On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to Baldwin?
:-)
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:24:05 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
Hey Lyin' Asshole, what part of "manslaughter" don't you understand?
This carries a max penalty of FIVE YEARS!
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:24:05 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, what part of "manslaughter" don't you understand? This carries a max penalty of FIVE YEARS!
On 2023-01-21 17:11, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:24:05 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, what part of "manslaughter" don't you understand? This carries a max penalty of FIVE YEARS!What part of "involuntary" don't you understand, Sunshine?
Do you ever get tired of being wrong all the time?
'however, in New Mexico, it is still a fourth-degree felony punishable
by up to 18 months in prison and up to $5,000 in fines.'
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:29:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:11, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 10:24:05 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What part of "involuntary" don't you understand, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, what part of "manslaughter" don't you understand? This carries a max penalty of FIVE YEARS!
Do you ever get tired of being wrong all the time?
'however, in New Mexico, it is still a fourth-degree felony punishable
by up to 18 months in prison and up to $5,000 in fines.'
Is, or is not, Bastard Baldwin being charged with manslaughter?
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the >>>> commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to >>>> Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the >>>> commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful >>>> manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:but I won't.
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful >>>> manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract? >> What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do it,
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:but I won't.
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do it,
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the >>>>>>> commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful >>>>>>> manner or without due caution and circumspection."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract? >>>>> What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:but I won't.
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do it,
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful >>>>>>> manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract? >>>>> What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:but I won't.
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do it,
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful >>>>>>>>> manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract? >>>>>>> What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Really?
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You, however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:it, but I won't.
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Really?
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You, however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:do it, but I won't.
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract. >>>> Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to
Really?
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You, however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
-hh
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:it, but I won't.
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
-hh
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the >>>>>>>>>>>> commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract. >>>>>>> Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they continue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are welcome to do
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:Really?
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You, however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
-hh
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I haveOn Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract. >>>>
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out. >>>
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried toIncorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
-hh
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried toIncorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried toIncorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that BaldwinSure:
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
-hh
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I haveOn Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract. >>>>>>>>>>>
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out. >>>>>>>>>>
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
-hh
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (whatSorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
That's on you. And despite prompting, you've still failed to provide for any rational explanation
for your statement being anything other than a prediction of First Degree Murder charges.
-hh
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
- Tommy, December 2021.
That's on you. And despite prompting, you've still failed to provide for any rational explanation
for your statement being anything other than a prediction of First Degree Murder charges.
-hh
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Did you not say those things?
:-)
- Tommy, December 2021.
That's on you. And despite prompting, you've still failed to provide for any rational explanation
for your statement being anything other than a prediction of First Degree Murder charges.
-hh
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are! >>>> Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are! >>>> Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too.
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are! >>>>>> Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago?
:-)
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have beenOn Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're in the business of making claims...
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N> >>>>>>>>>>>>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are! >>>>>>>> Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree >> murder charges" months ago?
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims...
...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read). >>>> How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree >>>> murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:murder charges" months ago?
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read). >>>> How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.I literally presented you with the comment where you:
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't.
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read). >>>>>> How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree >>>>>> murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost:
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
I'll produce the link if you insist.
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:murder charges" months ago?
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool.
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder.
Sure:
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read). >>>>>>>> How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:First I want you on the record:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>>>> Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up.
Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!First I want you on the record:
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'
Yes or no?
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:First I want you on the record:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:First I want you on the record:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin?
:-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it!
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:First I want you on the record:
On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that?
:-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it!I can prove it, and I will...
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:31:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I can prove it, and I will...
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:First I want you on the record:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it!
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
On 2023-02-06 21:54, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:31:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I can prove it, and I will...
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:First I want you on the record:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago'
Never said it, Fool.
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it!
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.Do you deny it?
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:19:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 21:54, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:31:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Do you deny it?
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I can prove it, and I will...
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:First I want you on the record:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine?
Never said it, Fool.On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
"B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in the
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
<https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago' >>>>>>>>>>>
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>>>> Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it!
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote, thus are LYING about the same.
On 2023-02-07 21:23, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:19:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 21:54, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:31:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Do you deny it?
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine. >>>>>>
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:First I want you on the record:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>
Never said it, Fool.On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you: >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago' >>>>>>>>>>>
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it! >>>> I can prove it, and I will...
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote, thus are LYING about the same.I can produce it.
And I will if you actually go on record as stating unambiguously that
you didn't write it.
