https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
Published: 10 September 2019
Abstract
Stone tools provide a unique window into the mode of adaptation and
cognitive abilities of Lower Paleolithic early humans. The persistently produced large cutting tools (bifaces/handaxes) have long been an
appealing focus of research in the reconstruction of Lower Paleolithic survival strategies, at the expenses of the small flake tools considered by-products of the stone production process rather than desired end
products. Here, we use use-wear, residues and technological analyses
to show direct and very early evidence of the deliberate production and
use of small flakes for targeted stages of the prey butchery process at
the late Lower Paleolithic Acheulian site of Revadim, Israel. We highlight the significant role of small flakes in Lower Paleolithic adaptation alongside the canonical large handaxes. Our results demonstrate the technological and cognitive flexibility of early human groups in the Levant and beyond at the threshold of the departure from Lower Paleolithic
lifeways.
Small flakes = ultra-thin slicing of meat to cure in sun allowed UV to kill parasites
DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
Small flakes = ultra-thin slicing of meat to cure in sun allowed UV to kill parasitesHere:
https://rumble.com/vqwxtc-the-worst-of-watch-this-volume-ii.html
I used to do a public access cable show. As you can see, it has about as much relevance to paleo anthropology as any of your posts, which is why I figured you'd
like it.
It was actually a movie review show -- film reviews -- though you may have trouble
guessing that from the clip.
At one point it was decided that we could scratch "Movies" and just do "Reviews,"
be them music, products or ANYTHING. Maybe I could reboot it for Youtube,
do a "Review" of internet trolls...
-- --
https://rumble.com/vqwxtc-the-worst-of-watch-this-volume-ii.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
Do they really believe H.erectus ran elephants to exhaustion?? :-DDD
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
"thousands of butchered animal bones were also retrieved from the site, including those of elephants"
:-D
Never heard of fossilization processes??
Do they really believe H.erectus ran elephants to exhaustion?? :-DDD
No snorkel noses needed.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
[...]
As was just stated in that other thread on the topic, this type of testing sucks
eggs through a hose. It's really, Really, REALLY bad.
Oh. That means it's the opposite of accurate.
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
No snorkel noses needed.
I Envy JTEM wrote:
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
You simply declaring
Primum Sapienti wrote:
I Envy JTEM wrote:
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian
mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
You simply declaringIf you weren't a moron, and if you had any reading comprehension, you might've
noticed that I did not simply declare anything. I cited an example. An actual example were testing on samples maybe 1-10th as old were atrociously inaccurate.
But, like I said, you'd have to not be a moron, and you'd need some reading comprehension, to have not made a fool of yourself like you just did.
Kisses.
-- --
https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html
I Envy JTEM wrote:
But, like I said, you'd have to not be a moron, and you'd need some reading
comprehension, to have not made a fool of yourself like you just did.
(The
I Envy JTEM wrote:
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
You simply declaring
DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
I Envy JTEM wrote:
But, like I said, you'd have to not be a moron, and you'd need some reading(The
comprehension, to have not made a fool of yourself like you just did.
I Envy JTEM
Jan 30, 2022, 2:04:41 AM (23 hours ago)
to
Primum Sapienti wrote:
I Envy JTEM wrote:
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian
mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
You simply declaring
If you weren't a moron, and if you had any reading comprehension, you might've
noticed that I did not simply declare anything. I cited an example. An actual
example were testing on samples maybe 1-10th as old were atrociously inaccurate.
But, like I said, you'd have to not be a moron, and you'd need some reading comprehension, to have not made a fool of yourself like you just did.
-- --
https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html
Primum Sapienti wrote:
I Envy JTEM wrote:
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian >>> mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as
depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
You simply declaring
If you weren't a moron, and if you had any reading comprehension, you might've
noticed that I did not simply declare anything. I cited an example. An actual
Primum Sapienti wrote:testing sucks
[...]
As was just stated in that other thread on the topic, this type of
eggs through a hose. It's really, Really, REALLY bad.
Oh. That means it's the opposite of accurate.
