temp is a product of air temp and atmospheric clarity.

    Something must be wrong with the mix designs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to kozelsm@yahoo.com on Mon May 2 23:15:25 2022
    On Mon, 2 May 2022 19:39:39 -0700 (PDT), Scott Kozel
    <kozelsm@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 5:49:32 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 02/05/2022 05:08, Scott Kozel wrote:
    On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-4, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 01/05/2022 06:05, Scott Kozel wrote:

    It has been up to 105 F here, and I haven't seen any liquified asphalt pavement yet.

    It doesn't liquify as such but it no longer has any shear strength and
    is torn apart by HGVs and agricultural vehicles in the mid afternoon
    when the air and road temperature is hottest. It doesn't help that the
    silage and harvest periods coincide with the hottest weather.

    Ordinary cars don't usually do much damage by comparison unless they
    brake hard or turn abruptly.

    Air temperature in the UK seldom gets above 30C but when it does older
    tarmac roads can still get globs of molten tar on and soften badly. Last >> >> year was particularly bad (as was 2018 when the rail lines buckled too). >> >
    87 F, not hot at all. Something must be wrong with the mix designs.

    It isn't the air temperature that matters. It is the surface temperature
    of the black tarmac road which can get too hot to touch and melts. It
    really only takes a nice still day and a clear blue sky in the summer
    months and after two or three days some tarmac roads will fail.

    I don't doubt that some of it is due to global warming making summer
    temperatures higher than they have ever been and taking older roads
    beyond their design expectations for the older formulation.

    You mentioned 30 C (87F). Even over 100F here it does not do that. Surface >temp is a product of air temp and atmospheric clarity.

    Surface temperature depends upon material properties, particularly
    emissivity. Under a clear sky, radiative heating significantly
    dominates over air temperature. Likewise for cooling. Around here, a
    bucket of water left outside at night will have ice on top when the
    air temperature never drops below 10 C. And black surfaces on the
    right material can easily be tens of degrees above ambient air
    temperature under the Sun.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)