No, you CAN'T produce because it DOESN'T EXIST! You are just pullingI can produce it.You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote,Do you deny it?No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of yourI can prove it, and I will...
lies. Got it!
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks
have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree
murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
😄
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding. Did you write those words? 😄
thus are LYING about the same.
And I will if you actually go on record as stating unambiguously
that you didn't write it.
your typical bullshit here because you are a LIAR.
On 2023-02-07 21:23, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:19:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 21:54, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:31:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Do you deny it?
On 2023-02-06 21:00, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:51:09 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-05 10:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:57:39 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-05 00:19, Tommy wrote:If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine. >>>>>>
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:09:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:53, Tommy wrote:First I want you on the record:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:21:06 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:31, Tommy wrote:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>
Never said it, Fool.On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 10:17:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I literally presented you with the comment where you: >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-02-01 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:44:15 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
On 2023-02-01 20:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:14 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:How will that explain what you meant when you talked about "first degree
On 2023-01-30 22:59, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 18:46, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:38:47 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What did he "make up", Sunshine?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:34:37 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:57:04 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sorry Tommy, but I'm not who made the connection to there being 1st Degree Murder charges:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:43 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Sure:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:48:35 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 2:02:40 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:12:05 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-22 10:11, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:53:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Here’s where Tommy set the goalpost: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2023-01-21 23:46, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:44:22 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:52:09 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-21 17:49, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:30:00 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine. That's a dodge and you know it.On 2023-01-21 17:12, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 11:04:40 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
What part of my analysis is flawed, Sunshine?On 2023-01-20 10:24, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:35:51 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:And WHAT PART of your FLAWED legal analysis are you going to retract?
commission of an unlawful act not amounting to felony, or in theThe prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:And the Armorer was charged too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "B. Involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alec-baldwin-charged-manslaughter-fatal-shooting-set-rust-d-says-rcna7189
Tommy, the charge is *involuntary* manslaughter.
commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful
manner or without due caution and circumspection."
Baldwin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-2/section-30-2-3/>
I wonder which part of that our little ray of sunshine thinks applies to
:-)
EVERY part of it, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pick something I've claimed that you now think I need to retract.
Dodge? Hardly - go back and post ALL of your STUPID legal analyses; I have
ALREADY shown how WRONG you are. This is a great insight into a libtard: they
ontinue to believe they are right EVEN after you prove they are wrong. YOU are
welcome to do it, but I won't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bottom line: Baldwin is FUCKED and will likely be convicted. His ONLY hope is
jurors will be mesmerized by his fame and one or two will hold out.
All that said, YOU claimed that Baldwin WOULD NOT be indicted - YOU were WRONG!
Really?
Got a quote of that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
LOL! Good try, but I am NOT in the business of proving to you what YOU said. You,
however, are more than welcome to show ME that I got it wrong.
You're in the business of making claims... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and then not backing them up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
Incorrect: your prediction that Baldwin would be charged with First Degree Murder was
what came first, and Alan disagreed with your claim.
So then: has Baldwin been charged with First Degree Murder? <Y/N>
And you wonder why I call you Lyin' Asshole - PROVE that I claimed that Baldwin
would be charged with First Degree Murder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If not a prediction, then what other possible interpretation does your above quote have?
There you go AGAIN, Lyin' Asshole - you make a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP (what
else is new?). At least you ADMITTED to being the FRAUD that you are!
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
Which is why I call you "Lyin' Asshole" - you just make shit up out of nowhere!
Did you not say those things?
:-)
That is OBVIOUS to even the casual reading, Fool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just wanted you to plainly admit it.
So what did you mean by it?
Hey Fool, read back to me the TITLE of this thread (if you can read).
murder charges" months ago?
:-)
Hey Fool, point to EXACTLY where I made that statement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago' >>>>>>>>>>>
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it! >>>> I can prove it, and I will...
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote, thus are LYING about the same.I can produce it.
And I will if you actually go on record as stating unambiguously that
you didn't write it.
LOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
I can produce it.Do you deny it?If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>First I want you on the record:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>Never said it, Fool.I literally presented you with the comment where you: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago' >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it! >>>>>> I can prove it, and I will...
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote, thus are LYING about the same.
And I will if you actually go on record as stating unambiguously that
you didn't write it.
No Fool, YOU made the false claim, so YOU prove it.
On 2023-02-09 08:08, Tommy wrote:
I missed this before "tried to kill" implies intent, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have beenLOL! The "goal post" was and is very clear Butcher Baldwin KILLED one and tried to
kill another. And the Fool is on record as CLAIMING that Butcher would NOT be charged.