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
Published: 10 September 2019
Abstract
Stone tools provide a unique window into the mode of adaptation and
cognitive abilities of Lower Paleolithic early humans. The persistently produced large cutting tools (bifaces/handaxes) have long been an
appealing focus of research in the reconstruction of Lower Paleolithic survival strategies, at the expenses of the small flake tools considered by-products of the stone production process rather than desired end
products. Here, we use use-wear, residues and technological analyses
to show direct and very early evidence of the deliberate production and
use of small flakes for targeted stages of the prey butchery process at
the late Lower Paleolithic Acheulian site of Revadim, Israel. We highlight the significant role of small flakes in Lower Paleolithic adaptation alongside the canonical large handaxes. Our results demonstrate the technological and cognitive flexibility of early human groups in the Levant and beyond at the threshold of the departure from Lower Paleolithic
lifeways.
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:59:20 PM UTC-5, Primum Sapienti wrote:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
Published: 10 September 2019
Abstract-
Stone tools provide a unique window into the mode of adaptation and cognitive abilities of Lower Paleolithic early humans. The persistently produced large cutting tools (bifaces/handaxes) have long been an
appealing focus of research in the reconstruction of Lower Paleolithic survival strategies, at the expenses of the small flake tools considered by-products of the stone production process rather than desired end products. Here, we use use-wear, residues and technological analyses
to show direct and very early evidence of the deliberate production and
use of small flakes for targeted stages of the prey butchery process at
the late Lower Paleolithic Acheulian site of Revadim, Israel. We highlight the significant role of small flakes in Lower Paleolithic adaptation alongside the canonical large handaxes. Our results demonstrate the technological and cognitive flexibility of early human groups in the Levant and beyond at the threshold of the departure from Lower Paleolithic lifeways.
Recycling of flint into small sharp flakes in Levant
Flint recycling habit in Homo
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-early-humans-deliberately-recycled-flint.html
You simply declaring it doesn't make it so.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
You simply declaring it doesn't make it so.And if you had reading comprehension & retention you'd know that I didn't simply declare. I raised the very real example of cocaine & tobacco on ancient Egyptian mummies which are only about a tenth as old, so one
might presume the testing to be slightly less problematic.
Now chew your cud. Thanks in advance.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/694054825022930944
When they can only respond with insults & distractions
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49650-8
Published: 10 September 2019
Abstract
Stone tools provide a unique window into the mode of adaptation and
cognitive abilities of Lower Paleolithic early humans. The persistently produced large cutting tools (bifaces/handaxes) have long been an
appealing focus of research in the reconstruction of Lower Paleolithic survival strategies, at the expenses of the small flake tools considered by-products of the stone production process rather than desired end
products. Here, we use use-wear, residues and technological analyses
to show direct and very early evidence of the deliberate production and
use of small flakes for targeted stages of the prey butchery process at
the late Lower Paleolithic Acheulian site of Revadim, Israel. We highlight the significant role of small flakes in Lower Paleolithic adaptation alongside the canonical large handaxes. Our results demonstrate the technological and cognitive flexibility of early human groups in the Levant and beyond at the threshold of the departure from Lower Paleolithic
lifeways.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
You simply declaring it doesn't make it so.
And if you had reading comprehension & retention you'd know that I didn't simply declare. I raised the very real example of cocaine & tobacco on ancient Egyptian mummies which are only about a tenth as old, so one
might presume the testing to be slightly less problematic.
Now chew your cud. Thanks in advance.
Primum Sapienti wrote:testing sucks
[...]
As was just stated in that other thread on the topic, this type of
eggs through a hose. It's really, Really, REALLY bad.
Oh. That means it's the opposite of accurate.
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Simply put: The testing sucks. It can't be trusted.
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
And if you had reading comprehension & retention you'd know that I didn't simply declare. I raised the very real example of cocaine & tobacco on ancient Egyptian mummies which are only about a tenth as old, so one
might presume the testing to be slightly less problematic.
Now chew your cud. Thanks in advance.
From January:
I Envy JTEM wrote:
As was just stated in that other thread on the topic, this type of
testing sucks
For example, they also claim to find cocaine & tobacco residue on Egyptian mummies even though neither plant appears in ancient Egypt, not even as depictions on tomb walls, and there has never been any evidence for a
trans Atlantic trade.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 67:18:52 |
Calls: | 6,915 |
Files: | 12,379 |
Messages: | 5,431,811 |