Card counting in blackjack is simply a myth. It worked somehow only with one deck and 100% penetration. John Scarne put jokingly the advantage of card counting. Suppose there is a one-deck blackjack game with 100% penetration (i.e. all cards are dealt).The player tracked the entire deck absolutely precisely. There are 5 cards remaining in the deck: 3 eights and 2 sevens. The player would bet the maximum immediately (actually, millions if it were possible!) There is NO way the player can lose! The
A situation like that would have occurred, but extremely rarely. To have 2 sevens and 3 eights at the bottom of a 52-card deck has a degree of certainty in the same category as the moon colliding with the earth!
A slight, slight advantage occurs only when there are lots of Tens and Aces remaining in the deck. The Player is paid 150%, while the Dealer is always paid 100% for a blackjack natural.
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:16:37 PM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
"Holy Rollers, The True Story Of Card Counting"
On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 at 12:43:24 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:16:37 PM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
"Holy Rollers, The True Story Of Card Counting"
As true as... all myths can be! Another egregious "true story" is the mythological MIT Team.
• https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-MIT-Blackjack-Team-work
• How did the MIT Blackjack Team work?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 403 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 111:42:55 |
Calls: | 8,465 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,181 |
Messages: | 5,909,940 |