I can produce it.Do you deny it?If you won't deny writing it, there's nothing to prove, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>First I want you on the record:You never wrote: "first degree murder charges", Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>Never said it, Fool.I literally presented you with the comment where you: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
Just as I thought - you CAN'T.
'talked about "first degree murder charges" months ago' >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'll produce the link if you insist.
By all means, Fool - produce the EVIDENCE!
Did you write this sentence:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
Yes or no?
Sorry, but NO. You brought it up - you PROVE IT!
You wrote it.
You know it.
Deny it: I dare you.
:-)
If you can't PROVE IT, it is just ANOTHER one of your lies. Got it! >>>>>> I can prove it, and I will...
...if you'll come out and deny that you wrote:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'
So:
Did you write those words?
Yes or no, Sunshine.
:-)
No, you CAN'T prove it, and you WON'T.
Yes or no.
No addtional words; no hiding.
Did you write those words?
:-)
You obviously CAN'T produce the statement YOU claimed I wrote, thus are LYING about the same.
And I will if you actually go on record as stating unambiguously that
you didn't write it.
No Fool, YOU made the false claim, so YOU prove it.I will.
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.Did you write,
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder >>>> charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine. >>>>
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.I never claimed that, Sunshine.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard
networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder >>>>>> charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine. >>>>>>
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder >>>>>> charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine. >>>>>>
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins. >>>> It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!I'll ask again.
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'll ask again.
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder >>>>>>>> charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins. >>>>>> It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:15:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'll ask again.
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins. >>>>>>>> It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'll ask again.
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:
I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins. >>>>>> It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
On 2023-02-12 09:23, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:15:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Where have I ever said it was, Sunshine?
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'll ask again.
On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
Did you write:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin'
...yes or no?
:-)
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 9:27:24 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-12 09:23, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:15:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Where have I ever said it was, Sunshine?
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:I'll ask again.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
Did you write:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
...yes or no?
:-)
Why do you care?
On 2023-02-14 18:04, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 9:27:24 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-12 09:23, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:15:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Where have I ever said it was, Sunshine?
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:I'll ask again.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
Did you write:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
...yes or no?
:-)
Why do you care?Why won't you answer?
:-)
On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 6:18:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-14 18:04, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 9:27:24 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Why won't you answer?
On 2023-02-12 09:23, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:15:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Where have I ever said it was, Sunshine?
On 2023-02-11 22:14, Tommy wrote:Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 10:11:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-11 22:04, Tommy wrote:I'm asking whether or not you said it, Sunshine.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-10 21:45, Tommy wrote:I'll ask again.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 10:53:55 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-02-09 22:39, Tommy wrote:I never claimed that, Sunshine.
It is accepted fact that Halyna Hutchins died.I will.WTF, is this ALL you've got Fool? REALLY?? That is one GIANT LEAP from "first degree murder"!!!
The moment you answer the simple question.
Yes or no:
Did you write, "'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder
charges on Bawling Baldwin'?
It's such a simple thing for you just to say "Yes" or "No", Sunshine.
Why does it frighten you so much?
BTW, it is ACCEPTED FACT that Bozo Baldwin DID kill Halyna Hutchins.
It is not accepted fact as to why she died.
Did you write,
No, at NO TIME did I accuse Baldwin of first degree murder, you Fool. The libtard networks WERE quiet about calling for first degree murder charges, or any other charges for that matter.
"'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'?
Yes or no, Sunshine?
Answer that plainly.
What you claimed, that I said Baldwin is guilty of First Degree Murder, is FALSE.
Is this PLAIN ENOUGH?
Is my answer plain enough?
Let me make it plainer:
You're lying.
How PATHETIC! You can't come up with the quote that you PROMISED!! YOU are the LIAR!!!
Did you write this:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >>>>>>>> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling >>>>>>>> Baldwin'?
Yes or no.
Again, that IS NOT me stating that Baldwin committed first degree murder, you FOOL!
Why won't you say "yes" or "no"?
Did you write:
'I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been
pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin'
...yes or no?
:-)
Why do you care?
:-)
Hey Fool, the bottom line is that I NEVER wrote that the creep Baldwin should be indicted for FIRST DEGREE MURDER, which is what you said I WROTE!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 33:31:38 |
| Calls: | 6,908 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,376 |
| Messages: | 5,428,210 |
| Posted today: | 2 |