• Indigenous arrival 130,000 years ago

    From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 22 05:08:27 2023
    XPost: sci.archaeology.mesoamerican, soc.history.ancient, mex.indigena
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism

    June 21’s CBC Radio One Ideas program may be of interest.

    Here are the details:

    Title: Indigenous archaeologist argues humans may have
    arrived here 130,000 years ago.

    Abstract: The dominant story in archaeology has long been
    that humans came to North America around 12,000 years
    ago. But indigenous archaeologist Paulette Steeves points
    to mounting evidence suggesting human migration may
    have occurred closer to 130,000 years ago.

    Link to article, which contains a button to play the 54 minute
    radio program: https://tinyurl.com/p4hzr4s9 .

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) "This could be the final breath; This is life and death;
    This is hard rock and water; Out here between wind and flame;
    Between tears and elation; Lies a secret nation" (Ron Hynes)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Thu Jun 22 05:14:51 2023
    David Dalton wrote:
    n archaeology has long been
    that humans came to North America around 12,000 years
    ago.

    "Pre Clovis" was well established some years ago. But it
    was hardly earth shattering.

    What happened was that the glacial period ended, the
    glaciers were retreating, it was getting warm and people
    seemed to have arrived here in large numbers.

    But it all snapped into reverse: The Younger Dryas
    Cooling.

    Then it happened again! It got warm again, the
    glaciers started to retreat again and people started
    coming here in large numbers, it seemed.

    "Clovis."

    But most of the cites are on the east coast. So
    maybe they were already here. Maybe they weren't
    so much arriving here as being pushed inland my
    rising sea level...

    Go to what is the coast today. During the glacial
    period you could walk a length equal to the entire
    state of Connecticut, into what is now the Atlantic
    ocean, and still be on dry land.

    But indigenous archaeologist Paulette Steeves points
    to mounting evidence suggesting human migration may
    have occurred closer to 130,000 years ago.

    The same conditions faced at the end of the last glacial
    period existed at the end of the previous glacial period.

    They would have existed at the beginning of the glacial
    period as well...




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/719822321821548544

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Sun Jul 2 00:08:14 2023
    XPost: sci.archaeology.mesoamerican, soc.history.ancient, mex.indigena
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism

    David Dalton wrote:
    June 21’s CBC Radio One Ideas program may be of interest.

    Here are the details:

    Title: Indigenous archaeologist argues humans may have
    arrived here 130,000 years ago.

    Abstract: The dominant story in archaeology has long been
    that humans came to North America around 12,000 years
    ago. But indigenous archaeologist Paulette Steeves points
    to mounting evidence suggesting human migration may
    have occurred closer to 130,000 years ago.

    Link to article, which contains a button to play the 54 minute
    radio program: https://tinyurl.com/p4hzr4s9 .


    Paulette Steeves. Haven't read her book, but in general
    pre-clovis sites work has gained a lot of ground. The Monte
    Verde site in particular all but forced acceptance of the
    notion.

    <https://www.smu.edu/~/media/Site/Dedman/Departments/Anthropology/MeltzerPDFs/Meltzer
    et al 1997 AM ANTIQ On the Pleistocene antiquity of Monte Verde.ashx>

    "The potential importance of the Monte Verde site for the peopling of
    the New World prompted a detailed examination of the collections from
    that locality, as well as a site visit in January 1997 by a group of Paleoindian specialists. It is the consensus of that group that the
    MV-II occupation at the site is both archaeological and 12,500 years
    old, as T. Dillehay has argued. ... "


    Quite a number of such sites:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pre-Clovis_archaeological_sites_in_the_Americas>

    The Cerutti site is the only that seems to go way out there,
    and has some real issues.

    From 2017

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318469280_Were_Hominins_in_California_130000_Years_Ago

    Abstract
    In a controversial study published in Nature, Holen et
    al. (2017) claim that hominins fractured mastodon bones
    and teeth with stone cobbles in California ∼130,000
    years ago. Their claim implies a human colonization of
    the New World more than 110,000 years earlier than the
    oldest widely accepted archaeological sites in the
    Americas. It is also at odds with genetic and fossil
    evidence for the dispersal of anatomically modern humans
    (Homo sapiens) out of Africa and around the world.
    Recognizing the incompatibility of their claim with
    extant knowledge, the authors suggest that the Cerutti
    Mastodon locality might have been created by an as-yet
    unidentified archaic hominin, for which no fossil,
    archaeological, or genomic evidence currently exists in
    northeast Asia or the Americas. We assess Holen et al.’s
    (2017) supporting evidence and argue that such
    extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,
    which their paper and supporting materials fail to
    provide.


    From 2020, though

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X20304478
    Raman and optical microscopy of bone micro-residues on
    cobbles from the Cerutti mastodon site

    Abstract

    ...Our analysis of two cobbles (pegmatite CM-254 and
    andesite CM-281) identifies bone micro-residues that
    are not evenly distributed over the cobbles, and are
    unlikely to have been transferred from sediment or
    from passive contact with adjacent macro-bones. Bone
    micro-residues on cobble CM-254 were recovered from
    surfaces associated with usewear, but were absent
    from the naturally broken surface found in direct
    contact with a mastodon rib. In addition, bone
    micro-residues on cobble CM-281 were recovered from
    upward facing locations with impact marks and other
    usewear; but were absent on the downward facing
    surface. Bone micro-residues are absent in sediment
    away from the bone concentrations. These new data
    support the argument that the associated concentration
    of broken stones and mastodon bones is in situ, and
    that bones in this concentration were likely broken
    by the pegmatite cobble (comprising CM-254 and other
    fragments), when it struck mastodon bones placed on
    the andesite cobble CM-281. These findings add to the
    totality of evidence that supports human agency rather
    than geological processes as the driver responsible
    for the CM taphonomic pattern.


    That doesn't quite meet "extraordinary claims require
    extraordinary evidence" especially when they phrase
    something as "likely" ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Sun Jul 2 04:06:12 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Paulette Steeves. Haven't read her book, but in general
    pre-clovis sites work has gained a lot of ground. The Monte
    Verde site in particular all but forced acceptance of the
    notion.

    The Gault site, which I cited many times -- I cited the site --
    is most intriguing. I'm *Very* disappointed that I haven't
    seen more on it. Oh, sure, plenty from the proponents but
    I'd like to hear SOMETHING from the detractors, here why
    it's not mainstream.

    Some of the claims, like a well (a water well) older than
    the oldest ever found elsewhere on the planet...

    I've always been of a mind that if you want to know when
    people started arriving in the Americas, figure out what
    was stopping them from coming here. If you can identify
    what kept people from reaching the Americas, you can
    date their arrival to whatever point that was gone.

    ...and that may have been 100,000 years ago or earlier.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/721666107169292289

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)